ukessays contact number

• Fair Use Policy
• Customer Login

UK Essays Corporate Information Hub

Find out more about UK Essays and our company in our corporate hub.

As a genuine UK based and registered business we have a plethora of information on how our company operates.

What are you looking for?

Press centre, trust centre, contact centre, legal centre.

At UK Essays, we're proud to know exactly what goes into making an awesome essay. We've dedicated over 14 years towards becoming experts in all things academic – from essays, assignments and coursework, through to dissertations, exams, reports and reflections. While others come and go, UK Essays has grown and developed into one of the world's leading academic support companies. Got more questions about our services?

Meet The Essay Heroes

We use a team of experts and academics to build your order and create a fantastic, unique and exciting piece of work every time. We only use highly qualified writers, including lecturers, teachers and PhD holders. Our in-house teams are on hand to support you with everything from placing your order through to ensuring your order is in perfect condition before being sent to you.

Judicial Branch of California

Court telephone numbers & email addresses, phone numbers & email addresses.

Jump to sections on this page: Civil - Court Services - Criminal - Family - Jury  -  Juvenile Dependency - Juvenile Justice - Office - Probate - Self-Help Center - Small Claims - Traffic

Essay Services

• Academic Writing Services
• Essay Writing Service
• Assignment Writing Service
• Essay Plan Writing Service

Dissertation Services

• Dissertation Writing Service
• Dissertation Proposal Service
• Topic with Titles Service
• Literature Review Service

Report Services

• Report Writing Service
• Reflective Writing Service
• Case Study Writing Service

Marking Services

• Marking Service
• Samples Samples
• Reviews Reviews
• About UKEssays
• Our Guarantees
• Our Quality Procedures
• Contact UKEssays
• Write for UKEssays

Please feel free to drop us a line. We will respond as soon as possible.

Looking for a career with us? From customer service representatives to developers, we're a good bunch.

We're here to help!

If you have general issues, please visit our help center.

Dubai Office

• Business Bliss Consultants FZE, Office 104/105 Level 1, Emaar Square – Building 4, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Boulevard, Downtown Dubai, United Arab Emirates
• UAE : +971 600 575 297
• International : +44 115 966 7955
• UK : 0115 966 7955
• USA : +1 (907) 205 5253
• Mon - Fri : 9:00 am - 17:00 pm Sun : Our phone lines will be closed, but you'll still be able to place your order online.
• Registered Office

UKEssays is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates.

• Business Bliss Consultants FZE, Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE.

*All calls are recorded for training and quality assurance purposes

Get Academic Help Today!

Encrypted with a 256-bit secure payment provider

Whale Color By Number Free Printable

This free printable whale color by number is a fun challenge that incorporates visual motor, visual spatial, and fine motor skills. You need to solve the maze puzzle to find the color by number code. The puzzle page and the solution can be downloaded for free at the bottom of the post. Enter your email in the sign up box.

HOW TO ACCESS THE COLOR BY NUMBER WHALE PAGE

• Enter your email in the sign up box at the bottom of the email. Look for the box with the picture of printable.
• Download the PDF. It will open in a new tab.
• Print the activity page and provide the students with crayons to complete the worksheet.

HOW TO COMPLETE THE PRINTABLE WORKSHEET

• Solve the color by number maze. Follow the path from each color to the number.
• Color the numbers.
• Use the colors to complete the whale picture.
• Check your solution.

Printable Maze Book

What skills are students working on with this puzzle.

This whale color by number encourages practice in the following areas:

• visual motor skills – following the path from the color to the number
• visual spatial skills – staying on the correct path and coloring in the lines
• fine motor skills – using crayons or colored pens
• visual scanning – finding the numbers in the whale picture to color it in

MORE FUN FREE STUFF

• Farm Color By Number
• Color By Number Kindergarten
• Color By Number Summer Printable
• I Spy Under the Sea

DOWNLOAD YOUR FREE PRINTABLE HERE

Enter your email in the sign up box to get access to the printable. A new tab will open with the PDF.

Your Therapy Source

Email: [email protected] Phone: (800) 507-4958 Fax: (518) 308-0290

Primary Navigation

Secondary navigation.

Mayor Adams Announces 10,000 Free Tickets For General Public For Macy’s 4th Of July Fireworks

June 25, 2024

Nation’s Largest Independence Day Celebration to Return to Hudson River for 48th Annual Fireworks Show

NEW YORK – New York City Mayor Eric Adams today announced 10,000 free tickets to the general public to view the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks from Hudson River Park’s Pier 45 or Pier 84 in Manhattan. To learn more or get tickets, visit   www.nycjuly4.com . Tickets will go live on Wednesday, June 26th at 10:00AM and will be distributed on a first come, first serve basis. Each member of the public will be limited to two tickets. The fireworks show will be visible all along the West Side Highway for those who do not receive a ticket. Entry points for the general public are:

• Christopher Street and Washington Street
• West 11th Street and Washington Street
• West 12th Street and Washington Street
• West 29th Street and 11th Avenue
• West 40th Street and 11th Avenue

 ADA accessible viewing locations will be located at Christopher Street and Washington Street and West 41st Street and 11th Avenue.

“While all New Yorkers will be able to take part in the illumination of our sky at the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks, our administration is making sure that 10,000 lucky New Yorkers have an opportunity to enjoy the show with a front row seat,” said Mayor Adams. “We’re making sure everyone has a fair shot at attending one of the city’s most exciting and iconic events. I look forward to joining the thousands of viewers celebrating America’s birthday right here in the Big Apple.”

