my father essay in urdu for class 3

• _وضاحتی مضامین
• _مختصر مضامین

Few Lines on My Father in Urdu | 10 Lines on My Father in Urdu

آج ہم اُردو میں والد پر دس سطریں فراہم کرنے جا رہے ہیں۔ یہ مختصر مضمون یاد رکھنے میں بھی آسان ہے۔ اس مضمون کو آسان اور سادہ الفاظ میں لکھا گیا ہے لہذا کوئی بھی طالب علم اس موضوع پر لکھ سکتا ہے۔ اُردو میں والد پر یہ مختصر مضمون عام طور پر پہلی، دوسری اور تیسری جماعت کے بچوں کے لیے کافی مفید ہے۔

میرے والد پر دس سطریں

میرے والد پر دس سطریں درج ذیل ہیں:

1) میرے والد کا نام زاہد حسن ہے۔

2) وہ ایک ڈاکٹر ہیں۔

3) میرے والد میری زندگی میں سب سے اہم شخص ہیں۔

4) وہ ایک محنتی انسان ہے، جو ہمارے خاندان کو بہتر سہولیات دینے کے لیے سخت محنت کرتے ہیں۔

5) میرے والد میرے ہر مشکل وقت میں ہمیشہ میرا ساتھ دیتے ہیں۔

6) وہ میری ہر ضرورت پوری کرتے ہیں۔

7) وہ ہمیشہ غریب لوگوں کی مدد کرتے ہیں۔

8) وہ ایک اچھے اخلاق کے مالک ہیں۔ 

9) میرے والد بہت اچھے انسان ہیں اور میں بھی ان جیسا بنانا چاہتا ہوں۔  

10) میں اپنے والد سے بہت پیار کرتا ہوں۔

ایک تبصرہ شائع کریں

Waldain Ka Ehtram Essay in Urdu for class 3 4 5 6 7 8 9th and others

Today we will write about the Waldain ka Ehtram essay in Urdu with headings, pdf and quotations for classes 3 4 5 6 7 8 9th and others in easy and short wordings. This essay reflects on the importance and influence of parents in our lives. Read insightful observations on what it means to show respect for your parents, Waldain ka Ehtram is an essay focused on parents and their immense contribution to the lives of their children. Learn more about its reflection here.

Discover the powerful lessons behind “Waldain Ka Ehtram” in this reflective essay. Explore how we can honour our elders and take away valuable lessons from their guidance. Explore the importance of honouring and respecting parents in Islamic teachings through this reflective essay on Waldain Ka Ehtram.

Waldain Ka Ehtram Essay in Urdu for class 3 4 5 6 7 8 9th and others | والدین کا احترام مضمون

والدین کا احترام پر مضمون.

یہ مضمون ہماری زندگیوں میں والدین کی اہمیت اور اثر و رسوخ کی عکاسی کرتا ہے. اپنے والدین کے لئے احترام ظاہر کرنے کا کیا مطلب ہے. جس میں والدین اور ان کے بچوں کی زندگیوں میں ان کی بے پناہ شراکت پر توجہ مرکوز کی گئی ہے. اس عکاس مضمون میں “والڈین کا احترام” کے پیچھے طاقتور اسباق دریافت کریں۔ دریافت کریں کہ ہم کس طرح اپنے بزرگوں کی عزت کر سکتے ہیں اور ان کی رہنمائی سے قیمتی اسباق لے سکتے ہیں۔

Importance of Waldain Ka Ehtram

والدین کا احترام کی اہمیت.

احترام دنیا میں ایک بنیادی خوبی ہے. ایک دوسرے کا احترام افراد یا برادریوں کے درمیان کسی بھی غلط فہمی کو ٹال دے گا۔ خاندان میں، مختلف وجوہات ہیں کہ بچوں کو اپنے والدین کا احترام کرنے کی کوشش کیوں کرنی چاہئے. بائبل حکم دیتی ہے کہ بچوں کو ہر روز اپنے والدین کی قدر کرنی چاہیے اور ان کا احترام کرنا چاہیے۔ یہ ایک وعدہ کے ساتھ واحد حکم ہے, لہذا, تنقیدی احترام والدین.یہ حکم ظاہر کرتا ہے کہ والدین خدا کے ساتھ شریک تخلیق کار ہیں، لهذا، والدین کا احترام کرنا خدا کا احترام کرنا ہے، جو حتمی خالق ہے.  اہم بات یہ ہے کہ والدین کا احترام ان لوگوں کے لئے شکر گزاری کا اظہار ہے جو دنیا میں زندگی لاتے ہیں۔  

ضرورت اس امر کی ہے کہ والدین کے ورثے اور علم کا احترام کیا جائے جو ایک نسل سے دوسری نسل میں منتقل ہوئے۔ والدین اس بات کو یقینی بنانے کے لئے بہت کچھ چھوڑنے کے لئے تیار ہیں کہ ان کے بچے ایسی زندگی گزاریں جو قابل ستائش اور سازگار ہو۔ یہ لوگوں کو یہ احساس کرنے کے لئے کافی ہے کہ والدین کا احترام کرنے کی ضرورت ہے، یہاں تک کہ جب نظم و ضبط. اہم بات یہ ہے کہ والدین ہمیشہ اپنے بچوں کے لئے ایک قیمتی زندگی کے لئے دعا کرتے ہیں، اور وہ اس بات کا یقین کرنے کے لئے کافی دیکھ بھال کرتے ہیں کہ ان کے پاس محفوظ مستقبل ہے.

Parents in the World

دنیا میں والدین.

