- Privacy Policy
Home » Research Recommendations – Examples and Writing Guide
Research Recommendations – Examples and Writing Guide
Table of Contents
Research recommendations are a critical component of academic and professional studies. They provide actionable insights and propose future directions based on the findings of a research project. Writing effective recommendations requires careful analysis, clarity, and relevance to the research objectives and outcomes. This guide explains the importance of research recommendations, offers practical examples, and provides a structured approach to writing them effectively.
Research Recommendations
Research recommendations are proposals or suggestions that stem from the findings of a study. They outline steps for addressing identified gaps, improving processes, or exploring new areas of inquiry. These recommendations are often directed toward specific stakeholders, such as researchers, policymakers, or practitioners, to encourage actionable outcomes.
Importance of Research Recommendations
Including recommendations in a research report or thesis is essential for:
- Bridging the gap between research findings and practical applications.
- Guiding future studies to build on the current research.
- Providing stakeholders with insights for decision-making and policy formulation.
- Highlighting the broader relevance and impact of the study.
Clear and well-formulated recommendations ensure that the research contributes meaningfully to the field and addresses real-world challenges.
Types of Research Recommendations
1. practical recommendations.
These suggestions focus on real-world applications of the research findings.
- Example: “Healthcare providers should implement training programs to improve staff awareness of mental health issues among adolescents.”
- Purpose: Practical recommendations offer actionable steps for professionals or organizations to address issues identified in the research.
2. Policy Recommendations
These recommendations are aimed at policymakers and emphasize the need for regulatory or legislative action.
- Example: “Governments should enforce stricter regulations on carbon emissions to mitigate the effects of climate change.”
- Purpose: Policy recommendations advocate for systemic changes to address societal or environmental challenges.
3. Research-Based Recommendations
These propose areas for further investigation to address gaps or limitations in the current study.
- Example: “Future research should explore the long-term effects of virtual learning on student engagement and academic performance.”
- Purpose: Research-based recommendations encourage the continuation of scientific inquiry.
4. Methodological Recommendations
These focus on improving research methods or processes for future studies.
- Example: “Researchers should consider using longitudinal designs to better understand the relationship between workplace stress and productivity.”
- Purpose: Methodological recommendations aim to refine approaches for more robust and reliable outcomes.
Examples of Research Recommendations
Example 1: education research.
Findings: Online learning platforms were effective in delivering education but lacked engagement for younger students. Recommendation: “Developers of online learning platforms should integrate gamification techniques, such as interactive quizzes and reward systems, to enhance engagement among primary school students.”
Example 2: Environmental Research
Findings: Urban green spaces improve air quality but are limited in high-density areas. Recommendation: “Urban planners should prioritize the incorporation of vertical gardens and rooftop greenery in city development plans to maximize environmental benefits in high-density urban areas.”
Example 3: Healthcare Research
Findings: Patients with chronic conditions benefit from personalized care plans, but many healthcare providers lack access to necessary tools. Recommendation: “Healthcare institutions should invest in electronic health record (EHR) systems with capabilities for personalized care planning to improve patient outcomes.”
Example 4: Business Research
Findings: Remote work increased productivity but negatively impacted team cohesion. Recommendation: “Organizations should adopt hybrid work models that combine remote work with regular in-person team-building activities to balance productivity and collaboration.”
Steps to Write Research Recommendations
1. review research findings.
Analyze the key findings and conclusions of your study to identify actionable insights. Ensure that your recommendations align with the research objectives and address the primary issues raised.
2. Identify the Audience
Determine who will benefit from or act upon your recommendations. Tailor your suggestions to the needs and interests of your audience, such as policymakers, practitioners, or fellow researchers.
3. Prioritize Relevance and Feasibility
Focus on recommendations that are directly relevant to your study and feasible for the intended audience to implement. Avoid overly broad or unrealistic suggestions.
4. Use Clear and Specific Language
Write recommendations in a concise and actionable manner. Specify what should be done, by whom, and how it can be achieved.
- Weak Recommendation: “Something should be done to address air pollution.”
- Strong Recommendation: “Local governments should implement low-emission zones in urban areas to reduce air pollution caused by vehicle traffic.”
5. Justify Your Recommendations
Provide a rationale for each recommendation by linking it to your research findings. Explain why the recommendation is important and how it can address the problem or gap identified in your study.
6. Categorize Recommendations
If you have multiple recommendations, organize them into categories, such as practical, policy, and research-based, to improve clarity and readability.
7. Conclude with a Call to Action
Encourage the audience to act on your recommendations by emphasizing their significance and potential impact.
Writing Guide for Research Recommendations
- Example: “Our study found that students in underfunded schools are less likely to have access to quality STEM education resources, leading to disparities in academic achievement.”
- Example: “Governments should allocate additional funding to schools in low-income areas to improve access to STEM education resources.”
- Example: “This intervention can address educational disparities and increase opportunities for students to pursue STEM careers.”
- Example: “This funding could be used to train teachers, purchase laboratory equipment, and develop extracurricular STEM programs.”
- Example: “By investing in STEM education, policymakers can foster innovation and economic growth while reducing educational inequities.”
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Vague Recommendations: Avoid general statements that lack actionable details.
- Unrealistic Suggestions: Ensure your recommendations are practical and achievable within the constraints of your audience.
- Ignoring Stakeholder Needs: Tailor your recommendations to the specific goals and capacities of the target audience.
- Failing to Justify Recommendations: Always connect your suggestions to the research findings to enhance credibility.
Research recommendations bridge the gap between findings and real-world impact, offering actionable solutions for addressing challenges or advancing knowledge. By crafting clear, relevant, and well-justified recommendations, researchers can ensure their work contributes meaningfully to their field and benefits stakeholders. Whether addressing practical, policy, or research-based needs, effective recommendations demonstrate the value of the research and its potential to drive positive change.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches . Sage Publications.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods . Oxford University Press.
- Silverman, D. (2020). Interpreting Qualitative Data . Sage Publications.
- Robson, C., & McCartan, K. (2016). Real World Research . Wiley.
- Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2016). The Craft of Research . University of Chicago Press.
About the author
Muhammad Hassan
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
You may also like
Research Methods – Types, Examples and Guide
APA Table of Contents – Format and Example
Tables in Research Paper – Types, Creating Guide...
Research Methodology – Types, Examples and...
Theoretical Framework – Types, Examples and...
Research Results Section – Writing Guide and...
Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making
Research recommendations play a crucial role in guiding scholars and researchers toward fruitful avenues of exploration. In an era marked by rapid technological advancements and an ever-expanding knowledge base, refining the process of generating research recommendations becomes imperative.
But, what is a research recommendation?
Research recommendations are suggestions or advice provided to researchers to guide their study on a specific topic . They are typically given by experts in the field. Research recommendations are more action-oriented and provide specific guidance for decision-makers, unlike implications that are broader and focus on the broader significance and consequences of the research findings. However, both are crucial components of a research study.
Difference Between Research Recommendations and Implication
Although research recommendations and implications are distinct components of a research study, they are closely related. The differences between them are as follows:
Types of Research Recommendations
Recommendations in research can take various forms, which are as follows:
These recommendations aim to assist researchers in navigating the vast landscape of academic knowledge.
Let us dive deeper to know about its key components and the steps to write an impactful research recommendation.
Key Components of Research Recommendations
The key components of research recommendations include defining the research question or objective, specifying research methods, outlining data collection and analysis processes, presenting results and conclusions, addressing limitations, and suggesting areas for future research. Here are some characteristics of research recommendations:
Research recommendations offer various advantages and play a crucial role in ensuring that research findings contribute to positive outcomes in various fields. However, they also have few limitations which highlights the significance of a well-crafted research recommendation in offering the promised advantages.
The importance of research recommendations ranges in various fields, influencing policy-making, program development, product development, marketing strategies, medical practice, and scientific research. Their purpose is to transfer knowledge from researchers to practitioners, policymakers, or stakeholders, facilitating informed decision-making and improving outcomes in different domains.
How to Write Research Recommendations?
Research recommendations can be generated through various means, including algorithmic approaches, expert opinions, or collaborative filtering techniques. Here is a step-wise guide to build your understanding on the development of research recommendations.
1. Understand the Research Question:
Understand the research question and objectives before writing recommendations. Also, ensure that your recommendations are relevant and directly address the goals of the study.
2. Review Existing Literature:
Familiarize yourself with relevant existing literature to help you identify gaps , and offer informed recommendations that contribute to the existing body of research.
3. Consider Research Methods:
Evaluate the appropriateness of different research methods in addressing the research question. Also, consider the nature of the data, the study design, and the specific objectives.
4. Identify Data Collection Techniques:
Gather dataset from diverse authentic sources. Include information such as keywords, abstracts, authors, publication dates, and citation metrics to provide a rich foundation for analysis.
5. Propose Data Analysis Methods:
Suggest appropriate data analysis methods based on the type of data collected. Consider whether statistical analysis, qualitative analysis, or a mixed-methods approach is most suitable.
6. Consider Limitations and Ethical Considerations:
Acknowledge any limitations and potential ethical considerations of the study. Furthermore, address these limitations or mitigate ethical concerns to ensure responsible research.
7. Justify Recommendations:
Explain how your recommendation contributes to addressing the research question or objective. Provide a strong rationale to help researchers understand the importance of following your suggestions.
8. Summarize Recommendations:
Provide a concise summary at the end of the report to emphasize how following these recommendations will contribute to the overall success of the research project.
By following these steps, you can create research recommendations that are actionable and contribute meaningfully to the success of the research project.
Download now to unlock some tips to improve your journey of writing research recommendations.
Example of a Research Recommendation
Here is an example of a research recommendation based on a hypothetical research to improve your understanding.
Research Recommendation: Enhancing Student Learning through Integrated Learning Platforms
Background:
The research study investigated the impact of an integrated learning platform on student learning outcomes in high school mathematics classes. The findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in student performance and engagement when compared to traditional teaching methods.
Recommendation:
In light of the research findings, it is recommended that educational institutions consider adopting and integrating the identified learning platform into their mathematics curriculum. The following specific recommendations are provided:
- Implementation of the Integrated Learning Platform:
Schools are encouraged to adopt the integrated learning platform in mathematics classrooms, ensuring proper training for teachers on its effective utilization.
- Professional Development for Educators:
Develop and implement professional programs to train educators in the effective use of the integrated learning platform to address any challenges teachers may face during the transition.
- Monitoring and Evaluation:
Establish a monitoring and evaluation system to track the impact of the integrated learning platform on student performance over time.
- Resource Allocation:
Allocate sufficient resources, both financial and technical, to support the widespread implementation of the integrated learning platform.
By implementing these recommendations, educational institutions can harness the potential of the integrated learning platform and enhance student learning experiences and academic achievements in mathematics.
This example covers the components of a research recommendation, providing specific actions based on the research findings, identifying the target audience, and outlining practical steps for implementation.
Using AI in Research Recommendation Writing
Enhancing research recommendations is an ongoing endeavor that requires the integration of cutting-edge technologies, collaborative efforts, and ethical considerations. By embracing data-driven approaches and leveraging advanced technologies, the research community can create more effective and personalized recommendation systems. However, it is accompanied by several limitations. Therefore, it is essential to approach the use of AI in research with a critical mindset, and complement its capabilities with human expertise and judgment.
Here are some limitations of integrating AI in writing research recommendation and some ways on how to counter them.
1. Data Bias
AI systems rely heavily on data for training. If the training data is biased or incomplete, the AI model may produce biased results or recommendations.
How to tackle: Audit regularly the model’s performance to identify any discrepancies and adjust the training data and algorithms accordingly.
2. Lack of Understanding of Context:
AI models may struggle to understand the nuanced context of a particular research problem. They may misinterpret information, leading to inaccurate recommendations.
How to tackle: Use AI to characterize research articles and topics. Employ them to extract features like keywords, authorship patterns and content-based details.
3. Ethical Considerations:
AI models might stereotype certain concepts or generate recommendations that could have negative consequences for certain individuals or groups.
How to tackle: Incorporate user feedback mechanisms to reduce redundancies. Establish an ethics review process for AI models in research recommendation writing.
4. Lack of Creativity and Intuition:
AI may struggle with tasks that require a deep understanding of the underlying principles or the ability to think outside the box.
How to tackle: Hybrid approaches can be employed by integrating AI in data analysis and identifying patterns for accelerating the data interpretation process.
5. Interpretability:
Many AI models, especially complex deep learning models, lack transparency on how the model arrived at a particular recommendation.
How to tackle: Implement models like decision trees or linear models. Provide clear explanation of the model architecture, training process, and decision-making criteria.
6. Dynamic Nature of Research:
Research fields are dynamic, and new information is constantly emerging. AI models may struggle to keep up with the rapidly changing landscape and may not be able to adapt to new developments.
How to tackle: Establish a feedback loop for continuous improvement. Regularly update the recommendation system based on user feedback and emerging research trends.
The integration of AI in research recommendation writing holds great promise for advancing knowledge and streamlining the research process. However, navigating these concerns is pivotal in ensuring the responsible deployment of these technologies. Researchers need to understand the use of responsible use of AI in research and must be aware of the ethical considerations.
