useful tool for
I argue that…
I maintain that…
I disagree that…
Don’t forget that for each part of your argument, you must provide enough evidence for the claims that you make. This means that if you include one of these templates in your essays, you have to explain the evidence it presents in a way that is clear and convincing for your reader.
I respond exercise and solutions
Using one of the templates, craft a rebuttal to the counterargument you just created.
Sociocultural theorists used to believe that adolescence was a time of “natural defiance” (Fung, 1995) and therefore discounted the role of educational programs aimed at supporting teenagers to form healthy habits. Much of the focus of schooling therefore became about teaching specific content and skills. However, this argument fails to demonstrate that the defiance observed during adolescence was “natural” or inherent and not a product of a specific cultural environment. It therefore does not convince me that education during the adolescent years needs to remain rigidly focused on content and skills.
Critics may call into question my assumption that effective physical education can help establish life-long healthy living habits. While it is true that we cannot assume that physical education will automatically lead to the establishment of healthy habits, I maintain that the creation of such habits, rather than simply teaching specific physical education content or skills, should be the central goal of an effective physical education program.
Graff, G., & Birkenstein, C. (2017). They say / I say: The moves that matter in academic writing, with readings (3rd ed.). New York: Norton W. W. Company.
Marshall, S. (2017). Advance in academic writing: Integrating research, critical thinking, academic reading and writing. Toronto, Canada: Pearson Education ESL.
Morley, J. (2014). Academic phrasebank. Retrieved from http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
[1] Adapted from Graff and Birkenstein (2016).
[2] The templates used in this handout are adapted from Morley (2014), Marshall (2017), and Graff and Birkenstein (2016).
Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.
Published on September 18, 2020 by Jack Caulfield . Revised on July 23, 2023.
The basic structure of an essay always consists of an introduction , a body , and a conclusion . But for many students, the most difficult part of structuring an essay is deciding how to organize information within the body.
Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes
The basics of essay structure, chronological structure, compare-and-contrast structure, problems-methods-solutions structure, signposting to clarify your structure, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about essay structure.
There are two main things to keep in mind when working on your essay structure: making sure to include the right information in each part, and deciding how you’ll organize the information within the body.
The three parts that make up all essays are described in the table below.
Part | Content |
---|---|
You’ll also have to consider how to present information within the body. There are a few general principles that can guide you here.
The first is that your argument should move from the simplest claim to the most complex . The body of a good argumentative essay often begins with simple and widely accepted claims, and then moves towards more complex and contentious ones.
For example, you might begin by describing a generally accepted philosophical concept, and then apply it to a new topic. The grounding in the general concept will allow the reader to understand your unique application of it.
The second principle is that background information should appear towards the beginning of your essay . General background is presented in the introduction. If you have additional background to present, this information will usually come at the start of the body.
The third principle is that everything in your essay should be relevant to the thesis . Ask yourself whether each piece of information advances your argument or provides necessary background. And make sure that the text clearly expresses each piece of information’s relevance.
The sections below present several organizational templates for essays: the chronological approach, the compare-and-contrast approach, and the problems-methods-solutions approach.
The chronological approach (sometimes called the cause-and-effect approach) is probably the simplest way to structure an essay. It just means discussing events in the order in which they occurred, discussing how they are related (i.e. the cause and effect involved) as you go.
A chronological approach can be useful when your essay is about a series of events. Don’t rule out other approaches, though—even when the chronological approach is the obvious one, you might be able to bring out more with a different structure.
Explore the tabs below to see a general template and a specific example outline from an essay on the invention of the printing press.
Essays with two or more main subjects are often structured around comparing and contrasting . For example, a literary analysis essay might compare two different texts, and an argumentative essay might compare the strengths of different arguments.
There are two main ways of structuring a compare-and-contrast essay: the alternating method, and the block method.
In the alternating method, each paragraph compares your subjects in terms of a specific point of comparison. These points of comparison are therefore what defines each paragraph.
The tabs below show a general template for this structure, and a specific example for an essay comparing and contrasting distance learning with traditional classroom learning.
In the block method, each subject is covered all in one go, potentially across multiple paragraphs. For example, you might write two paragraphs about your first subject and then two about your second subject, making comparisons back to the first.
The tabs again show a general template, followed by another essay on distance learning, this time with the body structured in blocks.
An essay that concerns a specific problem (practical or theoretical) may be structured according to the problems-methods-solutions approach.
This is just what it sounds like: You define the problem, characterize a method or theory that may solve it, and finally analyze the problem, using this method or theory to arrive at a solution. If the problem is theoretical, the solution might be the analysis you present in the essay itself; otherwise, you might just present a proposed solution.
The tabs below show a template for this structure and an example outline for an essay about the problem of fake news.
Discover proofreading & editing
Signposting means guiding the reader through your essay with language that describes or hints at the structure of what follows. It can help you clarify your structure for yourself as well as helping your reader follow your ideas.
In longer essays whose body is split into multiple named sections, the introduction often ends with an overview of the rest of the essay. This gives a brief description of the main idea or argument of each section.
The overview allows the reader to immediately understand what will be covered in the essay and in what order. Though it describes what comes later in the text, it is generally written in the present tense . The following example is from a literary analysis essay on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein .
Transition words and phrases are used throughout all good essays to link together different ideas. They help guide the reader through your text, and an essay that uses them effectively will be much easier to follow.
Various different relationships can be expressed by transition words, as shown in this example.
Because Hitler failed to respond to the British ultimatum, France and the UK declared war on Germany. Although it was an outcome the Allies had hoped to avoid, they were prepared to back up their ultimatum in order to combat the existential threat posed by the Third Reich.
Transition sentences may be included to transition between different paragraphs or sections of an essay. A good transition sentence moves the reader on to the next topic while indicating how it relates to the previous one.
… Distance learning, then, seems to improve accessibility in some ways while representing a step backwards in others.
However , considering the issue of personal interaction among students presents a different picture.
If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!
College essays
(AI) Tools
The structure of an essay is divided into an introduction that presents your topic and thesis statement , a body containing your in-depth analysis and arguments, and a conclusion wrapping up your ideas.
The structure of the body is flexible, but you should always spend some time thinking about how you can organize your essay to best serve your ideas.
An essay isn’t just a loose collection of facts and ideas. Instead, it should be centered on an overarching argument (summarized in your thesis statement ) that every part of the essay relates to.
The way you structure your essay is crucial to presenting your argument coherently. A well-structured essay helps your reader follow the logic of your ideas and understand your overall point.
Comparisons in essays are generally structured in one of two ways:
It’s also possible to combine both methods, for example by writing a full paragraph on each of your topics and then a final paragraph contrasting the two according to a specific metric.
