Anxiety
Surprise, novelty [ 10 ], and repetition [ 82 ] are typical behaviors of the notification system of social media [ 83 ]. Notifications are systematic impulses that saturate the attentional network due to the information overabundance they represent. This saturation produces a state of overalert in the individual. Thus, the notification acts as a digital stimulus [ 67 ] for the alerting system [ 84 ], changing the neurophysiological state of the individual [ 23 ]. It acts as a distractor and leads to problems of self-control and self-discipline [ 85 ].
Likewise, the information received as sensory input in the form of personalized notification [ 65 ] directly impacts the emotional system of the individual, associated with the second and third network of the Attention System theory [ 23 , 25 ], determining the priority of actions [ 65 ]. The emotional intensity of social media notifications [ 86 ] works because it is linked to psychological characteristics such as social appreciation, self-image, acceptance, social comparison, and recognition [ 87 , 88 ]. By affecting the main psychological emotions, notifications also generate anxiety in individuals who use social media [ 89 ]. This feeds both the anxiety of knowing what is behind the notification itself and the desire to obtain it [ 90 ], which generates disappointment or even depression in its absence [ 91 ].
The above duality can be expressed in terms of the Posner framework [ 24 ] by locating the bottom-up and top-down attention mechanisms. In the first case (bottom-up), the stimulus stands out by its characteristics, and the user wants to know what the notification contains. In the second case (top-down), the individual expects the notification stimulus to be associated with the achievement or fulfillment of goals [ 43 ], such as recognition, acceptance, or personal self-image.
Lastly, notifications capture attention because they are repetitive but novel. Repetition [ 47 ] does not represent, in this case, a problem for attention, since it generates surprising new emotions every time [ 68 ]. The user may crave a notification, but it remains uncertain until taking the selective action of paying attention to it. Although most notifications are not relevant [ 92 ], they are designed to be noticed as new, unique, and changing [ 93 ]. One of the reasons for individuals to be “Always On” [ 94 ] is the novelty of the notification acting on the ARAS.
The structural functioning of social media apps is described as fundamental to promote addiction in users [ 77 , 95 ]. The messages or publications received through the platforms can be described as data of an audiovisual nature, which are easily sent and consumed due to their short, fast, dynamic, and changing structure. Their structure and diverse, surprising, and constant functioning generate attention breaks in the subject [ 10 ] and produce the phenomenon of attentional dispersion, depending on uninterrupted activity, affecting sustained attention.
The structure of the message has three characteristics that determine the high attention levels of the subject. In the first place, messages are associated with audiovisual language [ 96 , 97 ], pointing to emotions, the most impulsive framework of attention.
Secondly, messages are short and dynamic, which fit the scarce attention aspect [ 47 , 48 ]. For this reason, attention travels from one message to another within the platform and in each message, which functions as a new informational impulse renewing the cycle of attention. This is a characteristic that makes constant the sustaining of attention. Once the user has accessed the platform through the notification, an initial moment or capture of attention, the individual remains in the interface for a long time, which is the sustaining and permanence moment [ 47 ]. Then, the user receives a new notification when tries to leave the platform (a moment of completion), which leads to new infinite and automate service cycles. It is the competition for the market of user’s time [ 70 ] dominated by the oligopolies of attention [ 73 ].
Finally, to ensure attention and avoid fatigue by the repetition of the platform, social media constantly change the communication interface with the user. It is, thus, novel and surprising. It regains attention with renewed stimuli [ 10 , 82 ].
The attention-grabbing power of social media [ 66 ] has generated the feeling that, if users do not constantly check their platforms, they will lose something important in their lives. Different studies identify the fear of missing out (FoMO) [ 98 , 99 ]. This is related to the impact of social media on user’s attention and its capture, even in addictive and psychologically problematic ways, which cause anxiety and stress.
FoMO can be understood from a neurophysiological perspective as the information flow and interaction that captures the attention coming from the activation of the filiation sensory mechanisms [ 10 , 47 ]. The relationship generated between the subject and social media, which is deeply dependent, produces psychological pathologies.
Simultaneously, attention also functions through involuntary electrochemical reactions that occur on received stimuli [ 100 ]. The FoMO is determined by the action of social media that feed the need for its use and that issues constant notifications maintaining and reinforcing user anxiety: “something is happening, and I might be missing it”.
The anxiety of receiving a signal of social approval determines the emotional functionality in terms of attention, of the intermittent and variable rewards [ 2 ]. Just as in a slot machine, the user inserts a coin, operates a button or a lever and craves a reward. The waiting time provokes a high level of uncertainty about the expected reward and, at the same time, generates a distance between the expected and received reward [ 101 ]. The uncertainty design is inherent to the interfaces and behavior of social media.
The communication interfaces design systems of social media, which act as the likes/rewards conjunction, construct reinforcements for behavioral stimuli, meaning promotion, and guidance for the actions of individuals. This action–reaction mechanism promoted by the system of likes and the intensely interactive design of social media converts the attention given into action or behavior of the individual and generates, with repetition and constant feedback, the systemic gratification itself of the platform, an addiction.
Addicted to the possible affirmative answer [ 102 , 103 ], users consume social media with the anxiety of reaching the jackpot [ 104 , 105 ], fueled by the values of individual recognition, selfishness, and popularity of the consumer society of the 21st century [ 74 ].
The theoretical development can be empirically verified with two social media consumption case studies investigated in 2019 and 2020. The first research is summarized in the monitoring of the social media usage executed on a group of 25 university students (19–21 years old) in December 2019. It consisted of the observation and elaboration of weekly reports of the most common smartphone applications usage time. The study found that the average time spent on the mobile phone is 4 h and 26 min per day, of which 85% of the time was dedicated to social media [ 4 ]. In the study, complemented by the realization of four focus groups developed with the 25 participants, some of the theoretically recognized social media attentional effects were verified, such as FoMO, anxiety, attention dispersion, and addictive behavior.
As said by the participants regarding social media, “you always need to be connected… to know what is happening. It is like a vital necessity. In social media you feel as if you were part of something, if you leave, it is as if you stop being part of it”. This statement exemplifies a direct relationship with mechanisms such as FoMO or the anxiety of connecting to social media [ 98 , 99 , 102 , 103 ]. Another student mentioned that “we feel alone if we are outside the social media, I think that everyone is afraid of being nobody”, and thus assumed the psychological universe of the emotional stimuli of social media consumption [ 22 , 23 ]. Meanwhile, another participant pointed out that “the vitality, the lights, the colors, everything is striking. It attracts us, we have everything in that place, on our mobile and, especially on social media”. The last statement describes the alerting system—notifications—that attracts the attention of platform users [ 10 , 82 , 84 ]. At the same time, it confirms the consolidation of interaction and information in social media [ 66 , 75 ].
The consumption of the social media is identified as addictive [ 103 ] by young people: “sometimes you access for one thing and end up doing many others without realizing it, you lose the sense of time… we are addicted and we are becoming even more dependent”, one statement that coincides with the neurophysiological and neuropsychological attention types previously described concerning social media [ 47 ].
Similarly, some of the young people monitored stated that “sometimes you don’t even know what you see, but you feel the need to be there, on the screen, just scrolling”, which serves to show the operation of the message structure and the design of the platform [ 47 , 65 ], as well as the effectiveness of notifications to sustain prolonged attention for a long time on social media.