Exploring research recommendations plays a critical role in shaping the trajectory of scientific inquiry. It serves as a compass, guiding researchers toward more robust methodologies, collaborative endeavors, and innovative approaches. Embracing these suggestions not only enhances the quality of individual studies but also contributes to the collective advancement of human understanding.
Frequently Asked Questions
The purpose of recommendations in research is to provide practical and actionable suggestions based on the study's findings, guiding future actions, policies, or interventions in a specific field or context. Recommendations bridges the gap between research outcomes and their real-world application.
To make a research recommendation, analyze your findings, identify key insights, and propose specific, evidence-based actions. Include the relevance of the recommendations to the study's objectives and provide practical steps for implementation.
Begin a recommendation by succinctly summarizing the key findings of the research. Clearly state the purpose of the recommendation and its intended impact. Use a direct and actionable language to convey the suggested course of action.
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles
- Promoting Research
Graphical Abstracts Vs. Infographics: Best practices for using visual illustrations for increased research impact
Dr. Sarah Chen stared at her computer screen, her eyes staring at her recently published…
- Publishing Research
10 Tips to Prevent Research Papers From Being Retracted
Research paper retractions represent a critical event in the scientific community. When a published article…
- Industry News
Google Releases 2024 Scholar Metrics, Evaluates Impact of Scholarly Articles
Google has released its 2024 Scholar Metrics, assessing scholarly articles from 2019 to 2023. This…
- Career Corner
- Reporting Research
How to Create a Poster That Stands Out: Tips for a smooth poster presentation
It was the conference season. Judy was excited to present her first poster! She had…
- Diversity and Inclusion
6 Reasons Why There is a Decline in Higher Education Enrollment: Action plan to overcome this crisis
Over the past decade, colleges and universities across the globe have witnessed a concerning trend…
Academic Essay Writing Made Simple: 4 types and tips
How to Effectively Cite a PDF (APA, MLA, AMA, and Chicago Style)
How to Optimize Your Research Process: A step-by-step guide
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
- AI in Academia
- Infographics
- Expert Video Library
- Other Resources
- Enago Learn
- Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
- Open Access Week 2024
- Peer Review Week 2024
- Publication Integrity Week 2024
- Conference Videos
- Enago Report
- Journal Finder
- Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
- Editing Services
- Publication Support Services
- Research Impact
- Translation Services
- Publication solutions
- AI-Based Solutions
- Thought Leadership
- Call for Articles
- Call for Speakers
- Author Training
- Edit Profile
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
Which among these would you prefer the most for improving research integrity?
- How it works
"Christmas Offer"
Terms & conditions.
As the Christmas season is upon us, we find ourselves reflecting on the past year and those who we have helped to shape their future. It’s been quite a year for us all! The end of the year brings no greater joy than the opportunity to express to you Christmas greetings and good wishes.
At this special time of year, Research Prospect brings joyful discount of 10% on all its services. May your Christmas and New Year be filled with joy.
We are looking back with appreciation for your loyalty and looking forward to moving into the New Year together.
"Claim this offer"
In unfamiliar and hard times, we have stuck by you. This Christmas, Research Prospect brings you all the joy with exciting discount of 10% on all its services.
Offer valid till 5-1-2024
We love being your partner in success. We know you have been working hard lately, take a break this holiday season to spend time with your loved ones while we make sure you succeed in your academics
Discount code: RP0996Y
How To Write Recommendations In A Research Study
Published by Alvin Nicolas at July 12th, 2024 , Revised On July 12, 2024
The ultimate goal of any research process is not just to gather knowledge, but to use that knowledge to make a positive impact. This is where recommendations come in. A well-written recommendations section in your research study translates your findings into actionable steps and guides future research on the topic.
This blog is your ultimate guide to understanding how to write recommendations in a research study. But before that, let’s see what is recommendation in research.
What Is Recommendation In Research
In a research study, the recommendation section refers to a suggested course of action based on the findings of your research . It acts as a bridge between the knowledge you gained and its practical implications.
Recommendations take your research results and propose concrete steps on how to use them to address a problem or improve a situation. Moreover, you can suggest new avenues and guide future research in building upon your work. This will improve the credibility of your research. For studies that include real-world implications, recommendations are a great way to provide evidence-based suggestions for policymakers or practitioners to consider.
Difference Between Research Recommendations and Implication
Research recommendations and implications often confuse researchers. They cannot easily differentiate between the two. Here is how they are different.
Where To Add Recommendations
Recommendations are mostly part of your conclusion and discussion sections. If you are writing a practical dissertation , you can include a separate section for your recommendations.
Types of Research Recommendations
There are different forms of recommendations in research. Some of them include the following.
How To Construct The Recommendations Section
There are different ways in which different scholars write the recommendations section. A general observation is a research question → conclusion → recommendation.
The following example will help you understand this better.
Research Question
How can the education of mothers impact the social skills of kindergarten children?
The role of mothers is a significant contributor towards the social skills of children. From an early age, kids tend to observe how their mother interacts with others and follow in her footsteps initially. Therefore, mothers should be educated and interact with good demeanour if they want their children to have excellent social skills.
Recommendation
The study revealed that a mother’s education plays an important role in building the social skills of children on kindergarten level. Future research could explore how the same continues in junior school level children.
How To Write Recommendations In Research
Now that you are familiar with the definition and types, here is a step-by-step guide on how to write a recommendation in research.
Step 1: Revisit Your Research Goals
Before doing anything else, you have to remind yourself of the objectives that you set out to achieve in your research. It allows you to match your recommendations directly to your research questions and see if you made any contribution to your goals.
Step 2: Analyse Your Findings
You have to examine your data and identify your key results. This analysis forms the foundation for your recommendations. Look for patterns and unexpected findings that might suggest new areas for other researchers to explore.
Step 3: Consider The Research Methods
Ask these questions from yourself: were the research methods effective? Is there any other way that would have been better to perform this research, or were there any limitations associated with the research methods?
Step 4: Prioritise Recommendations
You might have a lot of recommendations in mind, but all are not equal. You have to consider the impact and feasibility of each suggestion. Prioritise these recommendations, while remaining realistic about implementation.
Step 5: Write Actionable Statements
Do not be vague when crafting statements. Instead, you have to use clear and concise language that outlines specific actions. For example, if you want to say “improve education practices,” you could write “implement a teacher training program” for better clarity.
Step 6: Provide Evidence
You cannot just make suggestions out of thin air, and have to ground them in the evidence you have gathered through your research. Moreover, cite relevant data or findings from your study or previous literature to support your recommendations.
Step 7: Address Challenges
There are always some limitations related to the research at hand. As a researcher, it is your duty to highlight and address any challenges faced or what might occur in the future.
Tips For Writing The Perfect Recommendation In Research
Use these tips to write the perfect recommendation in your research.
- Be Concise – Write recommendations in a clear and concise language. Use one sentence statements to look more professional.
- Be Logical & Coherent – You can use lists and headings according to the requirements of your university.
- Tailor According To Your Readers – You have to aim your recommendations to a specific audience and colleagues in the field of study.
- Provide Specific Suggestions – Offer specific measures and solutions to the issues, and focus on actionable suggestions.
- Match Recommendations To Your Conclusion – You have to align your recommendations with your conclusion.
- Consider Limitations – Use critical thinking to see how limitations may impact the feasibility of your solutions.
- End With A Summary – You have to add a small conclusion to highlight suggestions and their impact.
Example Of Recommendation In Research
Context of the study:
This research studies how effective e-learning platforms are for adult language learners compared to traditional classroom instruction. The findings suggest that e-learning platforms can be just as effective as traditional classrooms in improving language proficiency.
Research Recommendation Sample
Language educators can incorporate e-learning tools into existing curriculums to provide learners with more flexibility. Additionally, they can develop training programs for educators on how to integrate e-learning platforms into their teaching practices.
E-learning platform developers should focus on e-learning platforms that are interactive and cater to different learning styles. They can also invest in features that promote learner autonomy and self-directed learning.
Future researchers can further explore the long-term effects of e-learning on language acquisition to provide insights into whether e-learning can support sustained language development.
Frequently Asked Questions
How to write recommendations in a research paper.
- Revisit your research goals
- Analyse your findings
- Consider the research methods
- Prioritise recommendations
- Write actionable statements
- Provide evidence
- Address challenges
How to present recommendations in research?
- Be concise
- Write logical and coherent
- Match recommendations to conclusion
- Ensure your recommendations are achievable
What to write in recommendation in research?
Your recommendation has to be concrete and specific and support the research with a clear rationale. Moreover, it should be connected directly to your research. Your recommendations, however, should not undermine your own work or use self-criticism.
You May Also Like
Writing a dissertation can be tough if this is the first time you are doing it. You need to look into relevant literature, analyze past researches, conduct surveys, interviews etc.
Table of contents is an essential part of dissertation paper. Here is all you need to know about how to create the best table of contents for dissertation.
This brief introductory section aims to deal with the definitions of two paradigms, positivism and post-positivism, as well as their importance in research.
As Featured On
USEFUL LINKS
LEARNING RESOURCES
COMPANY DETAILS
Splash Sol LLC
- How It Works
Suggestions for Future Research
Your dissertation needs to include suggestions for future research. Depending on requirements of your university, suggestions for future research can be either integrated into Research Limitations section or it can be a separate section.
You will need to propose 4-5 suggestions for future studies and these can include the following:
1. Building upon findings of your research . These may relate to findings of your study that you did not anticipate. Moreover, you may suggest future research to address unanswered aspects of your research problem.
2. Addressing limitations of your research . Your research will not be free from limitations and these may relate to formulation of research aim and objectives, application of data collection method, sample size, scope of discussions and analysis etc. You can propose future research suggestions that address the limitations of your study.
3. Constructing the same research in a new context, location and/or culture . It is most likely that you have addressed your research problem within the settings of specific context, location and/or culture. Accordingly, you can propose future studies that can address the same research problem in a different settings, context, location and/or culture.
4. Re-assessing and expanding theory, framework or model you have addressed in your research . Future studies can address the effects of specific event, emergence of a new theory or evidence and/or other recent phenomenon on your research problem.
My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance offers practical assistance to complete a dissertation with minimum or no stress. The e-book covers all stages of writing a dissertation starting from the selection to the research area to submitting the completed version of the work within the deadline. John Dudovskiy
Have a language expert improve your writing
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.
- Knowledge Base
- Dissertation
- How to Write Recommendations in Research | Examples & Tips
How to Write Recommendations in Research | Examples & Tips
Published on 15 September 2022 by Tegan George .
Recommendations in research are a crucial component of your discussion section and the conclusion of your thesis , dissertation , or research paper .
As you conduct your research and analyse the data you collected , perhaps there are ideas or results that don’t quite fit the scope of your research topic . Or, maybe your results suggest that there are further implications of your results or the causal relationships between previously-studied variables than covered in extant research.
Make your writing flawless in 1 upload
Be assured that you'll submit flawless writing. Upload your document to correct all your mistakes.
Table of contents
What should recommendations look like, building your research recommendation, how should your recommendations be written, recommendation in research example, frequently asked questions about recommendations.
Recommendations for future research should be:
- Concrete and specific
- Supported with a clear rationale
- Directly connected to your research
Overall, strive to highlight ways other researchers can reproduce or replicate your results to draw further conclusions, and suggest different directions that future research can take, if applicable.
Relatedly, when making these recommendations, avoid:
- Undermining your own work, but rather offer suggestions on how future studies can build upon it
- Suggesting recommendations actually needed to complete your argument, but rather ensure that your research stands alone on its own merits
- Using recommendations as a place for self-criticism, but rather as a natural extension point for your work
The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic writing
The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students.
Upload my document
There are many different ways to frame recommendations, but the easiest is perhaps to follow the formula of research question conclusion recommendation. Here’s an example.
Conclusion An important condition for controlling many social skills is mastering language. If children have a better command of language, they can express themselves better and are better able to understand their peers. Opportunities to practice social skills are thus dependent on the development of language skills.
As a rule of thumb, try to limit yourself to only the most relevant future recommendations: ones that stem directly from your work. While you can have multiple recommendations for each research conclusion, it is also acceptable to have one recommendation that is connected to more than one conclusion.
These recommendations should be targeted at your audience, specifically toward peers or colleagues in your field that work on similar topics to yours. They can flow directly from any limitations you found while conducting your work, offering concrete and actionable possibilities for how future research can build on anything that your own work was unable to address at the time of your writing.
See below for a full research recommendation example that you can use as a template to write your own.
The current study can be interpreted as a first step in the research on COPD speech characteristics. However, the results of this study should be treated with caution due to the small sample size and the lack of details regarding the participants’ characteristics.
Future research could further examine the differences in speech characteristics between exacerbated COPD patients, stable COPD patients, and healthy controls. It could also contribute to a deeper understanding of the acoustic measurements suitable for e-health measurements.
Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.
While it may be tempting to present new arguments or evidence in your thesis or disseration conclusion , especially if you have a particularly striking argument you’d like to finish your analysis with, you shouldn’t. Theses and dissertations follow a more formal structure than this.
All your findings and arguments should be presented in the body of the text (more specifically in the discussion section and results section .) The conclusion is meant to summarize and reflect on the evidence and arguments you have already presented, not introduce new ones.
The conclusion of your thesis or dissertation should include the following:
- A restatement of your research question
- A summary of your key arguments and/or results
- A short discussion of the implications of your research
For a stronger dissertation conclusion , avoid including:
- Generic concluding phrases (e.g. “In conclusion…”)
- Weak statements that undermine your argument (e.g. “There are good points on both sides of this issue.”)