You should try to follow your outline as you write your essay . However, if your ideas change or it becomes clear that your structure could be better, it’s okay to depart from your essay outline . Just make sure you know why you’re doing so.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
Caulfield, J. (2023, July 23). How to Structure an Essay | Tips & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved June 24, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/essay-structure/
Other students also liked, comparing and contrasting in an essay | tips & examples, how to write the body of an essay | drafting & redrafting, transition sentences | tips & examples for clear writing, what is your plagiarism score.
Discover five compelling argumentative essay examples and learn how to structure and write effective argumentative essays.
Writing an argumentative essay is an essential skill that helps you articulate your thoughts, present your arguments logically, and convince your audience of your viewpoint. In this article, we'll dive into the world of argumentative essays, providing you with five compelling argumentative essay examples and a detailed explanation of what makes each one effective. We'll also cover the structure of argumentative essays, offer tips for writing them, and answer some frequently asked questions.
An argumentative essay is a type of writing that presents a clear stance on a specific issue, supported by evidence and reasoning. The goal is to persuade the reader to agree with your perspective. Unlike other types of essays, argumentative essays require thorough research and a balanced approach, considering both sides of the argument before making a case for one.
Introduction.
In today's rapidly evolving world, technology has become an integral part of our lives, influencing almost every sector, including education. The debate over whether technology is a boon or a bane in education is ongoing, with strong arguments on both sides. While technology offers numerous benefits such as enhanced learning experiences, increased accessibility, and personalized education, it also poses challenges like distraction, inequality, and dependency.
One of the most significant advantages of technology in education is the enhancement of learning experiences. Interactive tools such as smart boards, educational apps, and virtual reality (VR) can make learning more engaging and effective.
Technology has also made education more accessible to a broader audience. Online courses and educational platforms allow students from all over the world to access quality education regardless of their geographical location.
Adaptive learning technologies can tailor educational content to individual students' needs, learning styles, and pace. This personalized approach helps students to grasp subjects more efficiently and keeps them motivated.
Despite the benefits, there are notable disadvantages. One of the main concerns is the potential for distraction. With the proliferation of digital devices, students may find it challenging to focus on their studies.
Not all students have equal access to technology and the internet, particularly in low-income or rural areas. This disparity can widen the achievement gap between students who have access to digital resources and those who do not.
In conclusion, the role of technology in education is a double-edged sword. While it offers significant advantages such as enhanced learning experiences, increased accessibility, and personalized education, it also presents challenges like distraction, inequality, and dependency. By implementing strategies that promote balanced and equitable use of technology, we can ensure that it serves as a boon rather than a bane in the educational landscape.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, has been a controversial topic for decades. While some argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime and delivers justice for victims, others believe it is inhumane and prone to errors. This essay explores both sides of the argument to determine whether the death penalty should be abolished.
Proponents of the death penalty argue that it serves as a powerful deterrent to serious crimes. The fear of facing the ultimate punishment may prevent individuals from committing heinous acts.
Supporters also believe that the death penalty delivers justice for victims and their families. It provides a sense of closure and ensures that the perpetrator cannot commit further crimes.
Opponents argue that the death penalty is inhumane and a violation of human rights. The process of execution is often prolonged and painful, causing unnecessary suffering.
There is also the risk of wrongful convictions, where innocent people are sentenced to death. The judicial system is not infallible, and mistakes can lead to irreversible consequences.
In conclusion, while the death penalty may offer a sense of justice and deterrence, its potential for inhumanity and wrongful convictions cannot be overlooked. Abolishing the death penalty would ensure that the justice system prioritizes human rights and the possibility of rehabilitation over irreversible punishment.
Social media has revolutionized the way we communicate, share information, and connect with others. While it offers numerous benefits such as staying in touch with friends and family, promoting businesses, and raising awareness about important issues, it also has negative effects like cyberbullying, misinformation, and decreased face-to-face interactions.
One of the primary benefits of social media is that it allows people to stay connected with friends and family, no matter the distance. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter enable users to share updates, photos, and videos easily.
Social media is a powerful tool for businesses to reach a broader audience, engage with customers, and promote their products or services. It provides a cost-effective way to market and grow a brand.
Despite its benefits, social media can also have negative effects. Cyberbullying is a significant issue, with many individuals experiencing harassment and abuse online.
Social media platforms can also contribute to the spread of misinformation and fake news. False information can quickly go viral, leading to confusion and mistrust.
In conclusion, while social media offers numerous benefits such as staying connected, promoting businesses, and raising awareness, it also has negative effects like cyberbullying, misinformation, and decreased face-to-face interactions. By using social media responsibly and promoting digital literacy, we can mitigate these negative impacts and harness the positive potential of these platforms.
Animal testing has been a contentious issue for many years. While it has contributed to numerous scientific and medical advancements, it also raises ethical concerns about the treatment of animals. This essay examines both sides of the argument to determine whether animal testing should be banned.
Proponents of animal testing argue that it has led to significant scientific and medical advancements. Many life-saving treatments and vaccines have been developed through research involving animals.
Opponents argue that animal testing is unethical and inhumane. Animals are subjected to painful procedures and kept in confined spaces, raising serious concerns about their welfare.
There are also viable alternatives to animal testing that are more humane and potentially more effective. These include in vitro testing, computer modeling, and human-patient simulators.
Critics also question the reliability and relevance of animal testing. Animals often react differently to substances than humans, leading to inaccurate results and potentially harmful outcomes.
In conclusion, while animal testing has contributed to significant scientific and medical advancements, the ethical concerns and availability of alternative methods suggest that it may be time to move away from this practice. Banning animal testing would promote the development of more humane and potentially more effective research methods.
The rising cost of college education has sparked a heated debate over whether it should be free. Advocates argue that free college education would increase accessibility, reduce inequality, and boost the economy, while opponents believe it would lead to increased taxes, decreased quality of education, and overburdened public systems. This essay explores both perspectives to determine whether college education should be free.
Proponents of free college education argue that it would make higher education accessible to everyone, regardless of their financial background. This increased accessibility would reduce the inequality gap, allowing more individuals to pursue their dreams and contribute positively to society.
Free college education could also provide significant economic benefits. A more educated workforce can lead to higher productivity, innovation, and economic growth. Additionally, graduates with less student debt are more likely to invest in homes, start businesses, and contribute to the economy.
Opponents argue that free college education would require a substantial increase in taxes and government spending. Funding higher education for all would place a significant financial burden on taxpayers, potentially leading to budget cuts in other essential services.
There are also concerns that making college education free could lead to a decrease in the quality of education. With increased enrollment, colleges and universities may struggle to maintain the same level of quality, resources, and support for students.
Another argument against free college education is that it could overburden public higher education systems. With a surge in enrollment, public colleges and universities may face difficulties in accommodating all students, leading to longer wait times, fewer resources, and compromised educational experiences.
