a case study in problem solving

Problem-Solving in Business: CASE STUDIES

• ABOUT THIS LIBGUIDE
• PROBLEM-SOLVING DEFINED AND WHY IT IS IMPORTANT
• SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS NEEDED IN PROBLEM-SOLVING
• PROBLEM-SOLVING STEPS
• CASE STUDIES
• MORE HELPFUL RESOURCES
• << Previous: PROBLEM-SOLVING STEPS
• Next: MORE HELPFUL RESOURCES >>
• Last Updated: Mar 23, 2024 4:47 PM
• URL: https://libguides.nypl.org/problem_solving_in_business

How it works

For Business

Join Mind Tools

Article • 10 min read

Case Study-Based Learning

Enhancing learning through immediate application.

By the Mind Tools Content Team

If you've ever tried to learn a new concept, you probably appreciate that "knowing" is different from "doing." When you have an opportunity to apply your knowledge, the lesson typically becomes much more real.

Adults often learn differently from children, and we have different motivations for learning. Typically, we learn new skills because we want to. We recognize the need to learn and grow, and we usually need – or want – to apply our newfound knowledge soon after we've learned it.

A popular theory of adult learning is andragogy (the art and science of leading man, or adults), as opposed to the better-known pedagogy (the art and science of leading children). Malcolm Knowles , a professor of adult education, was considered the father of andragogy, which is based on four key observations of adult learners:

• Adults learn best if they know why they're learning something.
• Adults often learn best through experience.
• Adults tend to view learning as an opportunity to solve problems.
• Adults learn best when the topic is relevant to them and immediately applicable.

This means that you'll get the best results with adults when they're fully involved in the learning experience. Give an adult an opportunity to practice and work with a new skill, and you have a solid foundation for high-quality learning that the person will likely retain over time.

So, how can you best use these adult learning principles in your training and development efforts? Case studies provide an excellent way of practicing and applying new concepts. As such, they're very useful tools in adult learning, and it's important to understand how to get the maximum value from them.

What Is a Case Study?

Case studies are a form of problem-based learning, where you present a situation that needs a resolution. A typical business case study is a detailed account, or story, of what happened in a particular company, industry, or project over a set period of time.

The learner is given details about the situation, often in a historical context. The key players are introduced. Objectives and challenges are outlined. This is followed by specific examples and data, which the learner then uses to analyze the situation, determine what happened, and make recommendations.

The depth of a case depends on the lesson being taught. A case study can be two pages, 20 pages, or more. A good case study makes the reader think critically about the information presented, and then develop a thorough assessment of the situation, leading to a well-thought-out solution or recommendation.

Why Use a Case Study?

Case studies are a great way to improve a learning experience, because they get the learner involved, and encourage immediate use of newly acquired skills.

They differ from lectures or assigned readings because they require participation and deliberate application of a broad range of skills. For example, if you study financial analysis through straightforward learning methods, you may have to calculate and understand a long list of financial ratios (don't worry if you don't know what these are). Likewise, you may be given a set of financial statements to complete a ratio analysis. But until you put the exercise into context, you may not really know why you're doing the analysis.

With a case study, however, you might explore whether a bank should provide financing to a borrower, or whether a company is about to make a good acquisition. Suddenly, the act of calculating ratios becomes secondary – it's more important to understand what the ratios tell you. This is how case studies can make the difference between knowing what to do, and knowing how, when, and why to do it.

Then, what really separates case studies from other practical forms of learning – like scenarios and simulations – is the ability to compare the learner's recommendations with what actually happened. When you know what really happened, it's much easier to evaluate the "correctness" of the answers given.

When to Use a Case Study

As you can see, case studies are powerful and effective training tools. They also work best with practical, applied training, so make sure you use them appropriately.

Remember these tips:

• Case studies tend to focus on why and how to apply a skill or concept, not on remembering facts and details. Use case studies when understanding the concept is more important than memorizing correct responses.
• Case studies are great team-building opportunities. When a team gets together to solve a case, they'll have to work through different opinions, methods, and perspectives.
• Use case studies to build problem-solving skills, particularly those that are valuable when applied, but are likely to be used infrequently. This helps people get practice with these skills that they might not otherwise get.
• Case studies can be used to evaluate past problem solving. People can be asked what they'd do in that situation, and think about what could have been done differently.

Ensuring Maximum Value From Case Studies

The first thing to remember is that you already need to have enough theoretical knowledge to handle the questions and challenges in the case study. Otherwise, it can be like trying to solve a puzzle with some of the pieces missing.

Here are some additional tips for how to approach a case study. Depending on the exact nature of the case, some tips will be more relevant than others.

• Read the case at least three times before you start any analysis. Case studies usually have lots of details, and it's easy to miss something in your first, or even second, reading.
• Once you're thoroughly familiar with the case, note the facts. Identify which are relevant to the tasks you've been assigned. In a good case study, there are often many more facts than you need for your analysis.
• If the case contains large amounts of data, analyze this data for relevant trends. For example, have sales dropped steadily, or was there an unexpected high or low point?
• If the case involves a description of a company's history, find the key events, and consider how they may have impacted the current situation.
• Consider using techniques like SWOT analysis and Porter's Five Forces Analysis to understand the organization's strategic position.
• Stay with the facts when you draw conclusions. These include facts given in the case as well as established facts about the environmental context. Don't rely on personal opinions when you put together your answers.

Writing a Case Study

You may have to write a case study yourself. These are complex documents that take a while to research and compile. The quality of the case study influences the quality of the analysis. Here are some tips if you want to write your own:

• Write your case study as a structured story. The goal is to capture an interesting situation or challenge and then bring it to life with words and information. You want the reader to feel a part of what's happening.
• Present information so that a "right" answer isn't obvious. The goal is to develop the learner's ability to analyze and assess, not necessarily to make the same decision as the people in the actual case.
• Do background research to fully understand what happened and why. You may need to talk to key stakeholders to get their perspectives as well.
• Determine the key challenge. What needs to be resolved? The case study should focus on one main question or issue.
• Define the context. Talk about significant events leading up to the situation. What organizational factors are important for understanding the problem and assessing what should be done? Include cultural factors where possible.
• Identify key decision makers and stakeholders. Describe their roles and perspectives, as well as their motivations and interests.
• Make sure that you provide the right data to allow people to reach appropriate conclusions.
• Make sure that you have permission to use any information you include.

A typical case study structure includes these elements:

• Executive summary. Define the objective, and state the key challenge.
• Opening paragraph. Capture the reader's interest.
• Scope. Describe the background, context, approach, and issues involved.
• Presentation of facts. Develop an objective picture of what's happening.
• Description of key issues. Present viewpoints, decisions, and interests of key parties.

Because case studies have proved to be such effective teaching tools, many are already written. Some excellent sources of free cases are The Times 100 , CasePlace.org , and Schroeder & Schroeder Inc . You can often search for cases by topic or industry. These cases are expertly prepared, based mostly on real situations, and used extensively in business schools to teach management concepts.

Case studies are a great way to improve learning and training. They provide learners with an opportunity to solve a problem by applying what they know.

There are no unpleasant consequences for getting it "wrong," and cases give learners a much better understanding of what they really know and what they need to practice.

Case studies can be used in many ways, as team-building tools, and for skill development. You can write your own case study, but a large number are already prepared. Given the enormous benefits of practical learning applications like this, case studies are definitely something to consider adding to your next training session.

Knowles, M. (1973). 'The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species [online].' Available here .

You've accessed 1 of your 2 free resources.

Get unlimited access

Discover more content

An introduction to price-setting.

How to Consider all the Relevant Factors When Setting Prices for Products or Services

Presenting Like a Pro

Using rhetorical tricks to create impact

Add comment

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment!

Get 30% off your first year of Mind Tools

Great teams begin with empowered leaders. Our tools and resources offer the support to let you flourish into leadership. Join today!

Sign-up to our newsletter

Subscribing to the Mind Tools newsletter will keep you up-to-date with our latest updates and newest resources.

Subscribe now

Business Skills

Personal Development

Leadership and Management

Member Extras

Most Popular

Latest Updates

Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die

Mind Tools Store

About Mind Tools Content

Discover something new today

Are you climate resilient infographic.

Infographic Transcript

Infographic

Dyslexia in the Workplace Video

Understanding and Supporting People With Dyslexia

How Emotionally Intelligent Are You?

Boosting Your People Skills

Self-Assessment

What's Your Leadership Style?

Learn About the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Way You Like to Lead

Recommended for you

Value-based management.

Managing for the Long Term by Maximizing Value, Not Profit

Business Operations and Process Management

Strategy Tools

Customer Service

Business Ethics and Values

Handling Information and Data

Project Management

Knowledge Management

Self-Development and Goal Setting

Time Management

Presentation Skills

Learning Skills

Career Skills

Communication Skills

Negotiation, Persuasion and Influence

Working With Others

Difficult Conversations

Creativity Tools

Self-Management

Work-Life Balance

Stress Management and Wellbeing

Coaching and Mentoring

Change Management

Team Management

Managing Conflict

Delegation and Empowerment

Performance Management

Leadership Skills

Developing Your Team

Talent Management

Problem Solving

Decision Making

Member Podcast

• Harvard Business School →
• Academic Experience
• Faculty & Research
• The Field Method
• A Global Experience

The HBS Case Method

• Joint Degree Programs
• The Section Experience
• The HBS Case Method →

Take a Seat in the MBA Classroom

• Harvard Business School

How the HBS Case Method Works

How the Case Method Works

• Read and analyze the case. Each case is a 10-20 page document written from the viewpoint of a real person leading a real organization. In addition to background information on the situation, each case ends in a key decision to be made. Your job is to sift through the information, incomplete by design, and decide what you would do.
• Discuss the case. Each morning, you’ll bring your ideas to a small team of classmates from diverse professional backgrounds, your discussion group, to share your findings and listen to theirs. Together, you begin to see the case from different perspectives, better preparing you for class.
• Engage in class. Be prepared to change the way you think as you debate with classmates the best path forward for this organization. The highly engaged conversation is facilitated by the faculty member, but it’s driven by your classmates’ comments and experiences. HBS brings together amazingly talented people from diverse backgrounds and puts that experience front and center. Students do the majority of the talking (and lots of active listening), and your job is to better understand the decision at hand, what you would do in the case protagonist’s shoes, and why. You will not leave a class thinking about the case the same way you thought about it coming in! In addition to learning more about many businesses, in the case method you will develop communication, listening, analysis, and leadership skills. It is a truly dynamic and immersive learning environment.
• Reflect. The case method prepares you to be in leadership positions where you will face time-sensitive decisions with limited information. Reflecting on each class discussion will prepare you to face these situations in your future roles.

Student Perspectives

“I’ve been so touched by how dedicated other people have been to my learning and my success.”

Faculty Perspectives

“The world desperately needs better leadership. It’s actually one of the great gifts of teaching here, you can do something about it.”

Alumni Perspectives

“You walk into work every morning and it's like a fire hose of decisions that need to be made, often without enough information. Just like an HBS case.”

Celebrating the Inaugural HBS Case

“How do you go into an ambiguous situation and get to the bottom of it? That skill – the skill of figuring out a course of inquiry, to choose a course of action – that skill is as relevant today as it was in 1921.”

• Top Courses
• Online Degrees
• Find your New Career
• Join for Free

Effective Problem-Solving and Decision-Making

This course is part of multiple programs. Learn more

This course is part of multiple programs

Taught in English

Some content may not be translated

Instructor: Diane Spiegel

Financial aid available

250,854 already enrolled

(6,701 reviews)

What you'll learn

Explain both the affordances and limitations associated with problem-solving and decision-making

Reflect on how mindset and personal bias influence your ability to solve problems and make decisions

Explain and discuss how organizational decisions or non-decisions impact personal development, team dynamics, and company-wide performance

Articulate how both good and bad team decisions can benefit your professional growth

Skills you'll gain

• Critical Thinking
• Decision Theory
• Decision-Making
• Problem Solving

Details to know

Add to your LinkedIn profile

See how employees at top companies are mastering in-demand skills

Build your subject-matter expertise

• Learn new concepts from industry experts
• Gain a foundational understanding of a subject or tool
• Develop job-relevant skills with hands-on projects
• Earn a shareable career certificate

Earn a career certificate

Add this credential to your LinkedIn profile, resume, or CV

Share it on social media and in your performance review

There are 4 modules in this course

Problem-solving and effective decision-making are essential skills in today’s fast-paced and ever-changing workplace. Both require a systematic yet creative approach to address today’s business concerns. This course will teach an overarching process of how to identify problems to generate potential solutions and how to apply decision-making styles in order to implement and assess those solutions. Through this process, you will gain confidence in assessing problems accurately, selecting the appropriate decision-making approaches for the situation at hand, making team decisions, and measuring the success of the solution’s implementation. Using case studies and situations encountered by class members, you will explore proven, successful problem-solving and decision-making models and methods that can be readily transferred to workplace projects.

Upon completing this course, you will be able to: 1. Identify key terms, styles, and approaches to effective problem-solving and decision-making 2. Explain both the affordances and limitations associated with problem-solving and decision-making 3. Reflect on how mindset and personal bias influence your ability to solve problems and make decisions 4. Explain and discuss how organizational decisions or non-decisions impact personal development, team dynamics, and company-wide performance 5. Articulate how both good and bad team decisions can benefit your professional growth

Identify the Problem

Problem-solving is an essential skill in today's fast-paced and ever-changing workplace. It requires a systematic approach that incorporates effective decision-making. Throughout this course, we will learn an overarching process of identifying problems to generate potential solutions, then apply decision-making styles in order to implement and assess those solutions. In this module, we will learn to identify problems by using a root cause approach as a foundational tool. Additionally, we will address problem parameters that often occur in business situations. Throughout this course, we will utilize a case scenario that will provide specific examples to illustrate the steps in the problem-solving and decision-making process.

What's included

1 video 7 readings 1 quiz 1 discussion prompt

1 video • Total 5 minutes

• Accurately Identify the Problem • 5 minutes • Preview module

7 readings • Total 55 minutes

• Problem Solving in Today’s Workplace • 5 minutes
• Introduction: Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Process • 10 minutes
• The Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Process • 5 minutes
• Course Example: Hybrid Work Environment • 5 minutes
• Parameters • 10 minutes
• Identify the Problem • 15 minutes
• Review: Identify the Problem • 5 minutes

1 quiz • Total 30 minutes

• Module 1 Quiz • 30 minutes

1 discussion prompt • Total 30 minutes

• Benefits and Drawbacks of Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Process • 30 minutes

Generate Solutions

In the previous module, we learned how to identify the root cause of a problem. Now we will discuss how mindset and personal bias can potentially limit creativity in solving workplace challenges. We’ll review problem-solving styles and creativity enhancement approaches to generate a variety of unique solutions while addressing constraints and limited resources.

1 video 6 readings 1 quiz 1 discussion prompt

1 video • Total 4 minutes

• Generate Multiple Solutions with Various Team Perspectives • 4 minutes • Preview module

6 readings • Total 80 minutes

• Introduction • 5 minutes
• Mindset & Personal Bias • 10 minutes
• Problem Solving Styles • 20 minutes
• Generate Solutions • 30 minutes
• Generate Solutions: Hybrid Work Environment Example • 10 minutes
• Review: Generate Solutions • 5 minutes
• Module 2 Quiz • 30 minutes
• Mindset & Personal Bias • 30 minutes

Make the Decision

In the previous module, we learned how to generate a variety of creative solutions. Now we need to decide which solution is the best option. We will explore which decision-making styles lend themselves to best solve the problem given its affordances and limitations. Tips for making better decisions are outlined as well as hazards to avoid.

1 video 5 readings 1 quiz 1 discussion prompt

1 video • Total 3 minutes

• Make the Decision • 3 minutes • Preview module

5 readings • Total 55 minutes

• Decisions Making Styles • 10 minutes
• Choose a Solution • 20 minutes
• Make the Decision: Hybrid Work Environment Example • 10 minutes
• Review: Make the Decision • 10 minutes
• Module 3 Quiz • 30 minutes
• The Impact of Decisions • 30 minutes

Implement and Assess the Solution

In the previous module, we learned how to make the decision given the best information at hand. Once the decision is made, it’s time to implement and assess the chosen solution. As we get ready to implement, we are well-served to review situational variables as elements in the environment may have shifted during the decision-making process. We will also need to define the solution’s performance metrics and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in order to later measure or assess the solution’s impact on the organization. Anecdotal data is equally valuable as it can share the emotional impact on employees.

• Measure Success Through Data • 3 minutes • Preview module
• Implement the Solution • 30 minutes
• Assess the Solution • 10 minutes
• Review: Implement and Assess the Solution • 5 minutes
• Final Message • 5 minutes
• Module 4 Quiz • 30 minutes
• Implement & Assess the Solution • 30 minutes

Instructor ratings

We asked all learners to give feedback on our instructors based on the quality of their teaching style.

Since 1965, the University of California, Irvine has combined the strengths of a major research university with the bounty of an incomparable Southern California location. UCI’s unyielding commitment to rigorous academics, cutting-edge research, and leadership and character development makes the campus a driving force for innovation and discovery that serves our local, national and global communities in many ways.

Recommended if you're interested in Business Essentials

University of California, Irvine

Project Management & Other Tools for Career Development

Specialization

Arizona State University

Problem-Solving

Decision-Making for Everyone

University of Colorado Boulder

Ethical Decision-Making in the Tech Industry

Why people choose coursera for their career.

Learner reviews

Showing 3 of 6701

6,701 reviews

Reviewed on Aug 8, 2023

Easy to go through course. Well build up with good example. Last part of the course was a bit confusing (situational variables / metrics KPI's) as it actually used same wording.