Your conclusion should leave the reader with a strong, decisive impression of your work.
In a thesis or dissertation, the discussion is an in-depth exploration of the results, going into detail about the meaning of your findings and citing relevant sources to put them in context.
The conclusion is more shorter and more general: it concisely answers your main research question and makes recommendations based on your overall findings.
Cite this Scribbr article
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.
George, T. (2022, September 15). How to Write Recommendations in Research | Examples & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved 11 November 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/research-recommendations/
Is this article helpful?
Tegan George
Other students also liked, how to write a discussion section | tips & examples, how to write a thesis or dissertation conclusion, how to write a results section | tips & examples.
The Ultimate Guide to Crafting Impactful Recommendations in Research
Are you ready to take your research to the next level? Crafting impactful recommendations is the key to unlocking the full potential of your study. By providing clear, actionable suggestions based on your findings, you can bridge the gap between research and real-world application.
In this ultimate guide, we'll show you how to write recommendations that make a difference in your research report or paper.
You'll learn how to craft specific, actionable recommendations that connect seamlessly with your research findings. Whether you're a student, writer, teacher, or journalist, this guide will help you master the art of writing recommendations in research. Let's get started and make your research count!
Understanding the Purpose of Recommendations
Recommendations in research serve as a vital bridge between your findings and their real-world applications. They provide specific, action-oriented suggestions to guide future studies and decision-making processes. Let's dive into the key purposes of crafting effective recommendations:
Guiding Future Research
Research recommendations play a crucial role in steering scholars and researchers towards promising avenues of exploration. By highlighting gaps in current knowledge and proposing new research questions, recommendations help advance the field and drive innovation.
Influencing Decision-Making
Well-crafted recommendations have the power to shape policies, programs, and strategies across various domains, such as:
- Policy-making
- Product development
- Marketing strategies
- Medical practice
By providing clear, evidence-based suggestions, recommendations facilitate informed decision-making and improve outcomes.
Connecting Research to Practice
Recommendations act as a conduit for transferring knowledge from researchers to practitioners, policymakers, and stakeholders. They bridge the gap between academic findings and their practical applications, ensuring that research insights are effectively translated into real-world solutions.
Enhancing Research Impact
By crafting impactful recommendations, you can amplify the reach and influence of your research, attracting attention from peers, funding agencies, and decision-makers.
Addressing Limitations
Recommendations provide an opportunity to acknowledge and address the limitations of your study. By suggesting concrete and actionable possibilities for future research, you demonstrate a thorough understanding of your work's scope and potential areas for improvement.
Identifying Areas for Future Research
Discovering research gaps is a crucial step in crafting impactful recommendations. It involves reviewing existing studies and identifying unanswered questions or problems that warrant further investigation. Here are some strategies to help you identify areas for future research:
Explore Research Limitations
Take a close look at the limitations section of relevant studies. These limitations often provide valuable insights into potential areas for future research. Consider how addressing these limitations could enhance our understanding of the topic at hand.
Critically Analyze Discussion and Future Research Sections
When reading articles, pay special attention to the discussion and future research sections. These sections often highlight gaps in the current knowledge base and propose avenues for further exploration. Take note of any recurring themes or unanswered questions that emerge across multiple studies.
Utilize Targeted Search Terms
To streamline your search for research gaps, use targeted search terms such as "literature gap" or "future research" in combination with your subject keywords. This approach can help you quickly identify articles that explicitly discuss areas for future investigation.
Seek Guidance from Experts
Don't hesitate to reach out to your research advisor or other experts in your field. Their wealth of knowledge and experience can provide valuable insights into potential research gaps and emerging trends.
By employing these strategies, you'll be well-equipped to identify research gaps and craft recommendations that push the boundaries of current knowledge. Remember, the goal is to refine your research questions and focus your efforts on areas where more understanding is needed.
Structuring Your Recommendations
When it comes to structuring your recommendations, it's essential to keep them concise, organized, and tailored to your audience. Here are some key tips to help you craft impactful recommendations:
Prioritize and Organize
- Limit your recommendations to the most relevant and targeted suggestions for your peers or colleagues in the field.
- Place your recommendations at the end of the report, as they are often top of mind for readers.
- Write your recommendations in order of priority, with the most important ones for decision-makers coming first.
Use a Clear and Actionable Format
- Write recommendations in a clear, concise manner using actionable words derived from the data analyzed in your research.
- Use bullet points instead of long paragraphs for clarity and readability.
- Ensure that your recommendations are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and timely (SMART).
Connect Recommendations to Research
By following this simple formula, you can ensure that your recommendations are directly connected to your research and supported by a clear rationale.
Tailor to Your Audience
- Consider the needs and interests of your target audience when crafting your recommendations.
- Explain how your recommendations can solve the issues explored in your research.
- Acknowledge any limitations or constraints of your study that may impact the implementation of your recommendations.
Avoid Common Pitfalls
- Don't undermine your own work by suggesting incomplete or unnecessary recommendations.
- Avoid using recommendations as a place for self-criticism or introducing new information not covered in your research.
- Ensure that your recommendations are achievable and comprehensive, offering practical solutions for the issues considered in your paper.
By structuring your recommendations effectively, you can enhance the reliability and validity of your research findings, provide valuable strategies and suggestions for future research, and deliver impactful solutions to real-world problems.
Crafting Actionable and Specific Recommendations
Crafting actionable and specific recommendations is the key to ensuring your research findings have a real-world impact. Here are some essential tips to keep in mind:
Embrace Flexibility and Feasibility
Your recommendations should be open to discussion and new information, rather than being set in stone. Consider the following:
- Be realistic and considerate of your team's capabilities when making recommendations.
- Prioritize recommendations based on impact and reach, but be prepared to adjust based on team effort levels.
- Focus on solutions that require the fewest changes first, adopting an MVP (Minimum Viable Product) approach.
Provide Detailed and Justified Recommendations
To avoid vagueness and misinterpretation, ensure your recommendations are:
- Detailed, including photos, videos, or screenshots whenever possible.
- Justified based on research findings, providing alternatives when findings don't align with expectations or business goals.
Use this formula when writing recommendations:
Observed problem/pain point/unmet need + consequence + potential solution
Adopt a Solution-Oriented Approach
Foster collaboration and participation.
- Promote staff education on current research and create strategies to encourage adoption of promising clinical protocols.
- Include representatives from the treatment community in the development of the research initiative and the review of proposals.
- Require active, early, and permanent participation of treatment staff in the development, implementation, and interpretation of the study.
Tailor Recommendations to the Opportunity
When writing recommendations for a specific opportunity or program:
- Highlight the strengths and qualifications of the researcher.
- Provide specific examples of their work and accomplishments.
- Explain how their research has contributed to the field.
- Emphasize the researcher's potential for future success and their unique contributions.
By following these guidelines, you'll craft actionable and specific recommendations that drive meaningful change and showcase the value of your research.
Connecting Recommendations with Research Findings
Connecting your recommendations with research findings is crucial for ensuring the credibility and impact of your suggestions. Here's how you can seamlessly link your recommendations to the evidence uncovered in your study:
Grounding Recommendations in Research
Your recommendations should be firmly rooted in the data and insights gathered during your research process. Avoid including measures or suggestions that were not discussed or supported by your study findings. This approach ensures that your recommendations are evidence-based and directly relevant to the research at hand.
Highlighting the Significance of Collaboration
Research collaborations offer a wealth of benefits that can enhance an agency's competitive position. Consider the following factors when discussing the importance of collaboration in your recommendations:
- Organizational Development: Participation in research collaborations depends on an agency's stage of development, compatibility with its mission and culture, and financial stability.
- Trust-Building: Long-term collaboration success often hinges on a history of increasing involvement and trust between partners.
- Infrastructure: A permanent infrastructure that facilitates long-term development is key to successful collaborative programs.
Emphasizing Commitment and Participation
Fostering quality improvement and organizational learning.
In your recommendations, highlight the importance of enhancing quality improvement strategies and fostering organizational learning. Show sensitivity to the needs and constraints of community-based programs, as this understanding is crucial for effective collaboration and implementation.
Addressing Limitations and Implications
If not already addressed in the discussion section, your recommendations should mention the limitations of the study and their implications. Examples of limitations include:
- Sample size or composition
- Participant attrition
- Study duration
By acknowledging these limitations, you demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of your research and its potential impact.
By connecting your recommendations with research findings, you provide a solid foundation for your suggestions, emphasize the significance of collaboration, and showcase the potential for future research and practical applications.
Crafting impactful recommendations is a vital skill for any researcher looking to bridge the gap between their findings and real-world applications. By understanding the purpose of recommendations, identifying areas for future research, structuring your suggestions effectively, and connecting them to your research findings, you can unlock the full potential of your study. Remember to prioritize actionable, specific, and evidence-based recommendations that foster collaboration and drive meaningful change.
As you embark on your research journey, embrace the power of well-crafted recommendations to amplify the impact of your work. By following the guidelines outlined in this ultimate guide, you'll be well-equipped to write recommendations that resonate with your audience, inspire further investigation, and contribute to the advancement of your field. So go forth, make your research count, and let your recommendations be the catalyst for positive change.
Q: What are the steps to formulating recommendations in research? A: To formulate recommendations in research, you should first gain a thorough understanding of the research question. Review the existing literature to inform your recommendations and consider the research methods that were used. Identify which data collection techniques were employed and propose suitable data analysis methods. It's also essential to consider any limitations and ethical considerations of your research. Justify your recommendations clearly and finally, provide a summary of your recommendations.
Q: Why are recommendations significant in research studies? A: Recommendations play a crucial role in research as they form a key part of the analysis phase. They provide specific suggestions for interventions or strategies that address the problems and limitations discovered during the study. Recommendations are a direct response to the main findings derived from data collection and analysis, and they can guide future actions or research.
Q: Can you outline the seven steps involved in writing a research paper? A: Certainly. The seven steps to writing an excellent research paper include:
- Allowing yourself sufficient time to complete the paper.
- Defining the scope of your essay and crafting a clear thesis statement.
- Conducting a thorough yet focused search for relevant research materials.
- Reading the research materials carefully and taking detailed notes.
- Writing your paper based on the information you've gathered and analyzed.
- Editing your paper to ensure clarity, coherence, and correctness.
- Submitting your paper following the guidelines provided.
Q: What tips can help make a research paper more effective? A: To enhance the effectiveness of a research paper, plan for the extensive process ahead and understand your audience. Decide on the structure your research writing will take and describe your methodology clearly. Write in a straightforward and clear manner, avoiding the use of clichés or overly complex language.
Sign up for more like this.
Work With Us
Private Coaching
Done-For-You
Short Courses
Client Reviews
Free Resources
Research Implications & Recommendations
By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Expert Reviewer: Dr Eunice Rautenbach | May 2024
T he research implications and recommendations are closely related but distinctly different concepts that often trip students up. Here, we’ll unpack them using plain language and loads of examples , so that you can approach your project with confidence.
Overview: Implications & Recommendations
- What are research implications ?
- What are research recommendations ?
- Examples of implications and recommendations
- The “ Big 3 ” categories
- How to write the implications and recommendations
- Template sentences for both sections
- Key takeaways
Implications & Recommendations 101
Let’s start with the basics and define our terms.
At the simplest level, research implications refer to the possible effects or outcomes of a study’s findings. More specifically, they answer the question, “ What do these findings mean?” . In other words, the implications section is where you discuss the broader impact of your study’s findings on theory, practice and future research.
This discussion leads us to the recommendations section , which is where you’ll propose specific actions based on your study’s findings and answer the question, “ What should be done next?” . In other words, the recommendations are practical steps that stakeholders can take to address the key issues identified by your study.
In a nutshell, then, the research implications discuss the broader impact and significance of a study’s findings, while recommendations provide specific actions to take, based on those findings. So, while both of these components are deeply rooted in the findings of the study, they serve different functions within the write up.
Need a helping hand?
Examples: Implications & Recommendations
The distinction between research implications and research recommendations might still feel a bit conceptual, so let’s look at one or two practical examples:
Let’s assume that your study finds that interactive learning methods significantly improve student engagement compared to traditional lectures. In this case, one of your recommendations could be that schools incorporate more interactive learning techniques into their curriculums to enhance student engagement.
Let’s imagine that your study finds that patients who receive personalised care plans have better health outcomes than those with standard care plans. One of your recommendations might be that healthcare providers develop and implement personalised care plans for their patients.
Now, these are admittedly quite simplistic examples, but they demonstrate the difference (and connection ) between the research implications and the recommendations. Simply put, the implications are about the impact of the findings, while the recommendations are about proposed actions, based on the findings.
The “Big 3” Categories
Now that we’ve defined our terms, let’s dig a little deeper into the implications – specifically, the different types or categories of research implications that exist.
Broadly speaking, implications can be divided into three categories – theoretical implications, practical implications and implications for future research .
Theoretical implications relate to how your study’s findings contribute to or challenge existing theories. For example, if a study on social behaviour uncovers new patterns, it might suggest that modifications to current psychological theories are necessary.
Practical implications , on the other hand, focus on how your study’s findings can be applied in real-world settings. For example, if your study demonstrated the effectiveness of a new teaching method, this would imply that educators should consider adopting this method to improve learning outcomes.