In conclusion, while free college education could increase accessibility, reduce inequality, and provide economic benefits, it also poses challenges such as increased taxes, potential decreases in education quality, and overburdened public systems. A balanced approach that includes targeted financial aid, scholarships, and affordable tuition options may be a more viable solution to addressing the rising costs of college education.
Q1: What is the purpose of an argumentative essay? A: The purpose of an argumentative essay is to present a clear stance on a specific issue, supported by evidence and reasoning, to persuade the reader to agree with the author's perspective.
Q2: How is an argumentative essay different from a persuasive essay? A: While both aim to convince the reader, an argumentative essay relies on evidence and logical reasoning, whereas a persuasive essay may use emotional appeals and personal opinions.
Q3: What are some common topics for argumentative essays? A: Common topics include social issues (e.g., gun control, abortion), ethical debates (e.g., animal testing, death penalty), and policy discussions (e.g., free college education, healthcare reform).
Q4: How can I choose a good topic for my argumentative essay? A: Choose a topic that you are passionate about, has clear opposing views, and can be supported with credible evidence and research.
Q5: What is the best way to structure an argumentative essay? A: An effective structure includes an introduction with a clear thesis statement, body paragraphs with evidence and counterarguments, and a conclusion that restates the thesis and summarizes key points.
Argumentative essays are a vital tool for developing critical thinking and persuasive communication skills. By exploring both sides of an issue and supporting your stance with evidence, you can create compelling arguments that engage and convince your audience. Whether you're writing about technology in education, the death penalty, social media, animal testing, or free college education, understanding the structure and components of an argumentative essay will help you craft strong, effective essays.
This page deals with the process of writing the argument: planning, structuring, strategies, writing, revision.
There are things that should be given some attention before you begin writing your argument. Thoughtful planning in the pre-writing stage increases the chances of your argument successfully convincing your audience. A well-executed piece of writing should be unified, coherent, and complete.
unified = the paper presents only a single idea or, if more than one idea, one point is made the principal one and the others are subordinated to it
coherent = the discussion flows smoothly and logically and is easy for the reader to follow; trying to make sense of the writing does not become an ordeal
complete = everything that should be said, has been said; no questions are left in the mind of the reader
Achieving a coherent, complete, unified piece of Argumentative Writing
1. Clearly state the argument/proposition of your essay.
2. Analyze the proposition. First, jot down points of conflict between your view and the opposing view. Second, think over your jottings and try to decide which points are the issues on which your argument should hinge. Third, arrange your jottings in order to give unity and coherence to your essay.
3. Write a paragraph (or more if necessary) on each point of conflict. (This step will have some variation, depending on whether you are using the block or point pattern of organization.)
4. Analyze and evaluate what you have written to see whether (a) the evidence seems reliable and (b) the reasoning free of fallacies.
5. Establish effective transitions between the discussions of the various points ( coherence ), keeping in mind that your objective is to connect each point to the main contention of your theme, the main proposition.
6. Think of your introduction. What makes the topic worth arguing about now (purpose)? (NOTE: Your topic should be broad enough to interest a large number of people, yet narrow enough that you can focus and manage the discussion.) What kind of people are you writing for (audience)? Can you depend on an interested and sympathetic hearing, or must you strive to gain attention and win people over? If you have to gain attention, how will you go about it? After you have thought about these things and written a first draft of your introduction, do you think it necessary to go back and revise the discussion in the body of your essay to make it better adapted to your audience?
7. Treat your conclusion as the last impression you will leave on your readers. Do you return here to your key point (your thesis), showing how your whole argument essay bears on and supports it? Do you leave your readers with a positive impression of your effort, even if you cannot be sure of having totally convinced them by reason?
Pattern Outlines for an Argument Essay
|
|
|
|
I. Introduction A. Main Point 1 B. Main Point 2 C. Main Point 3 D. Main Point 4
II. Response Section A. Summarize the opposition argument against your Main Point 1, offering counter argument that uses explanation and proof to defend your point of view. Follow this strategy for the other points of your argument. III. Summary A. Briefly restate the arguments pro and con on the topic IV. Conclusion A. Give a strong defense of your position, referencing your supporting evidence |
I. Introduction II. Main point 1 A. Summarize Point 1 B. Refute opposing arguments to Point 1, supporting your statements with explanation III. Main Point 2 A. Summarize Point 2 B. Refute opposing arguments to Point 2, supporting your statements with explanation IV. Main Point 3 A. Summarize Point 3 B. Refute opposing arguments to Point 3, supporting your statements with explanation V. Main Point 4 A. Summarize Point 4 B. Refute opposing arguments to Point 4, supporting your statements with explanation VI. Conclusion |
(Based on https://apps.spokane.edu/.../Summary%20Response%20Essay%20Assignment.pdf
In the context of argument, "pro" means agree/support, and "con" means disagree/oppose. Whether you structure your argument to follow the block style or point-by-point pattern, the three principal components of presentation, support, and refutation must be included. A point-by-point structure probably will be easier to follow, as the block style creates some separation between the "pro" and "con" sides of an argument which may require readers to do some up-and-down "scrolling" of the text.
Defining Arguments: defines what argument is and is not while providing some insights on laying the groundwork before the writing begins
How To Create an Argument: covers the stages of pre-writng, writing, and revising an argument
Argument at a Glance: P.A.P.A.: a blank page with no content
Argument Claims: discusses types of claims and perspectives from which to launch your argument; includes links to sample readings
Argument Outline: provides outlines for various argument structures and types and also contains worksheets for preparing an argument
Rogerian Argument: explains an alternative approach to the "traditional" argumentative style
Ethos, Logos, and Pathos: offers tips on how to interact with the audience in an argumentative context
Fallacies: a glossary of things to avoid
Sample Essays: a selection of seven argumentative essays written by students
The Purdue OWL: The OWL is the Online Writing Laboratory maintained by Purdue University. It is a comprehensive, encyclopedic online reference source for nearly all aspects of research and writing, from topic selection to citation styles and source evaluation. Every serious researcher should bookmark the OWL.
For information regarding writing argumentative papers, either type "Purdue OWL" argument into an internet search box. The first page of results provides links to more specific aspects of writing argument. Or, you can type the word argument into the "Search the OWL" box (https://owl.purdue.edu/search.html). Once you have landed on any OWL screen, it is good to scan the left pane for other pages which you may find useful.
CAVEAT: Purdue OWL has merged with Chegg, a for-profit company who has created a citation machine service for citation management. This partnership has resulted in pop-up advertisements appearing on OWL screens as well as permitting Chegg influence on OWL's citation help pages. Those using the OWL may wish to keep these things in mind.
Useful options besides the Purdue OWL are
To locate information on the internet on argument, in the search box type argument along with a modifying term such as writing or structure.
To locate additional LibGuides on argument on the internet, in the search box type argument libguide.