Reviewed on Aug 11, 2021

I really enjoyed this course. Its simple and easy to learn. Highly recommend this course to everyone who wants to improve their decision making and problem solving skills.

Reviewed on Jun 24, 2020

The Training course was very attractive and valuable for implementation of the knowledge gain for solving of different problem faced in official works as well as personal responsibilities.

New to Business Essentials? Start here.

Open new doors with Coursera Plus

Unlimited access to 7,000+ world-class courses, hands-on projects, and job-ready certificate programs - all included in your subscription

Advance your career with an online degree

Earn a degree from world-class universities - 100% online

Join over 3,400 global companies that choose Coursera for Business

Upskill your employees to excel in the digital economy

Frequently asked questions

When will i have access to the lectures and assignments.

Access to lectures and assignments depends on your type of enrollment. If you take a course in audit mode, you will be able to see most course materials for free. To access graded assignments and to earn a Certificate, you will need to purchase the Certificate experience, during or after your audit. If you don't see the audit option:

The course may not offer an audit option. You can try a Free Trial instead, or apply for Financial Aid.

The course may offer 'Full Course, No Certificate' instead. This option lets you see all course materials, submit required assessments, and get a final grade. This also means that you will not be able to purchase a Certificate experience.

What will I get if I subscribe to this Specialization?

When you enroll in the course, you get access to all of the courses in the Specialization, and you earn a certificate when you complete the work. Your electronic Certificate will be added to your Accomplishments page - from there, you can print your Certificate or add it to your LinkedIn profile. If you only want to read and view the course content, you can audit the course for free.

What is the refund policy?

If you subscribed, you get a 7-day free trial during which you can cancel at no penalty. After that, we don’t give refunds, but you can cancel your subscription at any time. See our full refund policy Opens in a new tab .

Is financial aid available?

Yes. In select learning programs, you can apply for financial aid or a scholarship if you can’t afford the enrollment fee. If fin aid or scholarship is available for your learning program selection, you’ll find a link to apply on the description page.

More questions

How to master the seven-step problem-solving process

In this episode of the McKinsey Podcast , Simon London speaks with Charles Conn, CEO of venture-capital firm Oxford Sciences Innovation, and McKinsey senior partner Hugo Sarrazin about the complexities of different problem-solving strategies.

Podcast transcript

Simon London: Hello, and welcome to this episode of the McKinsey Podcast , with me, Simon London. What’s the number-one skill you need to succeed professionally? Salesmanship, perhaps? Or a facility with statistics? Or maybe the ability to communicate crisply and clearly? Many would argue that at the very top of the list comes problem solving: that is, the ability to think through and come up with an optimal course of action to address any complex challenge—in business, in public policy, or indeed in life.

Looked at this way, it’s no surprise that McKinsey takes problem solving very seriously, testing for it during the recruiting process and then honing it, in McKinsey consultants, through immersion in a structured seven-step method. To discuss the art of problem solving, I sat down in California with McKinsey senior partner Hugo Sarrazin and also with Charles Conn. Charles is a former McKinsey partner, entrepreneur, executive, and coauthor of the book Bulletproof Problem Solving: The One Skill That Changes Everything [John Wiley & Sons, 2018].

Charles and Hugo, welcome to the podcast. Thank you for being here.

Hugo Sarrazin: Our pleasure.

Charles Conn: It’s terrific to be here.

Simon London: Problem solving is a really interesting piece of terminology. It could mean so many different things. I have a son who’s a teenage climber. They talk about solving problems. Climbing is problem solving. Charles, when you talk about problem solving, what are you talking about?

Charles Conn: For me, problem solving is the answer to the question “What should I do?” It’s interesting when there’s uncertainty and complexity, and when it’s meaningful because there are consequences. Your son’s climbing is a perfect example. There are consequences, and it’s complicated, and there’s uncertainty—can he make that grab? I think we can apply that same frame almost at any level. You can think about questions like “What town would I like to live in?” or “Should I put solar panels on my roof?”

You might think that’s a funny thing to apply problem solving to, but in my mind it’s not fundamentally different from business problem solving, which answers the question “What should my strategy be?” Or problem solving at the policy level: “How do we combat climate change?” “Should I support the local school bond?” I think these are all part and parcel of the same type of question, “What should I do?”

I’m a big fan of structured problem solving. By following steps, we can more clearly understand what problem it is we’re solving, what are the components of the problem that we’re solving, which components are the most important ones for us to pay attention to, which analytic techniques we should apply to those, and how we can synthesize what we’ve learned back into a compelling story. That’s all it is, at its heart.

I think sometimes when people think about seven steps, they assume that there’s a rigidity to this. That’s not it at all. It’s actually to give you the scope for creativity, which often doesn’t exist when your problem solving is muddled.

Simon London: You were just talking about the seven-step process. That’s what’s written down in the book, but it’s a very McKinsey process as well. Without getting too deep into the weeds, let’s go through the steps, one by one. You were just talking about problem definition as being a particularly important thing to get right first. That’s the first step. Hugo, tell us about that.

Hugo Sarrazin: It is surprising how often people jump past this step and make a bunch of assumptions. The most powerful thing is to step back and ask the basic questions—“What are we trying to solve? What are the constraints that exist? What are the dependencies?” Let’s make those explicit and really push the thinking and defining. At McKinsey, we spend an enormous amount of time in writing that little statement, and the statement, if you’re a logic purist, is great. You debate. “Is it an ‘or’? Is it an ‘and’? What’s the action verb?” Because all these specific words help you get to the heart of what matters.

Want to subscribe to The McKinsey Podcast ?

Simon London: So this is a concise problem statement.

Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah. It’s not like “Can we grow in Japan?” That’s interesting, but it is “What, specifically, are we trying to uncover in the growth of a product in Japan? Or a segment in Japan? Or a channel in Japan?” When you spend an enormous amount of time, in the first meeting of the different stakeholders, debating this and having different people put forward what they think the problem definition is, you realize that people have completely different views of why they’re here. That, to me, is the most important step.

Charles Conn: I would agree with that. For me, the problem context is critical. When we understand “What are the forces acting upon your decision maker? How quickly is the answer needed? With what precision is the answer needed? Are there areas that are off limits or areas where we would particularly like to find our solution? Is the decision maker open to exploring other areas?” then you not only become more efficient, and move toward what we call the critical path in problem solving, but you also make it so much more likely that you’re not going to waste your time or your decision maker’s time.

How often do especially bright young people run off with half of the idea about what the problem is and start collecting data and start building models—only to discover that they’ve really gone off half-cocked.

Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah.

Charles Conn: And in the wrong direction.

Simon London: OK. So step one—and there is a real art and a structure to it—is define the problem. Step two, Charles?

Charles Conn: My favorite step is step two, which is to use logic trees to disaggregate the problem. Every problem we’re solving has some complexity and some uncertainty in it. The only way that we can really get our team working on the problem is to take the problem apart into logical pieces.

What we find, of course, is that the way to disaggregate the problem often gives you an insight into the answer to the problem quite quickly. I love to do two or three different cuts at it, each one giving a bit of a different insight into what might be going wrong. By doing sensible disaggregations, using logic trees, we can figure out which parts of the problem we should be looking at, and we can assign those different parts to team members.

Simon London: What’s a good example of a logic tree on a sort of ratable problem?

Charles Conn: Maybe the easiest one is the classic profit tree. Almost in every business that I would take a look at, I would start with a profit or return-on-assets tree. In its simplest form, you have the components of revenue, which are price and quantity, and the components of cost, which are cost and quantity. Each of those can be broken out. Cost can be broken into variable cost and fixed cost. The components of price can be broken into what your pricing scheme is. That simple tree often provides insight into what’s going on in a business or what the difference is between that business and the competitors.

If we add the leg, which is “What’s the asset base or investment element?”—so profit divided by assets—then we can ask the question “Is the business using its investments sensibly?” whether that’s in stores or in manufacturing or in transportation assets. I hope we can see just how simple this is, even though we’re describing it in words.

When I went to work with Gordon Moore at the Moore Foundation, the problem that he asked us to look at was “How can we save Pacific salmon?” Now, that sounds like an impossible question, but it was amenable to precisely the same type of disaggregation and allowed us to organize what became a 15-year effort to improve the likelihood of good outcomes for Pacific salmon.

Simon London: Now, is there a danger that your logic tree can be impossibly large? This, I think, brings us onto the third step in the process, which is that you have to prioritize.

Charles Conn: Absolutely. The third step, which we also emphasize, along with good problem definition, is rigorous prioritization—we ask the questions “How important is this lever or this branch of the tree in the overall outcome that we seek to achieve? How much can I move that lever?” Obviously, we try and focus our efforts on ones that have a big impact on the problem and the ones that we have the ability to change. With salmon, ocean conditions turned out to be a big lever, but not one that we could adjust. We focused our attention on fish habitats and fish-harvesting practices, which were big levers that we could affect.

People spend a lot of time arguing about branches that are either not important or that none of us can change. We see it in the public square. When we deal with questions at the policy level—“Should you support the death penalty?” “How do we affect climate change?” “How can we uncover the causes and address homelessness?”—it’s even more important that we’re focusing on levers that are big and movable.

Would you like to learn more about our Strategy & Corporate Finance Practice ?

Simon London: Let’s move swiftly on to step four. You’ve defined your problem, you disaggregate it, you prioritize where you want to analyze—what you want to really look at hard. Then you got to the work plan. Now, what does that mean in practice?

Hugo Sarrazin: Depending on what you’ve prioritized, there are many things you could do. It could be breaking the work among the team members so that people have a clear piece of the work to do. It could be defining the specific analyses that need to get done and executed, and being clear on time lines. There’s always a level-one answer, there’s a level-two answer, there’s a level-three answer. Without being too flippant, I can solve any problem during a good dinner with wine. It won’t have a whole lot of backing.

Simon London: Not going to have a lot of depth to it.

Hugo Sarrazin: No, but it may be useful as a starting point. If the stakes are not that high, that could be OK. If it’s really high stakes, you may need level three and have the whole model validated in three different ways. You need to find a work plan that reflects the level of precision, the time frame you have, and the stakeholders you need to bring along in the exercise.

Charles Conn: I love the way you’ve described that, because, again, some people think of problem solving as a linear thing, but of course what’s critical is that it’s iterative. As you say, you can solve the problem in one day or even one hour.

Charles Conn: We encourage our teams everywhere to do that. We call it the one-day answer or the one-hour answer. In work planning, we’re always iterating. Every time you see a 50-page work plan that stretches out to three months, you know it’s wrong. It will be outmoded very quickly by that learning process that you described. Iterative problem solving is a critical part of this. Sometimes, people think work planning sounds dull, but it isn’t. It’s how we know what’s expected of us and when we need to deliver it and how we’re progressing toward the answer. It’s also the place where we can deal with biases. Bias is a feature of every human decision-making process. If we design our team interactions intelligently, we can avoid the worst sort of biases.

Simon London: Here we’re talking about cognitive biases primarily, right? It’s not that I’m biased against you because of your accent or something. These are the cognitive biases that behavioral sciences have shown we all carry around, things like anchoring, overoptimism—these kinds of things.

Both: Yeah.

Charles Conn: Availability bias is the one that I’m always alert to. You think you’ve seen the problem before, and therefore what’s available is your previous conception of it—and we have to be most careful about that. In any human setting, we also have to be careful about biases that are based on hierarchies, sometimes called sunflower bias. I’m sure, Hugo, with your teams, you make sure that the youngest team members speak first. Not the oldest team members, because it’s easy for people to look at who’s senior and alter their own creative approaches.

Hugo Sarrazin: It’s helpful, at that moment—if someone is asserting a point of view—to ask the question “This was true in what context?” You’re trying to apply something that worked in one context to a different one. That can be deadly if the context has changed, and that’s why organizations struggle to change. You promote all these people because they did something that worked well in the past, and then there’s a disruption in the industry, and they keep doing what got them promoted even though the context has changed.

Simon London: Right. Right.

Hugo Sarrazin: So it’s the same thing in problem solving.

Charles Conn: And it’s why diversity in our teams is so important. It’s one of the best things about the world that we’re in now. We’re likely to have people from different socioeconomic, ethnic, and national backgrounds, each of whom sees problems from a slightly different perspective. It is therefore much more likely that the team will uncover a truly creative and clever approach to problem solving.

Simon London: Let’s move on to step five. You’ve done your work plan. Now you’ve actually got to do the analysis. The thing that strikes me here is that the range of tools that we have at our disposal now, of course, is just huge, particularly with advances in computation, advanced analytics. There’s so many things that you can apply here. Just talk about the analysis stage. How do you pick the right tools?

Charles Conn: For me, the most important thing is that we start with simple heuristics and explanatory statistics before we go off and use the big-gun tools. We need to understand the shape and scope of our problem before we start applying these massive and complex analytical approaches.

Simon London: Would you agree with that?

Hugo Sarrazin: I agree. I think there are so many wonderful heuristics. You need to start there before you go deep into the modeling exercise. There’s an interesting dynamic that’s happening, though. In some cases, for some types of problems, it is even better to set yourself up to maximize your learning. Your problem-solving methodology is test and learn, test and learn, test and learn, and iterate. That is a heuristic in itself, the A/B testing that is used in many parts of the world. So that’s a problem-solving methodology. It’s nothing different. It just uses technology and feedback loops in a fast way. The other one is exploratory data analysis. When you’re dealing with a large-scale problem, and there’s so much data, I can get to the heuristics that Charles was talking about through very clever visualization of data.

You test with your data. You need to set up an environment to do so, but don’t get caught up in neural-network modeling immediately. You’re testing, you’re checking—“Is the data right? Is it sound? Does it make sense?”—before you launch too far.

Simon London: You do hear these ideas—that if you have a big enough data set and enough algorithms, they’re going to find things that you just wouldn’t have spotted, find solutions that maybe you wouldn’t have thought of. Does machine learning sort of revolutionize the problem-solving process? Or are these actually just other tools in the toolbox for structured problem solving?

Charles Conn: It can be revolutionary. There are some areas in which the pattern recognition of large data sets and good algorithms can help us see things that we otherwise couldn’t see. But I do think it’s terribly important we don’t think that this particular technique is a substitute for superb problem solving, starting with good problem definition. Many people use machine learning without understanding algorithms that themselves can have biases built into them. Just as 20 years ago, when we were doing statistical analysis, we knew that we needed good model definition, we still need a good understanding of our algorithms and really good problem definition before we launch off into big data sets and unknown algorithms.

Simon London: Step six. You’ve done your analysis.

Charles Conn: I take six and seven together, and this is the place where young problem solvers often make a mistake. They’ve got their analysis, and they assume that’s the answer, and of course it isn’t the answer. The ability to synthesize the pieces that came out of the analysis and begin to weave those into a story that helps people answer the question “What should I do?” This is back to where we started. If we can’t synthesize, and we can’t tell a story, then our decision maker can’t find the answer to “What should I do?”

Simon London: But, again, these final steps are about motivating people to action, right?

Charles Conn: Yeah.

Simon London: I am slightly torn about the nomenclature of problem solving because it’s on paper, right? Until you motivate people to action, you actually haven’t solved anything.

Charles Conn: I love this question because I think decision-making theory, without a bias to action, is a waste of time. Everything in how I approach this is to help people take action that makes the world better.

Simon London: Hence, these are absolutely critical steps. If you don’t do this well, you’ve just got a bunch of analysis.

Charles Conn: We end up in exactly the same place where we started, which is people speaking across each other, past each other in the public square, rather than actually working together, shoulder to shoulder, to crack these important problems.

Simon London: In the real world, we have a lot of uncertainty—arguably, increasing uncertainty. How do good problem solvers deal with that?

Hugo Sarrazin: At every step of the process. In the problem definition, when you’re defining the context, you need to understand those sources of uncertainty and whether they’re important or not important. It becomes important in the definition of the tree.

You need to think carefully about the branches of the tree that are more certain and less certain as you define them. They don’t have equal weight just because they’ve got equal space on the page. Then, when you’re prioritizing, your prioritization approach may put more emphasis on things that have low probability but huge impact—or, vice versa, may put a lot of priority on things that are very likely and, hopefully, have a reasonable impact. You can introduce that along the way. When you come back to the synthesis, you just need to be nuanced about what you’re understanding, the likelihood.

Often, people lack humility in the way they make their recommendations: “This is the answer.” They’re very precise, and I think we would all be well-served to say, “This is a likely answer under the following sets of conditions” and then make the level of uncertainty clearer, if that is appropriate. It doesn’t mean you’re always in the gray zone; it doesn’t mean you don’t have a point of view. It just means that you can be explicit about the certainty of your answer when you make that recommendation.

Simon London: So it sounds like there is an underlying principle: “Acknowledge and embrace the uncertainty. Don’t pretend that it isn’t there. Be very clear about what the uncertainties are up front, and then build that into every step of the process.”

Hugo Sarrazin: Every step of the process.

Simon London: Yeah. We have just walked through a particular structured methodology for problem solving. But, of course, this is not the only structured methodology for problem solving. One that is also very well-known is design thinking, which comes at things very differently. So, Hugo, I know you have worked with a lot of designers. Just give us a very quick summary. Design thinking—what is it, and how does it relate?

Hugo Sarrazin: It starts with an incredible amount of empathy for the user and uses that to define the problem. It does pause and go out in the wild and spend an enormous amount of time seeing how people interact with objects, seeing the experience they’re getting, seeing the pain points or joy—and uses that to infer and define the problem.

Simon London: Problem definition, but out in the world.