Practical implications can also involve policy reconsiderations . For example, if a study reveals significant health benefits from a particular diet, an implication might be that public health guidelines be re-evaluated.
Last but not least, there are the implications for future research . As the name suggests, this category of implications highlights the research gaps or new questions raised by your study. For example, if your study finds mixed results regarding a relationship between two variables, it might imply the need for further investigation to clarify these findings.
To recap then, the three types of implications are the theoretical, the practical and the implications on future research. Regardless of the category, these implications feed into and shape the recommendations , laying the foundation for the actions you’ll propose.
How To Write The Sections
Now that we’ve laid the foundations, it’s time to explore how to write up the implications and recommendations sections respectively.
Let’s start with the “ where ” before digging into the “ how ”. Typically, the implications will feature in the discussion section of your document, while the recommendations will be located in the conclusion . That said, layouts can vary between disciplines and institutions, so be sure to check with your university what their preferences are.
For the implications section, a common approach is to structure the write-up based on the three categories we looked at earlier – theoretical, practical and future research implications. In practical terms, this discussion will usually follow a fairly formulaic sentence structure – for example:
This research provides new insights into [theoretical aspect], indicating that…
The study’s outcomes highlight the potential benefits of adopting [specific practice] in..
This study raises several questions that warrant further investigation, such as…
Moving onto the recommendations section, you could again structure your recommendations using the three categories. Alternatively, you could structure the discussion per stakeholder group – for example, policymakers, organisations, researchers, etc.
Again, you’ll likely use a fairly formulaic sentence structure for this section. Here are some examples for your inspiration:
Based on the findings, [specific group] should consider adopting [new method] to improve…
To address the issues identified, it is recommended that legislation should be introduced to…
Researchers should consider examining [specific variable] to build on the current study’s findings.
Remember, you can grab a copy of our tried and tested templates for both the discussion and conclusion sections over on the Grad Coach blog. You can find the links to those, as well as loads of other free resources, in the description 🙂
FAQs: Implications & Recommendations
Research implications & recommendations, how do i determine the implications of my study.
To do this, you’ll need to consider how your findings address gaps in the existing literature, how they could influence theory, practice, or policy, and the potential societal or economic impacts.
When thinking about your findings, it’s also a good idea to revisit your introduction chapter, where you would have discussed the potential significance of your study more broadly. This section can help spark some additional ideas about what your findings mean in relation to your original research aims.
Should I discuss both positive and negative implications?
Absolutely. You’ll need to discuss both the positive and negative implications to provide a balanced view of how your findings affect the field and any limitations or potential downsides.
Can my research implications be speculative?
Yes and no. While implications are somewhat more speculative than recommendations and can suggest potential future outcomes, they should be grounded in your data and analysis. So, be careful to avoid overly speculative claims.
How do I formulate recommendations?
Ideally, you should base your recommendations on the limitations and implications of your study’s findings. So, consider what further research is needed, how policies could be adapted, or how practices could be improved – and make proposals in this respect.
How specific should my recommendations be?
Your recommendations should be as specific as possible, providing clear guidance on what actions or research should be taken next. As mentioned earlier, the implications can be relatively broad, but the recommendations should be very specific and actionable. Ideally, you should apply the SMART framework to your recommendations.
Can I recommend future research in my recommendations?
Absolutely. Highlighting areas where further research is needed is a key aspect of the recommendations section. Naturally, these recommendations should link to the respective section of your implications (i.e., implications for future research).
Wrapping Up: Key Takeaways
We’ve covered quite a bit of ground here, so let’s quickly recap.
- Research implications refer to the possible effects or outcomes of a study’s findings.
- The recommendations section, on the other hand, is where you’ll propose specific actions based on those findings.
- You can structure your implications section based on the three overarching categories – theoretical, practical and future research implications.
- You can carry this structure through to the recommendations as well, or you can group your recommendations by stakeholder.
Remember to grab a copy of our tried and tested free dissertation template, which covers both the implications and recommendations sections. If you’d like 1:1 help with your research project, be sure to check out our private coaching service, where we hold your hand throughout the research journey, step by step.
You Might Also Like:
How To Choose A Tutor For Your Dissertation
Hiring the right tutor for your dissertation or thesis can make the difference between passing and failing. Here’s what you need to consider.
5 Signs You Need A Dissertation Helper
Discover the 5 signs that suggest you need a dissertation helper to get unstuck, finish your degree and get your life back.
Writing A Dissertation While Working: A How-To Guide
Struggling to balance your dissertation with a full-time job and family? Learn practical strategies to achieve success.
How To Review & Understand Academic Literature Quickly
Learn how to fast-track your literature review by reading with intention and clarity. Dr E and Amy Murdock explain how.
Dissertation Writing Services: Far Worse Than You Think
Thinking about using a dissertation or thesis writing service? You might want to reconsider that move. Here’s what you need to know.
📄 FREE TEMPLATES
Research Topic Ideation
Proposal Writing
Literature Review
Methodology & Analysis
Academic Writing
Referencing & Citing
Apps, Tools & Tricks
The Grad Coach Podcast
I am taking a Research Design and Statistical Methods class. I am wondering if I can get tutors to help me with my homework to understand more about research and statistics. I want to pass this class. I searched on YouTube and watched some videos but I still need more clarification.
Great examples. Thank you
the communication barrier between nurse and patients
Submit a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Submit Comment
- Print Friendly
Writing the parts of scientific reports
22 Writing the conclusion & recommendations
There are probably some overlaps between the Conclusion and the Discussion section. Nevertheless, this section gives you the opportunity to highlight the most important points in your report, and is sometimes the only section read. Think about what your research/ study has achieved, and the most important findings and ideas you want the reader to know. As all studies have limitations also think about what you were not able to cover (this shows that you are able to evaluate your own work objectively).
Possible structure of this section:
Use present perfect to sum up/ evaluate:
This study has explored/ has attempted …
Use past tense to state what your aim was and to refer to actions you carried out:
- This study was intended to analyse …
- The aim of this study was to …
Use present tense to evaluate your study and to state the generalizations and implications that you draw from your findings.
- The results add to the knowledge of …
- These findings s uggest that …
You can either use present tense or past tense to summarize your results.
- The findings reveal …
- It was found that …
Achievements of this study (positive)
- This study provides evidence that …
- This work has contributed to a number of key issues in the field such as …
Limitations of the study (negative)
- Several limitations should be noted. First …
Combine positive and negative remarks to give a balanced assessment:
- Although this research is somewhat limited in scope, its findings can provide a basis for future studies.
- Despite the limitations, findings from the present study can help us understand …
Use more cautious language (modal verbs may, can, could)
- There are a number of possible extensions of this research …
- The findings suggest the possibility for future research on …
- These results may be important for future studies on …
- Examining a wider context could/ would lead …
Or indicate that future research is needed
- There is still a need for future research to determine …
- Further studies should be undertaken to discover…
- It would be worthwhile to investigate …
Academic Writing in a Swiss University Context Copyright © 2018 by Irene Dietrichs. All Rights Reserved.
- Dissertation Proofreading and Editing
- Dissertation Service
- Dissertation Proposal Service
- Dissertation Chapter
- Dissertation Topic and Outline
- Statistical Analysis Services
- Model Answers and Exam Notes
- Dissertation Samples
- Essay Writing Service
- Assignment Service
- Report Service
- Coursework Service
- Literature Review Service
- Reflective Report Service
- Presentation Service
- Poster Service
- Criminal Psychology Dissertation Topics | List of Trending Ideas With Research Aims
- Cognitive Psychology Dissertation Topics | 10 Top Ideas For Research in 2024
- Social Psychology Dissertation Topics | 10 Latest Research Ideas
- Top 10 Clinical Psychology Dissertation Topics with Research Aims
- Educational Psychology Dissertation Topics | 10 Interesting Ideas For Research
- Customer Service Dissertation Topics | List of Latest Ideas For Students
- 15 Interesting Music Dissertation Topics
- Business Intelligence Dissertation Topics | List of Top Ideas With Research Aims
- Physical Education Dissertation Topics | 15 Interesting Title Examples
- 15 Top Forensic Science Dissertation Topics with Research Aims
- Islamic Finance Dissertation Topics | List of 15 Top Ideas With Research Aims
- Dissertation Examples
- Dissertation Proposal Examples
- Essay Examples
- Report Examples
- Coursework Examples
- Assignment Examples
- Literature Review Examples
- Dissertation Topic and Outline Examples
- Dissertation Chapter Examples
- Dissertation Help
- Dissertation Topics
- Academic Library
- Assignment Plagiarism Checker
- Coursework Plagiarism Checke
- Dissertation Plagiarism Checker
- Thesis Plagiarism Checker
- Report Plagiarism Checke
- Plagiarism Remover Service
- Plagiarism Checker Free Service
- Turnitin Plagiarism Checker Free Service
- Free Plagiarism Checker for Students
- Difference Between Paraphrasing & Plagiarism
- Free Similarity Checker
- How Plagiarism Checkers Work?
- How to Cite Sources to Avoid Plagiarism?
- Free Topics
- Get a Free Quote
- Report Generating Service
- Model Answers and Exam Notes Writing
- Reflective or Personal Report Writing
- Poster Writing
- Literature Review Writing
- Premier Sample Dissertations
- Course Work
- Cognitive Psychology Dissertation Topics
- Physical Education Dissertation Topics
- 15 Top Forensic Science Dissertation Topics
- Top 10 Clinical Psychology Dissertation Topics
- Islamic Finance Dissertation Topics
- Social Psychology Dissertation Topics
- Educational Psychology Dissertation Topics
- Business Intelligence Dissertation Topics
- Customer Service Dissertation Topics
- Criminal Psychology Dissertation Topics
- Literature Review Example
- Report Example
- Assignment Example
- Coursework Example
- Coursework Plagiarism Checker
- Turnitin Plagiarism Checker
- Paraphrasing and Plagiarism
- Best Dissertation Plagiarism Checker
- Report Plagiarism Checker
- Similarity Checker
- Plagiarism Checker Free
- FREE Topics
Get an experienced writer start working
Review our examples before placing an order, learn how to draft academic papers, how to write recommendations: do’s and don’ts..
How to Write Citation? | A Practical Guide for Citation and References
How to Write References Quickly and Accurately? | A Practical Guide
Writing research recommendations involves suggesting future research directions or actions that can be taken based on the findings of a research study. The most crucial element of the analysis process, recommendations, is where you provide specific suggestions for interventions or solutions to the problems and limitations found throughout the assessment.
Explore New Dissertation Ideas
Find Current Dissertation Examples
The following guideline will help you explore how to write recommendations :
What are the Recommendations?
Research recommendations are suggestions for future research based on the findings of a research study. The researcher may make these recommendations, or they may be requested by the publisher, funding agency, or other stakeholders who have an interest in the research. The purpose of research recommendations is to identify areas where further investigation is needed and to provide direction for future research in the field.
Get Help Through Our Proofreading Editing Services
The recommendation section, whether it is included in the discussion section or conclusion, should involve the following:
- The research questions that the recommendation addresses.
- A concise summary of the findings from the research.
- The implications of the findings for practice.
- The strengths and limitations of the research.
- How do the findings relate to other research in the field?
- Recommendations for further research.
3-Step Dissertation Process!
Get 3+ Topics
Dissertation Proposal
Get Final Dissertation
What kind of recommendations are appropriate.
The appropriateness of recommendations depends on the research study and the research field. Generally, research recommendations should be based on the findings of the study and should address research gaps or limitations. Here are some types of recommendations that may be appropriate:
Finalise Your Topic After Getting Inspired by the Current Research Topics
1- Further Investigations
Suggest further investigations into specific research questions or hypotheses. This can include exploring new variables, testing different methods, or using different samples.
2- Development of New Research Methods or Techniques
Propose new research methods or techniques that can be used to address research questions or improve the quality of research.
3- Replication of the Study
Recommend replication of the study with larger or more diverse samples to increase the generalizability of the findings.
4- Extension of the Study
Suggest extending the study to different populations or contexts to explore the generalizability of the findings.
5- Collaboration with Other Researchers
Recommend collaboration with other researchers or research teams to leverage expertise and resources.
6- Integration of the Study Findings into Policy or Practice
Suggest ways in which the study findings can be used to inform policy or practice in the relevant field.
7- Addressing Limitations or Gaps in the Current Research Literature
Propose ways the study findings can address limitations or gaps in the current research literature.
Testimonials
Very satisfied students
This is our reason for working. We want to make all students happy, every day. Review us on Sitejabber
Get a Dissertation Proposal
Start your dissertation writing process with experts
Safe and confidential process Free custom topics to choose from Any deadline Unlimited free amendments Free anti-plagiarism report Money-back guarantee
Structuring of Recommendations
When learning how to write recommendations, start with structuring the recommendations section.
1- Summarize your Research Findings
Before making any recommendations, briefly summarise your study's key findings. This will provide context for your recommendations and ensure that they are relevant to the research topic.
2- Identify Research Gaps
Based on your research findings, identify gaps in the literature or areas requiring further investigation. Consider the limitations of your study and the potential implications of your findings.
3- Prioritize Recommendations
Determine the most important recommendations based on their potential impact and feasibility. You may want to organize your recommendations into short-term and long-term goals.