What’s the most common issue most students face when it comes to argumentative essay writing in general? Of course, there is a slew of problems that different students might face, such as topic choice, finding information, doing research, and so on. However, one challenge that cuts across the most is the issue of how to structure an argumentative essay. This is something that poses a source of concerns to not just one student, but a good number of them.
Why is that? The foremost thing anyone would tell you is that drafting a lengthy piece of text is in itself a hard task, not to talk of adding arguments into the structure. This is true because to draft a quality essay you need a lot of time and effort, besides finding the required source materials as well. Furthermore, one has to look for the perfect argumentative essay structure and format that helps project the ideas and points correctly.
It’s important to note that the challenges mentioned and many others that weren’t persisted even though an argumentative essay is one of the most popular text categories learners get exposed to, be it in high school or college. Perhaps the most important reason it is difficult is that most learners don’t know how to, or in other words – they don’t know the best way to structure an argumentative essay.
In this article, we hope to help students understand the way essay structure works and guide them towards all the tidbits of how to write an argumentative essay structure.
By default definition, an argumentative essay is a written text where opinions are expressed in support or against a central theme, and explanations back up the stance taken. It’s quite popular among students and teachers alike and is usually given for learners to develop good oratory and written skills when defending a particular point. It can be exposed as a written form of a debate. It’s also one of the types of essays in college that requires strong, excellent, and valid sources of evidence to validate one’s ideas.
The backbone of any written work is its structure. By creating the perfect structure, it becomes easy to note what’s needed and where one needs to write each idea. It’s easier to maintain a highly organized work with a well-planned argumentative essay structure. The structure is likely to consist of the following sections:
In this section, you provide a brief overview of the central theme, and then you need to outline the segments you are going to touch regarding the topic. An argument essay outline usually has sections like:
This is akin to debate on paper. Everything must be written in a tone that suggests you are perfectly confident of your stance. We will look at the components of the main body in the next section.
The main body is where writing the main debate begins. It is usually kicked off with a few words on the topic of discussion (introduction), from where you aim to bring your readers up to speed on the reason why you will be supporting/opposing a motion, just before you present your set of supporting ideas.
Here, you begin with your points. In writing your body paragraph, remember to keep yourself aligned with the previously set structure of the argumentative essay.
When you are presenting your ideas and their backup evidence, the following should be noted:
In this segment, your major aim is to find the weak spots in your opponent’s argument and turn them to full-blown tools to overthrow the validity of their statements. In other words, ‘create mountains out of their molehills.’ You would have to do this in a polite, slang-free, and sarcasm-free manner. In addition to this, you can turn some of their arguments against them by challenging their present views. You could choose to challenge their validity or credibility.
In general, here are a few other tips you can remember that will aid you in keeping to the argumentative essay outline you created:
The conclusion of any lengthy text is also a crucial part of the write-up. It should tally with what was discussed in the main part and should end with what was used to support your stand on the topic. It should also be in compliance with the given structure of an argumentative essay.
Get a professional assistance from certified experts right now
by Antony W
June 26, 2024
For some students, the hardest part of writing an argumentative essay is to structure the assignment.
Yet with a learning curve that isn’t too difficult to master, completing the writing will not only take you a short time but also turns into a super fun assignment.
In this guide, we'll teach you how to structure your argumentative essay the right way.
Whether you have a simple argumentative essay topic to complete or your professor has asked you to unpack and argue a controversial topic, this post will unveil everything you need to know to organize your thoughts in a logical order.
When you combine your research, writing, and analytical skills with the right essay outline for the argument, you'll end up with an assignment that your instructor will not only read from start to finish but one that scores the best grades possible.
You can have:
However, if you don’t present this information in a standard outline, your argumentative essay will fall flat.
Instructors insist that your argumentative writing should follow an appropriate structure for a good reason.
A good structure for an argumentative essay allows you to present your arguments and evidence in a logical order.
For you, it means you get a clear picture of how your arguments will unfold as you write.
For your audience, it solidifies the presentation of information, making the essay not only easy but also interesting to read from the very beginning.
Your instructor may ask you to present an outline before you start writing. Even if they don’t, you should consider having one because it will help to enhance your writing process.
Now that you know what a structure is and why it’s important, let’s have a look at the outline starting from top to bottom.
Keep in mind that while this structure is just an example, it will be the one you use to write many of, if not all, your argumentative essays.
Again, you shouldn’t be jumping sections in this format. It’s structural and you should therefore follow it from top to bottom.
Regardless of the type of argumentative essay that you have to write, you’ll divide the assignment into three major sections: the introduction paragraphs, the body part, and the conclusion.
In general, your argumentative essay will be 5 paragraphs long .
You’ll have to write an interesting introduction to introduce the topic and a conclusion to summarize your argument.
Your body paragraphs must support your view, identify opposing opinion, and respond to counterclaims.
Below is how to write every section of your argumentative essay assignment.
The introduction of your argument should be short and precise. You have a space for only 1 to 2 sentences. So make sure you write only the most important information.
Your goal here is to state your claim and explain it further with some background information if any.
Make the introduction as interesting to read as possible so that you can easily draw the attention of your reader in.
If your subject requires that you argue about an issue or theory, for example, you should provide a brief explanation about it.
If you’re examining literary work, make sure you state the author and the title of their work.
It's in the body paragraphs of an argumentative essay that you lay the foundation that you’ll use to prove your argument.
You’ll mostly concentrate on three things as you write this section:
Supporting evidence section must appear in your argumentative essay because it’s what proves whether your argument is strong enough for an audience to accept.
The elements of a supporting evidence paragraph include:
There can be one or more supporting paragraphs depending on the subject under investigation.
So if you’re going to have more supporting paragraphs, simply make sure each reflects all the elements above.
Because an argumentative essay must consider both sides of a subject, the essay must have a counterclaim paragraph .
Including this section means you’re not merely narrowly minded. Not to mention it goes a long way to make yourself sound a lot more reasonable and objective.
Including a counterclaim in an argument is not optional, it’s a must.
If you think about it, your readers have opposing point of views .
If you fail to include one or more of their arguments and then refute them, your essay will be weak and sound a lot more subjective. You don’t want this to be the case.
A good way to conclude a counterclaim is to include a sentence, which gives more weight to reassert your claim.
The purpose of the concluding paragraph is to show your reader that you have analyzed both sides of an issue and taken a strong position.
You shouldn’t merely restate the thesis or rewrite the introduction. Instead, write a good conclusion for the argument.
About the author
Antony W is a professional writer and coach at Help for Assessment. He spends countless hours every day researching and writing great content filled with expert advice on how to write engaging essays, research papers, and assignments.
In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
Get science-backed answers as you write with Paperpal's Research feature
Essay writing is a fundamental skill, a basic task, that is expected of those who choose to pursue their undergraduate and master’s degrees. It constitutes a key requirement for students to complete a given course credit. However, many students and early career researchers find themselves struggling with the challenge of organizing their thoughts into a coherent, engaging structure. This article is especially for those who see essay writing as a daunting task and face problems in presenting their work in an impactful way.