Hugo Sarrazin: With an enormous amount of empathy. There’s a huge emphasis on empathy. Traditional, more classic problem solving is you define the problem based on an understanding of the situation. This one almost presupposes that we don’t know the problem until we go see it. The second thing is you need to come up with multiple scenarios or answers or ideas or concepts, and there’s a lot of divergent thinking initially. That’s slightly different, versus the prioritization, but not for long. Eventually, you need to kind of say, “OK, I’m going to converge again.” Then you go and you bring things back to the customer and get feedback and iterate. Then you rinse and repeat, rinse and repeat. There’s a lot of tactile building, along the way, of prototypes and things like that. It’s very iterative.

Simon London: So, Charles, are these complements or are these alternatives?

Charles Conn: I think they’re entirely complementary, and I think Hugo’s description is perfect. When we do problem definition well in classic problem solving, we are demonstrating the kind of empathy, at the very beginning of our problem, that design thinking asks us to approach. When we ideate—and that’s very similar to the disaggregation, prioritization, and work-planning steps—we do precisely the same thing, and often we use contrasting teams, so that we do have divergent thinking. The best teams allow divergent thinking to bump them off whatever their initial biases in problem solving are. For me, design thinking gives us a constant reminder of creativity, empathy, and the tactile nature of problem solving, but it’s absolutely complementary, not alternative.

Simon London: I think, in a world of cross-functional teams, an interesting question is do people with design-thinking backgrounds really work well together with classical problem solvers? How do you make that chemistry happen?

Hugo Sarrazin: Yeah, it is not easy when people have spent an enormous amount of time seeped in design thinking or user-centric design, whichever word you want to use. If the person who’s applying classic problem-solving methodology is very rigid and mechanical in the way they’re doing it, there could be an enormous amount of tension. If there’s not clarity in the role and not clarity in the process, I think having the two together can be, sometimes, problematic.

The second thing that happens often is that the artifacts the two methodologies try to gravitate toward can be different. Classic problem solving often gravitates toward a model; design thinking migrates toward a prototype. Rather than writing a big deck with all my supporting evidence, they’ll bring an example, a thing, and that feels different. Then you spend your time differently to achieve those two end products, so that’s another source of friction.

Now, I still think it can be an incredibly powerful thing to have the two—if there are the right people with the right mind-set, if there is a team that is explicit about the roles, if we’re clear about the kind of outcomes we are attempting to bring forward. There’s an enormous amount of collaborativeness and respect.

Simon London: But they have to respect each other’s methodology and be prepared to flex, maybe, a little bit, in how this process is going to work.

Hugo Sarrazin: Absolutely.

Simon London: The other area where, it strikes me, there could be a little bit of a different sort of friction is this whole concept of the day-one answer, which is what we were just talking about in classical problem solving. Now, you know that this is probably not going to be your final answer, but that’s how you begin to structure the problem. Whereas I would imagine your design thinkers—no, they’re going off to do their ethnographic research and get out into the field, potentially for a long time, before they come back with at least an initial hypothesis.

Want better strategies? Become a bulletproof problem solver

Hugo Sarrazin: That is a great callout, and that’s another difference. Designers typically will like to soak into the situation and avoid converging too quickly. There’s optionality and exploring different options. There’s a strong belief that keeps the solution space wide enough that you can come up with more radical ideas. If there’s a large design team or many designers on the team, and you come on Friday and say, “What’s our week-one answer?” they’re going to struggle. They’re not going to be comfortable, naturally, to give that answer. It doesn’t mean they don’t have an answer; it’s just not where they are in their thinking process.

Simon London: I think we are, sadly, out of time for today. But Charles and Hugo, thank you so much.

Charles Conn: It was a pleasure to be here, Simon.

Hugo Sarrazin: It was a pleasure. Thank you.

Simon London: And thanks, as always, to you, our listeners, for tuning into this episode of the McKinsey Podcast . If you want to learn more about problem solving, you can find the book, Bulletproof Problem Solving: The One Skill That Changes Everything , online or order it through your local bookstore. To learn more about McKinsey, you can of course find us at McKinsey.com.

Charles Conn is CEO of Oxford Sciences Innovation and an alumnus of McKinsey’s Sydney office. Hugo Sarrazin is a senior partner in the Silicon Valley office, where Simon London, a member of McKinsey Publishing, is also based.

Explore a career with us

Related articles.

Strategy to beat the odds

Five routes to more innovative problem solving

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Assignments

• Annotated Bibliography
• Analyzing a Scholarly Journal Article
• Group Presentations
• Dealing with Nervousness
• Using Visual Aids
• Grading Someone Else's Paper
• Types of Structured Group Activities
• Group Project Survival Skills
• Leading a Class Discussion
• Multiple Book Review Essay
• Reviewing Collected Works
• Writing a Case Analysis Paper
• Writing a Case Study
• About Informed Consent
• Writing Field Notes
• Writing a Policy Memo
• Writing a Reflective Paper
• Writing a Research Proposal
• Generative AI and Writing
• Acknowledgments

Definition and Introduction

Case analysis is a problem-based teaching and learning method that involves critically analyzing complex scenarios within an organizational setting for the purpose of placing the student in a “real world” situation and applying reflection and critical thinking skills to contemplate appropriate solutions, decisions, or recommended courses of action. It is considered a more effective teaching technique than in-class role playing or simulation activities. The analytical process is often guided by questions provided by the instructor that ask students to contemplate relationships between the facts and critical incidents described in the case.

Cases generally include both descriptive and statistical elements and rely on students applying abductive reasoning to develop and argue for preferred or best outcomes [i.e., case scenarios rarely have a single correct or perfect answer based on the evidence provided]. Rather than emphasizing theories or concepts, case analysis assignments emphasize building a bridge of relevancy between abstract thinking and practical application and, by so doing, teaches the value of both within a specific area of professional practice.

Given this, the purpose of a case analysis paper is to present a structured and logically organized format for analyzing the case situation. It can be assigned to students individually or as a small group assignment and it may include an in-class presentation component. Case analysis is predominately taught in economics and business-related courses, but it is also a method of teaching and learning found in other applied social sciences disciplines, such as, social work, public relations, education, journalism, and public administration.

Ellet, William. The Case Study Handbook: A Student's Guide . Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2018; Christoph Rasche and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Analysis . Writing Center, Baruch College; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

How to Approach Writing a Case Analysis Paper

The organization and structure of a case analysis paper can vary depending on the organizational setting, the situation, and how your professor wants you to approach the assignment. Nevertheless, preparing to write a case analysis paper involves several important steps. As Hawes notes, a case analysis assignment “...is useful in developing the ability to get to the heart of a problem, analyze it thoroughly, and to indicate the appropriate solution as well as how it should be implemented” [p.48]. This statement encapsulates how you should approach preparing to write a case analysis paper.

Before you begin to write your paper, consider the following analytical procedures:

• Review the case to get an overview of the situation . A case can be only a few pages in length, however, it is most often very lengthy and contains a significant amount of detailed background information and statistics, with multilayered descriptions of the scenario, the roles and behaviors of various stakeholder groups, and situational events. Therefore, a quick reading of the case will help you gain an overall sense of the situation and illuminate the types of issues and problems that you will need to address in your paper. If your professor has provided questions intended to help frame your analysis, use them to guide your initial reading of the case.
• Read the case thoroughly . After gaining a general overview of the case, carefully read the content again with the purpose of understanding key circumstances, events, and behaviors among stakeholder groups. Look for information or data that appears contradictory, extraneous, or misleading. At this point, you should be taking notes as you read because this will help you develop a general outline of your paper. The aim is to obtain a complete understanding of the situation so that you can begin contemplating tentative answers to any questions your professor has provided or, if they have not provided, developing answers to your own questions about the case scenario and its connection to the course readings,lectures, and class discussions.
• Determine key stakeholder groups, issues, and events and the relationships they all have to each other . As you analyze the content, pay particular attention to identifying individuals, groups, or organizations described in the case and identify evidence of any problems or issues of concern that impact the situation in a negative way. Other things to look for include identifying any assumptions being made by or about each stakeholder, potential biased explanations or actions, explicit demands or ultimatums , and the underlying concerns that motivate these behaviors among stakeholders. The goal at this stage is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the situational and behavioral dynamics of the case and the explicit and implicit consequences of each of these actions.
• Identify the core problems . The next step in most case analysis assignments is to discern what the core [i.e., most damaging, detrimental, injurious] problems are within the organizational setting and to determine their implications. The purpose at this stage of preparing to write your analysis paper is to distinguish between the symptoms of core problems and the core problems themselves and to decide which of these must be addressed immediately and which problems do not appear critical but may escalate over time. Identify evidence from the case to support your decisions by determining what information or data is essential to addressing the core problems and what information is not relevant or is misleading.
• Explore alternative solutions . As noted, case analysis scenarios rarely have only one correct answer. Therefore, it is important to keep in mind that the process of analyzing the case and diagnosing core problems, while based on evidence, is a subjective process open to various avenues of interpretation. This means that you must consider alternative solutions or courses of action by critically examining strengths and weaknesses, risk factors, and the differences between short and long-term solutions. For each possible solution or course of action, consider the consequences they may have related to their implementation and how these recommendations might lead to new problems. Also, consider thinking about your recommended solutions or courses of action in relation to issues of fairness, equity, and inclusion.
• Decide on a final set of recommendations . The last stage in preparing to write a case analysis paper is to assert an opinion or viewpoint about the recommendations needed to help resolve the core problems as you see them and to make a persuasive argument for supporting this point of view. Prepare a clear rationale for your recommendations based on examining each element of your analysis. Anticipate possible obstacles that could derail their implementation. Consider any counter-arguments that could be made concerning the validity of your recommended actions. Finally, describe a set of criteria and measurable indicators that could be applied to evaluating the effectiveness of your implementation plan.

Use these steps as the framework for writing your paper. Remember that the more detailed you are in taking notes as you critically examine each element of the case, the more information you will have to draw from when you begin to write. This will save you time.

NOTE : If the process of preparing to write a case analysis paper is assigned as a student group project, consider having each member of the group analyze a specific element of the case, including drafting answers to the corresponding questions used by your professor to frame the analysis. This will help make the analytical process more efficient and ensure that the distribution of work is equitable. This can also facilitate who is responsible for drafting each part of the final case analysis paper and, if applicable, the in-class presentation.

Framework for Case Analysis . College of Management. University of Massachusetts; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Rasche, Christoph and Achim Seisreiner. Guidelines for Business Case Analysis . University of Potsdam; Writing a Case Study Analysis . University of Arizona Global Campus Writing Center; Van Ness, Raymond K. A Guide to Case Analysis . School of Business. State University of New York, Albany; Writing a Case Analysis . Business School, University of New South Wales.

Structure and Writing Style

A case analysis paper should be detailed, concise, persuasive, clearly written, and professional in tone and in the use of language . As with other forms of college-level academic writing, declarative statements that convey information, provide a fact, or offer an explanation or any recommended courses of action should be based on evidence. If allowed by your professor, any external sources used to support your analysis, such as course readings, should be properly cited under a list of references. The organization and structure of case analysis papers can vary depending on your professor’s preferred format, but its structure generally follows the steps used for analyzing the case.

Introduction

The introduction should provide a succinct but thorough descriptive overview of the main facts, issues, and core problems of the case . The introduction should also include a brief summary of the most relevant details about the situation and organizational setting. This includes defining the theoretical framework or conceptual model on which any questions were used to frame your analysis.

Following the rules of most college-level research papers, the introduction should then inform the reader how the paper will be organized. This includes describing the major sections of the paper and the order in which they will be presented. Unless you are told to do so by your professor, you do not need to preview your final recommendations in the introduction. U nlike most college-level research papers , the introduction does not include a statement about the significance of your findings because a case analysis assignment does not involve contributing new knowledge about a research problem.

Background Analysis

Background analysis can vary depending on any guiding questions provided by your professor and the underlying concept or theory that the case is based upon. In general, however, this section of your paper should focus on:

• Providing an overarching analysis of problems identified from the case scenario, including identifying events that stakeholders find challenging or troublesome,
• Identifying assumptions made by each stakeholder and any apparent biases they may exhibit,
• Describing any demands or claims made by or forced upon key stakeholders, and
• Highlighting any issues of concern or complaints expressed by stakeholders in response to those demands or claims.

These aspects of the case are often in the form of behavioral responses expressed by individuals or groups within the organizational setting. However, note that problems in a case situation can also be reflected in data [or the lack thereof] and in the decision-making, operational, cultural, or institutional structure of the organization. Additionally, demands or claims can be either internal and external to the organization [e.g., a case analysis involving a president considering arms sales to Saudi Arabia could include managing internal demands from White House advisors as well as demands from members of Congress].

Throughout this section, present all relevant evidence from the case that supports your analysis. Do not simply claim there is a problem, an assumption, a demand, or a concern; tell the reader what part of the case informed how you identified these background elements.

Identification of Problems

In most case analysis assignments, there are problems, and then there are problems . Each problem can reflect a multitude of underlying symptoms that are detrimental to the interests of the organization. The purpose of identifying problems is to teach students how to differentiate between problems that vary in severity, impact, and relative importance. Given this, problems can be described in three general forms: those that must be addressed immediately, those that should be addressed but the impact is not severe, and those that do not require immediate attention and can be set aside for the time being.

All of the problems you identify from the case should be identified in this section of your paper, with a description based on evidence explaining the problem variances. If the assignment asks you to conduct research to further support your assessment of the problems, include this in your explanation. Remember to cite those sources in a list of references. Use specific evidence from the case and apply appropriate concepts, theories, and models discussed in class or in relevant course readings to highlight and explain the key problems [or problem] that you believe must be solved immediately and describe the underlying symptoms and why they are so critical.

Alternative Solutions

This section is where you provide specific, realistic, and evidence-based solutions to the problems you have identified and make recommendations about how to alleviate the underlying symptomatic conditions impacting the organizational setting. For each solution, you must explain why it was chosen and provide clear evidence to support your reasoning. This can include, for example, course readings and class discussions as well as research resources, such as, books, journal articles, research reports, or government documents. In some cases, your professor may encourage you to include personal, anecdotal experiences as evidence to support why you chose a particular solution or set of solutions. Using anecdotal evidence helps promote reflective thinking about the process of determining what qualifies as a core problem and relevant solution .

Throughout this part of the paper, keep in mind the entire array of problems that must be addressed and describe in detail the solutions that might be implemented to resolve these problems.

Recommended Courses of Action

In some case analysis assignments, your professor may ask you to combine the alternative solutions section with your recommended courses of action. However, it is important to know the difference between the two. A solution refers to the answer to a problem. A course of action refers to a procedure or deliberate sequence of activities adopted to proactively confront a situation, often in the context of accomplishing a goal. In this context, proposed courses of action are based on your analysis of alternative solutions. Your description and justification for pursuing each course of action should represent the overall plan for implementing your recommendations.

For each course of action, you need to explain the rationale for your recommendation in a way that confronts challenges, explains risks, and anticipates any counter-arguments from stakeholders. Do this by considering the strengths and weaknesses of each course of action framed in relation to how the action is expected to resolve the core problems presented, the possible ways the action may affect remaining problems, and how the recommended action will be perceived by each stakeholder.

In addition, you should describe the criteria needed to measure how well the implementation of these actions is working and explain which individuals or groups are responsible for ensuring your recommendations are successful. In addition, always consider the law of unintended consequences. Outline difficulties that may arise in implementing each course of action and describe how implementing the proposed courses of action [either individually or collectively] may lead to new problems [both large and small].

Throughout this section, you must consider the costs and benefits of recommending your courses of action in relation to uncertainties or missing information and the negative consequences of success.

The conclusion should be brief and introspective. Unlike a research paper, the conclusion in a case analysis paper does not include a summary of key findings and their significance, a statement about how the study contributed to existing knowledge, or indicate opportunities for future research.

Begin by synthesizing the core problems presented in the case and the relevance of your recommended solutions. This can include an explanation of what you have learned about the case in the context of your answers to the questions provided by your professor. The conclusion is also where you link what you learned from analyzing the case with the course readings or class discussions. This can further demonstrate your understanding of the relationships between the practical case situation and the theoretical and abstract content of assigned readings and other course content.

Problems to Avoid

The literature on case analysis assignments often includes examples of difficulties students have with applying methods of critical analysis and effectively reporting the results of their assessment of the situation. A common reason cited by scholars is that the application of this type of teaching and learning method is limited to applied fields of social and behavioral sciences and, as a result, writing a case analysis paper can be unfamiliar to most students entering college.

After you have drafted your paper, proofread the narrative flow and revise any of these common errors:

• Unnecessary detail in the background section . The background section should highlight the essential elements of the case based on your analysis. Focus on summarizing the facts and highlighting the key factors that become relevant in the other sections of the paper by eliminating any unnecessary information.
• Analysis relies too much on opinion . Your analysis is interpretive, but the narrative must be connected clearly to evidence from the case and any models and theories discussed in class or in course readings. Any positions or arguments you make should be supported by evidence.
• Analysis does not focus on the most important elements of the case . Your paper should provide a thorough overview of the case. However, the analysis should focus on providing evidence about what you identify are the key events, stakeholders, issues, and problems. Emphasize what you identify as the most critical aspects of the case to be developed throughout your analysis. Be thorough but succinct.
• Writing is too descriptive . A paper with too much descriptive information detracts from your analysis of the complexities of the case situation. Questions about what happened, where, when, and by whom should only be included as essential information leading to your examination of questions related to why, how, and for what purpose.
• Inadequate definition of a core problem and associated symptoms . A common error found in case analysis papers is recommending a solution or course of action without adequately defining or demonstrating that you understand the problem. Make sure you have clearly described the problem and its impact and scope within the organizational setting. Ensure that you have adequately described the root causes w hen describing the symptoms of the problem.
• Recommendations lack specificity . Identify any use of vague statements and indeterminate terminology, such as, “A particular experience” or “a large increase to the budget.” These statements cannot be measured and, as a result, there is no way to evaluate their successful implementation. Provide specific data and use direct language in describing recommended actions.
• Unrealistic, exaggerated, or unattainable recommendations . Review your recommendations to ensure that they are based on the situational facts of the case. Your recommended solutions and courses of action must be based on realistic assumptions and fit within the constraints of the situation. Also note that the case scenario has already happened, therefore, any speculation or arguments about what could have occurred if the circumstances were different should be revised or eliminated.