The second research was based on a survey carried out between February and May 2020 with 740 people in Spain ( n = 740, with a mean age of 23.1 years). It showed that the average use of social media is 5.1 h per day, which is equivalent to almost 36 h per week. The survey was carried out among a population with different levels of education (22.8% had completed secondary school, 52.5% were undergraduates, 11.4% did vocational education, and 13.4% were postgraduates. They all declared to have access to the internet with a smartphone). The results are similar to other academic articles that show the long-time consumption of social media [ 106 , 107 ].
Furthermore, the results reveal that 55.8% of the sample considers that social media are addictive. Other participants consider social media as socialization tools (52.97%) or related to bullying (20.41%), as well as a source of social recognition (15.14%). Social media are also considered to generate feelings of saturation (14.46%) and have a high component of irrationality (5.14%).
The self-declaration data of the respondents show the activation of the attention processes defined in the theoretical perspective. Although these are preliminary investigations to measure and quantify attention, it is demonstrated that the design of social media is aimed at dominating the user’s attention, with satisfactory results for the platforms.
Attention can become a key element in understanding the consumption system of social media, despite its epistemological complexity. The article offers a theoretical approach to the concept of human attention using three different perspectives—neurophysiology, neuropsychology, and economy—which is a novel contribution. In the same way, the research connects the design of social media with its effects on human digital wellbeing. The article contributes to understanding the neurophysiological and neuropsychological basis of the concept, which helps to better structure the voluntary and involuntary organic functioning of attention economy.
Thanks to the theoretical construction of attention, the conceptual approach reveals the effects that social media consumption has on human attention. If attention is conceived as the gateway for the other processes of the human being to operate, the excessive consumption of social media is a threat that generates a series of repercussions for the physical and mental health. Social media—with its infinite and automated capacity of generation and reproduction of stimuli—condition the neurophysiological and neuropsychological systems and alter the behaviors of the subjects, both in their individuality and in their socio-affective development.
Sensory notification instruments work strategically on the emotions of the users and reproduce the cycle of capturing attention. The personalized mechanisms represent an electrochemical activation pattern within the neurophysiological and neuropsychological functions. Similarly, the effects on the massive capture of attention through platforms’ attractive designs—which act directly on the emotional system—determine the generation of a new profitable system of commodities that targets the capitalist exploitation of the cognitive and creative resources of users on a few platforms.
Some practical implications stem from the above, especially in terms of bringing two issues to the attention of citizens. On the one hand, it is necessary to raise awareness of the dangers of abuse in the consumption of social media for individuals, but above all thinking about the future of people’s digital welfare. On the other hand, it is fundamental to point out the economic oligopolies that control our attention and from which addictive technology is derived. This leads us to think about the need to establish self-regulation codes or good practices, as well as legislation that guarantees digital rights as human rights.
The theoretical approach of the article, however, has some limitations. The results of the cases presented to complement the explanation confirm the need to build longitudinal studies of social media consumption to gain a better understanding of the phenomenon. Likewise, it is important to develop a greater empirical approach, especially in a qualitative way, to explore in more detail the problem of the excessive use of social media and its problematic effects on human attention and digital wellbeing.
Although the study presents in a novel way the union of three perspectives, the concept of attention is much more complex and can be explored from other points of view not contemplated in this research.
The study also leads to future research. As mentioned before, more longitudinal analyses are needed. Although valuable data can be obtained from surveys or from qualitative approaches, research on social media; mobile devices; and their use, problems, or users’ motivations requires new methodological approaches to better understand the level, time, and attention paid to specific content. These methodological advances, such as information collected through brain monitoring with encephalography or eye-tracking techniques, will help us to understand the effects that social media use has on people’s attention. However, there is a need to qualitatively investigate the underlaying reasons for the intensive use of social media. Finally, another important line of future research is to confirm the public health impacts of the problematic use and concentration of human attention on social media.
Conceptualization, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; formal analysis, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; investigation, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; resources, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; writing—review and editing, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; visualization, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R.; supervision, S.G.-L., P.N.A.A., and C.F.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was funded by Social Observatory of La Caixa Foundation.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Advertisement
31k Accesses
93 Citations
40 Altmetric
Explore all metrics
The COVID-19 pandemic represented an unprecedented setting for the spread of online misinformation, manipulation, and abuse, with the potential to cause dramatic real-world consequences. The aim of this special issue was to collect contributions investigating issues such as the emergence of infodemics, misinformation, conspiracy theories, automation, and online harassment on the onset of the coronavirus outbreak. Articles in this collection adopt a diverse range of methods and techniques, and focus on the study of the narratives that fueled conspiracy theories, on the diffusion patterns of COVID-19 misinformation, on the global news sentiment, on hate speech and social bot interference, and on multimodal Chinese propaganda. The diversity of the methodological and scientific approaches undertaken in the aforementioned articles demonstrates the interdisciplinarity of these issues. In turn, these crucial endeavors might anticipate a growing trend of studies where diverse theories, models, and techniques will be combined to tackle the different aspects of online misinformation, manipulation, and abuse.
Explore related subjects.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Malicious and abusive behaviors on social media have elicited massive concerns for the negative repercussions that online activity can have on personal and collective life. The spread of false information [ 8 , 14 , 19 ] and propaganda [ 10 ], the rise of AI-manipulated multimedia [ 3 ], the presence of AI-powered automated accounts [ 9 , 12 ], and the emergence of various forms of harmful content are just a few of the several perils that social media users can—even unconsciously—encounter in the online ecosystem. In times of crisis, these issues can only get more pressing, with increased threats for everyday social media users [ 20 ]. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic makes no exception and, due to dramatically increased information needs, represents the ideal setting for the emergence of infodemics —situations characterized by the undisciplined spread of information, including a multitude of low-credibility, fake, misleading, and unverified information [ 24 ]. In addition, malicious actors thrive on these wild situations and aim to take advantage of the resulting chaos. In such high-stakes scenarios, the downstream effects of misinformation exposure or information landscape manipulation can manifest in attitudes and behaviors with potentially dramatic public health consequences [ 4 , 21 ].
By affecting the very fabric of our socio-technical systems, these problems are intrinsically interdisciplinary and require joint efforts to investigate and address both the technical (e.g., how to thwart automated accounts and the spread of low-quality information, how to develop algorithms for detecting deception, automation, and manipulation), as well as the socio-cultural aspects (e.g., why do people believe in and share false news, how do interference campaigns evolve over time) [ 7 , 15 ]. Fortunately, in the case of COVID-19, several open datasets were promptly made available to foster research on the aforementioned matters [ 1 , 2 , 6 , 16 ]. Such assets bootstrapped the first wave of studies on the interplay between a global pandemic and online deception, manipulation, and automation.