4- Provide Clear and Specific Recommendations
Your recommendations should be concise and specific. Avoid vague or general statements and provide actionable steps that can be taken to address the research gaps you have identified.
5- Justify Your Recommendations
Provide a rationale for each of your recommendations, explaining why they are necessary and how they will contribute to the overall research field.
6- Consider Potential Challenges
Be sure to consider potential challenges or limitations that may arise in implementing your recommendations. Provide suggestions for overcoming these challenges where possible.
7- Conclude with a Summary
End your recommendations with a brief summary of your main points. This will help reinforce the importance of your recommendations and ensure they are clearly understood.
Find Interesting Research Proposal Examples Here
Remember to tailor your recommendations to your specific research study and field of study. Keep in mind that your recommendations should be based on evidence and have practical applications for researchers, practitioners, or policymakers.
Building Concrete Research Recommendations
- The research process should be systematic and logical.
- Conduct the research in an objective and unbiased manner.
- The research findings should be reproducible.
- The research recommendations should be made with a concrete plan in mind.
- The research recommendations should be based on a solid foundation of evidence.
- The research recommendations should be clear and concise.
- The research recommendations should be achievable and realistic.
- The research recommendations should be made to further the research project's goals.
- They should be made to improve the quality of the research project.
- The research recommendations should make the research project more efficient.
- The recommendations should make the research project more effective.
- The research recommendations must aid in making the research project more successful.
What is the Smart Strategy for Writing Research Recommendations?
In academic writing, there are generally three types of Recommendations:
- Obligations
Explore Some Best Dissertation Writings Here
Recommendations can be further characterized as "SMART" or "non-SMART." A SMART Recommendation is one that is Specific, Measurable, Actionable, Realistic, and Time-bound. The following sections will provide more information on each of these characteristics.
- A Recommendation is " Specific " if it clearly spells out what actions need to take place, who needs to take those actions, and when they need to occur.
- A Recommendation is " Measurable " if specified indicators can be used to gauge whether it has successfully achieved its objectives.
- A Recommendation is " Actionable " if the necessary steps required to implement the recommendation are spelt out and achievable.
- A Recommendation is " Realistic " if it is achievable given the available resources (e.g., time, money, human resources).
- Finally, a Recommendation is " Time - bound " if there is a specified timeframe within which the recommendation should be achieved.
How Does It Work ?
Fill the Form
Please fill the free topic form and share your requirements
Writer Starts Working
The writer starts to find a topic for you (based on your requirements)
3+ Topics Emailed!
The writer shared custom topics with you within 24 hours
What are the Dos and Don'ts of Research Recommendations?
1- be specific.
Provide clear and specific recommendations that are relevant to the research study and the field of study. Use precise language and avoid vague or general statements.
2- Support Your Recommendations with Evidence
Base your recommendations on the research study's findings and other relevant literature. Provide evidence to support your recommendations and explain why they are necessary.
Identify and prioritise the most important recommendations based on their potential impact and feasibility.
4- Consider Practical Applications
Ensure that your recommendations have practical applications for researchers, practitioners, or policymakers. Think about how your recommendations can be implemented in practice and how they can contribute to the field.
5- Be Concise
Keep your recommendations concise and to the point. Avoid unnecessary details or explanations.
6- Provide a Rationale
Explain the rationale for each of your recommendations and how they will contribute to the overall research field.
1- Make Unsupported Claims
Avoid making claims that are not supported by evidence. Make sure that your recommendations are based on the research study's findings and other relevant literature.
2- Overgeneralize
Avoid overgeneralizing your recommendations. Make sure that your recommendations are specific to the research study and field.
3- Ignore Potential Challenges
Consider potential challenges or limitations that may arise in implementing your recommendations. Provide suggestions for overcoming these challenges where possible.
4- Disregard Practical Considerations
Ensure that your recommendations are practical and feasible. Consider the resources and constraints of the research field and how your recommendations can be implemented in practice.
5- Be Too Prescriptive
Avoid being too prescriptive in your recommendations. Provide guidance and direction, but allow room for interpretation and adaptation.
By following these dos and don'ts, you can ensure that your research recommendations are well-supported, relevant, and practical and will make a meaningful contribution to the research field.
Learn the Best Way to Write Acknowledgements
Explore the Current Samples of Acknowledgement
It is frequently the case that further research is needed to facilitate the advancement of a study. In your research plans, you can analyze potential study methodologies and the points regarding a subject that might be covered in such research.
The recommendations you include in your paper could be crucial to your research. Make sure your essay has clear recommendations that are simple to implement, can be used effectively, and are not unduly complex or challenging in any other manner. If you need further help writing recommendations, contact us via email or web chat.
admin farhan
Related posts.
Dissertation Interview Questions | Everything You Need To Know
Conducting Interviews for Your Dissertation | A Comprehensive Guide
What is Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and How Can It Benefit You? | Applications and Example
Comments are closed.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- Browse Titles
NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Evans D, Coad J, Cottrell K, et al. Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Oct. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 2.36.)
Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation.
Chapter 9 conclusions and recommendations for future research.
- How well have we achieved our original aim and objectives?
The initially stated overarching aim of this research was to identify the contextual factors and mechanisms that are regularly associated with effective and cost-effective public involvement in research. While recognising the limitations of our analysis, we believe we have largely achieved this in our revised theory of public involvement in research set out in Chapter 8 . We have developed and tested this theory of public involvement in research in eight diverse case studies; this has highlighted important contextual factors, in particular PI leadership, which had not previously been prominent in the literature. We have identified how this critical contextual factor shapes key mechanisms of public involvement, including the identification of a senior lead for involvement, resource allocation for involvement and facilitation of research partners. These mechanisms then lead to specific outcomes in improving the quality of research, notably recruitment strategies and materials and data collection tools and methods. We have identified a ‘virtuous circle’ of feedback to research partners on their contribution leading to their improved confidence and motivation, which facilitates their continued contribution. Following feedback from the HS&DR Board on our original application we did not seek to assess the cost-effectiveness of different mechanisms of public involvement but we did cost the different types of public involvement as discussed in Chapter 7 . A key finding is that many research projects undercost public involvement.
In our original proposal we emphasised our desire to include case studies involving young people and families with children in the research process. We recruited two studies involving parents of young children aged under 5 years, and two projects involving ‘older’ young people in the 18- to 25-years age group. We recognise that in doing this we missed studies involving children and young people aged under 18 years; in principle we would have liked to have included studies involving such children and young people, but, given the resources at our disposal and the additional resource, ethical and governance issues this would have entailed, we regretfully concluded that this would not be feasible for our study. In terms of the four studies with parental and young persons’ involvement that we did include, we have not done a separate analysis of their data, but the themes emerging from those case studies were consistent with our other case studies and contributed to our overall analysis.
In terms of the initial objectives, we successfully recruited the sample of eight diverse case studies and collected and analysed data from them (objective 1). As intended, we identified the outcomes of involvement from multiple stakeholders‘ perspectives, although we did not get as many research partners‘ perspectives as we would have liked – see limitations below (objective 2). It was more difficult than expected to track the impact of public involvement from project inception through to completion (objective 3), as all of our projects turned out to have longer time scales than our own. Even to track involvement over a stage of a case study research project proved difficult, as the research usually did not fall into neatly staged time periods and one study had no involvement activity over the study period.
Nevertheless, we were able to track seven of the eight case studies prospectively and in real time over time periods of up to 9 months, giving us an unusual window on involvement processes that have previously mainly been observed retrospectively. We were successful in comparing the contextual factors, mechanisms and outcomes associated with public involvement from different stakeholders‘ perspectives and costing the different mechanisms for public involvement (objective 4). We only partly achieved our final objective of undertaking a consensus exercise among stakeholders to assess the merits of the realist evaluation approach and our approach to the measurement and valuation of economic costs of public involvement in research (objective 5). A final consensus event was held, where very useful discussion and amendment of our theory of public involvement took place, and the economic approach was discussed and helpfully critiqued by participants. However, as our earlier discussions developed more fully than expected, we decided to let them continue rather than interrupt them in order to run the final exercise to assess the merits of the realist evaluation approach. We did, however, test our analysis with all our case study participants by sending a draft of this final report for comment. We received a number of helpful comments and corrections but no disagreement with our overall analysis.
- What were the limitations of our study?
Realist evaluation is a relatively new approach and we recognise that there were a number of limitations to our study. We sought to follow the approach recommended by Pawson, but we acknowledge that we were not always able to do so. In particular, our theory of public involvement in research evolved over time and initially was not as tightly framed in terms of a testable hypothesis as Pawson recommends. In his latest book Pawson strongly recommends that outcomes should be measured with quantitative data, 17 but we did not do so; we were not aware of the existence of quantitative data or tools that would enable us to collect such data to answer our research questions. Even in terms of qualitative data, we did not capture as much information on outcomes as we initially envisaged. There were several reasons for this. The most important was that capturing outcomes in public involvement is easier the more operational the focus of involvement, and more difficult the more strategic the involvement. Thus, it was relatively easy to see the impact of a patient panel on the redesign of a recruitment leaflet but harder to capture the impact of research partners in a multidisciplinary team discussion of research design.
We also found it was sometimes more difficult to engage research partners as participants in our research than researchers or research managers. On reflection this is not surprising. Research partners are generally motivated to take part in research relevant to their lived experience of a health condition or situation, whereas our research was quite detached from their lived experience; in addition people had many constraints on their time, so getting involved in our research as well as their own was likely to be a burden too far for some. Researchers clearly also face significant time pressures but they had a more direct interest in our research, as they are obliged to engage with public involvement to satisfy research funders such as the NIHR. Moreover, researchers were being paid by their employers for their time during interviews with us, while research partners were not paid by us and usually not paid by their research teams. Whatever the reasons, we had less response from research partners than researchers or research managers, particularly for the third round of data collection; thus we have fewer data on outcomes from research partners‘ perspectives and we need to be aware of a possible selection bias towards more engaged research partners. Such a bias could have implications for our findings; for example payment might have been a more important motivating factor for less engaged advisory group members.
There were a number of practical difficulties we encountered. One challenge was when to recruit the case studies. We recruited four of our eight case studies prior to the full application, but this was more than 1 year before our project started and 15 months or more before data collection began. In this intervening period, we found that the time scales of some of the case studies were no longer ideal for our project and we faced the choice of whether to continue with them, although this timing was not ideal, or seek at a late moment to recruit alternative ones. One of our case studies ultimately undertook no involvement activity over the study period, so we obtained fewer data from it, and it contributed relatively little to our analysis. Similarly, one of the four case studies we recruited later experienced some delays itself in beginning and so we had a more limited period for data collection than initially envisaged. Research governance approvals took much longer than expected, particularly as we had to take three of our research partners, who were going to collect data within NHS projects, through the research passport process, which essentially truncated our data collection period from 1 year to 9 months. Even if we had had the full year initially envisaged for data collection, our conclusion with hindsight was that this was insufficiently long. To compare initial plans and intentions for involvement with the reality of what actually happened required a longer time period than a year for most of our case studies.
In the light of the importance we have placed on the commitment of PIs, there is an issue of potential selection bias in the recruitment of our sample. As our sampling strategy explicitly involved a networking approach to PIs of projects where we thought some significant public involvement was taking place, we were likely (as we did) to recruit enthusiasts and, at worst, those non-committed who were at least open to the potential value of public involvement. There were, unsurprisingly, no highly sceptical PIs in our sample. We have no data therefore on how public involvement may work in research where the PI is sceptical but may feel compelled to undertake involvement because of funder requirements or other factors.
- What would we do differently next time?
If we were to design this study again, there are a number of changes we would make. Most importantly we would go for a longer time period to be able to capture involvement through the whole research process from initial design through to dissemination. We would seek to recruit far more potential case studies in principle, so that we had greater choice of which to proceed with once our study began in earnest. We would include case studies from the application stage to capture the important early involvement of research partners in the initial design period. It might be preferable to research a smaller number of case studies, allowing a more in-depth ethnographic approach. Although challenging, it would be very informative to seek to sample sceptical PIs. This might require a brief screening exercise of a larger group of PIs on their attitudes to and experience of public involvement.
The economic evaluation was challenging in a number of ways, particularly in seeking to obtain completed resource logs from case study research partners. Having a 2-week data collection period was also problematic in a field such as public involvement, where activity may be very episodic and infrequent. Thus, collecting economic data alongside other case study data in a more integrated way, and particularly with interviews and more ethnographic observation of case study activities, might be advantageous. The new budgeting tool developed by INVOLVE and the MHRN may provide a useful resource for future economic evaluations. 23
We have learned much from the involvement of research partners in our research team and, although many aspects of our approach worked well, there are some things we would do differently in future. Even though we included substantial resources for research partner involvement in all aspects of our study, we underestimated how time-consuming such full involvement would be. We were perhaps overambitious in trying to ensure such full involvement with the number of research partners and the number and complexity of the case studies. We were also perhaps naive in expecting all the research partners to play the same role in the team; different research partners came with different experiences and skills, and, like most of our case studies, we might have been better to be less prescriptive and allow the roles to develop more organically within the project.