والدین اس دنیا میں ہمارے لئے سب سے اہم شخص ہیں. ہمیں اپنے والدین کا احترام اور محبت کرنے کی ضرورت ہے. ہمارے پاس ان کے سوا کوئی نہیں۔ وہ ہم سے بہت محبت کرتے ہیں. زیادہ تر وقت وہ بچوں کے لئے براہ راست اپنی محبت کا اظہار نہیں کرتے ہیں، لیکن ہم آسانی سے اس کا احساس کر سکتے ہیں. خاص طور پر باپ سخت گیر ہوتے ہیں اور کبھی بھی کھل کر محبت کا اظہار نہیں کرتے۔ لیکن ہمیں یہ سمجھنا ہوگا کہ وہ ہم سے بہت محبت کرتے ہیں۔ ہمیں بھی ان سے محبت اور احترام کرنے کی ضرورت ہے. آج میں اپنے والدین کے بارے میں اشتراک کرنے جا رہا ہوں  

میرے والدین میری دنیا ہیں. ہر ایک کے والدین ہوتے ہیں اور انہیں اپنے والدین کا احترام اور محبت کرنی چاہئے۔ آج میں اپنے والدین کے بارے میں کچھ بتاؤں گا۔ وہ واقعی میرے لئے خاص ہیں. وہ میری زندگی کے لئے بہت معنی رکھتے ہیں. میں ان کی شراکت سے انکار نہیں کرسکتا جو انہوں نے میرے اور میری زندگی کے لئے کیا ہے۔

ہم اپنے والدین کی وجہ سے اس دنیا میں داخل ہوئے۔ یہ ہمارے والدین ہیں جنہوں نے ہمیں زندگی دی ہے اور ہمیں اس سے خوش ہونا سیکھنا چاہئے۔ میں اپنے والدین کا شکر گزار ہوں کہ وہ میرے لئے جو کچھ بھی کرتے ہیں۔ میرے والدین کے مضمون کے ذریعے، میں یہ بتانا چاہتا ہوں کہ وہ میرے لئے کتنے قیمتی ہیں اور میں ان کا کتنا احترام اور تعریف کرتا ہوں.  

My Strength My Parents

میری طاقت میرے والدین.

میرے والدین میری طاقت ہیں جو زندگی کے ہر مرحلے میں میری مدد کرتے ہیں۔ میں ان کے بغیر اپنی زندگی کا تصور بھی نہیں کر سکتا۔ میرے والدین ایک رہنما روشنی کی طرح ہیں جو جب بھی میں کھو جاتا ہوں تو مجھے سیدھے راستے پر لے جاتا ہے۔

میری ماں ایک گھریلو خاتون ہے اور وہ سب سے مضبوط عورت ہے جسے میں جانتا ہوں. وہ میرے کام میں میری مدد کرتی ہے اور مجھے مزیدار کھانا کھلاتی ہے۔ وہ ایک ٹیچر تھیں لیکن انہوں نے اپنے بچوں کی دیکھ بھال کے لیے نوکری چھوڑ دی۔

Islam’s Respect for Parents

والدین کے لیے اسلام کا احترام.

اپنے والدین کا احترام کرنا اسلام کی ایک بنیادی تعلیم ہے جو قرآن و حدیث دونوں میں بیان کی گئی ہے۔ یہ نسل، ثقافت اور جغرافیہ سے بالاتر ہے، پھر بھی بہت سے لوگ آج ان تعلیمات کو اپنی جدید زندگیوں پر لاگو کرنے کے لئے جدوجہد کرتے ہیں. اسلامی نظریات میں والدین کا احترام – اور 21 ویں صدی میں اپنے والدین کی عزت کرنے کے بارے میں عملی تجاویز فراہم کریں گے. والدین کا احترام کرنے کی اسلامی روایت والدین کا احترام کے تصور کو سمجھنا ضروری ہے. 

Understanding the Islamic concept of respect for waldain

والدین کا احترام کے اسلامی تصور کو سمجھنا.

جیسا کہ ذکر کیا گیا ہے، والدین کا احترام اپنے والدین کا احترام کرنے کا اسلامی تصور ہے۔ اس میں جسمانی اور جذباتی احترام دونوں شامل ہیں۔ والدین کا احترام اسلام کے اندر ایک بنیادی تعلیم ہے جس کی جڑیں اطاعت اور محبت میں پیوست ہیں۔ روایتی اسلامی مآخذ خاص طور پر اپنی ماں کی عزت کرنے پر زور دیتے ہیں، جیسا کہ حضرت محمد صلی اللہ علیہ و آلہ وسلم کی اپنی زندگی میں مثال سے ظاہر ہوتا ہے۔

Their Hobbies

ان کے مشاغل.

دوسروں کی طرح میرے والدین کے بھی کچھ انوکھے مشاغل ہیں، میرا شوق ہمیشہ کتابیں پڑھنا اور ویڈیو گیمز کھیلنا ہوتا ہے۔ میرے والد کا سب سے بڑا مشغلہ باڈی بلڈنگ ہے۔ ایسا کرنے کے علاوہ، وہ کتابیں پڑھنے سے محبت کرتا ہے. اس فرصت کے وقت میں وہ کتابیں پڑھنا شروع کر دیتا ہے۔ ہمارے پاس ایک چھوٹی سی فیملی لائبریری ہے۔ میں بھی کتاب سے محبت کرنے والا ہوں۔ یہی وجہ ہے کہ وہ ہر ماہ کتابیں خریدتا ہے۔ میرے والد مجھے کتاب سے محبت کرنے والے بننے کی طرف لے جاتے ہیں۔