In light of the previous considerations, the purpose of this special issue was to collect contributions proposing models, methods, empirical findings, and intervention strategies to investigate and tackle the abuse of social media along several dimensions that include (but are not limited to) infodemics, misinformation, automation, online harassment, false information, and conspiracy theories about the COVID-19 outbreak. In particular, to protect the integrity of online discussions on social media, we aimed to stimulate contributions along two interlaced lines. On one hand, we solicited contributions to enhance the understanding on how health misinformation spreads, on the role of social media actors that play a pivotal part in the diffusion of inaccurate information, and on the impact of their interactions with organic users. On the other hand, we sought to stimulate research on the downstream effects of misinformation and manipulation on user perception of, and reaction to, the wave of questionable information they are exposed to, and on possible strategies to curb the spread of false narratives. From ten submissions, we selected seven high-quality articles that provide important contributions for curbing the spread of misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media. In the following, we briefly summarize each of the accepted articles.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been plagued by the pervasive spread of a large number of rumors and conspiracy theories, which even led to dramatic real-world consequences. “Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic Detection of Emerging COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News” by Shahsavari, Holur, Wang, Tangherlini, and Roychowdhury grounds on a machine learning approach to automatically discover and investigate the narrative frameworks supporting such rumors and conspiracy theories [ 17 ]. Authors uncover how the various narrative frameworks rely on the alignment of otherwise disparate domains of knowledge, and how they attach to the broader reporting on the pandemic. These alignments and attachments are useful for identifying areas in the news that are particularly vulnerable to reinterpretation by conspiracy theorists. Moreover, identifying the narrative frameworks that provide the generative basis for these stories may also contribute to devise methods for disrupting their spread.
The widespread diffusion of rumors and conspiracy theories during the outbreak has also been analyzed in “Partisan Public Health: How Does Political Ideology Influence Support for COVID-19 Related Misinformation?” by Nicholas Havey. The author investigates how political leaning influences the participation in the discourse of six COVID-19 misinformation narratives: 5G activating the virus, Bill Gates using the virus to implement a global surveillance project, the “Deep State” causing the virus, bleach, and other disinfectants as ingestible protection against the virus, hydroxychloroquine being a valid treatment for the virus, and the Chinese Communist party intentionally creating the virus [ 13 ]. Results show that conservative users dominated most of these discussions and pushed diverse conspiracy theories. The study further highlights how political and informational polarization might affect the adherence to health recommendations and can, thus, have dire consequences for public health.
Network based on the web-page URLs shared on Twitter from January 16, 2020 to April 15, 2020 [ 18 ]. Each node represents a web-page URL, while connections indicate links among web-pages. The purple nodes represent traditional news sources, the orange nodes indicate the low-quality and misinformation news sources, and the green nodes represent authoritative health sources. The edges take the color of the source, while the node size is based on the degree
“Understanding High and Low Quality URL Sharing on COVID-19 Twitter Streams” by Singh, Bode, Budak, Kawintiranon, Padden, and Vraga investigate URL sharing patterns during the pandemic, for different categories of websites [ 18 ]. Specifically, authors categorize URLs as either related to traditional news outlets, authoritative health sources, or low-quality and misinformation news sources. Then, they build networks of shared URLs (see Fig. 1 ). They find that both authoritative health sources and low-quality/misinformation ones are shared much less than traditional news sources. However, COVID-19 misinformation is shared at a higher rate than news from authoritative health sources. Moreover, the COVID-19 misinformation network appears to be dense (i.e., tightly connected) and disassortative. These results can pave the way for future intervention strategies aimed at fragmenting networks responsible for the spread of misinformation.
The relationship between news sentiment and real-world events is a long-studied matter that has serious repercussions for agenda setting and (mis-)information spreading. In “Around the world in 60 days: An exploratory study of impact of COVID-19 on online global news sentiment” , Chakraborty and Bose explore this relationship for a large set of worldwide news articles published during the COVID-19 pandemic [ 5 ]. They apply unsupervised and transfer learning-based sentiment analysis techniques and they explore correlations between news sentiment scores and the global and local numbers of infected people and deaths. Specific case studies are also conducted for countries, such as China, the US, Italy, and India. Results of the study contribute to identify the key drivers for negative news sentiment during an infodemic, as well as the communication strategies that were used to curb negative sentiment.
Farrell, Gorrell, and Bontcheva investigate one of the most damaging sides of online malicious content: online abuse and hate speech. In “Vindication, Virtue and Vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic” , they adopt a mixed methods approach to analyze citizen engagement towards British MPs online communications during the pandemic [ 11 ]. Among their findings is that certain pressing topics, such as financial concerns, attract the highest levels of engagement, although not necessarily negative. Instead, other topics such as criticism of authorities and subjects like racism and inequality tend to attract higher levels of abuse, depending on factors such as ideology, authority, and affect.
Yet, another aspect of online manipulation—that is, automation and social bot interference—is tackled by Uyheng and Carley in their article “Bots and online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case studies in the United States and the Philippines” [ 22 ]. Using a combination of machine learning and network science, the authors investigate the interplay between the use of social media automation and the spread of hateful messages. They find that the use of social bots yields more results when targeting dense and isolated communities. While the majority of extant literature frames hate speech as a linguistic phenomenon and, similarly, social bots as an algorithmic one, Uyheng and Carley adopt a more holistic approach by proposing a unified framework that accounts for disinformation, automation, and hate speech as interlinked processes, generating insights by examining their interplay. The study also reflects on the value of taking a global approach to computational social science, particularly in the context of a worldwide pandemic and infodemic, with its universal yet also distinct and unequal impacts on societies.
It has now become clear that text is not the only way to convey online misinformation and propaganda [ 10 ]. Instead, images such as those used for memes are being increasingly weaponized for this purpose. Based on this evidence, Wang, Lee, Wu, and Shen investigate US-targeted Chinese COVID propaganda, which happens to rely heavily on text images [ 23 ]. In their article “Influencing Overseas Chinese by Tweets: Text-Images as the Key Tactic of Chinese Propaganda” , they tracked thousands of Twitter accounts involved in the #USAVirus propaganda campaign. A large percentage ( \(\simeq 38\%\) ) of those accounts was later suspended by Twitter, as part of their efforts for contrasting information operations. Footnote 1 Authors studied the behavior and content production of suspended accounts. They also experimented with different statistical and machine learning models for understanding which account characteristics mostly determined their suspension by Twitter, finding that the repeated use of text images played a crucial part.
Overall, the great interest around the COVID-19 infodemic and, more broadly, about research themes such as online manipulation, automation, and abuse, combined with the growing risks of future infodemics, make this special issue a timely endeavor that will contribute to the future development of this crucial area. Given the recent advances and breadth of the topic, as well as the level of interest in related events that followed this special issue—such as dedicated panels, webinars, conferences, workshops, and other special issues in journals—we are confident that the articles selected in this collection will be both highly informative and thought provoking for readers. The diversity of the methodological and scientific approaches undertaken in the aforementioned articles demonstrates the interdisciplinarity of these issues, which demand renewed and joint efforts from different computer science fields, as well as from other related disciplines such as the social, political, and psychological sciences. To this regard, the articles in this collection testify and anticipate a growing trend of interdisciplinary studies where diverse theories, models, and techniques will be combined to tackle the different aspects at the core of online misinformation, manipulation, and abuse.
https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/information-operations-june-2020.html .
Alqurashi, S., Alhindi, A., & Alanazi, E. (2020). Large Arabic Twitter dataset on COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04315 .
Banda, J.M., Tekumalla, R., Wang, G., Yu, J., Liu, T., Ding, Y., & Chowell, G. (2020). A large-scale COVID-19 Twitter chatter dataset for open scientific research—An international collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.03688 .