Read on as we delve into the basic elements of essay writing, outline key principles for organizing information, and cover some foundational features of writing essays.
Essays are written in a flowing and continuous pattern but with a structure of its own. An introduction, body and conclusion are integral to it. The key is to balance the amount and kind of information to be presented in each part. Various disciplines may have their own conventions or guidelines on the information to be provided in the introduction.
A clear articulation of the context and background of the study is important, as is the definition of key terms and an outline of specific models or theories used. Readers also need to know the significance of the study and its implications for further research. Most importantly, the thesis or the main proposition should be clearly presented.
The body of the essay is therefore organized into paragraphs that hold the main ideas and arguments and is presented and analyzed in a logical manner. Ideally, each paragraph of the body focuses on one main point or a distinct topic and must be supported by evidence and analysis. The concluding paragraph should bring back to the reader the key arguments, its significance and food for thought. It is best not to re-state all the points of the essay or introduce a new concept here.
In other words, certain general guidelines help structure the information in the essay. The information must flow logically with the context or the background information presented in the introductory part of the essay. The arguments are built organically where each paragraph in the body of the essay deals with a different point, yet closely linked to the para preceding and following it. Importantly, when writing essays, early career researchers must be careful in ensuring that each piece of information relates to the main thesis and is a building block to the arguments.
The structure of an essay can be determined by the kind of essay that is required.
Also known as the cause-and-effect approach, this is a straightforward way to structure an essay. In such essays, events are discussed sequentially, as they occurred from the earliest to the latest. A chronological structure is useful for discussing a series of events or processes such as historical analyses or narratives of events. The introduction should have the topic sentence. The body of the essay should follow a chorological progression with each para discussing a major aspect of that event with supporting evidence. It ends with a summarizing of the results of the events.
Where the essay focuses on a specific problem, the problem-methods-solutions structure can be used to organize the essay. This structure is ideal for essays that address complex issues. It starts with presenting the problem, the context, and thesis statement as introduction to the essay. The major part of the discussion which forms the body of the essay focuses on stating the problem and its significance, the author’s approach or methods adopted to address the problem along with its relevance, and accordingly proposing solution(s) to the identified problem. The concluding part offers a recap of the research problem, methods, and proposed solutions, emphasizing their significance and potential impact.
This structure of essay writing is ideally used when two or more key subjects require a comparison of ideas, theories, or phenomena. The three crucial elements, introduction, body, and conclusion, remain the same. The introduction presents the context and the thesis statement. The body of the essay seeks to focus on and highlight differences between the subjects, supported by evidence and analysis. The conclusion is used to summarize the key points of comparison and contrast, offering insights into the significance of the analysis.
Depending on how the subjects will be discussed, the body of the essay can be organized according to the block method or the alternating method. In the block method, one para discusses one subject and the next para the other subject. In the alternative method, both subjects are discussed in one para based on a particular topic or issue followed by the next para on another issue and so on.
An essay structure serves as a framework for presenting ideas coherently and logically. It comprises three crucial elements: an introduction that communicates the context, topic, and thesis statement; the body focusing on the main points and arguments supported with appropriate evidence followed by its analysis; and a conclusion that ties together the main points and its importance .
An essay structure well-defined essay structure enhances clarity, coherence, and readability, and is crucial for organizing ideas and arguments to effectively communicate key aspects of a chosen topic. It allows readers to better understand arguments presented and demonstrates the author’s ability to organize and present information systematically.
Yes, while expert recommend following an essay structure, early career researchers may choose how best to adapt standard essay structures to communicate and share their research in an impactful and engaging way. However, do keep in mind that deviating too far from established structures can hinder comprehension and weaken the overall effectiveness of the essay, By understanding the basic elements of essay writing and employing appropriate structures such as chronological, problem-methods-solutions, or compare and contrast, researchers can effectively organize their ideas and communicate their findings with clarity and precision.
Paperpal is a comprehensive AI writing toolkit that helps students and researchers achieve 2x the writing in half the time. It leverages 21+ years of STM experience and insights from millions of research articles to provide in-depth academic writing, language editing, and submission readiness support to help you write better, faster.
Get accurate academic translations, rewriting support, grammar checks, vocabulary suggestions, and generative AI assistance that delivers human precision at machine speed. Try for free or upgrade to Paperpal Prime starting at US$19 a month to access premium features, including consistency, plagiarism, and 30+ submission readiness checks to help you succeed.
Experience the future of academic writing – Sign up to Paperpal and start writing for free!
Powerful academic phrases to improve your essay writing .
You may also like, leveraging generative ai to enhance student understanding of..., how to write a good hook for essays,..., addressing peer review feedback and mastering manuscript revisions..., how paperpal can boost comprehension and foster interdisciplinary..., what is the importance of a concept paper..., how to write the first draft of a..., mla works cited page: format, template & examples, how to ace grant writing for research funding..., how to write a high-quality conference paper.
As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:
To regain access, please make sure that cookies and JavaScript are enabled before reloading the page.
Summarizing skills empower you to condense extensive information into digestible, concise points. In academic settings, mastering this skill lets you capture the essence of long papers or complex theories, aiding in study and communication.
Professionals rely on summarization to distill lengthy reports and documents into actionable insights critical for decision-making and efficient workflow.
As you learn to summarize effectively , you enhance your ability to understand and convey key messages swiftly and clearly, essential in scholarly and business environments.
Summarizing involves condensing a larger text into its essential points, allowing you to grasp the main ideas quickly and effectively. Effective summaries retain the original message’s core , offering a clear overview without delving into every detail.
This skill is invaluable in managing information overload, enabling students and professionals to absorb and communicate key points with precision.
Creating a practical summary demands precision and skill. You must distill complex information into its most essential points while retaining the essence of the original content. Here’s what to focus on:
Mastering the art of summarizing research papers is a valuable skill for students and researchers. It equips you to efficiently grasp the core ideas of a study without getting bogged down in every detail.
Don’t just passively skim the paper. Engage actively by underlining, highlighting, or taking margin notes. Focus on capturing key concepts, methodologies used, and the main findings the author(s) presented.
Pay particular attention to the introduction, which lays the groundwork by outlining the research question , relevant background information, and the overall significance of the study.
Research papers typically follow a standard structure. The introduction sets the stage, the methodology section details how the research was conducted, and the results section presents the data and findings.
Finally, the discussion section interprets the results, explains their implications, and acknowledges limitations. As you read, be mindful of how each section builds upon the others to answer the central research question.
Once you’ve familiarized yourself with the paper’s structure and content, it’s time to separate the essential from the interesting.
Ask yourself critical questions:
Now that you’ve extracted the key elements, it’s time to synthesize them into a concise and informative summary. Write in your own words to avoid plagiarism , and strive for clarity and conciseness.