انہوں نے ہمیشہ مجھے زیادہ سے زیادہ پڑھنے کے لئے حوصلہ افزائی کی. میری ماں کو کچھ مختلف دلچسپی ہے، یہ باغبانی ہے. نتیجتا ہمیں اپنے گھر کے سامنے ایک باغ مل گیا ہے۔ یہ واقعی خوبصورت لگ رہا ہے. مجھے باغ میں کام کرنا پسند ہے. جب میری ماں وہاں کام کرتی ہے، تو میں اس کی بہت مدد کرتا ہوں. مجھے پھول بہت پسند ہیں اور وہ کچھ سبزیاں بھی بو رہی ہیں۔  

والدین واقعی مددگار اور اچھے دوست ہیں. یہ ایک دوسرے کے ساتھ بہت اچھا برتاؤ کرتے ہیں۔ میں نے انہیں جھگڑتے ہوئے کبھی نہیں دیکھا۔ یہاں تک کہ وہ دوسرے لوگوں کی بھی مدد کرتے ہیں۔ پڑوسیوں اور ہمارے رشتہ داروں کے ساتھ بھی ان کے بہت اچھے تعلقات ہیں۔  

Note : I hope you appreciate the reading about essay Waldain ka Ehtram in Urdu language for class 3 4 5 6 7 8 9th and others 2023. You can also read best Quaid e Azam essay in Urdu

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Kids Learning
• Class 3 Essay
• My Father Essay for Class 3

Impressive My Father Essay in English for Class 3

Presenting My Father Essay in English for kids. Fathers might seldom express it, but their affection for their kids is incomparable. Kids are very close to their fathers. They consider them to be their inspiration. Dedicated to this bond between fathers and children, we are here with My Father Essay for Class 3 kids.

Fathers are very particular about their kids. They teach their kids good habits. They are the ones who educate them on the general situations of life. All of us have learned so much from our fathers. Fathers have a very strong personality. No matter what comes up, they know how to handle it. They are their kids’ first teachers and role models. They show how to keep up the morale, compete and conquer even the worst problems.

Read on to find an essay on My Father for Class 3 kids. This essay will aid students in getting a grip on drafting good essays on various topics. You can download these 10 lines on My Father Essay for Class 3 in a colourful PDF format, through the link provided below for free!

Download PDF of “My Father Essay in English 10 lines” for free

My father essay in english for class 3.

• My father’s name is Mr. Sandeep Joshi. He is 38 years old. He regularly does exercise and yoga in the morning.
• I consider him my role model. When I grow up, I want to be like him.
• He takes care of all the needs of our family. He is a perfect father.
• He is working in a big IT company in a managerial position. He is a very hardworking and responsible person.
• He respects and obeys his parents. He is always very attentive to their requirements.
• Every few weeks, he brings ice creams and chocolates for all of us. Sometimes, he takes us to restaurants, malls, movies, etc.
• On the weekends, he watches cartoons with me. He reads me interesting stories of kings, fairies, etc. from fictional books.
• Even though he must be tired, he always spends time with all of us when he returns from the office. He encourages having breakfast and dinner together.
• He believes in honesty. He teaches me to be honest, helpful, kind, polite and obedient.
• I can share everything with him without any second thought. I really feel blessed to have a father like him. I admire him very much.

The 10 lines of My Father Essay for Class 3 in English has been drafted keeping in mind the thought process of a child. The language has been kept quite simple so that kids find it easy to understand and replicate. There are other aspects that children might want to add about their fathers to the above essay. We have plenty of such amazing essays for Class 3 kids on the topics that are most frequently asked or taught in primary school.

Children are close to their fathers. They can share their feelings and thoughts about anything without any fear. Every child knows that if he/she gets into any trouble, his/her father would definitely find a way out of it. Children trust their fathers as their real-life superheroes who can solve problems of any scale.

Writing a few lines about My Father Essay for Class 3 gives kids a chance to explore and pen down their feelings about their fathers. It lets them ponder over what makes their fathers so special to them. There are numerous things that kids appreciate about their fathers but rarely express them. My Father Essay in English provides them with an opportunity to think about the topic and come up with their own sentences about their fathers.

There are numerous ways fathers make children feel special. They might not tell it in words, but they express it through their actions and care. They always support their kids in whatever they wish to pursue. They try to fulfil their wishes as far as possible. Fathers are selfless who never expect recognition. They take in the pain and spread happiness in their families. Truly, they are nothing less than superheroes! My Father Essay in English 10 lines is an attempt to celebrate this selfless love of a father and the bond he shares with his kid(s).

Looking out for more such enticing learning resources for your little one? Check out our Kids Learning section and explore a plethora of brain-tickling worksheets, stories, poems, general knowledge questions, NCERT Solutions, easy trivia questions, etc.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your Mobile number and Email id will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Request OTP on Voice Call

Post My Comment

• Share Share

Register with BYJU'S & Download Free PDFs

Register with byju's & watch live videos.

Essay on My Father for Students and Children

500+ words essay on my father.

Essay on My Father: Usually, people talk about a mother’s love and affection, in which a father’s love often gets ignored. A mother’s love is talked about repeatedly everywhere, in movies, in shows and more. Yet, what we fail to acknowledge is the strength of a father which often goes unnoticed. Father’s a blessing which not many people have in their lives. It would also be wrong to say that every father is the ideal hero for their kids because that is not the case. However, I can vouch for my father without any second thoughts when it comes to being an ideal person.

My Father is Different!