Boneh, D., Grotto, A. J., McDaniel, P., & Papernot, N. (2019). How relevant is the Turing test in the age of sophisbots? IEEE Security & Privacy, 17 (6), 64–71.
Article Google Scholar
Broniatowski, D. A., Jamison, A. M., Qi, S., AlKulaib, L., Chen, T., Benton, A., et al. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and Russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108 (10), 1378–1384.
Chakraborty, A., & Bose, S. (2020). Around the world in sixty days: An exploratory study of impact of COVID-19 on online global news sentiment. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Chen, E., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2020). Tracking social media discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic: Development of a public coronavirus Twitter data set. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6 (2), e19273.
Ciampaglia, G. L. (2018). Fighting fake news: A role for computational social science in the fight against digital misinformation. Journal of Computational Social Science, 1 (1), 147–153.
Cinelli, M., Cresci, S., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Tesconi, M. (2020). The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections. PLoS One, 15 (6), e0234689.
Cresci, S. (2020). A decade of social bot detection. Communications of the ACM, 63 (10), 61–72.
Da San M., G., Cresci, S., Barrón-Cedeño, A., Yu, S., Di Pietro, R., & Nakov, P. (2020). A survey on computational propaganda detection. In: The 29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’20), pp. 4826–4832.
Farrell, T., Gorrell, G., & Bontcheva, K. (2020). Vindication, virtue and vitriol: A study of online engagement and abuse toward British MPs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59 (7), 96–104.
Havey, N. (2020). Partisan public health: How does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation?. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359 (6380), 1094–1096.
Luceri, L., Deb, A., Giordano, S., & Ferrara, E. (2019). Evolution of bot and human behavior during elections. First Monday, 24 , 9.
Google Scholar
Qazi, U., Imran, M., & Ofli, F. (2020). GeoCoV19: a dataset of hundreds of millions of multilingual COVID-19 tweets with location information. ACM SIGSPATIAL Special, 12 (1), 6–15.
Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Wang, T., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of corona: Automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Singh, L., Bode, L., Budak, C., Kawintiranon, K., Padden, C., & Vraga, E. (2020). Understanding high and low quality URL sharing on COVID-19 Twitter streams. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Starbird, K. (2019). Disinformation’s spread: Bots, trolls and all of us. Nature, 571 (7766), 449–450.
Starbird, K., Dailey, D., Mohamed, O., Lee, G., & Spiro, E.S. (2018). Engage early, correct more: How journalists participate in false rumors online during crisis events. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’18), pp. 1–12. ACM.
Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2020). Public health and online misinformation: challenges and recommendations. Annual Review of Public Health, 41 , 433–451.
Uyheng, J., & Carley, K. M. (2020). Bots and online hate during the COVID-19 pandemic: Case studies in the United States and the Philippines. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Wang, A. H. E., Lee, M. C., Wu, M. H., & Shen, P. (2020). Influencing overseas Chinese by tweets: Text-Images as the key tactic of Chinese propaganda. Journal of Computational Social Science .
Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395 (10225), 676.
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA
Emilio Ferrara
Institute of Informatics and Telematics, National Research Council (IIT-CNR), 56124, Pisa, Italy
Stefano Cresci
University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Manno, Switzerland
Luca Luceri
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Emilio Ferrara .
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reprints and permissions
Ferrara, E., Cresci, S. & Luceri, L. Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19. J Comput Soc Sc 3 , 271–277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00094-5
Download citation
Received : 19 October 2020
Accepted : 23 October 2020
Published : 22 November 2020
Issue Date : November 2020
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00094-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Uses and Abuses of social media
Social media is one of the greatest inventions of modern technology. It is a virtual platform of connectivity. At present, there are so many social media in virtual platforms. These are Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Imo, WhatsApp etc. These are social networking services and internet-based social networks. These are the latest apps for globalization. These are the best medium of communication. These allow us to share our ideas, feelings, interests and activities with people. We can make contact with our near and dear ones instantly by using social media. We can write comments on our own and our member's status, photos, videos etc. We get many news and information from social media. Sometimes it gives us joy. It also refreshes our minds. We can make new friends by using social media. I t plays a significant role in trade and commerce. At present, social media-based e-commerce has become very popular all over the world. It allows customers to buy things without going to market. Every social network has abuses. Social media is no exception. It has some abuses. It is doing a lot of harm to the teenagers. Young people are so much addicted to social media. So their study is greatly hampered. Overuse of social media makes eyesight weak and a waste of time. Sometimes bad people commit crimes by using social media. Besides these negative aspects, social media has brought a great change in modern civilization.
You have a beautiful voice. Keep singing and touching hearts! telegram apk下载
Lisa Garbe ( WZB - Berlin Social Science Center), Marc Owen Jones (Hamad bin Khalifa University), David Herbert (UiB) and Lovise Aalen (CMI)
Social media have been hailed as the ultimate democratic tool, enabling users to self-organise and build communities, sometimes even contributing to the fall of dictatorships, as during the Arab Spring. But can social media also reinforce existing power relationships? What happens when access to social media is shut down? When social media are manipulated, so that only one story is shared?
Habab Idriss Ahmed
Michaël Tatham: Pauline Lemaire
Kjersti G. Berg
Journal of Refugee Studies, Special Issue "Camp histories. New Studies of Palestinian Migrations"
Carmeliza Rosario
Liv Tønnessen and Samia al-Nagar
Women's Studies International Forum
David Aled Williams
Edward Elgar Research Handbook on Environmental Crimes and Criminal Enforcement
Gunnar Sørbø
Abdelmageed M. Yahya, Abdalla Onour
Samia al-Nagar, Liv Tønnessen
Ottar Mæstad
Kaja Borhgrevink & Arne Strand
Heidi Mogstad
Public Anthropologist
Students are often asked to write an essay on Uses and Abuses of Internet in their schools and colleges. And if you’re also looking for the same, we have created 100-word, 250-word, and 500-word essays on the topic.
Let’s take a look…
The uses of internet.
The internet is a powerful tool that has revolutionized our world. It provides us with information, communication, and entertainment. We can research any topic, connect with friends, and enjoy movies or games.
However, the internet can also be misused. Cyberbullying, online scams, and the spread of false information are common problems. Furthermore, excessive internet use can lead to addiction, affecting our health and social life.
In conclusion, while the internet offers numerous benefits, it’s crucial to use it responsibly to avoid its potential pitfalls.
Also check:
Introduction.
The internet, a revolutionary invention of the 20th century, has transformed our lives in profound ways. It has become an indispensable tool in various sectors, including education, business, communication, and entertainment. However, like any tool, it can be used both for constructive and destructive purposes.
The internet has democratized access to information, breaking down geographical barriers. It has made education more accessible, with countless resources and online learning platforms available at our fingertips. It has also revolutionized communication, enabling instant interaction across the globe. The internet has made business operations more efficient, from online banking to e-commerce. It has also provided a platform for creative expression and entertainment, with platforms like YouTube and Spotify.