Bee, Lian Song et al. "Business Students' Perspectives on Case Method Coaching for Problem-Based Learning: Impacts on Student Engagement and Learning Performance in Higher Education." Education & Training 64 (2022): 416-432; The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Georgallis, Panikos and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching using Case-Based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; Hawes, Jon M. "Teaching is Not Telling: The Case Method as a Form of Interactive Learning." Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 5 (Winter 2004): 47-54; Georgallis, Panikos, and Kayleigh Bruijn. "Sustainability Teaching Using Case-based Debates." Journal of International Education in Business 15 (2022): 147-163; .Dean,  Kathy Lund and Charles J. Fornaciari. "How to Create and Use Experiential Case-Based Exercises in a Management Classroom." Journal of Management Education 26 (October 2002): 586-603; Klebba, Joanne M. and Janet G. Hamilton. "Structured Case Analysis: Developing Critical Thinking Skills in a Marketing Case Course." Journal of Marketing Education 29 (August 2007): 132-137, 139; Klein, Norman. "The Case Discussion Method Revisited: Some Questions about Student Skills." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 30-32; Mukherjee, Arup. "Effective Use of In-Class Mini Case Analysis for Discovery Learning in an Undergraduate MIS Course." The Journal of Computer Information Systems 40 (Spring 2000): 15-23; Pessoa, Silviaet al. "Scaffolding the Case Analysis in an Organizational Behavior Course: Making Analytical Language Explicit." Journal of Management Education 46 (2022): 226-251: Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Schweitzer, Karen. "How to Write and Format a Business Case Study." ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-write-and-format-a-business-case-study-466324 (accessed December 5, 2022); Reddy, C. D. "Teaching Research Methodology: Everything's a Case." Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 18 (December 2020): 178-188; Volpe, Guglielmo. "Case Teaching in Economics: History, Practice and Evidence." Cogent Economics and Finance 3 (December 2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2015.1120977.

Writing Tip

Ca se Study and Case Analysis Are Not the Same!

Confusion often exists between what it means to write a paper that uses a case study research design and writing a paper that analyzes a case; they are two different types of approaches to learning in the social and behavioral sciences. Professors as well as educational researchers contribute to this confusion because they often use the term "case study" when describing the subject of analysis for a case analysis paper. But you are not studying a case for the purpose of generating a comprehensive, multi-faceted understanding of a research problem. R ather, you are critically analyzing a specific scenario to argue logically for recommended solutions and courses of action that lead to optimal outcomes applicable to professional practice.

To avoid any confusion, here are twelve characteristics that delineate the differences between writing a paper using the case study research method and writing a case analysis paper:

• Case study is a method of in-depth research and rigorous inquiry ; case analysis is a reliable method of teaching and learning . A case study is a modality of research that investigates a phenomenon for the purpose of creating new knowledge, solving a problem, or testing a hypothesis using empirical evidence derived from the case being studied. Often, the results are used to generalize about a larger population or within a wider context. The writing adheres to the traditional standards of a scholarly research study. A case analysis is a pedagogical tool used to teach students how to reflect and think critically about a practical, real-life problem in an organizational setting.
• The researcher is responsible for identifying the case to study; a case analysis is assigned by your professor . As the researcher, you choose the case study to investigate in support of obtaining new knowledge and understanding about the research problem. The case in a case analysis assignment is almost always provided, and sometimes written, by your professor and either given to every student in class to analyze individually or to a small group of students, or students select a case to analyze from a predetermined list.
• A case study is indeterminate and boundless; a case analysis is predetermined and confined . A case study can be almost anything [see item 9 below] as long as it relates directly to examining the research problem. This relationship is the only limit to what a researcher can choose as the subject of their case study. The content of a case analysis is determined by your professor and its parameters are well-defined and limited to elucidating insights of practical value applied to practice.
• Case study is fact-based and describes actual events or situations; case analysis can be entirely fictional or adapted from an actual situation . The entire content of a case study must be grounded in reality to be a valid subject of investigation in an empirical research study. A case analysis only needs to set the stage for critically examining a situation in practice and, therefore, can be entirely fictional or adapted, all or in-part, from an actual situation.
• Research using a case study method must adhere to principles of intellectual honesty and academic integrity; a case analysis scenario can include misleading or false information . A case study paper must report research objectively and factually to ensure that any findings are understood to be logically correct and trustworthy. A case analysis scenario may include misleading or false information intended to deliberately distract from the central issues of the case. The purpose is to teach students how to sort through conflicting or useless information in order to come up with the preferred solution. Any use of misleading or false information in academic research is considered unethical.
• Case study is linked to a research problem; case analysis is linked to a practical situation or scenario . In the social sciences, the subject of an investigation is most often framed as a problem that must be researched in order to generate new knowledge leading to a solution. Case analysis narratives are grounded in real life scenarios for the purpose of examining the realities of decision-making behavior and processes within organizational settings. A case analysis assignments include a problem or set of problems to be analyzed. However, the goal is centered around the act of identifying and evaluating courses of action leading to best possible outcomes.
• The purpose of a case study is to create new knowledge through research; the purpose of a case analysis is to teach new understanding . Case studies are a choice of methodological design intended to create new knowledge about resolving a research problem. A case analysis is a mode of teaching and learning intended to create new understanding and an awareness of uncertainty applied to practice through acts of critical thinking and reflection.
• A case study seeks to identify the best possible solution to a research problem; case analysis can have an indeterminate set of solutions or outcomes . Your role in studying a case is to discover the most logical, evidence-based ways to address a research problem. A case analysis assignment rarely has a single correct answer because one of the goals is to force students to confront the real life dynamics of uncertainly, ambiguity, and missing or conflicting information within professional practice. Under these conditions, a perfect outcome or solution almost never exists.
• Case study is unbounded and relies on gathering external information; case analysis is a self-contained subject of analysis . The scope of a case study chosen as a method of research is bounded. However, the researcher is free to gather whatever information and data is necessary to investigate its relevance to understanding the research problem. For a case analysis assignment, your professor will often ask you to examine solutions or recommended courses of action based solely on facts and information from the case.
• Case study can be a person, place, object, issue, event, condition, or phenomenon; a case analysis is a carefully constructed synopsis of events, situations, and behaviors . The research problem dictates the type of case being studied and, therefore, the design can encompass almost anything tangible as long as it fulfills the objective of generating new knowledge and understanding. A case analysis is in the form of a narrative containing descriptions of facts, situations, processes, rules, and behaviors within a particular setting and under a specific set of circumstances.
• Case study can represent an open-ended subject of inquiry; a case analysis is a narrative about something that has happened in the past . A case study is not restricted by time and can encompass an event or issue with no temporal limit or end. For example, the current war in Ukraine can be used as a case study of how medical personnel help civilians during a large military conflict, even though circumstances around this event are still evolving. A case analysis can be used to elicit critical thinking about current or future situations in practice, but the case itself is a narrative about something finite and that has taken place in the past.
• Multiple case studies can be used in a research study; case analysis involves examining a single scenario . Case study research can use two or more cases to examine a problem, often for the purpose of conducting a comparative investigation intended to discover hidden relationships, document emerging trends, or determine variations among different examples. A case analysis assignment typically describes a stand-alone, self-contained situation and any comparisons among cases are conducted during in-class discussions and/or student presentations.

The Case Analysis . Fred Meijer Center for Writing and Michigan Authors. Grand Valley State University; Mills, Albert J. , Gabrielle Durepos, and Eiden Wiebe, editors. Encyclopedia of Case Study Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2010; Ramsey, V. J. and L. D. Dodge. "Case Analysis: A Structured Approach." Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal 6 (November 1981): 27-29; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods . 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2017; Crowe, Sarah et al. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11 (2011):  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-100; Yin, Robert K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods . 4th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing; 1994.

• << Previous: Reviewing Collected Works
• Next: Writing a Case Study >>
• Last Updated: May 7, 2024 9:45 AM
• URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Reading Lists
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

How to Solve Problems

• Laura Amico

To bring the best ideas forward, teams must build psychological safety.

Teams today aren’t just asked to execute tasks: They’re called upon to solve problems. You’d think that many brains working together would mean better solutions, but the reality is that too often problem-solving teams fall victim to inefficiency, conflict, and cautious conclusions. The two charts below will help your team think about how to collaborate better and come up with the best solutions for the thorniest challenges.

• Laura Amico is a former senior editor at Harvard Business Review.

Partner Center

We use essential cookies to make Venngage work. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Manage Cookies

Cookies and similar technologies collect certain information about how you’re using our website. Some of them are essential, and without them you wouldn’t be able to use Venngage. But others are optional, and you get to choose whether we use them or not.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are always on, as they’re essential for making Venngage work, and making it safe. Without these cookies, services you’ve asked for can’t be provided.

Show cookie providers

• Google Login

Functionality Cookies

These cookies help us provide enhanced functionality and personalisation, and remember your settings. They may be set by us or by third party providers.

Performance Cookies

These cookies help us analyze how many people are using Venngage, where they come from and how they're using it. If you opt out of these cookies, we can’t get feedback to make Venngage better for you and all our users.

• Google Analytics

Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set by our advertising partners to track your activity and show you relevant Venngage ads on other sites as you browse the internet.

• Google Tag Manager
• Infographics
• Daily Infographics
• Popular Templates
• Accessibility
• Graphic Design
• Graphs and Charts
• Data Visualization
• Human Resources
• Beginner Guides

Blog Business How to Present a Case Study like a Pro (With Examples)

How to Present a Case Study like a Pro (With Examples)

Written by: Danesh Ramuthi Sep 07, 2023

Okay, let’s get real: case studies can be kinda snooze-worthy. But guess what? They don’t have to be!

In this article, I will cover every element that transforms a mere report into a compelling case study, from selecting the right metrics to using persuasive narrative techniques.

And if you’re feeling a little lost, don’t worry! There are cool tools like Venngage’s Case Study Creator to help you whip up something awesome, even if you’re short on time. Plus, the pre-designed case study templates are like instant polish because let’s be honest, everyone loves a shortcut.

Click to jump ahead: 

What is a case study presentation?

What is the purpose of presenting a case study, how to structure a case study presentation, how long should a case study presentation be, 5 case study presentation examples with templates, 6 tips for delivering an effective case study presentation, 5 common mistakes to avoid in a case study presentation, how to present a case study faqs.

A case study presentation involves a comprehensive examination of a specific subject, which could range from an individual, group, location, event, organization or phenomenon.

They’re like puzzles you get to solve with the audience, all while making you think outside the box.

Unlike a basic report or whitepaper, the purpose of a case study presentation is to stimulate critical thinking among the viewers. 

The primary objective of a case study is to provide an extensive and profound comprehension of the chosen topic. You don’t just throw numbers at your audience. You use examples and real-life cases to make you think and see things from different angles.

The primary purpose of presenting a case study is to offer a comprehensive, evidence-based argument that informs, persuades and engages your audience.

Here’s the juicy part: presenting that case study can be your secret weapon. Whether you’re pitching a groundbreaking idea to a room full of suits or trying to impress your professor with your A-game, a well-crafted case study can be the magic dust that sprinkles brilliance over your words.

Think of it like digging into a puzzle you can’t quite crack . A case study lets you explore every piece, turn it over and see how it fits together. This close-up look helps you understand the whole picture, not just a blurry snapshot.

It’s also your chance to showcase how you analyze things, step by step, until you reach a conclusion. It’s all about being open and honest about how you got there.

Besides, presenting a case study gives you an opportunity to connect data and real-world scenarios in a compelling narrative. It helps to make your argument more relatable and accessible, increasing its impact on your audience.

One of the contexts where case studies can be very helpful is during the job interview. In some job interviews, you as candidates may be asked to present a case study as part of the selection process.

Having a case study presentation prepared allows the candidate to demonstrate their ability to understand complex issues, formulate strategies and communicate their ideas effectively.

The way you present a case study can make all the difference in how it’s received. A well-structured presentation not only holds the attention of your audience but also ensures that your key points are communicated clearly and effectively.

In this section, let’s go through the key steps that’ll help you structure your case study presentation for maximum impact.

Let’s get into it. 

Open with an introductory overview 

Start by introducing the subject of your case study and its relevance. Explain why this case study is important and who would benefit from the insights gained. This is your opportunity to grab your audience’s attention.

Explain the problem in question

Dive into the problem or challenge that the case study focuses on. Provide enough background information for the audience to understand the issue. If possible, quantify the problem using data or metrics to show the magnitude or severity.

Detail the solutions to solve the problem

After outlining the problem, describe the steps taken to find a solution. This could include the methodology, any experiments or tests performed and the options that were considered. Make sure to elaborate on why the final solution was chosen over the others.

Key stakeholders Involved

Talk about the individuals, groups or organizations that were directly impacted by or involved in the problem and its solution. 

Stakeholders may experience a range of outcomes—some may benefit, while others could face setbacks.

For example, in a business transformation case study, employees could face job relocations or changes in work culture, while shareholders might be looking at potential gains or losses.

Discuss the key results & outcomes

Discuss the results of implementing the solution. Use data and metrics to back up your statements. Did the solution meet its objectives? What impact did it have on the stakeholders? Be honest about any setbacks or areas for improvement as well.

Include visuals to support your analysis

Visual aids can be incredibly effective in helping your audience grasp complex issues. Utilize charts, graphs, images or video clips to supplement your points. Make sure to explain each visual and how it contributes to your overall argument.

Pie charts illustrate the proportion of different components within a whole, useful for visualizing market share, budget allocation or user demographics.

This is particularly useful especially if you’re displaying survey results in your case study presentation.

Stacked charts on the other hand are perfect for visualizing composition and trends. This is great for analyzing things like customer demographics, product breakdowns or budget allocation in your case study.

Consider this example of a stacked bar chart template. It provides a straightforward summary of the top-selling cake flavors across various locations, offering a quick and comprehensive view of the data.

Not the chart you’re looking for? Browse Venngage’s gallery of chart templates to find the perfect one that’ll captivate your audience and level up your data storytelling.

Recommendations and next steps

Wrap up by providing recommendations based on the case study findings. Outline the next steps that stakeholders should take to either expand on the success of the project or address any remaining challenges.

Acknowledgments and references

Thank the people who contributed to the case study and helped in the problem-solving process. Cite any external resources, reports or data sets that contributed to your analysis.

Feedback & Q&A session

Open the floor for questions and feedback from your audience. This allows for further discussion and can provide additional insights that may not have been considered previously.

Closing remarks

Conclude the presentation by summarizing the key points and emphasizing the takeaways. Thank your audience for their time and participation and express your willingness to engage in further discussions or collaborations on the subject.

Well, the length of a case study presentation can vary depending on the complexity of the topic and the needs of your audience. However, a typical business or academic presentation often lasts between 15 to 30 minutes. 

This time frame usually allows for a thorough explanation of the case while maintaining audience engagement. However, always consider leaving a few minutes at the end for a Q&A session to address any questions or clarify points made during the presentation.

When it comes to presenting a compelling case study, having a well-structured template can be a game-changer. 

It helps you organize your thoughts, data and findings in a coherent and visually pleasing manner. 

Not all case studies are created equal and different scenarios require distinct approaches for maximum impact. 

To save you time and effort, I have curated a list of 5 versatile case study presentation templates, each designed for specific needs and audiences. 

Here are some best case study presentation examples that showcase effective strategies for engaging your audience and conveying complex information clearly.

1 . Lab report case study template

Ever feel like your research gets lost in a world of endless numbers and jargon? Lab case studies are your way out!

Think of it as building a bridge between your cool experiment and everyone else. It’s more than just reporting results – it’s explaining the “why” and “how” in a way that grabs attention and makes sense.

This lap report template acts as a blueprint for your report, guiding you through each essential section (introduction, methods, results, etc.) in a logical order.

Want to present your research like a pro? Browse our research presentation template gallery for creative inspiration!

2. Product case study template

It’s time you ditch those boring slideshows and bullet points because I’ve got a better way to win over clients: product case study templates.

Instead of just listing features and benefits, you get to create a clear and concise story that shows potential clients exactly what your product can do for them. It’s like painting a picture they can easily visualize, helping them understand the value your product brings to the table.

Grab the template below, fill in the details, and watch as your product’s impact comes to life!

3. Content marketing case study template

In digital marketing, showcasing your accomplishments is as vital as achieving them. 

A well-crafted case study not only acts as a testament to your successes but can also serve as an instructional tool for others. 

With this coral content marketing case study template—a perfect blend of vibrant design and structured documentation, you can narrate your marketing triumphs effectively.

4. Case study psychology template

Understanding how people tick is one of psychology’s biggest quests and case studies are like magnifying glasses for the mind. They offer in-depth looks at real-life behaviors, emotions and thought processes, revealing fascinating insights into what makes us human.

Writing a top-notch case study, though, can be a challenge. It requires careful organization, clear presentation and meticulous attention to detail. That’s where a good case study psychology template comes in handy.