As everyone likes to believe that their father is different, so do I. Nonetheless, this conviction is not merely based on the love I have for him, but also because of his personality. My father owns a business and is quite disciplined in all aspects of life. He is the one who taught me to always practice discipline no matter what work I do.

Most importantly, he has a jovial nature and always makes my mother laugh with his silly antics even after 27 years of marriage. I completely adore this silly side of him when he is with his loved ones. He tries his best to fulfill all our wishes but also maintains the strictness when the need arises.

One of the best things I love about my father is that he has always kept a very safe and open home environment. For instance, my siblings and I can talk about anything with him without the fear of being scolded or judged. This has helped us not to lie, which I have often noticed with my friends.

In addition, my father has an undying love for animals which makes him very sympathetic towards them. He practices his religion devotedly and is very charitable too. I have never seen my father misbehave with his elders in my entire life which makes me want to be like him even more.

Get the huge list of more than 500 Essay Topics and Ideas

My Father is My Source of Inspiration

I can proudly say that it is my father who has been my source of inspiration from day one. In other words, his perspective and personality together have shaped me as a person. Similarly, he has a great impact on the world as well in his own little ways. He devotes his free time in taking care of stray animals which inspires me to do the same.

My father has taught me the meaning of love in the form of a rose he gifts to my mother daily without fail. This consistency and affection encourage all of us to treat them the same way. All my knowledge of sports and cars, I have derived from my father. It is one of the sole reasons why I aspire to be a cricket player in the future.

To sum it up, I believe that my father has it all what it takes to be called a real-life superhero. The way he manages things professionally and personally leaves me mesmerized every time. No matter how tough the times got, I watched my father become tougher. I certainly aspire to become like my father. If I could just inherit ten percent of what he is, I believe my life will be sorted.

Customize your course in 30 seconds

Which class are you in.

• Travelling Essay
• Picnic Essay
• Our Country Essay
• My Parents Essay
• Essay on Favourite Personality
• Essay on Memorable Day of My Life
• Essay on Knowledge is Power
• Essay on Gurpurab
• Essay on My Favourite Season
• Essay on Types of Sports

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download the App

WorkSheets Buddy

Download Math, Science, English and Many More WorkSheets

My Father Essay For Class 3

Every family needs a strong grip behind them. For my family, it is my father. A father is an irreplaceable member of anyone’s family. A father is a person who takes care of all the needs of his wife and children. He is known to make many sacrifices for his family.

We are providing two essay samples for students of class 3 on the topic ‘My Father’ for reference.

Short Essay on My Father of 100 Words

My father’s name is Amal Ray. I love my father very much. To me, he is the best father in the world. My father is a very hardworking person. He maintains discipline in the family.  

My father is a businessman. Previously he was a teacher in a higher secondary school. Now he handles our family business of medicine. He wakes up first in the morning. Every morning, my father reads the newspaper.

My father loves my sister and me very much. He buys us beautiful gifts on our birthdays. On my last birthday, he gifted me a remote-controlled car. I enjoy his company very much.

Engage your kid into diverse thoughts and motivate them to improve their English with our  Essay for Class 3  and avail the Simple Essays suitable for them.

Long Essay on My Father of 150 Words

My father is a great father to my sister and me. He always motivates us to do well in school. He is my best friend. In the morning, he exercises to stay fit and healthy. My father is a family man who spends time with his family.

My father is very kind and helps people. He guides me in my difficult times. He helps me in my studies, tells me stories. Sometimes when he is free, he plays with me. He taught me always to work hard.

My father drops my sister and me at our school every day. My father does not get angry at all. My father can sing very well. He used to sing me to sleep in my childhood. My father provides all the necessary things for our family.

My father encourages my sister and me to eat healthy food. According to him, healthy food builds a healthy body. I want to be like him in the future, and he is my role model.

10 Lines on My Father in English

• My father respects the elders of our family.
• My father maintains a healthy relationship with our relatives.
• In his free time, my father spends time with our family.
• My father is a respectable person in society.
• My father loves humanity and serves to protect the community.
• My father is very ethical and protective of our family.
• My father always puts other’s needs before his own.
• I always pray for my father’s good health.
• My father brings tasty and healthy snacks while returning home from work.
• I want to become successful and fulfill my father’s dream in the future.

Frequently Asked Questions on My Father

Question: How should a father raise his child?

Answer:   A father should teach his child the value of discipline and friendship. A father should spend time with his family. He can play with his son or daughter, or he can take them to visit somewhere. He should teach them about humanity and love. Overall a good father always teaches his child to be good to others.

Question: How should a child celebrate “Father’s Day”?

Answer:  Father’s Day is celebrated on 20th June in India. This day is celebrated to honour the sacrifices of our fathers. A father works very hard for his family. On this day, a child should make his father feel special. We can cook his favourite dish and tell him to relax on this day.

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.

Notify me of new posts by email.

berkeley essay competition 2021

By submitting your essay, you give the BERKELEY PRIZE the nonexclusive, perpetual right to reproduce the essay or any part of the essay, in any and all media at the BERKELEY PRIZE’s discretion.  A “nonexclusive” right means you are not restricted from publishing your paper elsewhere if you use the following attribution that must appear in that new placement: “First submitted to and/or published by the international Berkeley Undergraduate Prize for Architectural Design Excellence ( www.BerkeleyPrize.org ) in competition year 20(--) (and if applicable) and winner of that year’s (First, Second, Third…) Essay prize.” Finally, you warrant the essay does not violate any intellectual property rights of others and indemnify the BERKELEY PRIZE against any costs, loss, or expense arising out of a violation of this warranty.