However, the internet’s misuse is a growing concern. Cyberbullying, identity theft, and online harassment are rampant, causing psychological harm to individuals. The internet has also facilitated the spread of misinformation and fake news, leading to societal discord and distrust. Additionally, it has given rise to internet addiction, affecting individuals’ mental health and productivity. The proliferation of explicit content is another issue, impacting the moral fabric of society.
In conclusion, while the internet has myriad benefits, its misuse can lead to serious consequences. It is crucial to use this tool responsibly, promoting digital literacy and ethical online behavior. As we stride further into the digital age, we must strike a balance between leveraging the internet’s potential and mitigating its pitfalls.
The advent of the internet has revolutionized the world, bringing about profound changes in the way we live, learn, and work. It has become an integral part of our lives, providing us with a plethora of information and services at our fingertips. However, like any other invention, the internet also has its share of uses and abuses. This essay explores the beneficial aspects of the internet and its potential pitfalls.
The internet’s most significant advantage is its ability to connect people globally. It has made communication faster, cheaper, and more efficient, breaking down geographical barriers. Through email, social media, video conferencing, and instant messaging, we can interact with anyone, anywhere, at any time.
Moreover, the internet has transformed the business landscape. E-commerce has opened up new markets, enabling businesses to reach customers globally. It has also made financial transactions more straightforward and faster through online banking and digital payments.
Despite its advantages, the internet is not without its downsides. One of the most prevalent abuses is cybercrime. This encompasses a wide range of malicious activities, from identity theft and fraud to cyberstalking and cyberbullying. The anonymity that the internet provides can be exploited by unscrupulous individuals to harm others.
Additionally, the internet can be a source of addiction. Excessive use of social media, online gaming, or other digital activities can lead to internet addiction, negatively impacting mental health and personal relationships.
In conclusion, the internet is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers immense benefits, facilitating communication, education, and business. On the other hand, it can be a tool for harm, enabling cybercrime, the spread of misinformation, and addiction. As users, it is incumbent upon us to use the internet responsibly. We must be vigilant in protecting ourselves from its potential abuses while harnessing its vast potential for our benefit. As the internet continues to evolve, so too must our understanding and regulation of its use and abuse.
If you’re looking for more, here are essays on other interesting topics:
Happy studying!
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Works cited.
Smartphone have various pedagogical advantages that can be leveraged by the education system. For instance, educational institutions have embraced technology through the development of social media platforms that facilitate discussion forums between the students and the instructors. Such discussions can be constructively developed to help the students to attain course objectives faster and more effectively. However, recent trends in the use of smartphones have seen more students bringing the devices to class and using them during their classes. Technology has become uncontrollable because the students spend most of their time on social media, and it is a distraction in class.
Furthermore, the use of smartphones to access various social media platforms have also led to an increase in cases of cyber-bullying. For instance, students may use their smartphones to critic the dressing code of one of their classmates or even ill-talk their teacher while in class. These are some of the issues that are threatening the performance of the students because they are sources of distraction, rather than an advantage to the education system. It follows that parents, teachers, and the authorities in the education system must look into the development of a feasible way to eliminate the use of smartphones and social media during the class time. Children at school need to be discouraged against cyber-bullying, sending malicious text messages to their peers, and sharing inappropriate videos and images during class time.
Growth in technology has seen many teenagers being lured into the use of social media platforms, and the addictive nature of the platforms is associated with negative effects. Some of the issues highlighted by researchers on the issue include an increase in cyber-bullying cases, lower performance in school, and erosion in the social skills of the teenagers. This paper focuses on the effects of smartphones on students when they are used during class time. Teachers have repeatedly reported cases of students being addicted to their phones to a level that they cannot concentrate in class. While some of the proposed solutions are viable, it is apparent that there is a need to develop more comprehensive solutions that consider the needs of the students. Students should particularly have the chance to access the internet through their smartphones at all times, but it is imperative to control the type of information accessed during class time.
Critics claim that it is not necessary to teach students how to use their smartphones because they already know when and how to use them. It is apparent that most teenagers have a higher prowess in using smartphones when considering the ability to text faster and to use various texting skills that pass messages faster to their peers. This implies that the students using smartphones in class spend very little time sending various messages, and this would typically serve as a way to keep the classes interesting by breaking the monotony of the long lectures and notes taking. However, a study conducted at the Boston College revealed that when students are allowed to send random text messages through social media platforms in class, they are likely to lose concentration, and they end up missing some of the major points introduced by the instructors (Kowalski par. 2).
This results in lower grades for the students who are constantly texting in class. The study at also proposed that while it is not possible or ethical to force students to keep their smartphones away from the classroom, it is possible to train them to use the smartphones more effectively. The solution lies in the development of a platform where the students can only send texts that are related to the subject matter in class (Bik and Goldstein 1). This implies that they have to be attentive to find interesting facts or opinions to post on their social media platforms. The study clearly highlighted the fact that using this approach increases the performance of the students because the smartphones do not act as sources of distraction; rather, they provide a platform for the students to ask relevant questions and make some appropriate observations about the lessons.
The contemporary world has seen the global society embracing technology fully, and the use of smartphones is particularly one of the most popular ways of spreading and accessing information. Banning smartphones in schools is, therefore, an injustice to the students because it limits their ability to connect with the rest of the world in information sharing. However, it is apparent that using smartphones is one of the major distractions in class, and it is likely to result in the lowering of the performance levels of the students (Warnich and Gordon 44).
Since the classrooms are designed to provide information relevant to the curriculum, it is imperative for the administrative functions in schools to banning the use of smartphones in class, unless authorized by the teachers. Studies have revealed that one of the primary characteristics of smartphones is the ability to multitask; hence, the users have all their attention drawn from the instructors in class when they use their phones. Studies have also shown that excessive use of smartphones and the associated social networks might have a negative effect on the psychological development of the students (Thomas et al. 296). For instance, when teenagers are forced to keep away from their smartphones, they portray withdrawal symptoms that are associated with boredom and agitation. Banning smartphones from the classrooms will ultimately train the teenagers to stay without using them for hours; hence, it is a rehabilitative solution.
While most people believe that everyone should have the freedom to access information through the internet, it is important to develop a system that monitors the use of smartphones in class. It would not be ethical to ban smartphones in schools, but an alternative to banning them in class is the development of a system that monitors the usage of smartphones in class. For instance, some students may need to search for more information about the topics introduced during a particular lesson, while others may only use their smartphones to access various social media platforms that are not helpful for their learning (Baker et al. 276). The monitoring system should be designed to flag the students using their smartphones to access irrelevant information on social media during class time. Such students should be punished by being forced to switch their phones off or being banned from bringing them to class for several days. This negative reinforcement of behavior would be quite instrumental in nurturing the use of smartphones to access relevant information among the students. Since parents and teachers are aware of the negative and positive effects of using smartphones, it is important to train their children to use the devices to access the appropriate information at the right time (Thoman and O’Bannon 13). They should focus on leveraging the pedagogical advantages of smartphones, rather than allowing them to lower the performance of the students, which will subsequently result in lower competitive power in the employment market.