“New York City has gone above and beyond to make sure that New Yorkers are able to safely view the spectacular Macy’s fireworks this year,” said  Noreen Doyle, president and CEO, Hudson River Park Trust . “We appreciate all Mayor Adams and his team have done to support this celebratory event, along with the New York City Police Department, Fire Department, and many other agencies, for their careful planning, and we look forward to celebrating with thousands of people on July 4.”

For the first time in over a decade, the Macy’s 4th of July Fireworks will launch from barges along the Hudson River, lighting up the New York City skyline and providing miles of prime viewing along the West Side of Manhattan. This year’s display will feature thousands of shells, with an array of effects and vibrant colors, shapes, light, and sounds.

Media Contact

[email protected] (212) 788-2958

Supreme Court says Biden admin can combat social media misinformation in free speech case

The case turned on whether the biden administration had been using the bully pulpit or was actually bullying when officials urged removal of controversial posts on covid vaccines and other issues..

WASHINGTON −The Supreme Court on Wednesday handed the Biden administration an election-year victory, throwing out a conservative challenge to government efforts to have social media companies remove posts it considered misinformation.

The 6-3 decision, led by Justice Amy Coney Barrett , was a response to a suit that came during a hot-button period when social media was thick with contentious posts over COVID-19, vaccines, top government scientist Anthony Fauci , and other emotional topics. Justices Samuel Alito , Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas dissented.

Barrett, writing for the majority, said the challengers argued that unfettered speech on social media is critical to their work as scientists, pundits and activists.

“But they do not point to any specific instance of content moderation that caused them identifiable harm,” Barrett wrote . “They have therefore failed to establish an injury that is sufficiently ‘concrete and particularized.’”

More: Supreme Court strikes down Trump-era ban on bump stocks for guns

In the dissent, Alito complained that the majority "unjustifiably refuses to address this serious threat to the First Amendment."

"For months, high-ranking Government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech," Alito wrote.

Alito highlighted as problematic an email sent from a Biden COVID adviser to a Facebook official in March of 2021 complaining that the platform was not being responsive to the administration’s concerns and “we have been considering our options on what to do about it.”

By dismissing the case without deciding the underlying First Amendment issue, the justices avoided saying when governments go too far in interacting with media platforms about their content.

The Republican-led states of Missouri and Louisiana and five individual users of social media had charged the White House, the surgeon general and others with violating their free speech rights by coercing Facebook, YouTube and X (formerly Twitter) to remove or downgrade posts.

The Department of Justice said government agencies weren’t improperly threatening social media companies , but instead, were encouraging them to remove harmful or false information, including about vaccines. There was no retaliation when the platforms did not comply, the DOJ said.

In July 2023, a district court in Louisiana sided against the administration, imposing sweeping restrictions on the government’s interaction with social media platforms.

The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals narrowed the restraints . But the DOJ said that would still place unprecedented limits on how government officials can speak about matters of public concern, address national security threats, or relay public health information.

The restrictions were on hold while the Supreme Court reviewed the case.

Related Supreme Court defines when public officials may block critics on personal social media accounts

Experts had called the case , Murthy v. Missouri, a unique chance for the court to define how far governments may go to protect against online distribution of harmful content.

Alex Abdo, litigation director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said it was disappointing the high court didn't provide more guidance on the limits the First Amendment places on the government’s pressure campaigns.

“This guidance would have been especially valuable in the months leading up to the election,” he told USA TODAY.

But the Supreme Court said the challengers failed to show enough of a connection between the Biden administration’s communications with social media companies and restrictions on their postings.

"To be sure, the record reflects that the Government defendants played a role in at least some of the platforms’ moderation choices," Barrett wrote. "But the Fifth Circuit, by attributing every platform decision at least in part to the defendants, glossed over complexities in the evidence."

Even if there was a link, Barrett wrote, the challengers didn’t show enough likelihood that they would be harmed in the future.

Platforms have continued to enforce their own policies against COVID-19 misinformation, so blocking the government from communicating with the companies is unlikely to make a difference, the majority said.

“In my opinion, the plaintiffs were right on one issue – the potential for government pressure to implicate First Amendment rights warrants careful consideration from the courts,” said Gautman Hans, who helps lead the Cornell Law School First Amendment Clinic. "But this case was obviously the wrong one for the Court to assess those free speech questions."

The high court also heard another case this year about content moderation, examining the constitutionality of laws passed by Florida and Texas to limit the ability of social media giants to regulate user content.

Both cases grew out of concern from conservatives that their views were being suppressed, including claims of 2020 election fraud, the origin of and treatments for COVID-19.

The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Jim Jordan, who has argued the Biden administration pressured social media companies to censor posts about Hunter Biden’s laptop and COVID-19 vaccines, said Wednesday the high court’s decision demonstrated the need for legislation to protect the freedom of expression.

“Our country benefits when ideas can be tested and debated fairly on their merits, whether online or in the halls of Congress,” said Jordan, R-Ohio.

“While we respectfully disagree with the Court's decision, our investigation has shown the need for legislative reforms, such as the Censorship Accountability Act, to better protect Americans harmed by the unconstitutional censorship-industrial complex. Our important work will continue."