Registration and Submission

You (and your teammate if you have one) will be asked to complete a short registration form which will not be seen by members of the BERKELEY PRIZE Committee or Jury.

REGISTER HERE.

Additional Help and Information

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition: Fostering Intellectual Discourse in Architecture

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition –  Architecture Competitions Every Student Should Know About

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition stands as a beacon for nurturing critical thinking and scholarly discourse in the field of architecture. Organized by the Berkeley Undergraduate Prize for Architectural Design Excellence, this competition invites undergraduate students across the globe to engage in thought-provoking essays on pivotal architectural topics.

Cultivating Intellectual Inquiry

Encouraging diverse perspectives.

The competition seeks to encourage a diverse range of voices and perspectives in architectural discourse. It challenges students to delve into pressing architectural issues, fostering an environment where fresh ideas and innovative thinking can flourish.

The Challenge: Exploring Pertinent Architectural Themes

Provoking thoughtful reflection.

Participants in the Berkeley Essay Prize Competition explore a spectrum of architectural themes, encompassing sustainability, social responsibility, urban planning, cultural preservation, and design innovation. This platform encourages students to critically analyze the role of architecture in shaping societies and addressing global challenges.

Noteworthy Topics

Expanding architectural dialogue.

Essays submitted to the Berkeley Prize Competition have covered an array of thought-provoking topics:

• “Architectural Responses to Climate Change”: Discussions on designing environmentally responsive structures that mitigate the impact of climate change.
• “Inclusive Urban Spaces”: Explorations of architectural strategies fostering inclusivity and accessibility in urban environments.
• “Preservation vs. Innovation”: Deliberations on balancing the preservation of heritage with the need for innovative architectural interventions.

Impacting the Architectural Discourse

Recognizing intellectual rigor.

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition is not just about recognition; it is a platform for students to present their well-researched and compelling arguments to a global audience. Winning essays showcase intellectual rigor, critical analysis, and a nuanced understanding of architectural complexities.

Engage and Enrich

Seizing the opportunity.

For students passionate about architecture’s transformative power, the Berkeley Essay Prize Competition offers an avenue to voice their ideas, engage in meaningful dialogue, and contribute to the evolving architectural discourse.

Conclusion: Elevating Architectural Discourse

Catalyzing intellectual growth.

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition stands tall as a catalyst for intellectual growth in the realm of architecture. It is a testament to the importance of fostering critical inquiry and innovative thinking among the next generation of architects.

Embrace the Challenge

Enriching architectural perspectives.

For aspiring architects and scholars, the Berkeley Essay Prize Competition presents an opportunity to not only demonstrate academic prowess but also to shape the narrative of architecture through thoughtful discourse.

Join the Conversation

Contribute to architectural evolution.

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition beckons students to delve into the depths of architectural inquiry, challenge conventions, and contribute ideas that could redefine the future of architectural design and discourse. It’s an invitation to be part of a global conversation that transcends boundaries and inspires change.

Rethinking The Future (RTF) is a Global Platform for Architecture and Design. RTF through more than 100 countries around the world provides an interactive platform of highest standard acknowledging the projects among creative and influential industry professionals.

Kunitachi House by Roovice

Tara Housing, Delhi: Transforming Urban Living through Innovative Design

Related posts.

Fernandez Architecture: Crafting Elegance and Minimalism in Architectural Excellence

Christ Hospital Joint and Spine Center, USA: Revolutionizing Healthcare Architecture

Buerger Center for Advanced Pediatric Care, USA: Elevating Pediatric Healthcare Architecture

The New Hospital Tower at Rush University Medical Center, USA: Redefining Healthcare Architecture Excellence

Teletón Infant Oncology Clinic, Mexico: A Paradigm of Healing Architecture

Pars Hospital, Iran: A Masterpiece of Architectural Ingenuity in Healthcare

• Architectural Community
• Architectural Facts
• RTF Architectural Reviews
• Architectural styles
• City and Architecture
• Fun & Architecture
• History of Architecture
• Design Studio Portfolios
• Designing for typologies
• RTF Design Inspiration
• Architecture News
• Career Advice
• Case Studies
• Construction & Materials
• Covid and Architecture
• Interior Design
• Know Your Architects
• Landscape Architecture
• Materials & Construction
• Product Design
• RTF Fresh Perspectives
• Sustainable Architecture
• Top Architects
• Travel and Architecture
• Rethinking The Future Awards 2022
• RTF Awards 2021 | Results
• GADA 2021 | Results
• RTF Awards 2020 | Results
• ACD Awards 2020 | Results
• GADA 2019 | Results
• ACD Awards 2018 | Results
• GADA 2018 | Results
• RTF Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2017 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2016 | Results
• RTF Sustainability Awards 2015 | Results
• RTF Awards 2014 | Results
• RTF Architectural Visualization Competition 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2020 – Results
• Designer’s Days of Quarantine Contest – Results
• Urban Sketching Competition May 2020 – Results
• RTF Essay Writing Competition April 2020 – Results
• Architectural Photography Competition 2019 – Finalists
• The Ultimate Thesis Guide
• Introduction to Landscape Architecture
• Perfect Guide to Architecting Your Career
• How to Design Architecture Portfolio
• How to Design Streets
• Introduction to Urban Design
• Introduction to Product Design
• Complete Guide to Dissertation Writing
• Introduction to Skyscraper Design
• Educational
• Hospitality
• Institutional
• Office Buildings
• Public Building
• Residential
• Sports & Recreation
• Temporary Structure
• Commercial Interior Design
• Corporate Interior Design
• Healthcare Interior Design
• Hospitality Interior Design
• Residential Interior Design
• Sustainability
• Transportation
• Urban Design
• Host your Course with RTF
• Architectural Writing Training Programme | WFH
• Editorial Internship | In-office
• Graphic Design Internship
• Research Internship | WFH
• Research Internship | New Delhi
• RTF | About RTF
• Submit Your Story

Looking for Job/ Internship?