The use of smartphones in class is one of the major issues that teachers in the modern world have to deal with. It is a source of distraction for the students, and it is likely to lower their performance significantly. One of the alternative strategies to eliminate the issue is to completely ban bringing smartphones to school, but this would only lead to an injustice to the students because it would deny them the opportunity to connect to the world through various online information channels. It would be best to monitor the use of smartphones or to ban them in class, but not in school. Some critics also believe that students should have the freedom to use their cell phones because it only takes a few minutes from their class time, but studies have shown that it erodes their concentration. A better approach would be training the students to use the smartphones to share information about the topics in class. The most viable approach toward solving the issue is to eliminate the chances of accessing irrelevant information through smartphone while in class. Technology can be used to provide a platform where certain social media platforms are blocked within the classrooms to discourage the use of smartphones during lessons.
Baker, William, et al. “On the Use of Cell Phones and Other Electronic Devices in the Classroom: Evidence from a Survey of Faculty and Students.” Journal of Education for Business, vol. 87, no. 5, 2012, pp. 275-289.
Bik, Holly, and Miriam Goldstein. “An Introduction to Social Media for Scientists.” PLoS Biol, vol. 11, no. 4, 2013, pp. 1.
Kowalski, Kathiann. When Smartphones go to School . 25 Nov. 2008, www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/when-smartphones-go-school. Accessed 7 December 2016.
Thomas, Kevin, et al. “Cell Phones in the Classroom: Teachers’ Perspectives of Inclusion, Benefits, and Barriers.” Computers in the Schools, vol. 30, no. 4, 2013, pp. 295-308.
Thomas, Kevin, and Blanche O’Bannon. “Cell Phones in the Classroom: Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions.” Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, vol. 301, no. 1, 2013, pp. 11-20.
Warnich, Pieter, and Clare Gordon. “The Integration of Cell Phone Technology and Poll Everywhere as Teaching and Learning Tools into the School History Classroom.” Yesterday and Today, vol. 13, no. 1, 2015, pp. 40-66.
IvyPanda. (2020, September 3). The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-uses-and-abuses-of-technologies-and-medias/
"The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias." IvyPanda , 3 Sept. 2020, ivypanda.com/essays/the-uses-and-abuses-of-technologies-and-medias/.
IvyPanda . (2020) 'The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias'. 3 September.
IvyPanda . 2020. "The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias." September 3, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-uses-and-abuses-of-technologies-and-medias/.
1. IvyPanda . "The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias." September 3, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-uses-and-abuses-of-technologies-and-medias/.
Bibliography
IvyPanda . "The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias." September 3, 2020. https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-uses-and-abuses-of-technologies-and-medias/.
Discover the world's research
Research is focused on child and teen mental health, exploring why they are struggling and what can be done to help them
Vol. 54 No. 1 Print version: page 63
[ This article is part of the 2023 Trends Report ]
The Covid -19 pandemic era ushered in a new set of challenges for youth in the United States, leading to a mental health crisis as declared by the United States surgeon general just over a year ago. But U.S. children and teens have been suffering for far longer.
In the 10 years leading up to the pandemic, feelings of persistent sadness and hopelessness—as well as suicidal thoughts and behaviors—increased by about 40% among young people, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System .
“We’re seeing really high rates of suicide and depression, and this has been going on for a while,” said psychologist Kimberly Hoagwood, PhD, a professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine. “It certainly got worse during the pandemic.”
In addition to the social isolation and academic disruption nearly all children and teens faced, many also lost caregivers to Covid -19, had a parent lose their job, or were victims of physical or emotional abuse at home.
All these difficulties, on top of growing concerns about social media, mass violence, natural disasters, climate change, and political polarization—not to mention the normal ups and downs of childhood and adolescence—can feel insurmountable for those who work with kids.
“The idea of a ‘mental health crisis’ is really broad. For providers and parents, the term can be anxiety-provoking,” said Melissa Brymer, PhD, who directs terrorism and disaster programs at the UCLA–Duke University National Center for Child Traumatic Stress. “Part of our role is to highlight specific areas that are critical in this discussion.”
Across the field, psychologists are doing just that. In addition to studying the biological, social, and structural contributors to the current situation, they are developing and disseminating solutions to families, in schools, and at the state level. They’re exploring ways to improve clinical training and capacity and working to restructure policies to support the most vulnerable children and teens.
Psychologists were also behind new mental health recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a group of volunteer health professionals who evaluate evidence on various preventive health services. The task force now recommends regular anxiety screenings for youth ages 8 to 18 and regular depression screenings for adolescents ages 12 to 18.
“I see these trends in children’s mental health problems as being critical, but there are solutions,” Hoagwood said. “If we refocus our efforts toward those solutions, we could see some of these tides turn.”
Across the United States, more than 200,000 children lost a parent or primary caregiver to Covid -19 (“ Covid -19 Orphanhood,” Imperial College London, 2022). In the face of those losses, families had to curtail mourning rituals and goodbye traditions because of social distancing requirements and other public health measures, Brymer said. Many children are still grieving, sometimes while facing added challenges such as moving to a different home or transferring to a new school with unfamiliar peers.
The CDC also reports that during the pandemic, 29% of U.S. high school students had a parent or caregiver who lost their job, 55% were emotionally abused by a parent or caregiver, and 11% were physically abused ( Adolescent Behaviors and Experiences Survey—United States, January–June 2021 , CDC ).
“Schools are crucial for keeping kids safe and connecting them with services, but the pandemic completely disrupted those kinds of supports,” Brymer said.
Those extreme disruptions didn’t affect all young people equally. Echoing pre- Covid -19 trends, the CDC also found that girls, LGBTQ+ youth, and those who have experienced racism were more likely to have poor mental health during the pandemic, said social psychologist Kathleen Ethier, PhD, director of the CDC’s Division of Adolescent and School Health.
Contributing factors likely include stigma, discrimination, and online bullying, Ethier said. Female students also report much higher levels of sexual violence than their male peers, which can further harm mental health.
As much hardship as Covid -19 wrought, it’s far from the only factor contributing to the current crisis. Biology also appears to play a role. The age of puberty has been dropping for decades, especially in girls, likely leading to difficulty processing complex feelings and knowing what to do about them ( Eckert-Lind, C., et al., JAMA Pediatrics , Vol. 174, No. 4, 2020 ). In early puberty, regions of the brain linked to emotions and social behavior are developing more quickly than regions responsible for the cognitive control of behavior, such as the prefrontal cortex, Ethier said.
Those developmental changes drive young people to seek attention and approval from their peers . For some, using social media fulfills that need in a healthy way, providing opportunities for connection and validation to youth who may be isolated from peers, geographically or otherwise.
For others, negative messages—including online bullying and unrealistic standards around physical appearance—appear to have a detrimental effect, but more research is needed to understand who is most at risk.
“There is clearly some aspect of young people’s online life that’s contributing [to the mental health crisis], we just don’t know exactly what that is,” said Ethier.
Finally, structural factors that affect millions of U.S. children, including poverty, food insecurity, homelessness, and lack of access to health care and educational opportunities, can lead to stress-response patterns that are known to underlie mental health challenges.
“Even in very young children, prolonged stress can trigger a cycle of emotion-regulation problems, which can in turn lead to anxiety, depression, and behavioral difficulties,” Hoagwood said. “These things are well established, but we’re not doing enough as a field to address them.”
The biggest challenge facing mental health care providers right now, experts say, is a shortage of providers trained to meet the mounting needs of children and adolescents.