Focus on capturing the essence of the paper, ensuring your summary effectively conveys the research question, methodology, key findings, and the authors’ conclusions. The length of your summary will depend on the specific requirements – a one-paragraph abstract for a literature review or a multi-page report for a class assignment.
The final step is crucial. Carefully proofread your summary to ensure it accurately reflects the original paper and avoids introducing personal opinions or biases. Double-check for factual accuracy, grammar , and a logical flow of information.
A well-crafted summary should be a self-contained piece that effectively communicates the essence of the research paper.
Summarizing a story effectively involves condensing the plot into its critical points while maintaining the essence of the narrative. It’s a great way to test your comprehension and share the core of a story without revealing all the details.
Start by establishing the story’s foundation. Who are the main characters, and what is their relationship to each other? Briefly introduce them and mention the setting where the story unfolds. This provides context for the events to follow.
Every story revolves around a central conflict, a problem the protagonist faces. This could be an external challenge, like a villain or a dangerous situation, or an internal struggle, like a moral dilemma or a personal growth journey. Understanding this conflict is crucial for summarizing the story’s core.
Once you’ve grasped the conflict, identify the significant events that propel the story forward. These are not minor details but turning points that raise the stakes, force the protagonist to make crucial decisions, or bring them closer to resolving the conflict. Summarize these critical events in chronological order.
The climax is the peak of the story’s tension, where the conflict reaches its most critical stage. Briefly describe this turning point without revealing how it’s resolved.
The very end of your summary should touch upon the resolution – did the protagonist overcome the conflict? Did they achieve their goal or learn a valuable lesson? However, avoid revealing explicit details to avoid spoiling the story for those who have yet to experience it.
Summarizing a book requires condensing a vast amount of information into a concise and informative piece. It’s like creating a miniature version that captures the book’s essence without getting bogged down in every detail.
Go beyond simply reading the book. Actively engage with the text by underlining key points, jotting down notes in the margins, or creating a separate document to capture your thoughts. Focus on capturing the main characters, the central conflict that drives the plot, and any significant themes explored throughout the story.
Most novels follow a similar structure. The beginning introduces the main characters, setting the stage for the story’s world. The plot thickens as the central conflict emerges, propelling the characters on their journeys.
The climax presents the most intense moment of tension, followed by a resolution that ties up loose ends or leaves room for interpretation. As you take notes, be mindful of how each part of the book builds upon the others to create a cohesive narrative.
Once you’ve finished reading and grasped the book’s structure well, it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Ask yourself key questions:
Now that you’ve identified the book’s key elements weave them together to create a concise and informative summary.
Proofread your summary carefully to ensure it accurately reflects the book and avoids introducing your opinions. Check for factual accuracy, grammar, and a logical flow of information.
Your polished summary should be a self-contained piece that effectively conveys the book’s essence, leaving the reader intrigued and wanting to delve deeper.
Reports are dense with information, so summarizing them requires pinpointing the crucial elements and presenting them concisely.
Before diving in, understand the report’s objective. Is it presenting research findings, analyzing a business situation, or making policy recommendations? Knowing the purpose helps you identify the most important information.
Reports typically follow a logical structure. Look for headings and subheadings that organize the content. Pay close attention to sections like:
As you navigate the report’s structure, ask yourself critical questions to pinpoint the key elements:
Once you’ve identified the essential information, weave it into a well-structured summary.
Proofread your summary meticulously to ensure it accurately reflects the report’s content and avoids introducing your opinions or biases. Double-check for factual accuracy, grammar, and a logical flow of information.
Summarizing an essay effectively is valuable for students and anyone encountering academic writing . It allows you to quickly grasp the main points and assess its argument without getting bogged down in every detail.
Make sure to do more than skim the essay. Give it a close read, underlining or highlighting key points and taking notes in the margins. Focus on capturing the central argument, the primary evidence to support it, and any counter-arguments the author addresses.
Pay particular attention to the thesis statement, which typically appears in the introduction and encapsulates the essay’s main point.
Most essays follow a standard structure . The introduction sets the stage by outlining the topic, providing relevant background information, and presenting the thesis statement. The body paragraphs delve deeper, focusing on a single point supporting the thesis.
Evidence such as facts, statistics, or quotes from credible sources bolsters the argument. The conclusion summarizes the main points and reiterates the thesis statement, sometimes offering the author’s final thoughts or implications of the argument.
Once you familiarize yourself with the essay’s structure and content, it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff. Ask yourself critical questions:
Now that you’ve identified the key elements synthesize them into a concise and informative summary.
The final step is crucial. Proofread your summary carefully to ensure it accurately reflects the essay’s content and avoids introducing your opinions or biases. Double-check for factual accuracy, grammar, and a logical flow of information.
A well-crafted summary should be a self-contained piece that effectively conveys the essence of the essay’s argument.
Learning how to summarize is a vital skill that enhances your understanding, communication, and efficiency in academia, professional settings, or daily life.
By mastering the summarizing techniques, you become adept at distilling complex information into essential, manageable pieces. This ability saves time, deepens comprehension, and facilitates clearer, more effective communication.
As you do, you will find that your ability to extract key points from dense materials improves, as does your capacity to convey these points to others succinctly and effectively. This skill will serve you well in all aspects of your life, making you a more proficient student, a capable professional, and a clearer communicator overall.
Click below to find a pricing plan that fits your needs.
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
How to build a 'structure and flow' in a good essay our expert takes you through the third stage of writing an essay in upsc essentials' new series. don't miss the essay exercise towards the end of the article..
How to write essays for UPSC Civil Services Exams? This is one of the most popular questions among aspirants. In UPSC Essentials’ special series UPSC Essays Simplified , we take you through various steps of writing a good essay. While there is no set formula or fixed criteria prescribed, Manas Srivastava talks to Ravi Kapoor , our expert, in this new series who guides the aspirants with a simplified framework on how to write a good essay. Don’t miss ‘The Essay Exercise’ towards the end of the article.
Ravi Kapoor focuses on the following steps of pre-writing and writing stages which will help aspirants to write a ‘good essay’.
) | |
) | |
About our Expert: Ravi Kapoor IRS (R) , has now ditched his coveted rank of deputy commissioner and has offered free quality mentorship to UPSC aspirants, drawing upon his ten years of experience to create customised and productive curriculum. Through a free mentorship programme, he integrates tailored educational materials, psychological principles, visual learning techniques, and a strong emphasis on mental well-being into his teaching skills granting aspirants a chance to learn from his expertise.
Everyone knows that an essay should be broken down into an introduction, body and conclusion. But what is written inside these 3 components and HOW it is written makes the difference between an essay fetching average or excellent scores.
Structuring and flow refer to the organisation of the essay and your ideas therein.
A good structure is a way of organising information that fits well with the essay topic and the ideas you wish to present in your arguments such that the reader can make sense of the entire write-up without much effort.