Rtf will connect you with right design studios.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

Competitive Prize Contests 2025

The Lipson Program George Morey Richardson Latin Translation Prize Philo Sherman Bennett Prize in Political Science Owen D. Young Prize in International Relations Thomas G. Rosenmeyer Greek Translation Prize Dorothy Rosenberg Memorial Prize in Lyric Poetry Elizabeth Mills Crothers Prize in Literary Composition Emily Chamberlain Cook Prize in Poetry Roselyn Schneider Eisner Prizes Florence Mason Palmer Prize Ina Coolbirth Memorial Poetry Prize Lili Fabilli and Eric Hoffer Essay Prize Nicola de Lorenzo Prize in Music Composition Anne and Benjamin Goor Prize in Jewish Studies

The Prizes Program at UC Berkeley ( [email protected] ) is an important forum for rewarding creative expression and scholarly achievement by Berkeley’s finest students. Winners receive both recognition and a cash prize, which is coordinated with the winner’s financial aid package.

Below you will find all of Berkeley’s Prize contests. Please note the criteria of each contest before entering.

Note: Prize contest entries need to be submitted, via our online submission form before 4 p.m. on the contest deadline (listed on the chart below). See the General Rules for Competitive Prizes for complete submission information. Please click on the contest names below for specific details about each prize.

The Lipson Program

The Leslie Lipson Program at UC Berkeley is intended to encourage undergraduate students to study humanistic values and their practical application for individuals, societies, and states.

The program consists of the Lipson Essay Prize, the Lipson Scholarship, and the Lipson Research Grant.

Leslie Lipson Biography. The Leslie Lipson Program is endowed in memory of Professor Leslie Lipson, who taught political theory and comparative government at Berkeley for 33 years. As a professor, Lipson’s first love was the undergraduate curriculum, and undergraduate students twice selected him as the best teacher in the Department of Political Science. Berkeley honored Lipson in 1980 with the Berkeley Citation, for individuals of extraordinary achievement in their field who have given outstanding service to the campus. Lipson’s books include The Great Issues of Politics, which has been published in ten editions, translated into numerous foreign languages, and used in introductory political science courses across the country; and his seminal work, The Ethical Crises of Civilization, in which he analyzed the historical developments in world civilizations that have resulted in both better and worse ethical choices. “Humanistic values are the fundamental values of good and evil, right and wrong, just and unjust, as carried out by individuals and societies in service of or against humanity” (Leslie Lipson).

Lipson Essay Prize

The Leslie Lipson Scholarship and Prize Fund (“the Fund’) will assist deserving financially needy undergraduate students enrolled at the University of California, Berkeley, and is open to students  regardless of race, color, national origin, or religion.  The Fund is dedicated to educating outstanding undergraduate students in humanistic values and to provide the means to conduct research concerning those values.

All recipients of Leslie Lipson Prize, Scholarship and Research Awards will be known as Leslie Lipson Scholars. Lipson Prize winners will receive a scholarship only if they are scholarship eligible and demonstrate financial need as determined by the Financial Aid Office. The Fund will provide all or a portion of their need-based scholarship. Recipients of the scholarship may also be eligible for the Research Award to conduct research during the summer between their scholarship terms.

Candidates shall apply at the end of the fall semester of their freshman or sophomore years, and recipients will be selected by the end of the spring semester of the year in which they apply. 

Successful candidates are awarded the Lipson Prize in spring and Lipson Scholarships will be awarded for their sophomore through senior years for those who apply as freshmen, and for the junior and senior years for those who apply as sophomores.

Eligibility

To be eligible for the Lipson Essay Prize, students need to be eligible freshmen or sophomores and have a minimum 3.0 grade-point average (GPA). Students from any field of study are welcome to apply. Essays will be reviewed by the Lipson Committee, and the committee may award prizes for all Scholarship Winners.

Submissions need to be submitted via our online submission form by January 17th, 2025  at 4 PM.

2023-2024 Lipson Scholarship Program Essay Topics

Please choose one topic.

• Currently it is often said that democracy in America is at a crossroads, in terms of its very ability to exist. Do you agree or disagree? What are the causes of such a disintegration, if indeed that is occurring?
• As famously stated by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, “You are entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts .” Has “red” and “blue” tribalism in current American culture now made it difficult, or even impossible, for people of different parties and persuasions to agree on what is reality or what is “true”?
• Is America in danger of becoming an authoritarian state? Are American democratic institutions, as embodied by our three branches of government, strong enough to defeat peaceably an armed threat of civil war?
•  What response to terrorism is consistent with and upholds humanistic values?
• Should there be any limits on political speech at universities? If you believe there should be limits, what would those be and how would they be enforced?
• Explain the persistence of anti-semitism over the centuries and why there is a resurgence today.

Prize Amounts

A prize of $10,000 is awarded to students who submit winning essays on one of six topics related to humanistic values.

• Essays shorter or longer than the recommended amount will not be disadvantaged by sole virtue of their length
• 12-point font; double-spaced with one-inch margins; numbered pages
• Last 4 digits of your student identification (SID) number in top-right corner of every page
• You may submit only one essay per calendar year
• Your submissions need to be anonymous; please do not include your name

Please submit via our online submission form.