“There’s a growing recognition that mental health is just as important as physical health in young people’s development, but that’s happening just as mental health services are under extreme strain,” said clinical psychologist Robin Gurwitch, PhD, a professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Duke University Medical Center.
Schools, for example, are a key way to reach and help children—but a 2022 Pew Research Center survey found that only about half of U.S. public schools offer mental health assessments and even fewer offer treatment services. Psychologists are now ramping up efforts to better equip schools to support student well-being onsite.
Much of that work involves changing policies at the school or district level to provide more support for all students. For example, school connectedness—the degree to which young people feel that adults and peers at school care about them and are invested in their success—is a key contributor to mental health. Youth who felt connected during middle and high school have fewer problems with substance use, mental health, suicidality, and risky sexual behavior as adults ( Steiner, R. J., et al., Pediatrics , Vol. 144, No. 1, 2019 ).
Through its What Works in Schools program , the CDC funds school districts to make changes that research shows foster school connectedness. Those include improving classroom management, implementing service-learning programs for students in their communities, bringing mentors from the community into schools, and making schools safer and more supportive for LGBTQ+ students.
Psychologists are also building training programs to help teachers and other school staff create supportive classrooms and aid students who are in distress. Classroom Wise (Well-Being Information and Strategies for Educators), developed by the Mental Health Technology Transfer Center Network and the University of Maryland’s National Center for School Mental Health (NCSMH), is a free, flexible online course and resource library that draws on psychological research on social-emotional learning, behavioral regulation, mental health literacy, trauma, and more ( Evidence-Based Components of Classroom Wise (PDF, 205KB), NCSMH, 2021 ).
“We’re using evidence-based practices from child and adolescent mental health but making these strategies readily available for teachers to apply in the classroom,” said clinical psychologist Nancy Lever, PhD, codirector of NCSMH, who helped develop Classroom Wise .
The course incorporates the voices of students and educators and teaches actionable strategies such as how to create rules and routines that make classrooms feel safe and how to model emotional self-regulation. The strategies can be used by anyone who interacts with students, from teachers and administrators to school nurses, coaches, and bus drivers.
“What we need is to build capacity through all of the systems that are part of children’s lives—in families, in schools, in the education of everybody who interacts with children,” said psychologist Ann Masten, PhD, a professor of child development at the University of Minnesota.
Other training efforts focus on the students themselves. Given that preteens and teenagers tend to seek support from their peers before turning to adults, the National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN) created conversation cards to equip kids with basic skills for talking about suicide. The advice, available in English and Spanish, includes how to ask about suicidal thoughts, how to listen without judgment, and when to seek guidance from an adult ( Talking About Suicide With Friends and Peers, NCTSN, 2021 ).
While training people across the school population to spot and address mental health concerns can help reduce the strain on mental health professionals, there will always be a subset of students who need more specialized support.
Telehealth, nearly ubiquitous these days, is one of the best ways to do that. In South Carolina, psychologist Regan Stewart, PhD, and her colleagues colaunched the Telehealth Outreach Program at the Medical University of South Carolina in 2015. Today, nearly every school in the state has telehealth equipment (Wi-Fi and tablets or laptops that kids can use at school or take home) and access to providers (psychology and social work graduate students and clinicians trained in trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy). Students who need services, which are free thanks to grant funding or covered by Medicaid, meet one-on-one with their clinician during the school day or after hours ( American Psychologist , Vol. 75, No. 8, 2020 ).
“We learned a lot about the use of technology during the pandemic,” Ethier said. “At this point, it’s very much a matter of having sufficient resources so more school districts can access those sources of care.”
Limited resources are leaving families low on options, with some young people making multiple trips to the emergency room for mental health-related concerns or spending more than six months on a waiting list for mental health support. That points to a need for more trained emergency responders and psychiatric beds, psychologists say, but also for better upstream screening and prevention to reduce the need for intensive care.
“Just as we need more capacity for psychiatric emergencies in kids, we also need an infusion of knowledge and ordinary strategies to support mental health on the positive side,” Masten said.
In New York, Hoagwood helped launch the state-funded Evidence Based Treatment Dissemination Center in 2006, which offers free training on evidence-based practices for trauma, behavioral and attention problems, anxiety, depression, and more to all mental health professionals who work with children in state-licensed programs, which include foster care, juvenile justice, and school settings, among others. The center provides training on a core set of tools known as PracticeWise ( Chorpita, B. F., & Daleiden E. L., Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , Vol. 77, No. 3, 2009 ). It also offers tailored training based on requests from community agency leaders and clinicians who provide services to children and their families.
Hoagwood, in collaboration with a consortium of family advocates, state officials, and researchers, also helped build and test a state-approved training model and credentialing program for family and youth peer advocates. The peer advocate programs help expand the mental health workforce while giving families access to peers who have similar lived experience ( Psychiatric Services , Vol. 71, No. 5, 2020).
Youth peer advocates are young adults who have personal experience with systems such as foster care, juvenile justice, or state psychiatric care. They work within care teams to provide basic education and emotional support to other youth, such as giving advice on what questions to ask a new mental health practitioner and explaining the differences between psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. Youth peer advocates in New York can now receive college credit for their training in peer specialist work.
“Making community health work into a viable career can also increase diversity among mental health workers and help us address structural racism,” Hoagwood said.
Pediatricians are another group that can provide a first line of defense, drawing on their relationships with parents to destigmatize mental health care.
“Pediatricians are in many ways uniquely positioned to help address the mental health crisis in youth,” said Janine A. Rethy, MD, MPH, division chief of community pediatrics at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and an associate professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University School of Medicine. “We have the privilege of building long-term relationships with children and their families over many years,” with at least 12 well-child checkups in just the first three years of a child’s life, followed by annual visits.
During these visits, they can watch for warning signs of social and behavioral problems and screen for maternal depression and other issues in parents, which is now recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (PDF, 660KB) . Several new resources provide guidance for integrating mental health care into pediatric practices, including the Behavioral Health Integration Compendium (PDF, 4.1MB) and the Healthy Steps program . But most pediatricians need more education on mental health issues in order to effectively respond, Rethy said—yet another area where psychologists may be able to help. Psychologists can provide direct consultations and training to pediatricians through the Pediatric Mental Health Care Access program.
“The more we can weave mental health knowledge, capacity, and checkpoints into places where parents feel comfortable—like the doctor’s office and at school—the better,” Masten said. “All professionals who work with young people really need the knowledge that’s being generated by psychologists.”
Scientists reach a wider audience
Psychologists take aim at misinformation
Psychological research becomes more inclusive
EDI roles expand
Worker well-being is in demand
Efforts to improve childrens’ mental health increase
Partnerships accelerate progress
Suicide prevention gets a new lifeline
Some faculty exit academia
Venture capitalists shift focus
Psychologists rebrand the field
Science shows how to protect kids’ mental health, but it’s being ignored Prinstein, M., & Ethier, K. A., Scientific American , 2022
How pediatricians can help mitigate the mental health crisis Rethy, J. A., & Chawla, E. M., Contemporary Pediatrics , 2022
Review: Structural racism, children’s mental health service systems, and recommendations for policy and practice change Alvarez, K., et al., Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , 2022
The APA Monitor on Psychology ® sister e-newsletter offers fresh articles on psychology trends, new research, and more.
Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.
Subscribe to APA’s audio podcast series highlighting some of the most important and relevant psychological research being conducted today.
Subscribe to Speaking of Psychology and download via:
Related topics.
Advertisement
Supported by
As the new school year starts, a wave of new laws that aim to curb distracted learning is taking effect in Indiana, Louisiana and other states.
By Natasha Singer
Natasha Singer covers technology in schools. She welcomes reader tips at nytimes.com/tips
Cellphones have become a school scourge. More than 70 percent of high school teachers say student phone distraction is a “major problem,” according to a survey this year by Pew Research .
That’s why states are mounting a bipartisan effort to crack down on rampant student cellphone use. So far this year, at least eight states have passed laws, issued orders or adopted rules to curb phone use among students during school hours.
The issue isn’t simply that some children and teenagers compulsively use apps like Snap, TikTok and Instagram during lessons, distracting themselves and their classmates. In many schools, students have also used their phones to bully, sexually exploit and share videos of physical attacks on their peers.
But cellphone restrictions can be difficult for teachers to enforce without schoolwide rules requiring students to place their phones in lockers or other locations.
Now state lawmakers, along with some prominent governors , are pushing for more uniform restrictions in public schools.
Teachers, students, parents and school administrators, tell us in the form below about the technology benefits or tech-related school problems that you have observed. We’re interested in beneficial uses of school tech as well as classroom drawbacks like online learning distractions and cyberbullying.
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Social media is a tool that is becoming quite popular these days because of its user-friendly features. Social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and more are giving people a chance to connect with each other across distances. Read Essay on Social Media here.
Social Media Impact on Society. Social media has become an integral part of our society, influencing how we communicate, interact, and consume information. The rise of platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok has transformed the way we connect with others, share our thoughts and experiences, and access news and entertainment.
People's reliance on digital communication over in-person contact has increased along with the popularity of social media. Face-to-face interaction has suffered as a result, which has adverse effects on interpersonal relationships and the development of social skills. Decreased Emotional Intimacy.
Social media essay topics can include anything involving social media. Here are a few examples of strong social media essay topics: Social media and society. Analyzing social media impact. Comparing social media platforms. Digital communication analysis. Social media marketing case studies.
However, it is unarguable fact the presence of social media has made our lives easier and faster. · Social media is a high-quality tool for education. · Social media can create alertness for social problems. · There is a quick transfer of information online and the users can stay well informed. · Social media is a medium of information.
Excessive social media use can also have negative impacts on overall well-being and relationships. It can lead to a decrease in face-to-face interactions and a lack of genuine connection with others. Effect 2: Influence on societal norms and values. 1. Exploration of how social media shapes cultural and societal norms
When writing an argumentative essay on social media, it is essential to choose a specific aspect of the topic to focus on. Here are some potential areas of exploration: Impact on Mental Health: Examine research studies and personal anecdotes to argue whether social media has a positive or negative impact on mental well-being.
Social media brings benefits and risks to teens. Psychology can help identify a path forward. New psychological research exposes the harms and positive outcomes of social media. APA's recommendations aim to add science-backed balance to the discussion. Weir, K. (2023, September 1).
Essay on Social Media. Social media is the communal interaction among people in which they create, share or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities. It has become the basic need and quality of human beings to be social. The spectacular developments in communications and innovative and astonishing entertainment have given access to ...
This paper provides a review regarding the use of social networks or social media, particularly Facebook as a platform in information sharing. Content may be subject to copyright. changed the ...
Set a "digital curfew" for one hour before bed. At night, plug the phone in across the room or in another room. Silence the phone at night. Limit which apps you use in the evening. News and social media apps can cause worry, stress, or anxiety. Gaming and social media apps are hard to turn off and lead to later bedtimes.
1.1. Problematic social media engagement in the context of addictions. Problematic social media use is markedly similar to the experience of substance addiction, thus leading to problematic social media use being modelled by some as a behavioural addiction - social media addiction (SMA; Sun and Zhang, 2020).In brief, an addiction loosely refers to a state where an individual experiences a ...
By being kind and using social media wisely, we can all enjoy the good things it has to offer while staying safe and happy. Paragraph on Uses And Abuses Of Social Media in 250 Words. Social media can be helpful or harmful. It is a place where people share news, pictures, and stories with friends. This helps people stay connected and learn new ...
Human attention has become an object of study that defines both the design of interfaces and the production of emotions in a digital economy ecosystem. Guided by the control of users' attention, the consumption figures for digital environments, mainly social media, show that addictive use is associated with multiple psychological, social, and ...
The COVID-19 pandemic represented an unprecedented setting for the spread of online misinformation, manipulation, and abuse, with the potential to cause dramatic real-world consequences. The aim of this special issue was to collect contributions investigating issues such as the emergence of infodemics, misinformation, conspiracy theories, automation, and online harassment on the onset of the ...
Answer: Uses and Abuses of social media. Social media is one of the greatest inventions of modern technology. It is a virtual platform of connectivity. At present, there are so many social media in virtual platforms. These are Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Imo, WhatsApp etc. These are social networking services and internet-based social networks.
Bullying has been a very challenging issue to resolve for many years. It is increasingly spreading by the use of social media, where most bullies spread malice at the touch of a button. Bullying's prevalence has lead to numerous consequences such as anxiety, depression, diminished effort in academics, and suicide.
Uses and Abuses of Social Media. Lisa Garbe (WZB - Berlin Social Science Center), Marc Owen Jones (Hamad bin Khalifa University), David Herbert (UiB) and Lovise Aalen (CMI) Social media have been hailed as the ultimate democratic tool, enabling users to self-organise and build communities, sometimes even contributing to the fall of ...
Uses of the Internet. The internet's most significant advantage is its ability to connect people globally. It has made communication faster, cheaper, and more efficient, breaking down geographical barriers. Through email, social media, video conferencing, and instant messaging, we can interact with anyone, anywhere, at any time.
The Uses and Abuses of Technologies and Medias Essay. Smartphone have various pedagogical advantages that can be leveraged by the education system. For instance, educational institutions have embraced technology through the development of social media platforms that facilitate discussion forums between the students and the instructors.
A study recently carried out in Spain (Orange, 2018) shows that young people start. using social media networks from the age of 14 and the most active users are between 16 and 24 years. old. In ...
The Uses and Abuses of Social Media English Essay Important @InfinityLearningCorner-----☑️ In this video- ...
Essay "Uses and abuses of Social Media" in English . Roll of Social Media in our Life. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTowjOvJ75IYF9ucYiyjYdH7Wp4SxLPijF...
Early on Friday morning, a 31-year-old female trainee doctor retired to sleep in a seminar hall after a gruelling day at one of India's oldest hospitals. It was the last time she was seen alive ...
The Covid-19 pandemic era ushered in a new set of challenges for youth in the United States, leading to a mental health crisis as declared by the United States surgeon general just over a year ago.But U.S. children and teens have been suffering for far longer. In the 10 years leading up to the pandemic, feelings of persistent sadness and hopelessness—as well as suicidal thoughts and ...
The Florida measure also requires school districts to block student access to social media platforms on school Wi-Fi and specifically prohibits TikTok on school-issued devices.