Think of it as a helpful guide, taking care of formatting and structure while you focus on the juicy content. No more wrestling with layouts or margins – just pour your research magic into crafting a compelling narrative.

5. Lead generation case study template

Lead generation can be a real head-scratcher. But here’s a little help: a lead generation case study.

Think of it like a friendly handshake and a confident resume all rolled into one. It’s your chance to showcase your expertise, share real-world successes and offer valuable insights. Potential clients get to see your track record, understand your approach and decide if you’re the right fit.

No need to start from scratch, though. This lead generation case study template guides you step-by-step through crafting a clear, compelling narrative that highlights your wins and offers actionable tips for others. Fill in the gaps with your specific data and strategies, and voilà! You’ve got a powerful tool to attract new customers.

Related: 15+ Professional Case Study Examples [Design Tips + Templates]

So, you’ve spent hours crafting the perfect case study and are now tasked with presenting it. Crafting the case study is only half the battle; delivering it effectively is equally important. 

Whether you’re facing a room of executives, academics or potential clients, how you present your findings can make a significant difference in how your work is received. 

Forget boring reports and snooze-inducing presentations! Let’s make your case study sing. Here are some key pointers to turn information into an engaging and persuasive performance:

• Know your audience : Tailor your presentation to the knowledge level and interests of your audience. Remember to use language and examples that resonate with them.
• Rehearse : Rehearsing your case study presentation is the key to a smooth delivery and for ensuring that you stay within the allotted time. Practice helps you fine-tune your pacing, hone your speaking skills with good word pronunciations and become comfortable with the material, leading to a more confident, conversational and effective presentation.
• Start strong : Open with a compelling introduction that grabs your audience’s attention. You might want to use an interesting statistic, a provocative question or a brief story that sets the stage for your case study.
• Be clear and concise : Avoid jargon and overly complex sentences. Get to the point quickly and stay focused on your objectives.
• Use visual aids : Incorporate slides with graphics, charts or videos to supplement your verbal presentation. Make sure they are easy to read and understand.
• Tell a story : Use storytelling techniques to make the case study more engaging. A well-told narrative can help you make complex data more relatable and easier to digest.

Ditching the dry reports and slide decks? Venngage’s case study templates let you wow customers with your solutions and gain insights to improve your business plan. Pre-built templates, visual magic and customer captivation – all just a click away. Go tell your story and watch them say “wow!”

Nailed your case study, but want to make your presentation even stronger? Avoid these common mistakes to ensure your audience gets the most out of it:

Overloading with information

A case study is not an encyclopedia. Overloading your presentation with excessive data, text or jargon can make it cumbersome and difficult for the audience to digest the key points. Stick to what’s essential and impactful. Need help making your data clear and impactful? Our data presentation templates can help! Find clear and engaging visuals to showcase your findings.

Lack of structure

Jumping haphazardly between points or topics can confuse your audience. A well-structured presentation, with a logical flow from introduction to conclusion, is crucial for effective communication.

Ignoring the audience

Different audiences have different needs and levels of understanding. Failing to adapt your presentation to your audience can result in a disconnect and a less impactful presentation.

Poor visual elements

While content is king, poor design or lack of visual elements can make your case study dull or hard to follow. Make sure you use high-quality images, graphs and other visual aids to support your narrative.

Not focusing on results

A case study aims to showcase a problem and its solution, but what most people care about are the results. Failing to highlight or adequately explain the outcomes can make your presentation fall flat.

How to start a case study presentation?

Starting a case study presentation effectively involves a few key steps:

• Grab attention : Open with a hook—an intriguing statistic, a provocative question or a compelling visual—to engage your audience from the get-go.
• Set the stage : Briefly introduce the subject, context and relevance of the case study to give your audience an idea of what to expect.
• Outline objectives : Clearly state what the case study aims to achieve. Are you solving a problem, proving a point or showcasing a success?
• Agenda : Give a quick outline of the key sections or topics you’ll cover to help the audience follow along.
• Set expectations : Let your audience know what you want them to take away from the presentation, whether it’s knowledge, inspiration or a call to action.

How to present a case study on PowerPoint and on Google Slides?

Presenting a case study on PowerPoint and Google Slides involves a structured approach for clarity and impact using presentation slides :

• Title slide : Start with a title slide that includes the name of the case study, your name and any relevant institutional affiliations.
• Introduction : Follow with a slide that outlines the problem or situation your case study addresses. Include a hook to engage the audience.
• Objectives : Clearly state the goals of the case study in a dedicated slide.
• Findings : Use charts, graphs and bullet points to present your findings succinctly.
• Analysis : Discuss what the findings mean, drawing on supporting data or secondary research as necessary.
• Conclusion : Summarize key takeaways and results.
• Q&A : End with a slide inviting questions from the audience.

What’s the role of analysis in a case study presentation?

The role of analysis in a case study presentation is to interpret the data and findings, providing context and meaning to them. 

It helps your audience understand the implications of the case study, connects the dots between the problem and the solution and may offer recommendations for future action.

Is it important to include real data and results in the presentation?

Yes, including real data and results in a case study presentation is crucial to show experience,  credibility and impact. Authentic data lends weight to your findings and conclusions, enabling the audience to trust your analysis and take your recommendations more seriously

How do I conclude a case study presentation effectively?

To conclude a case study presentation effectively, summarize the key findings, insights and recommendations in a clear and concise manner. 

End with a strong call-to-action or a thought-provoking question to leave a lasting impression on your audience.

What’s the best way to showcase data in a case study presentation ?

The best way to showcase data in a case study presentation is through visual aids like charts, graphs and infographics which make complex information easily digestible, engaging and creative. 

Don’t just report results, visualize them! This template for example lets you transform your social media case study into a captivating infographic that sparks conversation.

Choose the type of visual that best represents the data you’re showing; for example, use bar charts for comparisons or pie charts for parts of a whole. 

Ensure that the visuals are high-quality and clearly labeled, so the audience can quickly grasp the key points. 

Keep the design consistent and simple, avoiding clutter or overly complex visuals that could distract from the message.

Choose a template that perfectly suits your case study where you can utilize different visual aids for maximum impact. 

Need more inspiration on how to turn numbers into impact with the help of infographics? Our ready-to-use infographic templates take the guesswork out of creating visual impact for your case studies with just a few clicks.

Related: 10+ Case Study Infographic Templates That Convert

Congrats on mastering the art of compelling case study presentations! This guide has equipped you with all the essentials, from structure and nuances to avoiding common pitfalls. You’re ready to impress any audience, whether in the boardroom, the classroom or beyond.

And remember, you’re not alone in this journey. Venngage’s Case Study Creator is your trusty companion, ready to elevate your presentations from ordinary to extraordinary. So, let your confidence shine, leverage your newly acquired skills and prepare to deliver presentations that truly resonate.

Go forth and make a lasting impact!

Discover popular designs

Infographic maker

Brochure maker

White paper online

Newsletter creator

Flyer maker

Timeline maker

Letterhead maker

Mind map maker

Ebook maker

7 Favorite Business Case Studies to Teach—and Why

Explore more.

• Case Teaching
• Course Materials

FEATURED CASE STUDIES

The Army Crew Team . Emily Michelle David of CEIBS

ATH Technologies . Devin Shanthikumar of Paul Merage School of Business

Fabritek 1992 . Rob Austin of Ivey Business School

Lincoln Electric Co . Karin Schnarr of Wilfrid Laurier University

Pal’s Sudden Service—Scaling an Organizational Model to Drive Growth . Gary Pisano of Harvard Business School

The United States Air Force: ‘Chaos’ in the 99th Reconnaissance Squadron . Francesca Gino of Harvard Business School

Warren E. Buffett, 2015 . Robert F. Bruner of Darden School of Business

To dig into what makes a compelling case study, we asked seven experienced educators who teach with—and many who write—business case studies: “What is your favorite case to teach and why?”

The resulting list of case study favorites ranges in topics from operations management and organizational structure to rebel leaders and whodunnit dramas.

1. The Army Crew Team

Emily Michelle David, Assistant Professor of Management, China Europe International Business School (CEIBS)

“I love teaching  The Army Crew Team  case because it beautifully demonstrates how a team can be so much less than the sum of its parts.

I deliver the case to executives in a nearby state-of-the-art rowing facility that features rowing machines, professional coaches, and shiny red eight-person shells.

After going through the case, they hear testimonies from former members of Chinese national crew teams before carrying their own boat to the river for a test race.

The rich learning environment helps to vividly underscore one of the case’s core messages: competition can be a double-edged sword if not properly managed.

Executives in Emily Michelle David’s organizational behavior class participate in rowing activities at a nearby facility as part of her case delivery.

Despite working for an elite headhunting firm, the executives in my most recent class were surprised to realize how much they’ve allowed their own team-building responsibilities to lapse. In the MBA pre-course, this case often leads to a rich discussion about common traps that newcomers fall into (for example, trying to do too much, too soon), which helps to poise them to both stand out in the MBA as well as prepare them for the lateral team building they will soon engage in.

Finally, I love that the post-script always gets a good laugh and serves as an early lesson that organizational behavior courses will seldom give you foolproof solutions for specific problems but will, instead, arm you with the ability to think through issues more critically.”

2. ATH Technologies

Devin Shanthikumar, Associate Professor of Accounting, Paul Merage School of Business

“As a professor at UC Irvine’s Paul Merage School of Business, and before that at Harvard Business School, I have probably taught over 100 cases. I would like to say that my favorite case is my own,   Compass Box Whisky Company . But as fun as that case is, one case beats it:  ATH Technologies  by Robert Simons and Jennifer Packard.

ATH presents a young entrepreneurial company that is bought by a much larger company. As part of the merger, ATH gets an ‘earn-out’ deal—common among high-tech industries. The company, and the class, must decide what to do to achieve the stretch earn-out goals.

ATH captures a scenario we all want to be in at some point in our careers—being part of a young, exciting, growing organization. And a scenario we all will likely face—having stretch goals that seem almost unreachable.

It forces us, as a class, to really struggle with what to do at each stage.

After we read and discuss the A case, we find out what happens next, and discuss the B case, then the C, then D, and even E. At every stage, we can:

see how our decisions play out,

figure out how to build on our successes, and

address our failures.

The case is exciting, the class discussion is dynamic and energetic, and in the end, we all go home with a memorable ‘ah-ha!’ moment.

I have taught many great cases over my career, but none are quite as fun, memorable, and effective as ATH .”

3. Fabritek 1992

Rob Austin, Professor of Information Systems, Ivey Business School

“This might seem like an odd choice, but my favorite case to teach is an old operations case called  Fabritek 1992 .

The latest version of Fabritek 1992 is dated 2009, but it is my understanding that this is a rewrite of a case that is older (probably much older). There is a Fabritek 1969 in the HBP catalog—same basic case, older dates, and numbers. That 1969 version lists no authors, so I suspect the case goes even further back; the 1969 version is, I’m guessing, a rewrite of an even older version.

There are many things I appreciate about the case. Here are a few:

It operates as a learning opportunity at many levels. At first it looks like a not-very-glamorous production job scheduling case. By the end of the case discussion, though, we’re into (operations) strategy and more. It starts out technical, then explodes into much broader relevance. As I tell participants when I’m teaching HBP's Teaching with Cases seminars —where I often use Fabritek as an example—when people first encounter this case, they almost always underestimate it.

It has great characters—especially Arthur Moreno, who looks like a troublemaker, but who, discussion reveals, might just be the smartest guy in the factory. Alums of the Harvard MBA program have told me that they remember Arthur Moreno many years later.

Almost every word in the case is important. It’s only four and a half pages of text and three pages of exhibits. This economy of words and sparsity of style have always seemed like poetry to me. I should note that this super concise, every-word-matters approach is not the ideal we usually aspire to when we write cases. Often, we include extra or superfluous information because part of our teaching objective is to provide practice in separating what matters from what doesn’t in a case. Fabritek takes a different approach, though, which fits it well.

It has a dramatic structure. It unfolds like a detective story, a sort of whodunnit. Something is wrong. There is a quality problem, and we’re not sure who or what is responsible. One person, Arthur Moreno, looks very guilty (probably too obviously guilty), but as we dig into the situation, there are many more possibilities. We spend in-class time analyzing the data (there’s a bit of math, so it covers that base, too) to determine which hypotheses are best supported by the data. And, realistically, the data doesn’t support any of the hypotheses perfectly, just some of them more than others. Also, there’s a plot twist at the end (I won’t reveal it, but here’s a hint: Arthur Moreno isn’t nearly the biggest problem in the final analysis). I have had students tell me the surprising realization at the end of the discussion gives them ‘goosebumps.’

Finally, through the unexpected plot twist, it imparts what I call a ‘wisdom lesson’ to young managers: not to be too sure of themselves and to regard the experiences of others, especially experts out on the factory floor, with great seriousness.”

4. Lincoln Electric Co.

Karin Schnarr, Assistant Professor of Policy, Wilfrid Laurier University

“As a strategy professor, my favorite case to teach is the classic 1975 Harvard case  Lincoln Electric Co.  by Norman Berg.

I use it to demonstrate to students the theory linkage between strategy and organizational structure, management processes, and leadership behavior.

This case may be an odd choice for a favorite. It occurs decades before my students were born. It is pages longer than we are told students are now willing to read. It is about manufacturing arc welding equipment in Cleveland, Ohio—a hard sell for a Canadian business classroom.

Yet, I have never come across a case that so perfectly illustrates what I want students to learn about how a company can be designed from an organizational perspective to successfully implement its strategy.

And in a time where so much focus continues to be on how to maximize shareholder value, it is refreshing to be able to discuss a publicly-traded company that is successfully pursuing a strategy that provides a fair value to shareholders while distributing value to employees through a large bonus pool, as well as value to customers by continually lowering prices.

However, to make the case resonate with today’s students, I work to make it relevant to the contemporary business environment. I link the case to multimedia clips about Lincoln Electric’s current manufacturing practices, processes, and leadership practices. My students can then see that a model that has been in place for generations is still viable and highly successful, even in our very different competitive situation.”

5. Pal’s Sudden Service—Scaling an Organizational Model to Drive Growth

Gary Pisano, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School

“My favorite case to teach these days is  Pal’s Sudden Service—Scaling an Organizational Model to Drive Growth .

I love teaching this case for three reasons:

1. It demonstrates how a company in a super-tough, highly competitive business can do very well by focusing on creating unique operating capabilities. In theory, Pal’s should have no chance against behemoths like McDonalds or Wendy’s—but it thrives because it has built a unique operating system. It’s a great example of a strategic approach to operations in action.

2. The case shows how a strategic approach to human resource and talent development at all levels really matters. This company competes in an industry not known for engaging its front-line workers. The case shows how engaging these workers can really pay off.

3. Finally, Pal’s is really unusual in its approach to growth. Most companies set growth goals (usually arbitrary ones) and then try to figure out how to ‘backfill’ the human resource and talent management gaps. They trust you can always find someone to do the job. Pal’s tackles the growth problem completely the other way around. They rigorously select and train their future managers. Only when they have a manager ready to take on their own store do they open a new one. They pace their growth off their capacity to develop talent. I find this really fascinating and so do the students I teach this case to.”

6. The United States Air Force: ‘Chaos’ in the 99th Reconnaissance Squadron

Francesca Gino, Professor of Business Administration, Harvard Business School

“My favorite case to teach is  The United States Air Force: ‘Chaos’ in the 99th Reconnaissance Squadron .

The case surprises students because it is about a leader, known in the unit by the nickname Chaos , who inspired his squadron to be innovative and to change in a culture that is all about not rocking the boat, and where there is a deep sense that rules should simply be followed.

For years, I studied ‘rebels,’ people who do not accept the status quo; rather, they approach work with curiosity and produce positive change in their organizations. Chaos is a rebel leader who got the level of cultural change right. Many of the leaders I’ve met over the years complain about the ‘corporate culture,’ or at least point to clear weaknesses of it; but then they throw their hands up in the air and forget about changing what they can.

Chaos is different—he didn’t go after the ‘Air Force’ culture. That would be like boiling the ocean.

Instead, he focused on his unit of control and command: The 99th squadron. He focused on enabling that group to do what it needed to do within the confines of the bigger Air Force culture. In the process, he inspired everyone on his team to be the best they can be at work.

The case leaves the classroom buzzing and inspired to take action.”

7. Warren E. Buffett, 2015

Robert F. Bruner, Professor of Business Administration, Darden School of Business

“I love teaching   Warren E. Buffett, 2015  because it energizes, exercises, and surprises students.

Buffett looms large in the business firmament and therefore attracts anyone who is eager to learn his secrets for successful investing. This generates the kind of energy that helps to break the ice among students and instructors early in a course and to lay the groundwork for good case discussion practices.

Studying Buffett’s approach to investing helps to introduce and exercise important themes that will resonate throughout a course. The case challenges students to define for themselves what it means to create value. The case discussion can easily be tailored for novices or for more advanced students.

Either way, this is not hero worship: The case affords a critical examination of the financial performance of Buffett’s firm, Berkshire Hathaway, and reveals both triumphs and stumbles. Most importantly, students can critique the purported benefits of Buffett’s conglomeration strategy and the sustainability of his investment record as the size of the firm grows very large.

By the end of the class session, students seem surprised with what they have discovered. They buzz over the paradoxes in Buffett’s philosophy and performance record. And they come away with sober respect for Buffett’s acumen and for the challenges of creating value for investors.

Surely, such sobriety is a meta-message for any mastery of finance.”