- Implications for research practice and funding
If one of the objectives of R&D policy is to increase the extent and effectiveness of public involvement in research, then a key implication of this research is the importance of influencing PIs to value public involvement in research or to delegate to other senior colleagues in leading on involvement in their research. Training is unlikely to be the key mechanism here; senior researchers are much more likely to be influenced by peers or by their personal experience of the benefits of public involvement. Early career researchers may be shaped by training but again peer learning and culture may be more influential. For those researchers sceptical or agnostic about public involvement, the requirement of funders is a key factor that is likely to make them engage with the involvement agenda. Therefore, funders need to scrutinise the track record of research teams on public involvement to ascertain whether there is any evidence of commitment or leadership on involvement.
One of the findings of the economic analysis was that PIs have consistently underestimated the costs of public involvement in their grant applications. Clearly the field will benefit from the guidance and budgeting tool recently disseminated by MHRN and INVOLVE. It was also notable that there was a degree of variation in the real costs of public involvement and that effective involvement is not necessarily costly. Different models of involvement incur different costs and researchers need to be made aware of the costs and benefits of these different options.
One methodological lesson we learned was the impact that conducting this research had on some participants’ reflection on the impact of public involvement. Particularly for research staff, the questions we asked sometimes made them reflect upon what they were doing and change aspects of their approach to involvement. Thus, the more the NIHR and other funders can build reporting, audit and other forms of evaluation on the impact of public involvement directly into their processes with PIs, the more likely such questioning might stimulate similar reflection.
- Recommendations for further research
There are a number of gaps in our knowledge around public involvement in research that follow from our findings, and would benefit from further research, including realist evaluation to extend and further test the theory we have developed here:
- In-depth exploration of how PIs become committed to public involvement and how to influence agnostic or sceptical PIs would be very helpful. Further research might compare, for example, training with peer-influencing strategies in engendering PI commitment. Research could explore the leadership role of other research team members, including research partners, and how collective leadership might support effective public involvement.
- More methodological work is needed on how to robustly capture the impact and outcomes of public involvement in research (building as well on the PiiAF work of Popay et al. 51 ), including further economic analysis and exploration of impact when research partners are integral to research teams.
- Research to develop approaches and carry out a full cost–benefit analysis of public involvement in research would be beneficial. Although methodologically challenging, it would be very useful to conduct some longer-term studies which sought to quantify the impact of public involvement on such key indicators as participant recruitment and retention in clinical trials.
- It would also be helpful to capture qualitatively the experiences and perspectives of research partners who have had mixed or negative experiences, since they may be less likely than enthusiasts to volunteer to participate in studies of involvement in research such as ours. Similarly, further research might explore the (relatively rare) experiences of marginalised and seldom-heard groups involved in research.
- Payment for public involvement in research remains a contested issue with strongly held positions for and against; it would be helpful to further explore the value research partners and researchers place on payment and its effectiveness for enhancing involvement in and impact on research.
- A final relatively narrow but important question that we identified after data collection had finished is: what is the impact of the long periods of relative non-involvement following initial periods of more intense involvement for research partners in some types of research, particularly clinical trials?
Included under terms of UK Non-commercial Government License .
- Cite this Page Evans D, Coad J, Cottrell K, et al. Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Oct. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 2.36.) Chapter 9, Conclusions and recommendations for future research.
- PDF version of this title (4.3M)
In this Page
Other titles in this collection.
- Health Services and Delivery Research
Recent Activity
- Conclusions and recommendations for future research - Public involvement in rese... Conclusions and recommendations for future research - Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on
Connect with NLM
National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894
Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
Help Accessibility Careers
Recommendation in Research
Ai generator.
A recommendation in research refers to the advice or suggestions provided by researchers at the conclusion of their study, aimed at addressing the gaps identified, enhancing future research , and applying findings in practical contexts. Recommendations are crucial as they guide stakeholders, including policymakers, practitioners, and fellow researchers, on how to utilize the research outcomes effectively. These suggestions are typically based on the evidence gathered during the study and are intended to improve practices, inform decision-making, and inspire further investigations to build on the existing knowledge.
What is Recommendation in Research?
A recommendation in research is a suggestion or course of action proposed by researchers based on their study’s findings. It aims to address identified gaps, enhance future research, and apply results in practical scenarios. Recommendations guide stakeholders, such as policymakers and fellow researchers, on utilizing the research effectively to improve practices, inform decisions, and inspire further studies.
Examples of Recommendations in Research
- Implement Comprehensive Training Programs : Ensure that employees receive ongoing training to keep up with technological advancements.
- Increase Funding for Renewable Energy Projects : Allocate more resources to develop sustainable energy solutions.
- Promote Interdisciplinary Research : Encourage collaboration across various fields to address complex global issues.
- Adopt Advanced Data Analytics : Utilize cutting-edge data analysis techniques to improve decision-making processes.
- Enhance Public Awareness Campaigns : Develop strategies to educate the public on critical health issues.
- Strengthen Cybersecurity Measures : Implement robust security protocols to protect sensitive information.
- Encourage Community Involvement : Foster greater community participation in local governance.
- Develop Inclusive Policies : Create policies that address the needs of diverse populations.
- Optimize Supply Chain Management : Improve logistics and supply chain efficiency to reduce costs.
- Support Mental Health Initiatives : Increase support for mental health programs and services.
Recommendation for Students in Research
Research is a crucial component of academic and professional development. Here are some key recommendations for students engaged in research to ensure success and meaningful contributions to their field:
1. Choose a Relevant and Interesting Topic
- Personal Interest: Select a topic that genuinely interests you.
- Relevance: Ensure the topic is relevant to your field of study.
- Scope: Make sure the topic is neither too broad nor too narrow.
2. Conduct a Thorough Literature Review
- Background Research: Review existing literature to understand the current state of knowledge.
- Identify Gaps: Identify gaps in the existing research that your study can address.
- Theoretical Framework: Build a strong theoretical foundation for your research.
3. Develop a Clear Research Plan
- Objectives: Define clear and achievable research objectives.
- Methodology: Choose appropriate research methods and techniques.
- Timeline: Create a realistic timeline with milestones for completing each stage of the research.
4. Use Reliable and Valid Sources
- Academic Journals: Prefer peer-reviewed journals for sourcing information.
- Primary Sources: Whenever possible, use primary sources to gather data.
- Citation Management: Use citation management tools to organize your references.
5. Ensure Ethical Conduct
- Informed Consent: Obtain informed consent from participants if your research involves human subjects.
- Data Privacy: Ensure the confidentiality and privacy of your data.
- Integrity: Maintain honesty and transparency in your research process.
6. Develop Strong Analytical Skills
- Critical Thinking: Develop the ability to critically analyze data and sources.
- Statistical Analysis: Gain proficiency in statistical methods if your research involves quantitative data.
- Qualitative Analysis: Learn methods for analyzing qualitative data, such as thematic analysis.
7. Seek Feedback and Collaboration
- Mentorship: Seek guidance from your research advisor or mentor regularly.
- Peer Review: Engage with peers for feedback and constructive criticism.
- Collaboration: Collaborate with other researchers to enhance the quality of your study.
8. Maintain Clear and Consistent Documentation
- Research Journal: Keep a detailed journal of your research process, observations, and reflections.
- Data Management: Organize your data systematically for easy retrieval and analysis.
- Progress Reports: Regularly update your progress and adjust your plan as needed.
9. Communicate Your Findings Effectively
- Writing Skills: Develop strong academic writing skills to present your findings clearly.
- Presentations: Learn to create and deliver effective presentations of your research.
- Publication: Aim to publish your research in reputable academic journals or conferences.
10. Stay Updated and Continue Learning
- Current Trends: Stay updated with the latest developments in your field.
- Professional Development: Attend workshops, seminars, and conferences to enhance your knowledge and skills.
- Networking: Build a professional network with other researchers and professionals in your field.
Types of Recommendation in Research
Recommendations in research are crucial as they provide actionable insights based on the study’s findings. Here are the primary types of recommendations commonly found in research:
1. Practical Recommendations
Practical recommendations offer actionable advice that can be implemented in real-world settings. These are particularly useful for practitioners and policymakers.
- Implementation Strategies: Suggest ways to apply research findings in practice.
- Policy Changes: Recommend modifications to existing policies or the creation of new policies.
- Best Practices: Identify effective practices and procedures based on research results.
2. Theoretical Recommendations
Theoretical recommendations are aimed at advancing academic knowledge and understanding. They often suggest directions for future research or adjustments to existing theories.
- Theory Development: Propose new theories or modifications to existing ones based on research findings.
- Conceptual Frameworks: Suggest new conceptual models or frameworks.
- Research Hypotheses: Recommend specific hypotheses for future testing.
3. Methodological Recommendations
Methodological recommendations focus on the research process itself. They offer suggestions for improving research design, data collection, and analysis techniques.
- Research Design: Advise on more effective or innovative research designs.
- Data Collection Methods: Recommend better or alternative methods for data collection.
- Analytical Techniques: Suggest advanced or more appropriate analytical techniques.
4. Policy Recommendations
Policy recommendations are directed towards governmental or organizational bodies. They aim to influence policy-making processes based on research evidence.
- Legislative Changes: Recommend changes to laws or regulations.
- Organizational Policies: Suggest adjustments to organizational policies and procedures.
- Public Health Initiatives: Propose new public health strategies or interventions.
5. Educational Recommendations
Educational recommendations are targeted at educational institutions, educators, and curriculum developers. They aim to improve educational practices and outcomes.
- Curriculum Development: Suggest changes or additions to curricula.
- Teaching Methods: Recommend effective teaching strategies and methods.
- Educational Programs: Propose new programs or enhancements to existing ones.
Recommendation for Future Researchers
Future researchers can benefit from insights and guidance to enhance the quality and impact of their studies. Here are some key recommendations:
1. Explore Unanswered Questions
- Identify Gaps: Focus on gaps highlighted in previous research to build on existing knowledge.
- New Areas: Investigate emerging areas or under-researched topics within your field.
2. Improve Methodological Rigor
- Innovative Methods: Incorporate innovative research methodologies and techniques.
- Replication Studies: Conduct replication studies to verify and validate findings from prior research.
- Mixed Methods: Utilize mixed methods approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research problem.
3. Ensure Ethical Conduct
- Ethical Guidelines: Adhere to ethical guidelines and standards throughout the research process.
- Informed Consent: Ensure that participants provide informed consent and understand their rights.
- Data Privacy: Protect the confidentiality and privacy of participants’ data.
4. Enhance Data Quality
- Robust Data Collection: Use robust data collection methods to ensure accuracy and reliability.
- Triangulation: Employ triangulation by using multiple data sources or methods to strengthen findings.
- Longitudinal Studies: Consider conducting longitudinal studies to observe changes over time.
5. Collaborate and Network
- Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Work with researchers from different disciplines to gain diverse perspectives.
- International Partnerships: Form partnerships with international researchers to broaden the scope and impact of your study.
- Professional Networks: Join professional organizations and attend conferences to stay updated and connected.
What is the Purpose of Recommendation in Research
Recommendations in research are essential for guiding future actions based on the study’s findings. Here are the main purposes of including recommendations in research:
1. Guiding Future Research
- Identify Gaps: Point out areas where more research is needed.
- Suggest Topics: Recommend specific topics or questions for future studies.
- Encourage Validation: Suggest replicating the study in different settings to confirm results.
2. Informing Policy and Practice
- Policy Changes: Provide evidence-based suggestions for improving or creating policies.
- Best Practices: Offer practical advice for professionals to improve their work.
- Implementation: Suggest ways to apply the research findings in real-world situations.
3. Enhancing Academic Knowledge
- Theoretical Contributions: Help develop or refine theories based on the research findings.
- Stimulate Discussion: Encourage further academic debate and inquiry.
4. Improving Research Methods
- Methodology: Recommend better or alternative research methods.
- Data Collection: Suggest more effective ways to gather data.
- Analysis Techniques: Propose improved methods for analyzing data.
5. Solving Practical Problems
- Actionable Solutions: Offer practical solutions to problems identified in the research.
- Resource Allocation: Guide organizations on how to use resources more effectively.
- Strategic Planning: Assist in planning future actions based on the research insights.
How to Write Research Recommendations?
Writing research recommendations involves providing actionable advice based on the findings of your study. Here are steps and tips to help you write effective research recommendations:
1. Review Your Findings
- Summarize Key Findings: Begin by summarizing the most important findings of your research.
- Highlight Significant Results: Focus on results that have significant implications for future research, policy, or practice.
2. Align Recommendations with Objectives
- Reflect on Objectives: Ensure that your recommendations align with the original objectives of your study.
- Address Research Questions: Directly address the research questions or hypotheses you set out to explore.
3. Be Specific and Actionable
- Concrete Actions: Provide specific actions that stakeholders can take.
- Clear Guidance: Offer clear and practical steps rather than vague suggestions.
4. Prioritize Recommendations
- Importance: Rank recommendations based on their importance and feasibility.
- Immediate vs. Long-Term: Distinguish between recommendations that can be implemented immediately and those that are long-term.
5. Consider Different Audiences
- Tailor Recommendations: Adapt recommendations to different audiences such as policymakers, practitioners, researchers, or the general public.
- Relevant Language: Use language and terms that are relevant and understandable to each audience.
6. Support with Evidence
- Link to Findings: Base your recommendations on the evidence from your research.
- Cite Data: Use data and examples from your study to justify each recommendation.