Good flow refers to how your arguments and counterarguments connect from one to another such that the reader finds it logically connected and easy to comprehend.
An essay without these elements will appear to be disorganized, jargoned, hard to comprehend and overall, complicated.
Contrary to popular belief, flow and structure are not subjective writing skills that are inborn in good writers but can be learned and improved upon. What follows is a series of structuring techniques that will help you choose the best one for any essay topic you may encounter.
1. 2 side face-off:.
This is the oldest trick in the book. While writing the body of the essay, you divide it into arguments and counterarguments. In other words, you compare one side of the debate with the other.
For example:
“Thinking is like a game; it does not begin unless there is an opposite team”
The body of the essay can be divided into 2 parts- one agreeing with the statement and one disagreeing with it as follows:
Thinking is reciprocal as thought builds on other thoughts. The Socratic method, championed by Socrates, is a testament to this idea. Socrates would go around Athens spreading knowledge by asking questions and inciting dialogue which would lead the conversationist to the point of realization about something new and profound.
Similarly, when Einstein said he was standing on the shoulders of giants, he meant that his theory of relativity was built using many ideas developed by mathematicians and physicists who came before him.
The reciprocal nature of thought helps to improve it by allowing dissent and counterarguments much like a game of chess. An example is the Case study pioneered by Harvard Business School wherein one case is debated upon in detail considering various strategies before arriving at the optimal one.
While dissent and opposition can lead to many a good idea, there are more ways for thought to develop into ideas within human consciousness. Human cognition is too complex to be restricted to one mode of thinking. A Case in point is intuitive or creative thinking that can arise spontaneously without the interlocking of two human intelligences.
For instance, creative geniuses often hit upon their best ideas out of the blue in ‘Eureka’ moments that seem to arise from within the subconscious mind without the presence of an opponent.
Another example is ‘thought-experiments’ used by philosophers that are designed to be introspective exercises that one engages with, with oneself. Thought experiments are indispensable tools for philosophers and physicists to offer insight into a profound problem of logic and metaphysics.
It has become fashionable to break the essay topic into various dimensions such as Social, Cultural, Historical, Economic etc. But this is not a one-size-fits-all method and may or may not work with every essay topic.
“Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in the school…”
While this topic can be written about based on various dimensions such as economic, historical, social etc, it is not necessarily the best structure for it.
Instead, a better way to present the information in this essay topic would have a mix of chronology and analysis in the following way-
We are blank slates when we are born onto which society and culture leave their imprint. Through childhood and adolescence, the education system seeks to put us through a treadmill of learning, hoping for a fully functional human to emerge at the end. Sadly, the world that awaits a young adult after school is often very different from what the education system has imparted.
Memorization, exams, grades and NCERT books amount to nothing in a world driven by start-ups, ChatGPT and Social Media influencers…. Please note that the dimensions such as social, cultural and historical factors can also be mentioned in the body of the essay as supporting content ideas.
In most essay topics, these dimensions are best used to describe the reasons and impact of an issue or debate instead of as just a structure.
Some essay topics are uniquely suited for a chronological structure wherein you take the reader through a historical journey or evolution such as :
“History is a series of victories won by the scientific man over the romantic man”
This topic is about the ancient debate between rationality and idealism. To write well about it, you would have to trace the through major historical intellectual movements such as the Scientific Revolution, the Dark Ages, the Renaissance, etc. While doing so, you could mention how each stage was relevant for rational thinking versus idealism with relevant examples.
While you do so chronologically, remember to also present a balanced approach in your arguments- On every stage, you can mention how rational thinking and idealism have been in a tight relationship, but both have been an integral part of human consciousness representing creativity and logic. You may also mention how this to and fro has enriched human civilisation and led to the development of science and art.
Many students like to start their essays with an anecdote- a personal story or an imaginary one about characters highlighting the debate presented in the essay topic. While this is not a bad strategy, it requires a fair amount of creative writing ability to pull off properly. It is also important to mention that anecdotes are not the most suitable vehicle to comprehensively deal with the essay topic as not all arguments can easily fit into a personal story.
An example of a good use of anecdotal structure is:
“Not all who wander are lost”
About 2000 years ago, a wandering prince changed the world by questioning the most profound and radical assumptions about human existence. Prince Siddhartha was bathed in luxury and wanted for nothing. But when we saw the naked reality of the world and all its suffering, he could not silence his mind to the questions that we take for granted- why is there suffering and death? If suffering is inevitable then what is the point of life? Is there peace to be found or are we doomed to suffer in this life?
He wandered for years in search of answers, as lost as a soul can be. But in the end, it was his wandering that changed the world forever. When he became the Buddha, he not only found himself but saved millions of others from being lost themselves….
Anecdotes can make for good hooks or introductions to an essay but may not serve well to cover the entire body of the essay.
|
| |
1. Use Anecdotes or historical examples in intro 2. 2 side face-offs in body of the essay 3. Balanced conclusion | ||
Start with comparing USSR and USA in the cold war. Preparation for nuclear war and hint at how being pre-emptive is strategic but not always a good thing. | ||
Argument- Counter-argument- | ||
Conclude by saying that we must strike a balance between preparedness and being spontaneous:
|
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
The UPSC articles of Indian Express is now on Telegram. Join our Telegram channel- Indian Express UPSC Hub and stay updated with the latest Updates. For your answers, queries and suggestions write at manas.srivastava@ indianexpress.com .
Manas Srivastava is currently working as Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express (digital) and majorly writes for UPSC-related projects leading a unique initiative known as UPSC Essentials. In the past, Manas has represented India at the G-20 Youth Summit in Mexico. He is a former member of the Youth Council, GOI. A two-time topper/gold medallist in History (both in graduation and post-graduation) from Delhi University, he has mentored and taught UPSC aspirants for more than four years. His diverse role in The Indian Express consists of writing, editing, anchoring/ hosting, interviewing experts, and curating and simplifying news for the benefit of students. He hosts the YouTube talk show called ‘Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik’ and a LIVE series on Instagram and YouTube called ‘You Ask We Answer’.His talks on ‘How to read a newspaper’ focus on newspaper reading as an essential habit for students. His articles and videos aim at finding solutions to the general queries of students and hence he believes in being students' editor, preparing them not just for any exam but helping them to become informed citizens. This is where he makes his teaching profession meet journalism. He is also currently working on a monthly magazine for UPSC Aspirants. He is a recipient of the Dip Chand Memorial Award, the Lala Ram Mohan Prize and Prof. Papiya Ghosh Memorial Prize for academic excellence. He was also awarded the University’s Post-Graduate Scholarship for pursuing M.A. in History where he chose to specialise in Ancient India due to his keen interest in Archaeology. He has also successfully completed a Certificate course on Women’s Studies by the Women’s Studies Development Centre, DU. As a part of N.S.S in the past, Manas has worked with national and international organisations and has shown keen interest and active participation in Social Service. He has led and been a part of projects involving areas such as gender sensitisation, persons with disability, helping slum dwellers, environment, adopting our heritage programme. He has also presented a case study on ‘Psychological stress among students’ at ICSQCC- Sri Lanka. As a compere for seminars and other events he likes to keep his orating hobby alive. His interests also lie in International Relations, Governance, Social issues, Essays and poetry. ... Read More
Salman Khan's wedding plans with Sangeeta Bijlani were called off at the last minute, as revealed by Warda Nadiadwala, the wife of producer Sajid Nadiadwala. The couple had planned to get married on the same day as Warda and Sajid's wedding, but Salman backed out. He even joked about eloping with Sajid on stage.