More Educator Favorites

Emily Michelle David is an assistant professor of management at China Europe International Business School (CEIBS). Her current research focuses on discovering how to make workplaces more welcoming for people of all backgrounds and personality profiles to maximize performance and avoid employee burnout. David’s work has been published in a number of scholarly journals, and she has worked as an in-house researcher at both NASA and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Devin Shanthikumar  is an associate professor and the accounting area coordinator at UCI Paul Merage School of Business. She teaches undergraduate, MBA, and executive-level courses in managerial accounting. Shanthikumar previously served on the faculty at Harvard Business School, where she taught both financial accounting and managerial accounting for MBAs, and wrote cases that are used in accounting courses across the country.

Robert D. Austin is a professor of information systems at Ivey Business School and an affiliated faculty member at Harvard Medical School. He has published widely, authoring nine books, more than 50 cases and notes, three Harvard online products, and two popular massive open online courses (MOOCs) running on the Coursera platform.

Karin Schnarr is an assistant professor of policy and the director of the Bachelor of Business Administration (BBA) program at the Lazaridis School of Business & Economics at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada where she teaches strategic management at the undergraduate, graduate, and executive levels. Schnarr has published several award-winning and best-selling cases and regularly presents at international conferences on case writing and scholarship.

Gary P. Pisano is the Harry E. Figgie, Jr. Professor of Business Administration and senior associate dean of faculty development at Harvard Business School, where he has been on the faculty since 1988. Pisano is an expert in the fields of technology and operations strategy, the management of innovation, and competitive strategy. His research and consulting experience span a range of industries including aerospace, biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, specialty chemicals, health care, nutrition, computers, software, telecommunications, and semiconductors.

Francesca Gino studies how people can have more productive, creative, and fulfilling lives. She is a professor at Harvard Business School and the author, most recently, of  Rebel Talent: Why It Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life . Gino regularly gives keynote speeches, delivers corporate training programs, and serves in advisory roles for firms and not-for-profit organizations across the globe.

Robert F. Bruner is a university professor at the University of Virginia, distinguished professor of business administration, and dean emeritus of the Darden School of Business. He has also held visiting appointments at Harvard and Columbia universities in the United States, at INSEAD in France, and at IESE in Spain. He is the author, co-author, or editor of more than 20 books on finance, management, and teaching. Currently, he teaches and writes in finance and management.

Related Articles

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience, including personalizing content. Learn More . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies and revised Privacy Policy .

Case Studies

This case study outlines the importance of problem solving skills in the manufacturing industry. It will introduce students to different strategies for tackling problems, and incorporates an interactive choose-your-own-adventure activity. Videos, interviews, and open-ended questions further engage students and stress good problem solving skills in the workplace.

The Improving Observation Skills case study introduces students to how the brain handles incoming information and how human attention and perception can be very different from reality. It addresses a variety of distractions in the manufacturing workplace and provides tips on how to manage these distractions. The case study emphasizes the importance of observation skills in shift changes, in workplace safety awareness, and for a company’s financial stability.

• --> Login or Sign Up

• Problem Solving Workshop

How to Approach a Case Study in a Problem Solving Workshop

John Palfrey and Lisa Brem

Share This Article

• Custom Field #1
• Custom Field #2
• Similar Products

Product Description

This note, designed for students in the Problem Solving Workshop, gives helpful tips for approaching problem solving case studies. Learning Objectives

• Help students effectively read problem solving case studies and prepare for problem solving class discussions and exercises.

Subjects Covered Problem Solving, Case Studies

Accessibility

To obtain accessible versions of our products for use by those with disabilities, please contact the HLS Case Studies Program at [email protected] or +1-617-496-1316.

Educator Materials

Registered members of this website can download this product at no cost. Please  create an account  or  sign in  to gain access to these materials.

Note: It can take up to three business days after you create an account to verify educator access. Verification will be confirmed via email.

For more information about the Problem Solving Workshop, or to request a teaching note for this case study, contact the Case Studies Program at [email protected] or +1-617-496-1316.

Additional Infor mation

The Problem Solving Workshop: A Video Introduction

Copyright Information

Please note that each purchase of this product entitles the purchaser to one download and use.  If you need multiple copies, please purchase the number of copies you need. For more information, see  Copying Your Case Study .

Product Videos

Custom field, product reviews, write a review.

Find Similar Products by Category

Recommended.

Creating Collaborative Documents

David Abrams

How to Be a Good Team Member

Joseph William Singer

Problem Solving for Lawyers

Writing and Presenting Short Memoranda to Supervisors

David B. Wilkins

• Related Products

Problem-Solving

Problem-solving is a complex skill used in times where solutions are not readily available. It is defined as “the skill of finding solutions for difficult or complex issues.” Using problem-solving in our daily lives helps us think through what options are possible in difficult situations and also helps create new solutions to move past the issue at hand.

Learning in Observation

The following video case studies are a learning tool that helps students, families, and educators examine the context of the social problems that might arise for youth and young adults. Visual media gives everyone a common viewing experience and centralizes the discussion around making choices and decisions in situations where problems exist. The activities extend learning around problem-solving and help learners understand why many of the problems that exist in everyday life are more complex than we think.

Watch the high school video case study below and think about how the opportunities for problem-solving involve both advocacy and the ability to receive and listen to other people’s perspectives. Hand out Character Profile Cards to students or groups of students and have them watch the video from the perspective of that character.

Referencing the profile cards , facilitate a discussion after watching the video. Some questions for discussion may include:

• What does my character know that the other characters need to know?
• What do the other characters know that my character needs to know?
• What are some possible solutions to the problem?
• Who can support the solution to make sure it is effective?
• Who needs to be a part of the solution?

The following video case study takes place at home between two brothers. Similar to the case study above, use questions to reflect on the problem and the process of problem-solving taken up by the parents.

Use the following questions to guide small groups in discussion around problem-solving.

• Why does this approach work well to discover the truth around the problem?
• What are some things that the parents learned about their children in the process of working through the problem?
• As a parent, why would it be important to get both perspectives?
• As a child, why would it be important to be heard, but also to hear your sibling’s perspective?
• What are some complex or difficult issues that are addressed in this process?

Observation to Practice

It might seem easy to find solutions when we are outside of the situation, however, it can be hard to solve problems when they pop up in our daily lives. The following are steps you can take to start problem-solving.

• Identify the problem
• Invite others affected by the problem to help understand what happened
• With help, collect more information about what happened
• Using the collected information, consider what process is most appropriate for reaching positive solutions
• Use the process to collaborate with others and generate plans for moving towards a solution
• Act towards goals that will help bring about a solution

Try it out for yourself! Use the following link to practice problem-solving in real-life situations.

Related Tools

Good day plan.

How I’m Determined has Helped with Bullying OC

The Importance of Knowing your Disability OC

• Our Mission

Making Learning Relevant With Case Studies

The open-ended problems presented in case studies give students work that feels connected to their lives.

To prepare students for jobs that haven’t been created yet, we need to teach them how to be great problem solvers so that they’ll be ready for anything. One way to do this is by teaching content and skills using real-world case studies, a learning model that’s focused on reflection during the problem-solving process. It’s similar to project-based learning, but PBL is more focused on students creating a product.

Case studies have been used for years by businesses, law and medical schools, physicians on rounds, and artists critiquing work. Like other forms of problem-based learning, case studies can be accessible for every age group, both in one subject and in interdisciplinary work.

You can get started with case studies by tackling relatable questions like these with your students:

• How can we limit food waste in the cafeteria?
• How can we get our school to recycle and compost waste? (Or, if you want to be more complex, how can our school reduce its carbon footprint?)
• How can we improve school attendance?
• How can we reduce the number of people who get sick at school during cold and flu season?

Addressing questions like these leads students to identify topics they need to learn more about. In researching the first question, for example, students may see that they need to research food chains and nutrition. Students often ask, reasonably, why they need to learn something, or when they’ll use their knowledge in the future. Learning is most successful for students when the content and skills they’re studying are relevant, and case studies offer one way to create that sense of relevance.

Teaching With Case Studies

Ultimately, a case study is simply an interesting problem with many correct answers. What does case study work look like in classrooms? Teachers generally start by having students read the case or watch a video that summarizes the case. Students then work in small groups or individually to solve the case study. Teachers set milestones defining what students should accomplish to help them manage their time.

During the case study learning process, student assessment of learning should be focused on reflection. Arthur L. Costa and Bena Kallick’s Learning and Leading With Habits of Mind gives several examples of what this reflection can look like in a classroom: 

Journaling: At the end of each work period, have students write an entry summarizing what they worked on, what worked well, what didn’t, and why. Sentence starters and clear rubrics or guidelines will help students be successful. At the end of a case study project, as Costa and Kallick write, it’s helpful to have students “select significant learnings, envision how they could apply these learnings to future situations, and commit to an action plan to consciously modify their behaviors.”

Interviews: While working on a case study, students can interview each other about their progress and learning. Teachers can interview students individually or in small groups to assess their learning process and their progress.

Student discussion: Discussions can be unstructured—students can talk about what they worked on that day in a think-pair-share or as a full class—or structured, using Socratic seminars or fishbowl discussions. If your class is tackling a case study in small groups, create a second set of small groups with a representative from each of the case study groups so that the groups can share their learning.

4 Tips for Setting Up a Case Study

1. Identify a problem to investigate: This should be something accessible and relevant to students’ lives. The problem should also be challenging and complex enough to yield multiple solutions with many layers.

2. Give context: Think of this step as a movie preview or book summary. Hook the learners to help them understand just enough about the problem to want to learn more.

3. Have a clear rubric: Giving structure to your definition of quality group work and products will lead to stronger end products. You may be able to have your learners help build these definitions.

4. Provide structures for presenting solutions: The amount of scaffolding you build in depends on your students’ skill level and development. A case study product can be something like several pieces of evidence of students collaborating to solve the case study, and ultimately presenting their solution with a detailed slide deck or an essay—you can scaffold this by providing specified headings for the sections of the essay.

Problem-Based Teaching Resources

There are many high-quality, peer-reviewed resources that are open source and easily accessible online.

• The National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science at the University at Buffalo built an online collection of more than 800 cases that cover topics ranging from biochemistry to economics. There are resources for middle and high school students.
• Models of Excellence , a project maintained by EL Education and the Harvard Graduate School of Education, has examples of great problem- and project-based tasks—and corresponding exemplary student work—for grades pre-K to 12.
• The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning at Purdue University is an open-source journal that publishes examples of problem-based learning in K–12 and post-secondary classrooms.
• The Tech Edvocate has a list of websites and tools related to problem-based learning.

In their book Problems as Possibilities , Linda Torp and Sara Sage write that at the elementary school level, students particularly appreciate how they feel that they are taken seriously when solving case studies. At the middle school level, “researchers stress the importance of relating middle school curriculum to issues of student concern and interest.” And high schoolers, they write, find the case study method “beneficial in preparing them for their future.”

Lean Six Sigma Training Certification

• Facebook Instagram Twitter LinkedIn YouTube
• (877) 497-4462

8D Corrective Action: Mastering Problem-Solving for Continuous Improvement

May 13th, 2024

Businesses constantly refine products, services, and workflows to stay ahead. But issues can still pop up, angering customers and jacking costs while hurting a company’s image. This is where the 8D corrective action problem-solving method earns its stripes.

It was developed by Ford in the 80s and has since spread widely across manufacturing, healthcare, aerospace, and more.

The 8D approach is a methodical process combining pros from different parts of the company, analytical tools, and fact-based decision-making.

By following its eight systematic steps, organizations can expertly handle thorny problems. They uncover root causes and implement lasting fixes addressing immediate concerns while fueling constant upgrades to prevent repeat issues.

Key Highlights

• Understanding the origins and history of the 8D corrective action methodology, its benefits, and when to apply it for optimal results.
• Exploring the eight disciplined steps of the 8D corrective action process.
• Integrating the 8D methodology with quality management systems, leveraging Enterprise Quality Management Software (EQMS) to streamline workflows.
• Examining case studies and examples from various industries, including manufacturing, service, healthcare, and the automotive sector.

Understanding the 8D Corrective Action Problem-Solving Methodology

The Eight Disciplines (8D) methodology is a structured, team-based approach to problem-solving that aims to identify the root causes of issues and implement effective corrective actions. 

It is a comprehensive framework that combines analytical tools, cross-functional collaboration, and a disciplined mindset to tackle complex problems systematically.

The 8D process establishes a step-by-step approach that guides organizations through eight distinct disciplines, each building upon the previous one. 

Origins and History of 8D Corrective Action

The origins of the 8D methodology can be traced back to the 1980s when it was developed and pioneered by Ford Motor Company. 

Initially referred to as “ Team Oriented Problem Solving ” (TOPS), this approach was designed to address the recurring quality issues that plagued the automotive industry at the time.

Recognizing the limitations of traditional problem-solving techniques, Ford sought to establish a more robust and effective framework that would not only resolve immediate concerns but also drive continuous improvement and prevent future issues. 

The 8D methodology quickly gained traction within Ford and was subsequently adopted as the company’s primary approach for documenting and addressing problem-solving efforts.

As the benefits of the 8D corrective action process became evident, it rapidly gained popularity among other manufacturers and industries, transcending its automotive roots. 

Today, the 8D methodology is widely employed across various sectors, including manufacturing, healthcare, aerospace, and service industries, among others.

Benefits of Using 8D Corrective Action

Implementing the 8D problem-solving methodology offers numerous benefits to organizations, including:

1. Systematic Approach : The structured nature of the 8D process ensures a consistent and comprehensive approach to problem-solving, reducing the risk of overlooking critical factors or jumping to premature conclusions.

2. Root Cause Identification : By emphasizing root cause analysis , the 8D methodology goes beyond addressing surface-level symptoms and focuses on identifying and eliminating the underlying causes of problems.

3. Cross-Functional Collaboration : The team-based approach fosters cross-functional collaboration, leveraging diverse perspectives and expertise from various departments, leading to more robust and well-rounded solutions.

4. Preventive Measures : The 8D corrective action process incorporates preventive actions to mitigate the recurrence of similar issues, promoting a culture of continuous improvement and proactive problem-solving.

5. Improved Quality and Reliability : By addressing root causes and implementing corrective actions, organizations can enhance the quality and reliability of their products, services, and processes, leading to increased customer satisfaction and cost savings.

6. Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Learning : The documentation and archiving of 8D processes facilitate knowledge sharing and organizational learning, enabling teams to build upon past experiences and lessons learned.

When to Apply 8D Corrective Action

The 8D problem-solving methodology is particularly valuable in situations where:

• Root Cause Analysis is Required: When issues persist despite initial troubleshooting efforts, or when the underlying causes are not immediately apparent, the 8D process can provide a structured approach to root cause analysis.
• Recurring Problems: If an organization experiences recurring problems or quality issues, the 8D methodology can help identify and eliminate the root causes, preventing future occurrences.
• Quality Issues with Significant Impact: When quality issues have a substantial impact on customer satisfaction, safety, regulatory compliance, or financial performance, the rigorous 8D approach can be employed to address the problem comprehensively.
• Complex Problems: For intricate problems involving multiple factors, processes, or departments, the cross-functional nature of the 8D team and the systematic approach can facilitate a thorough investigation and effective solution development.

By understanding the core principles, benefits, and appropriate application scenarios of the 8D problem-solving methodology, organizations can leverage this powerful framework to drive continuous improvement , enhance quality, and maintain a competitive edge in their respective industries.

The Eight Disciplines (8D) Process

At the heart of the 8D corrective action methodology lies a structured, step-by-step approach that guides organizations through eight distinct disciplines. 

Each discipline builds upon the previous one, ensuring a thorough investigation, analysis, and resolution of the problem at hand.

The eight disciplines of the 8D process are designed to facilitate a systematic and disciplined approach to problem-solving, leveraging cross-functional collaboration, analytical tools, and data-driven decision-making. 

D0: Planning and Preparation

Before embarking on the 8D corrective action journey, proper planning and preparation are crucial. This initial step, often referred to as Discipline Zero (D0), lays the foundation for a successful problem-solving effort.

During D0, the team gathers relevant information about the problem, assesses the need for interim containment actions, and establishes the prerequisites for forming an effective cross-functional team. 

This stage involves collecting data on symptoms, identifying potential risks, and ensuring that the necessary resources and support are in place to execute the 8D process effectively.

D1: Team Formation

The first formal discipline of the 8D process focuses on assembling a cross-functional team with the collective knowledge, skills, and expertise required to tackle the problem at hand. 

Effective team formation is critical to the success of the 8D corrective action effort, as it ensures diverse perspectives and a comprehensive understanding of the issue.

During D1, team members are carefully selected from various departments or functions, such as product engineering, process engineering, quality assurance, and data analysis.

Best practices in team formation involve considering factors such as technical expertise, problem-solving skills, interpersonal abilities, and the availability and commitment of potential team members. 

Establishing ground rules, communication protocols, and team-building exercises can further enhance collaboration and effective teamwork.

D2: Problem Description

In Discipline 2, the team focuses on accurately describing the problem, utilizing quantitative data and evidence-based approaches. 

This step is crucial, as it establishes a shared understanding of the issue and guides the subsequent steps of the 8D process.

The problem description involves defining the problem statement in specific, measurable terms, identifying the affected product or process, and quantifying the impact on operations, quality, customer satisfaction, and costs. 

Tools such as the “ 5 Whys ” technique, Ishikawa (fishbone) diagrams , and “ Is/Is Not ” analysis can aid in this process, helping to capture relevant details and categorize information.

D3: Interim Containment Actions

While the team works towards identifying and implementing permanent solutions, Discipline 3 focuses on implementing interim containment actions to mitigate the immediate impact of the problem and protect customers from further exposure.

Interim containment actions are temporary measures designed to isolate the problem and prevent it from causing further harm or spreading to other areas, processes, or products. 