Competitive Prizes Online Submission

2023-24: Victoria Fan, "The Center Will Not Hold: The State of Democracy"; Sophia Martinez, "How Echo Chambers and Algorithms Have Led Americans Away from a Universal Truth"; Zoe Lodge, "Sense and Desensitivity: Polarization is Destroying the Fabric of American Political Culture"; Carmen Berry, "When Feelings Become Fact: Climate Change Denialism as a Symptom of Political Mistrust"; Grace Camperi, "In the Cave of Political Tribalism"; Connor Eubank,  "State of Terror: The Ethical Cost of Legitimizing State Terrorism"; Alex Lewis Richter, " Countering Forever Wars: A Framework for Just & Unjust Counterterrorism Operations"; Alkis Loannis Toutziaridis,  "Rights and Resistance: The Dual Front in Counter-Terrorism Strategy"; Viraj Roy Gupta, "Untangling the Hydra: Combatting the Many Faces of Anti-Semitism"; Guanjie Cheng, "A Historical Journey Through the Persistence of Anti-Semitism”; Chloe Sabrina Zitsow, " Money, Money, Money: How the Myth of Jews and Finances Drives Antisemitism"

2022-23: Peyton Koch, "The Democracy Camel:  Has the Final Straw"; Irina Velitskaya, "The Consequences Are Clear: Social Media and the History of Human Innovation"; Agodi Okoroafor, "What do the Wealthiest 1% owe the 99%?"; Julia Gignac, "From Imperfect Progress by Unsatisfying Compromise"; Hy Nguyen, " An Invisible Hand plaguing our economy: The economics behind the Medical-Industrial Complex"; Ashley Kim, "BeReal… Let’s Be Real"; Keshwanth Babu Puligulla, "Agree to Disagree: An Examination of Political and Cultural Polarization"

2021-22:  Madeleine (Maddi) Wong, "America MMXXII: The Return of Democracy- An Attack on De Jure and De Facto Democracy through the Jeopardization of Civil Rights"; Margaux Bauerlein,"Social Trust and Negative Liberty: Free to Be Me (and Suffer for It)"

2020–21: Stephan Dai, "Lies and Internet Posts, Evidence that Brandenburg’s Toast?"; Aleeza Adnan, Alxander Fung, Emma Gerson, Valmic Muking, "Culture Warn’t: The Imaginary War the 1% Wants us to Fight"; Vyoma Raman, Deborah Le-En Tan

2019–20: Evan Juan, "The Obligation of a Human Right to Health"; Aditya Varma, "American E(conomics) X(clusion) C(hurch) E(xpansion) P(rogress) T(echnology)-ionalism"; Max Zhang, "Sleeping at the Wheel"

2018–19: Hannah Herrick, "The Persistence of Racism through Colorblindness"; Vedant Kajaria, "A Consummate Relationship with Anarchy"; Karen Lee, "Condemned to Condemn"; Tara Madhav "American Democracy, Racism and the State of Exception"; Kathleen Navas, "Psychological Basis and Modern Impact of Racism on Society"; Wyatt Singh, "The Second Coming: A Century Later, W.B. Yeats' Words Are Still Relevant"; Sharon Marie Vaz, "Yeats' Spiritus Mundi and its Relevance to 2019"; Leo Zlimen, "Our Own Phantom World"

2017–18: David Olin, "The Spirit and the Machine", Nicholas Pingitore, "Wandering with Walden", Evan Schwartz, "Arguments for Disobeying Trump's order for a Preemptive Nuclear Strike: Echoes from the Nuremberg Tribunal", Talia Wenger, "How Artificial Intelligence Re-Ignites the Human Spirit"

2016–17: Alexander Casendio, "Is democracy in general, as a form of government, currently broken on an international basis?"; Daniel Rosenthal,"What are the reasons for the cultural and political polarizations in the U.S. and what is its impact on humanistic values. Is this only a national trend, or is it an issue internationally?"; Thomas Lee Kadie,"The Licensing of Right-Wing Populism"

2015–16: 1st prize: Liya Nahusenay, "Islamophobia: A Detrimental Misnomer"; Neel Somani, "Contemporary Stereotyping: Exploring the Seduction of Bias"; 2nd prize: Nina Djukic, "A Rare Drought Rain"; Suleman Khan, "The Government That Cried Wolf: Refugees and National Security"; Olivia Maigret. "The Complicity of Religion in Terrorism"

2014–15: Carter Bryce Keeling, "The People's Climate March"; Ismael Farooqui, "The Invisible Hand: The results of wealth accumulation in a democracy"; Joprdan Hyatt-Miller, "The Logic of Violence"; James Rosenberg, "Legal Accountability for Torture: Preserving a Nation of Rights and Values"; Zijing Song, "One Oligarchy, Under God"

2013–14: Elizabeth Carroll, "A Nation of Suspects: Modern Surveillance and the Right to Privacy"; Wenyan He, "The Bilateral Nature of Ethics in Economic Inequality"; Taylor Madigan, "A Rawlsian Approach to Economic Inequality"; Sharada Narayan, "The Politics of Political Ethics"; Zijing Song, "The State of Obama's Union"

2012–13: Pierre Bourbonnais, "No Excuses for Lying"; Apruva Govande, "Emotional Bridges through Empathy"; Adithyavairavan Murali, "War on Terror: The Great Game of Education, Economics and Human Dignity"; Seth Victor, "The Lies and Unethical Nature of the War on Terror"

2011–12: Adam Susaneck, "How Party Stratification Leads to Duopoly as Ideology Establishing Elections as a Script Creating Not Deadlock, Livelock!"