Read UPSC Magazine
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Introducing your argument. Like other academic essays, an argumentative essay begins with an introduction. The introduction serves to capture the reader's interest, provide background information, present your thesis statement, and (in longer essays) to summarize the structure of the body.
The argument needs to be complete and logical so that there is no doubt as to the intention. One of the more common formats for an argumentative essay is the five-paragraph format. But this method is by no means the only acceptable construction for an argument. The five-paragraph essay consists of: an introductory paragraph
An argumentative essay comprises five essential components: 1. Claim. Claim in argumentative writing is the central argument or viewpoint that the writer aims to establish and defend throughout the essay. A claim must assert your position on an issue and must be arguable. It can guide the entire argument.
Argumentative literary essays are typically more informal and do not follow the same structure as an academic essay. The following are popular examples of argumentative literary essays: "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King, Jr. "Death of the Moth" by Virginia Woolf "Shooting an Elephant" by George Orwell
When you're writing a persuasive essay, you need more than just an opinion to make your voice heard. Even the strongest stance won't be compelling if it's not structured properly and reinforced with solid reasoning and evidence. Learn what elements every argumentative essay should include and how to structure it depending on your audience ...
The standard argumentative essay is often 3-5 pages, which will usually mean a lot more than five paragraphs, but your overall structure will look the same as a much shorter essay. An argumentative essay at its simplest structure will look like: Paragraph 1: Intro. Set up the story/problem/issue; Thesis/claim . Paragraph 2: Support
The structure of the argumentative essay is held together by the following. A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the essay. In the first paragraph of an argument essay, students should set the context by reviewing the topic in a general way.
Step 5 — Write your essay. Begin the introductory paragraph with a hook — a question, a startling statistic, or a bold statement to draw in your readers. Always logically structure your arguments with smooth transitions between ideas.
Argumentative Essay: Purpose: An argumentative essay aims to persuade the reader to accept or agree with a specific point of view or argument. Structure : It follows a clear structure with an introduction, thesis statement, body paragraphs presenting arguments and evidence, counterarguments and refutations, and a conclusion.
In order for your argument to be persuasive, it must use an organizational structure that the audience perceives as both logical and easy to parse. Three argumentative methods —the Toulmin Method, Classical Method, and Rogerian Method— give guidance for how to organize the points in an argument. Note that these are only three of the most ...
An argumentative essay takes a stance on an issue and presents an argument to defend that stance with the intent of persuading the reader to agree. It generally requires extensive research into a topic so that you have a deep grasp of its subtleties and nuances, are able to take a position on the issue, and can make a detailed and logical case ...
Bonus exercise: See if you can identify the "template" structure that each of the sentences below is using (hint, they are different from the templates provided above). ... In a good argumentative essay, in addition to expressing your position and argument, you should consider possible opposing views to your argument: refer to what your ...
The basic structure of an essay always consists of an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. But for many students, the most difficult part of structuring an essay is deciding how to organize information within the body. This article provides useful templates and tips to help you outline your essay, make decisions about your structure, and ...
The argument is often the most difficult of essays for students to begin. We are many times as unsure of our positions as we are of our reasons for our positions on controversial topics. "Because that's what I believe" is only the starting point. Explaining why you believe in your position is the task of the argument.
Tips for Writing a Strong Argumentative Essay. Do thorough research: Gather credible sources and evidence to support your arguments. Use clear and concise language: Make your points easy to understand and follow. Address counterarguments: Acknowledge opposing views and refute them with evidence. Stay organized: Use a logical structure and flow ...
inconsistency in your essay. • suggests an answer complex enough to require a whole essay's worth of discussion. If the question is too vague, it won't suggest a line of argument. The question should elicit reflection and argument rather than summary or description. • can be explored using the sources you have available for the assignment,
Whether you structure your argument to follow the block style or point-by-point pattern, the three principal components of presentation, support, and refutation must be included. A point-by-point structure probably will be easier to follow, as the block style creates some separation between the "pro" and "con" sides of an argument which may ...
Choose an argument type essay question from one or your courses. Write a list of the arguments that support your thesis. Next, you need to develop each of these arguments. For this you need to structure the information to present information which supports your thesis and to defend against arguments which contradict it.
By creating the perfect structure, it becomes easy to note what's needed and where one needs to write each idea. It's easier to maintain a highly organized work with a well-planned argumentative essay structure. The structure is likely to consist of the following sections: Section 1: Introduction Of An Argument Essay Outline
2. A very solid hook. 3. A reasonable and debatable claim. 4. And sufficient evidence to convince an audience to agree with you. However, if you don't present this information in a standard outline, your argumentative essay will fall flat. Instructors insist that your argumentative writing should follow an appropriate structure for a good reason.
How to Structure an Argument in Your Essay. Lesson Transcript. Instructor Amy Bonn. Amy has taught college and law school writing courses. She holds a master's degree in English and a law degree ...
1. What is an essay structure? An essay structure serves as a framework for presenting ideas coherently and logically. It comprises three crucial elements: an introduction that communicates the context, topic, and thesis statement; the body focusing on the main points and arguments supported with appropriate evidence followed by its analysis; and a conclusion that ties together the main points ...
Write an argumentative essay clearly stating a claim, acknowledging a counterargument, responding to the counterargument with concession or rebuttal, using correct grammar and punctuation, and formal academic tone. ... your side Opposing view / Counter Argument Rebuttal Conclusion *** This is a classic Argument Structure ...
Focus on capturing the central argument, the primary evidence to support it, and any counter-arguments the author addresses. Pay particular attention to the thesis statement, which typically appears in the introduction and encapsulates the essay's main point. 2. Deconstruct the Essay's Structure. Most essays follow a standard structure. The ...
Structure in the body of the Essay: Argument-Mention the need and merit for vigilance, caution and pre-emptive action during good times; Use various examples to support arguments; Counter-argument-While vigilance is good, we must also enjoy the moment in the now. Life is short and we should count our blessings and appreciate the blessings of ...
To get high scores at essay writing tests, learners of English as a foreign language need to focus on good arguments more than on complex grammar. The finding challenges conventional approaches to ...