These actions may include segregating defective products, implementing additional inspections or checks, or introducing manual oversight until permanent corrective actions are in place.

It is essential to verify the effectiveness of interim containment actions and monitor their implementation to ensure that they are successful in containing the problem and minimizing its impact on operations and customers.

D4: Root Cause Analysis

At the core of the 8D corrective action process lies Discipline 4, which focuses on identifying the root causes of the problem through rigorous analysis and data-driven investigation. 

This step is crucial, as it lays the foundation for developing effective and sustainable corrective actions.

During root cause analysis, the team employs various analytical tools and techniques, such as comparative analysis , fault tree analysis , and root cause verification experiments. 

These methods help to isolate and verify the underlying causes of the problem, separating symptoms from true root causes.

Thorough documentation and verification of root causes are essential in this discipline, ensuring that the team has a solid foundation for developing effective corrective actions.

D5: Permanent Corrective Actions (PCAs)

Building upon the insights gained from root cause analysis , Discipline 5 focuses on selecting and verifying permanent corrective actions (PCAs) that address the identified root causes and mitigate the risk of future occurrences.

During this stage, the team evaluates potential corrective actions based on their effectiveness in addressing the root causes, as well as their feasibility, cost, and potential impact on other processes or systems. 

Risk assessment tools, such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), can aid in this evaluation process.

Once the most appropriate corrective actions have been selected, the team verifies their effectiveness through pilot testing , simulations, or other validation methods. 

This step ensures that the proposed solutions will indeed resolve the problem and prevent its recurrence without introducing unintended consequences.

Detailed planning and documentation of the corrective actions, including acceptance criteria, implementation timelines, and responsibilities, are critical components of Discipline 5.

D6: Implementation and Validation

In Discipline 6, the team focuses on implementing the selected permanent corrective actions and validating their effectiveness in resolving the problem and preventing future occurrences.

This stage involves developing a comprehensive project plan that outlines the steps, timelines, and resources required for successful implementation. 

Effective communication and coordination with all relevant stakeholders, including cross-functional teams and management, are essential to ensure a smooth transition and minimize disruptions.

During implementation, the team closely monitors the progress and performance of the corrective actions, gathering data and feedback to validate their effectiveness. 

This validation process may involve conducting simulations, inspections, or collecting performance metrics to assess the impact of the implemented solutions.

If the validation process reveals any shortcomings or unintended consequences, the team may need to revisit the corrective actions, make adjustments, or conduct further root cause analysis to address any remaining issues.

D7: Preventive Actions

Discipline 7 of the 8D process focuses on taking preventive measures to ensure that the lessons learned and improvements made during the problem-solving journey are embedded into the organization’s processes, systems, and culture.

In this stage, the team reviews similar products, processes, or areas that could be affected by the same or similar root causes, identifying opportunities to apply preventive actions more broadly. 

This proactive approach helps to mitigate the risk of future occurrences and promotes a culture of continuous improvement .

Effective implementation of preventive actions requires cross-functional collaboration, clear communication, and ongoing monitoring to ensure their sustained effectiveness.

D8: Closure and Celebration

The final discipline of the 8D process, D8, serves as a critical step in recognizing the team’s efforts, sharing lessons learned, and celebrating the successful resolution of the problem.

During this stage, the team conducts a final review of the problem-solving journey, documenting key lessons and insights that can be applied to future projects. 

This documentation not only preserves institutional knowledge but also facilitates continuous improvement by enabling the organization to build upon past experiences.

Equally important is the recognition and celebration of the team’s achievements. By acknowledging the collective efforts, dedication, and collaboration of team members, organizations can foster a positive and supportive culture that values problem-solving and continuous improvement.

Formal recognition events, such as team presentations or awards ceremonies, can be organized to showcase the team’s accomplishments and highlight the impact of their work on the organization’s quality, customer satisfaction, and overall performance.

By completing the eight disciplines of the 8D process, organizations can effectively navigate complex problems, identify root causes, implement sustainable solutions, and establish a foundation for continuous improvement and organizational learning.

Integrating 8D Corrective Action with Quality Management Systems

While the 8D problem-solving methodology offers a robust framework for addressing quality issues and driving continuous improvement, its effectiveness can be further amplified by integrating it with an organization’s quality management systems . 

Leveraging enterprise-level software solutions can streamline the 8D process, enhance collaboration, and foster a culture of continuous improvement.

The Role of EQMS in 8D Corrective Action

Enterprise Quality Management Software (EQMS) plays a pivotal role in supporting the successful implementation of the 8D corrective action methodology. 

By utilizing an EQMS, teams can benefit from features such as:

• Standardized 8D Workflows: Pre-configured 8D workflows and templates ensure consistency and adherence to best practices, guiding teams through each discipline with clearly defined tasks, responsibilities, and timelines.
• Collaboration and Communication: EQMS platforms facilitate cross-functional collaboration by providing secure document sharing, real-time updates, and centralized communication channels, ensuring that all stakeholders remain informed and engaged throughout the 8D process.
• Data Management and Reporting: Comprehensive data management capabilities within an EQMS enable teams to easily capture, analyze, and report on quality data, facilitating data-driven decision-making and root cause analysis during the 8D process.
• Integration with Quality Systems: EQMS solutions often integrate with other quality management systems, such as corrective and preventive action (CAPA) systems, enabling seamless information sharing and ensuring that the insights gained from the 8D process are incorporated into broader quality improvement initiatives.

Automating 8D Corrective Action Workflows

One of the key advantages of leveraging an EQMS is the ability to automate 8D workflows, streamlining the process and reducing the administrative burden on teams. 

Automated workflows also facilitate consistent documentation and record-keeping, which is essential for maintaining compliance with industry regulations and standards, as well as enabling knowledge sharing and organizational learning.

Data-Driven Decision-making

The 8D corrective action methodology heavily relies on data-driven decision-making, particularly during the root cause analysis and corrective action selection phases. 

An EQMS provides teams with powerful data analysis and reporting capabilities, enabling them to quickly identify trends, patterns, and correlations that can inform their decision-making process.

Continuous Improvement Culture

Ultimately, the integration of the 8D methodology with an EQMS fosters a culture of continuous improvement within an organization. 

The insights gained from the 8D process, coupled with the robust reporting and analytics capabilities of an EQMS, provide organizations with a wealth of data and knowledge that can be leveraged to drive ongoing process optimization and quality enhancement initiatives.

Case Studies and Examples of 8D Corrective Action

To illustrate the practical application and impact of the 8D problem-solving methodology, let us explore a few real-world case studies and examples from various industries. 

These examples will showcase how organizations have successfully leveraged the 8D approach to address quality issues, resolve complex problems, and drive continuous improvement.

Manufacturing Quality Issues

In the manufacturing sector, where quality and reliability are paramount, the 8D methodology has proven invaluable in addressing a wide range of issues. 

One notable example is a leading automotive parts manufacturer that faced recurring quality issues with a critical component, resulting in costly rework and customer dissatisfaction.

By implementing the 8D process, a cross-functional team was assembled to investigate the problem. Through root cause analysis , they identified a flaw in the supplier’s raw material handling processes, leading to inconsistencies in the component’s material properties.

The team implemented interim containment actions to segregate and inspect incoming materials, while also working with the supplier to implement permanent corrective actions, such as upgrading their material handling equipment and revising their quality control procedures.

Service Industry Applications of 8D Corrective Action

While the 8D corrective action approach is often associated with manufacturing, it has also proven valuable in the service industry, where quality and process excellence are equally critical. 

A prominent financial institution faced challenges with excessive customer complaints related to billing errors and account discrepancies.

By implementing the 8D methodology, a cross-functional team analyzed the problem, identifying root causes such as outdated software systems, inadequate training for customer service representatives, and inefficient data entry processes.

The team implemented interim containment actions, including manual account audits and increased customer communication, while also developing permanent corrective actions, such as upgrading their billing software, revising training programs, and streamlining data entry procedures.

Healthcare and Life Sciences

In the healthcare and life sciences industries, where patient safety and regulatory compliance are paramount, the 8D methodology has proven invaluable in addressing quality issues and mitigating risks.

A prominent pharmaceutical company faced a recurring issue with contamination in one of its drug products, posing potential health risks and regulatory concerns.

By implementing the 8D corrective action process, a cross-functional team investigated the issue, identifying root causes related to inadequate environmental controls in the manufacturing facility and inconsistencies in the cleaning and sterilization procedures.

Interim containment actions included quarantining and recalling affected product batches, while permanent corrective actions focused on upgrading the facility’s HVAC systems, revising cleaning and sterilization protocols, and implementing enhanced environmental monitoring.

Automotive Industry (origin of 8D Corrective Action)

It is fitting to revisit the automotive industry, where the 8D methodology originated. In a recent case study, a major automaker faced recurring issues with engine failures in one of their popular vehicle models, leading to costly warranty claims and customer dissatisfaction.

By implementing the 8D process, a cross-functional team investigated the issue, identifying root causes related to a design flaw in the engine’s cooling system and inadequate testing procedures during the product development phase.

Interim containment actions included issuing technical service bulletins and providing temporary cooling system modifications for affected vehicles.

Permanent corrective actions focused on redesigning the engine’s cooling system, implementing more rigorous testing protocols, and enhancing communication between the engineering and manufacturing teams.

Through the 8D process and integration with their quality management practices, the automaker successfully resolved the engine failure issue, regained customer trust, and enhanced their overall product quality and reliability.

The 8D corrective action problem-solving method has proven extremely useful for handling thorny quality issues, continuously upgrading workflows, and cultivating an excellence culture in businesses.

By pairing its structured team approach with analytical tools and fact-based choices, the 8D process empowers companies to uncover root causes. It also helps implement lasting fixes and prevent repeating mistakes through establishing protective measures.

As the case studies and examples show, it’s been put to great use across many industries from manufacturing to healthcare where it originated in automotive.

Its flexibility and power have made 8D valued for boosting quality, improving customer satisfaction and staying ahead competitively no matter the market.

The Eight Disciplines methodology remains a strong tool for companies serious about excellence, innovation, and customer focus.

By wholeheartedly embracing this robust framework and blending it with modern quality practices, businesses can expertly handle complex problems. They can also unlock fresh opportunities and build the foundation for sustainable success.

In other words, don’t sleep on 8D corrective action problem-solving. Its fact-based, team-centric transformation approach strengthens any organization now and into the future.

SixSigma.us offers both Live Virtual classes as well as Online Self-Paced training. Most option includes access to the same great Master Black Belt instructors that teach our World Class in-person sessions. Sign-up today!

Virtual Classroom Training Programs Self-Paced Online Training Programs

SixSigma.us Accreditation & Affiliations

Monthly Management Tips

• Be the first one to receive the latest updates and information from 6Sigma
• Get curated resources from industry-experts
• Gain an edge with complete guides and other exclusive materials
• Become a part of one of the largest Six Sigma community
• Unlock your path to become a Six Sigma professional

" * " indicates required fields

Download the Unstop app now!

Check out the latest opportunities just for you!

How To Solve Case Study? (A Strategy By IIM L Student That Works Every Time!)

Table of content: 

• Step 1: Identify the problem statement

Step 2: Propose solutions with a pinch of creativity

Step 3: establish the scale and impact of the solution.

“Case study competitions” - Something that is arguably one of the most valuable parts of your MBA life. But this may be daunting for many. Maybe you’re not sure which case competitions to participate in, so you pile too much on your plate. Maybe you’re not sure about the right way to solve a case study. In this article, we’ll break down everything you need to know about acing a case study competition, from scratch! 

A case study competition can be an academic or corporate competition in which participants come together to solve either a real-world case or a framed case that is presented. We present to you Muskan Atar, who will walk you through her tested strategy to solve case study competitions and win them in style!

Framework to solve case studies

After participating in 7-8 case competitions, I realized I had been unconsciously solving it using the same framework. It is very similar to the framework used for product management cases. Hence, it didn't disappoint me. 

Step 1: Identify the problem statement 

Case competitions like Accenture Strategy Case Connect and Colgate Transcend provide an exact problem statement with the expected outcome. But, in most cases, we must dive deep to break down the problem statement and identify the potential causes. 

Like, for Colgate Transcend, the problem statement was (summary) -

Should Colgate diversify into Electric Tooth Brush (ETB) Segment? If yes, then how?

Here, we identified the problems through secondary research (reports from consultancy firms) and primary research (customer surveys). The problem statement identified were:

• Low awareness of ETB 
• Low willingness to pay
• High competition from existing players

After identifying the problems, we need to establish whether solving them is actually worth it or not. We did this by:

• Expected Sales, Market Size, and Expected Growth Rate of identified customer segment
• Increasing willingness to upgrade life (Market Trend)
• High adaptability to technological changes (Market Trend)

Other methods of identifying problem statements are Focus Groups, Customer Interviews, Journey Analyzers, BCG matrix, Value Chain Analysis, PESTEL, SWOT(W part), Porter's Five Forces, Annual Reports, etc.

Given the short time for case competitions, I think the most efficient method is first-hand experience. Rather than starting from scratch, it is better to identify the problems as a customer and collect more data on the same.

Further, this data can be represented in the form of - Customer Personas, Key Insights, Trends, Customer Decision Making Journey, etc. 

If you have identified the right problems, your half work is done!

Before even thinking of solutions, set the KPIs based on the problem statement.

Like, in Accenture Strategy Case Connect, the problem statement was (summary) -

Should a large-scale oil refinery firm diversify into EV charging stations? If yes, suggest an execution strategy 

After establishing that the firm needs to diversify, we set the KPI for the solution as - Increment in business generated due to portfolio diversification.

Then, we did a VRIO analysis to identify the competitive advantage (CA), available resources, and capabilities of the firm. SWOT analysis can also be done to get a bird's eye view. 

Key insights were:

• The firm has an established infrastructure across the nation (CA)
• The firm is cash-positive (resource)
• Lack of EV charger manufacturing capabilities

Based on the above insights, we decided mode of entry as a strategic alliance with EV charger manufacturers to minimize the entry risk and cost of development. 

We represented the solution in the form of a business plan that covered the roles of stakeholders, partners, customer value proposition, and a phase-wise rollout plan for the future.

After setting the KPIs and VRIO analysis, in case you struggle to create solutions, you can do:

• Competitor benchmarking to get a reference
• Research strategies implemented by outside-India players
• Study recent technological trends and their application
• Understand the current focus of the firm through annual reports, recent acquisitions, and news headlines

Other ways of representing the strategies are Ansoff Matrix, Portfolio Strategy, Market Mapping, 4Ps, Marketing Funnel, GTM, Mock-ups, etc.

Above all, you should always suggest solutions that reduce customer efforts. If you try changing consumer behavior by increasing efforts, they will exCHANGE you with your competitors.

Competitions like the HCCB Case Challenge provide an exact budget. For others, you must look at financial reports and funding rounds to estimate the budget. Then, you can utilize the data to calculate ROI using guesstimates as accurately as possible (use published data).

You can also do a cost-benefit, NPV- IRR, break-even point, cash-flow analysis, etc. I prefer showing profitable unit economics to envision scale and impact.

In PM/Marketing cases, you can also show whether customers accept the solution or not. If 90% of customers are facing a problem, doesn't mean that 90% will accept your solution.

Like in Myntra Stylbiz, we had to suggest solutions for the 18-25 customer segment such that Myntra becomes the most engaging and preferred destination. We showed results of UAT (using Figma) that indicated the likelihood of customers using the solution. This data also helped to estimate the increase in sales, purchase frequency, and new customers. 

I have also seen participants running marketing campaigns on social media on a small scale. 

More than thinking big, focus on thinking real. 

For more, check out her post. 

If you'd like to submit your story, click here .

Whatever your concern, we have broken down everything you need to know about case study competitions , from scratch:

• Challenge Yourself With These B-school Competitions
• Case Study Competitions- Details, Winning Strategies, And More!
• Cheat Sheet To Crack Hiring Challenges And Case Competitions
• How To Win Business Case Competitions: The Secret Revealed
• Why MBA case competitions are worth the hype!

In pursuit of being a good product manager, she started participating in Case Competitions during her MBA. It gave her a mention in Forbes D2C Top 100 Competitive Leaders, but more than that it helped her build problem-solving and team-building skills. It also helped her become insensitive to results, and make a rational sense of them. Apart from PMing, she likes to write, watch movies, crack lame jokes and eat really good food.

to our newsletter

Blogs you need to hog!

L'Oréal Sustainability Challenge 2023 Winners Of Planet Track From BITSoM Dig Out Their Winning Mantra

Hero Campus Challenge S8 Winners Take Us Through Their Road To Victory

TISS HRM & LR Summer Placements 2023: 100% Placement, Record Numbers!

TVS Credit E.P.I.C 5.0 Champions Share Learnings From Their Remarkable Journey!

A Robot-assisted real case-handling approach to improving students’ learning performances in vocational training

• Published: 14 May 2024

Cite this article

• Chun-Chun Chang 1 &
• Gwo-Jen Hwang   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5155-276X 2 , 3  

Explore all metrics

In vocational education, cultivating students’ ability to deal with real cases is a crucial training objective. The BSFE (i.e., Brainstorming, Screening, Formation, Examination) model is a commonly adopted training procedure. Each stage is designed for guiding students to analyze and find solutions to handle real cases. However, as one teacher is generally responsible for several dozen students, it becomes challenging for the teacher to adequately address each student’s questions and individual needs. Therefore, this study proposed the robot teaching assistant-supported learning (RTAL) mode following the BSFE model to cope with this problem. This investigation assessed its efficacy through an experiment within an Acute Asthma Attack curriculum. The research involved 103 nursing students in their third year from two distinct classes at a vocational university. Fifty-three students from a class constituted the experimental group that implemented the RTAL approach, whereas the other class, comprising 50 students, was the control group utilizing the standard technology-supported learning (CTL) approach. Findings indicated that the experimental group surpassed the control group in various aspects, including learning outcomes, learning attitudes, problem-solving tedencies, critical thinking awareness, acceptance of technology, and satisfaction with the learning experience. The interview findings also revealed that the RTAL mode could cater to individualized learning needs, facilitate interaction, and serve as an auxiliary instructional tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Developing a gamified artificial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behavior in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students

Barriers and Facilitators of Robot-Assisted Education in Higher Education: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review

“hand-it-on”: an innovative simulation on the relation of non-technical skills to healthcare, data availability.