7. Address Limitations
- Acknowledge Constraints: Recognize any limitations in your study and how they might affect your recommendations.
- Suggest Improvements: Provide suggestions for how future research can address these limitations.
8. Highlight Benefits
- Positive Outcomes: Emphasize the potential benefits of implementing your recommendations.
- Impact: Discuss the impact your recommendations could have on the field, policy, or practice.
9. Be Realistic
- Feasibility: Ensure that your recommendations are realistic and achievable.
- Resources: Consider the resources required to implement your recommendations and whether they are available.
10. Review and Revise
- Proofread: Carefully review your recommendations for clarity, coherence, and correctness.
- Feedback: Seek feedback from peers or advisors to refine your recommendations.
FAQ’s
Why are recommendations important in research.
Recommendations provide practical applications of research findings, guiding stakeholders in implementing changes or further investigations.
How do you write a good research recommendation?
A good research recommendation is specific, actionable, and directly linked to the study’s conclusions and data.
What should be included in a research recommendation?
Include the action to be taken, the rationale behind it, and its expected impact or benefits.
Can recommendations suggest further research?
Yes, recommendations often suggest areas for further study to address limitations or explore new questions.
How should recommendations be structured in a research paper?
Recommendations should follow the conclusion section, clearly numbered or bullet-pointed for easy reading.
What is the difference between conclusions and recommendations?
Conclusions summarize the findings, while recommendations propose actions based on those findings.
Who benefits from research recommendations?
Policymakers, practitioners, researchers, and other stakeholders can benefit from research recommendations.
How many recommendations should a research paper have?
The number of recommendations varies but should be concise and focused, usually between three to five key suggestions.
Can recommendations be generalized to other contexts?
Recommendations should be context-specific but can sometimes be adapted for broader application.
What language should be used in writing recommendations?
Use clear, precise, and direct language to ensure recommendations are easily understood and actionable.
Text prompt
- Instructive
- Professional
10 Examples of Public speaking
20 Examples of Gas lighting
Reviewer comments: examples for common peer review decisions
Peer-reviewing an academic manuscript is not an easy task. Especially if you are unsure about how to formulate your feedback. Examples of reviewer comment s can help! Here you can find an overview of sample comments and examples for the most common review decisions: ‘minor revisions’, ‘major revisions’, ‘revise and resubmit’ and ‘reject’ decisions.
Examples of ‘minor revisions’ reviewer comments
Examples of ‘major revisions’ reviewer comments, examples of ‘revise and resubmit’ reviewer comments, examples of ‘reject’ reviewer comments.
- “This is a well-written manuscript that only needs to undergo a few minor changes. First, …”
- “The manuscript is based on impressive empirical evidence and makes an original contribution. Only minor revisions are needed before it can be published.”
- “I thoroughly enjoyed reviewing this manuscript and only have some minor requests for revision.”
- “The authors develop a unique theoretical framework, and I believe that they should highlight their originality much more.”
- “The authors conduct very relevant research, but fail to emphasise the relevance in their introduction.”
- “The authors draw on extensive empirical evidence. I believe that they can put forward their arguments much more confidently.”
- “The authors adequately addressed my feedback from the first round of peer review. I only have some minor comments for final improvements.”
- “To improve the readability of the paper, I suggest dividing the analysis into several subsections.”
- “Figure 3 is difficult to read and should be adjusted.”
- “Table 1 and 2 can be combined to create a better overview.”
- “The abstract is too long and should be shortened.”
- “I had difficulties understanding the first paragraph on page 5, and suggest that the authors reformulate and simplify it.”
- “The manuscript contains an elaborate literature review, but definitions of the key concepts are needed in the introduction.”
- “Throughout the manuscript, there are several language mistakes. Therefore, I recommend a professional round of language editing before the paper is published.”
- “The paper should undergo professional language editing before it can be published.”
If you want to learn more about common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision and see examples of how an actual peer review might look like, check out this post on ‘minor revisions’ .
- “The manuscript shows a lot of promise, but some major issues need to be addressed before it can be published.”
- “This manuscript addresses a timely topic and makes a relevant contribution to the field. However, some major revisions are needed before it can be published.”
- “I enjoyed reading this manuscript, and believe that it is very promising. At the same time, I identified several issues that require the authors’ attention.”
- “The manuscript sheds light on an interesting phenomenon. However, it also has several shortcomings. I strongly encourage the authors to address the following points.”
- “The authors of this manuscript have an ambitious objective and draw on an interesting dataset. However, their main argument is unclear.”
- “The key argument needs to be worked out and formulated much more clearly.”
- “The theoretical framework is promising but incomplete. In my opinion, the authors cannot make their current claims without considering writings on… “
- “The literature review is promising, but disregards recent publications in the field of…”
- “The empirical evidence is at times insufficient to support the authors’ claims. For instance, in section…”
- “I encourage the authors to provide more in-depth evidence. For instance, I would like to see more interview quotes and a more transparent statistical analysis.”
- “The authors work with an interesting dataset. However, I was missing more detailed insights in the actual results. I believe that several additional tables and figures can improve the authors’ argumentation. “
- “I believe that the manuscript addresses a relevant topic and includes a timely discussion. However, I struggled to understand section 3.1.”
- “I think that the manuscript can be improved by removing section 4 and integrating it into section 5.”
- “The discussion and conclusions are difficult to follow and need to be rewritten to highlight the key contributions of this manuscript.”
- “The line of argumentation should be improved by dividing the manuscript into clear sections with subheadings.”
If you want to learn more about common reasons for a ‘major revisions’ decision and see examples of how an actual peer review might look like, check out this post on ‘major revisions’ .
- “I encourage the authors to revise their manuscript and to resubmit it to the journal.”
- “In its current form, this paper cannot be considered for publication. However, I see value in the research approach and encourage the authors to revise and resubmit their manuscript.”
- “ With the right changes, I believe that this manuscript can make a valuable contribution to the field of …”
- “The paper addresses a valuable topic and raises interesting questions. However, the logic of the argument is difficult to follow. “
- “The manuscript tries to achieve too many things at the same time. The authors need to narrow down their research focus.”
- “The authors raise many interesting points, which makes it difficult for the reader to follow their main argument. I recommend that the authors determine what their main argument is, and structure their manuscript accordingly.”
- “The literature review raises interesting theoretical debates. However, in its current form, it does not provide a good framework for the empirical analysis.”
- “A clearer theoretical stance will increase the quality of the paper.”
- “The manuscript draws on impressive data, as described in the methodology. However, the wealth of data does not come across in the analysis. My recommendation is to increase the number of interview quotes, figures and statistics in the empirical analysis.”
- “The authors draw several conclusions which are hard to connect to their empirical findings. “
- The authors are advised to critically reflect on the generalizability of their research findings.”
- “The manuscript needs to better emphasise the research relevance and its practical implications.”
- “It is unclear what the authors consider their main contribution to the academic literature, and what they envisage in terms of recommendations for further research.”
If you want to learn more about common reasons for a ‘revise and resubmit’ decision and see examples of how an actual peer review might look like, check out this post on ‘revise and resubmit’ .
- “I do not believe that this journal is a good fit for this paper.”
- “While the paper addresses an interesting issue, it is not publishable in its current form.”
- “In its current state, I do not recommend accepting this paper.”
- “Unfortunately, the literature review is inadequate. It lacks..”
- “The paper lacks a convincing theoretical framework , which is necessary to be considered for publication.”
- “Unfortunately, the empirical data does not meet disciplinary standards.”
- “While I applaud the authors’ efforts, the paper does not provide sufficient empirical evidence.”
- “The empirical material is too underdeveloped to consider this paper for publication.”
- “The paper has too many structural issues, which makes it hard to follow the argument.”
- “There is a strong mismatch between the literature review and the empirical analysis.”
- “The main contribution of this paper is unclear.”
- “It is unclear what the paper contributes to the existing academic literature.”
- “The originality of this paper needs to be worked out before it can be considered for publication.”
- “Unfortunately, the language and sentence structures of this manuscript are at times incomprehensible. The paper needs rewriting and thorough language editing to allow for a proper peer review.”
If you want to learn more about common reasons for a ‘reject’ decision and see examples of how an actual peer review might look like, check out this post on ‘reject’ decisions .
Master Academia
Get new content delivered directly to your inbox.
Subscribe and receive Master Academia's quarterly newsletter.
Minor revisions: Sample peer review comments and examples
5 proven ways to become an academic peer reviewer, related articles.
Dealing with failure as a PhD student
Revise and resubmit: Sample peer review comments and examples
How to peer review an academic paper
How to structure your viva presentation (with examples)
Scientific Paper Format with Tips and an Example
Writing a scientific paper doesn't have to be a complex puzzle, but without the right format, it can quickly become one. A clear structure is the foundation for getting your research across in the most effective way. It's not just about what you say but how you present it. The format guides your readers through the information, helping them grasp your methods, results, and conclusions without unnecessary confusion.
In this article, we'll explain how to format a scientific paper. You'll learn what belongs where and why it matters. By the end, you'll have the confidence to organize your research in a way that makes sense—both to you and to your readers.
What Is a Scientific Paper
A scientific paper is a written report that presents research findings, methods, and conclusions in a clear and structured way. Its primary purpose is to communicate new knowledge or discoveries to the scientific community, typically following a formal structure to ensure clarity and ease of understanding. Scientific papers are divided into sections, each serving a clear purpose—from introducing the research question to discussing the results. Its goal is to share knowledge, contribute to ongoing studies, and provide evidence that others can build upon.
If you're struggling to come up with a good topic for your upcoming paper, our list of science research topics ideas will definitely come in handy.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
Wednesday Addams
Mysterious, dark, and sarcastic
You’re the master of dark humor and love standing out with your unconventional style. Your perfect costume? A modern twist on Wednesday Addams’ gothic look. You’ll own Halloween with your unapologetically eerie vibe. 🖤🕸️
Let Experts Handle Your Paper!
Let EssayPro's skilled writers provide the research and writing you need to succeed.
Overview of a Scientific Paper Format
A scientific paper follows a standardized format designed to present research in a logical sequence. It typically begins with a title page and abstract, followed by an introduction that sets up the research question. The methods section outlines how the research was conducted, while the results section presents the data. The discussion interprets the findings, and the conclusion ties everything together. Additional sections, such as tables, figures, acknowledgments, and references, further support the content. The appendix may be included as supplementary material.
Let's explain how to format a scientific paper in more detail below and meanwhile, here's a table illustrating the typical length for each section:
The scientific paper title page introduces the reader to the research in a direct, professional manner. The title should be precise, reflecting the study's subject, focus, and any manipulated variables—think of it as a quick summary that attracts relevant readers.
The author(s) and their affiliation(s) (such as their university or organization) are listed below. If a specific author is responsible for correspondence, their contact information is also included. A running head (a shortened version of the title) is used for page headers, maintaining a clear, organized appearance across pages.
The abstract provides a brief, standalone summary of the entire scientific research paper format. In 150–200 words, it answers four key questions:
- What is the study about (purpose)?
- How was it conducted (methods)?
- What were the findings (results)?
- What conclusions were drawn?
This quick overview is crucial for helping readers decide if the paper is relevant to their interests. The abstract should avoid citations and acronyms, as it needs to be understandable without additional context. It should act as a concise window into the study without requiring further reading.
Keywords are specific terms (usually 3–5) placed below the abstract to help readers and databases categorize and locate the study. Keywords should focus on the main topics and concepts discussed in the paper. Listing keywords in this manner improves the paper's discoverability in searches. For example, a study on the mental health benefits of green spaces might use the following: " mental health, green spaces, urban planning, public health ."
Introduction
Wondering how to write an introduction for a scientific research paper? Start by discussing the background of your topic, outlining current knowledge, and why this subject is relevant. This includes mentioning relevant studies by other researchers to help readers understand the scientific context.
Follow this with a research question that pinpoints what your study seeks to answer, as well as a clear hypothesis —a testable prediction that your study will confirm or refute. Then, provide your study's objectives : What specific goals are you aiming to achieve?
Lastly, briefly outline your scope and methods to give readers a preview of your approach without diving into full details. Together, these elements create a roadmap for the paper and clarify why the research is both necessary and timely.
For interesting science fair project ideas , check out our special article.
The methods section for your scientific research paper details the steps taken to ensure reproducibility. Start with a description of the study design (e.g., experimental or observational). Outline the participants or subjects , specifying any relevant characteristics, as well as the materials used (e.g., equipment, software, chemicals). Describe the procedures in sequence, providing a rationale for each step. Use the past tense to describe completed actions and include details on controls or unique methods. Summarize data analysis techniques , including statistical tests or software used. Here's what to keep in mind:
- Include sufficient detail for replication.
- Avoid subjective language or conclusions.
- Cite established methods if relevant.
- Use active voice where possible, especially in procedural descriptions.
In the scientific paper results section, present findings objectively, without interpretation. Summarize main trends and observations , highlighting patterns or relationships relevant to your research question. Support these statements with figures and tables , but provide accompanying descriptions to ensure readability without visuals. For example, instead of simply saying, "See Fig. 1," describe, "temperature showed a direct correlation with metabolic rate (see Fig. 1)." Report statistical test results in the text for transparency and include both expected and unexpected findings. Make sure to:
- Describe patterns in simple terms.
- Include all results, regardless of whether they support the hypothesis.