The data and materials are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Aralihond, A., Shanta, Z., Pullattayil, A., & Powell, C. V. E. (2020). Treating acute severe asthma attacks in children: Using aminophylline. Breathe , 16 (4). https://doi.org/10.1183/20734735.0081-2020 .

Banaeian, H., & Gilanlioglu, I. (2021). Influence of the NAO robot as a teaching assistant on university students’ vocabulary learning and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 37 (3), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6130 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Bell, D. (1996). The formation of concepts and the structure of thoughts. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 56 (3), 583–596.

Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018). Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics , 3 (21), eaat5954. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 .

Chen, H., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2020). Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education , 150 , 103836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103836 .

Chen, B., Hwang, G. H., & Wang, S. H. (2021). Gender differences in cognitive load when applying game-based learning with Intelligent Robots. Educational Technology & Society , 24 (3), 102–115.

Google Scholar  

Chen, X., Cheng, G., Zou, D., Zhong, B., & Xie, H. (2023). Artificial intelligent robots for precision education. Educational Technology & Society , 26 (1), 171–186.

Chookaew, S., & Panjaburee, P. (2022). Implementation of a robotic-transformed five-phase inquiry learning to foster students’ computational thinking and engagement: A mobile learning perspective. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation , 16 (2), 198–220.

Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education , 55 (4), 1618–1627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004 .

Dubovi, I., Levy, S. T., & Dagan, E. (2017). Now I know how! The learning process of medication administration among nursing students with non-immersive desktop virtual reality simulation. Computers & Education , 113 , 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.009 .

Engwall, O., & Lopes, J. (2020). Interaction and collaboration in robot-assisted language learning for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning , 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799821 .

Fildes, E. E., Campell, N. J., & Garcia, R. (2021). International nursing collaboration to establish the Philippine quit line using a conceptual model for partnership and sustainability in global health. Journal of Addictions Nursing , 32 (1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000382 .

Galvão, E. C. F., & Püschel, V. A. A. (2012). Multimedia application in mobile platform for teaching the measurement of central venous pressure. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da Usp, 46 , 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342012000700016 .

Hong, Z. W., Huang, Y. M., Hsu, M., & Shen, W. W. (2016). Authoring robot-assisted instructional materials for improving learning performance and motivation in EFL classrooms. Educational Technology & Society , 19 (1), 337–349.

Hsieh, J. C., & Lee, J. S. (2021). Digital storytelling outcomes, emotions, grit, and perceptions among EFL middle school learners: Robot-assisted versus Power Point-assisted presentations. Computer Assisted Language Learning . https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1969410 .

Hwang, G. J., Yang, T. C., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2009). A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments. Computers & Education , 53 (2), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.016 .

Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S. Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education , 69 , 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.008 .

Jahan, A., Ismail, M. Y., Sapuan, S. M., & Mustapha, F. (2010). Material screening and choosing methods–a review. Materials & Design , 31 (2), 696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.013 .

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. IntechOpen , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086 .

Jones, H., Lawton, A., & Gupta, A. (2022). Asthma attacks in children—challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Pediatrics , 89 (4), 373–377.

Kanero, J., et al. (2018). Social robots for early language learning: Current evidence and future directions. Child Development Perspectives , 12 (3), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12277 .

Kennedy, J., Baxter, P., Senft, E., & Belpaeme, T. (2016, March). Social robot tutoring for child second language learning. 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 231–238). IEEE.

Kim, R. H., & Mellinger, J. D. (2020). Educational strategies to foster bedside teaching. Surgery , 167 (3), 532–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.06.007 .

Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2020). Robot tutor and pupils’ educational ability: Teaching the times tables. Computers & Education , 157 , 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103970 .

Kubilinskiene, S., Zilinskiene, I., Dagiene, V., & Sinkevicius, V. (2017). Applying robotics in school education: A systematic review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing , 5 (1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2017.5.1.04 .

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization , 8 (3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2014.067029 .

Article   MathSciNet   Google Scholar  

Lei, X., & Rau, P. L. P. (2021). Effect of Robot Tutor’s feedback Valence and Attributional Style on Learners. International Journal of Social Robotics , 1–19.

Li, D., & Chen, X. (2020). Study on the Application and Challenges of Educational Robots in Future Education Paper presented at the 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE). Lin, C. Y., & Wang, T. H. (2017). Implementation of personalized e-assessment for remedial teaching in an e-learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (4), 1045–1058. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00657a .

Liao, Y. J., Jao, Y. L., Boltz, M., Adekeye, O. T., Berish, D., Yuan, F., & Zhao, X. (2023). Use of a Humanoid Robot in supporting Dementia Care: A qualitative analysis. SAGE Open Nursing , 9 , 23779608231179528.

Lin, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Hsu, Y. D. (2019). Effects of ASQ-based flipped learning on nurse practitioner learners’ nursing skills, learning achievement and learning perceptions. Computers & Education , 139 , 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.014 .

Mater, E. A. M., Ahmed, E. I., ElSayed, A. A., Shaikh, M. A. E., & Farag, M. K. (2014). The impact of the objective structured clinical examination approach for clinical evaluation skills on the student’s performance in nursing college. World Journal of Medical Sciences , 11 (4), 609–613. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjms.2014.11.4.91139 .

Mazzoni, E., & Benvenuti, M. (2015). A robot-partner for preschool children learning English using socio-cognitive conflict. Educational Technology & Society , 18 (4), 474–485.

Obafemi, K. E. (2024). Enhancing pupils’ academic performance in mathematics using brainstorming instructional strategy. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education , 4 (2), 99–106.

Papadopoulos, I., Lazzarino, R., Miah, S., & Weaver, T. (2020). A systematic review of the literature regarding socially assistive robots in pre-tertiary education. Computers & Education , 155 , 103924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103924 .

Park, H. W., Grover, I., Spaulding, S., Gomez, L., & Breazeal, C. (2019, July). A model-free affective reinforcement learning approach to personalization of an autonomous social robot companion for early literacy education. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33 (l), 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301687 .

Pfadenhauer, M., & Dukat, C. (2015). Robot caregiver or robot-supported caregiving? The performative deployment of the social robot PARO in dementia care. International Journal of Social Robotics , 7 , 393–406.

Pueyo-Garrigues, M., Whitehead, D., Pardavila-Belio, M. I., Canga-Armayor, A., Pueyo-Garrigues, S., & Canga-Armayor, N. (2019). Health education: A rogerian concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies , 94 , 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.03.005 .

Randall, N. (2019). A Survey of Robot-assisted Language Learning (RALL). ACM transactions on Human-Robot Interaction , ( 9 ) 1.7:1–736. https://doi.org/10.1145/3345506 .

Rezasoltani, A., Saffari, E., Konjani, S., Ramezanian, H., & Zam, M. (2022). Exploring the viability of robot-supported flipped classes in English for medical purposes reading com-prehension. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2208 07442 . https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.07442 .

Richert, A., Schiffmann, M., & Yuan, C. (2020). A nursing robot for social interactions and health assessment. In Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, July 24–28, 2019, Washington DC, USA 10 (pp. 83–91). Springer International Publishing.

Rowe, B. H., Sevcik, W., & Villa-Roe, C. (2011). Management of severe acute asthma in the emergency department. Current Opinion in Critical Care , 17 (4), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0b013e328348bf09 .

Shimada, M., Kanda, T., & Koizumi, S. (2012). How can a social robot facilitate children’s collaboration? In Social Robotics: 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China, October 29–31, 2012. Proceedings 4 (pp. 98–107). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3642-34103-810 .

Su, C. H., He, Y. H., & Peng, Y. H. (2012). Respiratory care for a patient undergoing extracorporeal life support for Status Asthmaticus. Journal of Respiratory Therapy , 11 (1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.6269/JRT.2012.11.1.05 .

Trollvik, A., Nordbach, R., Silen, C., & Ringsberg, K. C. (2011). Children’s experiences of living with asthma: Fear of exacerbations and being ostracized. Journal of Pediatric Nursing , 26 (4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2010.05.003 .

Varney, M. W., Janoudi, A., Aslam, D. M., & Graham, D. (2012). Building young engineers: TASEM for third graders in woodcreek magnet elementary school. IEEE Transactions on Education , 55 (1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2011.2131143 .

Yang, K. H., & Lu, B. C. (2021). Towards the successful game-based learning: Detection and feedback to misconceptions is the key. Computers & Education , 160 , 104033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104033 .

Yueka, L. (2019). Current situation, d ynamic and problems of AI + t eacher education . Journal of Modern Education Technology , 29 (11), 114–120. Zhong, S.

Download references

This study is supported in part by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan under contract numbers NSTC 112-2410-H-011-012-MY3 and MOST 111-2410-H-011 -007 -MY3. The study is also supported by the “Empower Vocational Education Research Center” of National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (NTUST) from the Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan City, Taiwan

Chun-Chun Chang

Graduate Institute of Educational Information and Measurement, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung City, Taiwan

Gwo-Jen Hwang

Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City, Taiwan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study. Material preparation, data collection, analysis, project management and methodology were performed by Chun-Chun Chang. Methodology and supervision were performed Gwo-Jen Hwang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwo-Jen Hwang .

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval.

The study has been evaluated and approved by the research ethics committee of Chang Gung with the IRB number 202300304B0C101.

Consent to participate

The participants all agreed to take part in this study.

Consent for publication

The publication of this study has been approved by all authors.

Conflicts of interest

There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Chang, CC., Hwang, GJ. A Robot-assisted real case-handling approach to improving students’ learning performances in vocational training. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12778-w

Download citation

Received : 13 March 2024

Accepted : 07 May 2024

Published : 14 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12778-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Vocational education
• Nursing education
• Professional training
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Learning and Teaching

• Case Studies
• Groupwork Case Studies

Case Study: Authentic Assessment – Dr Gosia Goclowska

Interested in the idea of introducing more ‘real-world’ challenges into your teaching, but not sure how to go about it? Wondering how best to structure your unit to support collaborative groupwork? Read on about the approach used by Dr Gosia Goclowka in her final year elective unit for Psychology students.

Themes: flipped learning, mentimeter, groupwork, authentic assessment

Here’s a video of Dr Goclowska outlining her unit at Edufest in February 2024:

The two signal features of authentic assessment are firstly, a real-world problem and secondly, stakeholders who want to solve the problem. Primary considerations in setting authentic assessment are whether and how to put students into groups, how much time to allocate to the whole exercise and how much scaffolding or structure to provide. This case study is organised under those headings. For further information on the theory and practice of authentic assessment, refer to our guide here .  

1. Real-world problem

Authentic assessments require students to work on a real-life problem, and in this one-semester final year elective unit students are asked to take on the mantle of a researcher working at a university. They must come together in groups of ideally 6 or 7 to identify a real-world problem that might benefit from further research with a budget of £2000. Their task is to complete a funding bid using a proforma based on a real grant application. The precise nature of the problem they choose is up to the students. Examples of topics chosen in the past include:

• Can doodling increase pupils’ creativity?
• Can art therapy tackle school children’s anxiety?
• How can we help students with ADHD thrive creatively?
• Why does mindfulness improve creative performance?
• Can ChatGPT increase the creativity of students’ writing?

2. Stakeholders interested in solving the problem

The second element of authentic assessment is that work is prepared for an audience, real or imagined, who have an interest in the problem discussed. The notional audience for the students is the research bid assessors and although students will have no contact with bid assessors, real or role-played, they are guided in their task by tutors who act as mentors. Their role is that of a senior colleague with experience of the research bidding process. By occupying this role tutors are able to infuse authenticity into their interactions with the students, giving sometimes surprising ‘behind the scenes’ advice to the students, such as that, when writing a bid application, accentuating the positive is sometimes a better approach than strict accuracy! Although the tutors will ultimately act as summative assessors, that is not the role they are playing during tutorials, and so students are invited to meet the requirements of a grant awarding panel rather than seek to satisfy the preferences and biases of their tutor.

3. Groupwork

A common element of authentic assessment is the need for collaboration, and groupwork is an integral part of Dr Goclowska’s unit. Let’s look at how she structures this component:

  Group formation:

• At the beginning of the semester, students form groups. Self-selected groups have worked well with cohorts where students were already known to each other, but in other years when there have been more joint-honours students, pre-setting the groups to ensure an even spread of expertise has been more successful.
• During the first teaching session, students are given guidance on how to build a strong team . Firstly, they are asked to discover the expertise in their group. Some may have been on placement the previous year for example, and be able to draw on their time in industry.
• They are directed to draw up at least three ground rules, such as attending meetings.
• Finally, they are directed to set up a group communication channel, such as WhatsApp, to facilitate ongoing collaboration.

Fostering interdependence through ‘jigsaw learning’:

• Although groups do not need to pitch their initial ideas until week 5, the framework for collaborative working is scaffolded from the start by assigning students different readings to create interdependence on one another. This is a technique known as ‘jigsaw learning’, meaning different team members have different parts of the puzzle and so must come together to gain a full picture.

Addressing conflict:

• The conflict that has arisen has been minimal: Dr Goclowska estimates it has occurred in only around 5% of cases. One factor may be that this unit is elective, so only students comfortable with collaboration are likely to choose it. Another factors may be that only 20% of a student’s grade arises directly from groupwork (a group presentation on their research bid), while 80% is drawn from an individual write-up of that bid, meaning students are not as concerned as they might otherwise be about freeloading.
• Most complaints have been low level and anonymous and have been dealt with simply with reminders to the group to be mindful of the ground rules drawn up at the start.

(For further guidance on how to set up effective groupwork see CLT’s case study of two units in Economics and our guidance on effective groupwork . You may also wish to consider supporting technologies, such as Moodle marking , Feedback Fruits and Crowdmark – the latter two of which will need to be funded by your department, faculty or school.)

The unit takes place over a whole semester, with the task set and groups formed right at the start so that they have plenty of time to grapple with group dynamics, assimilate new knowledge, use it to crystallise ideas and then work out how to communicate these through their presentations and research bids. Students valued this, commenting:

‘being in our presentation groups from the begining [sic] was super helpful in bulding [sic] relationship[s] with them before we had to start properly working on our research proposal ideas and presentation’, ‘the consistent group work within this module really helped uni to feel less lonely.’

5. Scaffolding

Authentic assessment often allows a large degree of autonomy, and this is the case here in that groups are free to choose their own topic for the research bid, albeit in their first tutorial, for which they are required to pitch two different ideas, they may be encouraged more in one direction than another. This freedom reflects the positioning of this unit as a final year elective unit, where students have already built a good amount of expertise as well as the skills for independent study. Students appreciated this freedom, with one student commenting

‘I liked how there was lots of scope for us to explore our own interests in a research proposal :)’.

This is not to say the unit is without structure, however. As can be seen from the graphic below, careful thought has been given to sequencing, with topical sessions that cover domain knowledge clustered near the start of the unit. These are delivered through a model of flipped learning, whereby students watch or read material before attending the in-person sessions to discuss what they have learnt. Mentimeter is used to check understanding and to generate discussion. Although some admitted to struggling to motivate themselves to study beforehand, many enjoyed the approach, with one commenting

‘I love the teaching set-up where we watch [and] learn the content independently and then come together in class to discuss it -this feels like a much more productive use of lecture time.’

Topical sessions are followed by formative feedback sessions building to the summative assessment points. The topical sessions feed into idea formation, while the formative sessions help to hone these ideas and the communication of them. The final summative assessment is a development of the first, so the feedback from the recorded presentations provides an opportunity for students to build on their initial work. This structure is appreciated by students, with one commenting:

‘I really like how the second assessment is directly linked to the first. It […] allows you to directly apply the first set of feedback and see your progress. Because of this, it feels like the module is set-up to really support students’ development.’

Some units in Psychology operate a system for groupwork whereby some marks are allocated by the other students in the group. This is a process known as ‘peer review’ and,  following student feedback, may become a feature of this unit as well. Currently, however, any peer review takes place in a purely informal way, as students work together to create their research pitches. More formal reviews of progress come in the form of tutorials where tutors take on the role of mentors who have more knowledge of the process of bidding for funding than the students do. The first tutorial is a fairly informal opportunity for feedback and a narrowing down from two topics to one. The second tutorial gives more in-depth feedback on a particular idea, and again, is formative, while the third tutorial gives an opportunity for feedback on a summative piece of work (the recorded presentation regarding the final research idea). It’s value is maximised by being used to give formative feedback, as pointers are given for how to translate that verbal presentation into an individual written submission.

The skills the students learn from this unit are many: problem solving, collaboration, budgeting to name but a few. They are also taught self-reliance: given the creativity and specificity required in developing a bid for applied research these are not tasks that can simply be delegated to GenAI. This approach to designing a unit can also ultimately produce more employable, happier students.

Related Articles

• Case Study: Groupwork – Collaboration and Engagement
• Case Study: Groupwork – A collection of cases

Article Contents