- Ensure the text complements the data.
The discussion section interprets the results and connects them to the study's hypothesis and prior research. Start by analyzing whether the results support or contradict the original hypothesis, explaining any biological or scientific relevance. Integrate your findings with previous studies to highlight patterns or differences and explore possible explanations for any unexpected results—proposing hypotheses that future research might test. Emphasize trends, even if statistically insignificant, if they offer interesting insights, but avoid overstating these. End with a concise summary of the main points and suggest realistic directions for future research without generic statements. While formatting a scientific research paper, remember to avoid redundancy with the Results section by not re-listing data, and keep the focus on interpretation rather than description.
The conclusion provides a brief but impactful summary of the study's main findings and their broader significance. Start by reiterating the key findings in a concise manner to remind readers of the study's core discoveries. Then, discuss the overall significance of these findings, explaining how they contribute to the field and why they matter. Avoid introducing new information here; instead, reinforce the main conclusions and leave the reader with a clear understanding of the study's value and implications. This section should succinctly encapsulate the essence of the research and its impact.
Tables and Figures
Tables and figures are vital parts of a scientific paper that visually present data and enhance comprehension. Use them when they convey information more clearly than words alone. Each table or figure should be a self-contained unit with a descriptive caption explaining its content so it can be understood without referencing the text. Cite each figure or table in the text, but avoid redundant explanations.
- Tables : Use for organized data comparisons.
- Figures : Choose graphs to illustrate relationships between variables.
- Captions : Briefly summarize what's displayed, avoiding detailed descriptions in the text.
- Preference : Whenever possible, opt for figures over tables, as they generally convey relationships more effectively.
This approach ensures clarity and efficiency in data presentation.
Acknowledgments
The acknowledgments section offers a space to thank individuals or organizations who significantly contributed to the research but aren't listed as authors. This might include funding sources, mentors, technical assistants, or others who provided critical support. Keep acknowledgments brief but specific. For example, you might mention an organization that provided grant funding or a colleague who assisted with data analysis. It's a professional courtesy to recognize these contributions, and many journals expect such acknowledgment as part of academic transparency and integrity.
The references section in your scientific research paper format lists all sources cited within the paper, following a consistent citation style, such as APA, MLA, or Chicago. Essential details include:
- author names
- publication date
- source information (e.g., journal name or book publisher).
The list can be ordered alphabetically by author (author-date format) or by the sequence in which citations appear in the text (numbered format). Ensure each entry follows the required format for your paper, as proper citation gives credit to original researchers and strengthens the credibility of your work.
Format for Citing References in the Text
Whenever you refer to another researcher's work, whether it's their results, conclusions, or methods, proper citation is necessary. The reference in the text should only include the author's last name and the year of publication. Here are the common ways for how to cite a scientific paper:
- Parenthetical Citation : If the author's name is not part of the sentence, the citation should go in parentheses at the end of the relevant sentence or clause, followed by punctuation. Example : "Research has shown that heat affects enzyme activity (Lee 1999)." Example : "This study shows a significant impact of heat on enzyme activity (Lee 1999), which contradicts previous assumptions."
- Author Prominent Citation : If you mention the author's name in the sentence, place the year of publication immediately after the name in parentheses. Example : "Lee (1999) found that heat alters enzyme activity." Example : "As demonstrated by Lee (1999), heat can significantly alter enzyme activity."
- Emphasizing the Year : If the publication year is central to your point, omit the parentheses around the date. Example : "In 1999, Lee discovered the effects of heat on enzyme activity." This is useful for showing historical context or when the timing of a study is relevant to the discussion.
- Incorrect Citation Format : Avoid placing the date before the author's name. Incorrect : "Lee found that heat affects enzyme activity (1999)."
- Multiple Authors : If you want to cite multiple studies in one reference, list all authors in the same set of parentheses, separated by semicolons, and arrange them in chronological order. Example : "Several studies have found that heat influences enzyme activity (Lee 1999, Patel 2002, Turner 2005)."
- Citing More Than Three Authors : If there are more than three authors, use "et al." after the first author's last name to indicate the rest of the authors. Example : "Johnson et al. (2008) confirmed the results of previous studies."
The appendix holds supplementary material that is not critical to the main text but is valuable for interested readers. Items commonly placed here include:
- additional data sets
- extended calculations or
- large tables and figures.
This section is especially helpful for detailed methods, complex statistical analyses, or additional results that support but don't directly drive the study's conclusions. For clarity, each appendix item should be labeled and referenced within the paper as needed, helping readers easily locate this supporting information if they choose.
Scientific Paper Format Example
Now, to understand the scientific paper format in action, it's helpful to look at a complete example. Below is a sample that includes each part of a standard scientific paper, showing how to structure and present research findings in a clear, organized way.
If you'd rather have a professional writing your paper with expertise, pay for essay here and get a tailored piece of your own!
Let's Recap
In this guide, we explored how to format a scientific paper, covering everything from the title page to the appendix. Following a clear format not only ensures that your research is presented professionally but also makes it easier for others to understand, replicate, and build upon your work. In order to effectively guide readers through your study's journey, consider the following:
- Follow the standard order (Title, Abstract, Introduction, etc.) for clarity and impact.
- Each section should serve a clear purpose, with unnecessary details left out.
- Use a consistent citation format to give proper credit and strengthen your paper's credibility.
- Tables and figures should add clarity, not clutter.
- A polished paper reflects attention to detail and enhances readability.
Following these steps will help ensure your scientific paper is professional, organized, and impactful. And if you ever need extra support, our science assignment helper is always ready to lend a hand!
Get Your Scientific Paper Done Right!
Our professional writers are ready to help you deliver high-quality results.
What Is the General Format of a Scientific Paper?
What is apa format for scientific paper, how to format a table for a scientific paper.
is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.
Author. (2014). How to Write a Paper in Scientific Journal Style and Format Reprinted from the On-line Resources Website http://www.bates.edu/biology/student-resources/resources/ ***************************************************************** The title goes here, centered justified, not capitalized . https://www.bates.edu/biology/files/2010/06/How-to-Write-Guide-v10-2014.pdf
Hoogenboom, B. J., & Manske, R. C. (2012). HOW TO WRITE A SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy , 7 (5), 512. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3474301/
- Liberty University
- Jerry Falwell Library
- Special Collections
- < Previous
Home > ETD > Doctoral > 6191
Doctoral Dissertations and Projects
Investigating the effects of social and emotional learning on career and technical education students' career readiness certification.
Helen K. Linkous , Liberty University Follow
School of Education
Doctor of Philosophy in Advanced Educational Studies (PhD)
Antionette Stroter
social-emotional learning, career and technical education, career readiness, Panorama Social-Emotional Learning survey
Disciplines
Education | Vocational Education
Recommended Citation
Linkous, Helen K., "Investigating the Effects of Social and Emotional Learning on Career and Technical Education Students' Career Readiness Certification" (2024). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects . 6191. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/6191
The purpose of this quantitative predictive-correlational study was to determine if social-emotional learning (SEL) impacts career and technical education (CTE) students’ career readiness certification. This study was guided by Albert Bandura’s social learning theory which has been applied to social emotional learning to help individuals develop the skills necessary to navigate social interactions effectively. It is important to understand the correlation between SEL and career readiness since it affects students’ graduation, employability, and the potential for high-skilled, high-waged careers. The 152 participants for the study were drawn from a convenience sample of high school students who completed a CTE program of study after the spring semester of the 2023-2024 school year. The Panorama Social-Emotional Learning survey was administered to CTE students who were on track to complete a CTE program of study. A binary logistic regression was conducted to determine if students’ social-emotional learning scores could predict their career readiness certification. Themes were identified as related to SEL in CTE. The results yielded a significant relationship between SEL and CTE students’ career readiness certification. The findings of this study revealed the intersection between SEL and CTE. The study's conclusions included the connection between SEL and students’ preparedness for the workforce as well as the unique niche for research specific to the career and technical education setting. Specific suggestions for future research are provided based on the results and limitations of this study.
Available for download on Thursday, November 13, 2025
Since November 13, 2024
Included in
Vocational Education Commons
- Collections
- LU Faculty SHARE
- Theses and Dissertations
- Conferences and Events
- Open Educational Resources (OER)
- Explore Disciplines
Advanced Search
- Notify me via email or RSS .
Faculty Authors
- Submit Research
- Expert Gallery Login
Student Authors
- Undergraduate Submissions
- Graduate Submissions
- Honors Submissions
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Recommendations for future research should be: Concrete and specific. Supported with a clear rationale. Directly connected to your research. Overall, strive to highlight ways other researchers can reproduce or replicate your results to draw further conclusions, and suggest different directions that future research can take, if applicable.
For example, recommendations from research on climate change can be used to develop policies that reduce carbon emissions and promote sustainability. Program development: Research recommendations can guide the development of programs that address specific issues. For example, recommendations from research on education can be used to develop ...
Here is a step-wise guide to build your understanding on the development of research recommendations. 1. Understand the Research Question: Understand the research question and objectives before writing recommendations. Also, ensure that your recommendations are relevant and directly address the goals of the study. 2.
Step 2: Analyse Your Findings. You have to examine your data and identify your key results. This analysis forms the foundation for your recommendations. Look for patterns and unexpected findings that might suggest new areas for other researchers to explore.
Your dissertation needs to include suggestions for future research. Depending on requirements of your university, suggestions for future research can be either integrated into Research Limitations section or it can be a separate section. You will need to propose 4-5 suggestions for future studies and these can include the following: 1. Building upon findings of your research. These may relate ...
In this example, the author delivers a suggestion based on the research findings (the risk of social isolation grows among people aged 65 and more). The measures to improve this situation are indicated (the organizations dealing with problems of social isolation should pay more attention to people over 65 years old).
Recommendation in research example. See below for a full research recommendation example that you can use as a template to write your own. Recommendation section. The current study can be interpreted as a first step in the research on COPD speech characteristics. However, the results of this study should be treated with caution due to the small ...
Crafting impactful recommendations is a vital skill for any researcher looking to bridge the gap between their findings and real-world applications. By understanding the purpose of recommendations, identifying areas for future research, structuring your suggestions effectively, and connecting them to your research findings, you can unlock the ...
Research implications refer to the possible effects or outcomes of a study's findings. The recommendations section, on the other hand, is where you'll propose specific actions based on those findings. You can structure your implications section based on the three overarching categories - theoretical, practical and future research ...
Suggest how your work reported in this paper opens new research possibilities. Implications of the study: Place the study in a wider context of research in the discipline and/ or a situation in the real world. (positive) Applications of the research: Indicate how the research may be practically useful in real-world situations: Recommendations
Conduct the research in an objective and unbiased manner. The research findings should be reproducible. The research recommendations should be made with a concrete plan in mind. The research recommendations should be based on a solid foundation of evidence. The research recommendations should be clear and concise.
The initially stated overarching aim of this research was to identify the contextual factors and mechanisms that are regularly associated with effective and cost-effective public involvement in research. While recognising the limitations of our analysis, we believe we have largely achieved this in our revised theory of public involvement in research set out in Chapter 8. We have developed and ...
A recommendation in research refers to the advice or suggestions provided by researchers at the conclusion of their study, aimed at addressing the gaps identified, enhancing future research, and applying findings in practical contexts.Recommendations are crucial as they guide stakeholders, including policymakers, practitioners, and fellow researchers, on how to utilize the research outcomes ...
Here are some helpful tips for writing dissertation recommendations that you should incorporate when drafting a research paper: Avoid general or vague recommendations. Be specific and concrete. Offer measurable insights Ensure your suggestions are practical and implementable. Avoid focusing on theoretical concepts or new findings but on future ...
Table of contents. Step 1: Restate the problem. Step 2: Sum up the paper. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Research paper conclusion examples. Frequently asked questions about research paper conclusions.
Examples of 'reject' reviewer comments. "I do not believe that this journal is a good fit for this paper.". "While the paper addresses an interesting issue, it is not publishable in its current form.". "In its current state, I do not recommend accepting this paper.". "Unfortunately, the literature review is inadequate.
In this article, we discuss six types of future research suggestion. These include: (1) building on a particular finding in your research; (2) addressing a flaw in your research; examining (or testing) a theory (framework or model) either (3) for the first time or (4) in a new context, location and/or culture; (5) re-evaluating and (6 ...
Table of contents. What not to include in your discussion section. Step 1: Summarize your key findings. Step 2: Give your interpretations. Step 3: Discuss the implications. Step 4: Acknowledge the limitations. Step 5: Share your recommendations. Discussion section example. Other interesting articles.
Title Page. The scientific paper title page introduces the reader to the research in a direct, professional manner. The title should be precise, reflecting the study's subject, focus, and any manipulated variables—think of it as a quick summary that attracts relevant readers.. The author(s) and their affiliation(s) (such as their university or organization) are listed below.
The first question asks for a ready-made solution, and is not focused or researchable. The second question is a clearer comparative question, but note that it may not be practically feasible. For a smaller research project or thesis, it could be narrowed down further to focus on the effectiveness of drunk driving laws in just one or two countries.
Specific suggestions for future research are provided based on the results and limitations of this study. ... The 152 participants for the study were drawn from a convenience sample of high school students who completed a CTE program of study after the spring semester of the 2023-2024 school year. The Panorama Social-Emotional Learning survey ...