2010–11: Ayden Parish, "Fundamentalism, Church and State"; Timothy Borjian, "The Problems with American Exceptionalism"

2009–10: Jasmine L. Segall, "Ethical Implications of Anonymous Methods of Modern Warfare"; Spreeha Debchaudhury, "We the People: A Colorful Portrayal"

2008–09: Alexander Setzepfandt, "Optimism: Breaking Free from the Unethical Behavior of Others"; Anirudh Narla, "The Triumph of Grey: The Importance of Indeterminacy and Complexity in Black and White"

2007–08: Danielle Rathje, "Fair Trade and Global Responsibility"; Keith Browner Brown, "Factoring in Humanity: The Failure of Population Control"

2006–07: Andrina Tran, "Varieties of Morality: William James, Pragmatism and Freedom "

2005–06: Erica Mu, "Dismantling Torture: An Examination of the United States at a Political and Ethical Crossroads"; Jillian Marks, "Torture: An Analysis of Its Evils"; Alexander H. Lau, "Revealing Racial Bias: A Case for Affirmative Action"

2004–05: Jacqueline Nader "The Greatest Danger of Our Time"; Yanpei Chen, "Morality and Political Discourse"; Charles Lin, "Avoiding a Tragedy: Reconciling International Interests in the Atmospheric Commons"

2003–04: No award given

2002–03: Jennifer Greenburg, "Women's Participation in Post-Apartheid Reform"; Sebastian Petty, "Back to the Land: Institutional Forms of Community Supported Agriculture"; Tina Sang, "Chinese Household Registration System"

2001–02: Susan Tche, "Effects of the New World Economy on Post-Embargo Vietnam"

2000–01: Cynthia Houng, "Sustainable Development? Towards a New Synthesis of Environment Ethics and Philosophy"; Joseph Kim, "Does Absentee Voting Have Anti-Social Effects on Voters?"; Pha Lo, "The Hmong of Laos: Cultural Perspectives on Implementing a Global Agenda"

Lipson Scholarship

The Lipson Scholarship, established in 2001, is a need-based scholarship awarded up to a scholar’s full financial need per year and is only available to eligible students who submit winning essays for the Lipson Essay Prize.

To receive the Lipson Scholarship, students must win the Lipson Essay Prize and be a freshman or sophomore when they apply. The Lipson Scholarship will fund the costs of the scholars’ sophomore through senior years at UC Berkeley for those who apply as freshmen, and the costs of the scholars’ junior and senior years for those who apply as sophomores, based on their financial need as determined by the Financial Aid and Scholarships Office. 

Lipson Research Grant

The third component of the Lipson Program, which is optional, is the Lipson Research Grant (established in 2001).

Lipson Scholars who wish to do research in greater depth have the opportunity to apply for funds to support their own original research project. Scholars will undertake such projects during the summer. Scholars selected for the Lipson Research Grant will receive a $5,000 stipend for summer living expenses so that they may devote their time to their summer research project; an additional $250 will be awarded in the fall semester after the scholar submits a paper about his or her summer project. Lipson Research Grant recipients may decide to develop the paper further into an honors thesis, or even a graduate-level dissertation. Projects must relate to humanistic values and their implementation, and might, for example, address such topics as human rights issues, bio-ethics, the impact on developing societies of global capitalism, or environmental concerns in the 21st century. Students will receive further details about this research opportunity following their selection as Lipson Scholars. While the Lipson Research Grant is optional, it is an important part of the Lipson Program.

• Previous Research Projects add Summer 2012 Ayden Parish: Prototype Theory and the Categorization of Autism Jasmine Segall: Microfinance: Interest Rates and Social Performance in the United States and Guatemala

– Top –

George Morey Richardson Latin Translation Prize

The Richardson Latin Translation Prize is open to all UC Berkeley students. A first-place prize and second-place prize are awarded for the best translation of classical English into Ciceronian Latin.

History of the Prize: The Richardson Latin Translation Prize was established through the will of George Morey Richardson of Berkeley, dated May 16, 1896: “I give and devise to The Regents of the University of California, two lots or parcels of land, situated in Highland Trust, Oakland Township, Alameda County, State of California, to expend the income there or from the proceeds thereof, when sold, for an annual prize known as the ‘Richardson Latin Translation Prize,’ to be awarded to undergraduates (later to include graduate students) of the University of California for the best translation of classical English into Ciceronian Latin.” The prize was established in 1896.

Please review the General Rules for Competitive Prizes .

Contest deadline is January 17th, 2025  at 4 PM.

2023-2024 George Morey Richardson Latin Translation English Passage

2023–24: No award given

2022–23: Claire Healy ($2,000)

2021–22: No award given

2020–21: 1st prize: Joshua Benjamins ($1,900)

2019–20: 1st prize: Daniel Squire ($1,000); 2nd prize: Joshua Benjamins ($800)

2018–19: 1st prize: Daniel Squire ($1,000); 2nd prize: Joshua Benjamin ($500)

2017–18: 1st prize: Daniel Squire ($1,500)

2016–17: 1st prize: Daniel Squire ($1,400)

2015–16: 1st prize: Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($1,000); 2nd prize: Daniel Squire ($400)

2014–15: 1st prize: Michael Zellman-Rohrer ($1,000); 2nd prize: Tom Recht ($500)

2013–14: 1st prize: Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($1,500)

2012–13: 1st prize: Jared Hudson and Michael Zellman-Rohrer ($750 each)

2011–12: 1st prize: Michael Zellman–Rohrer ($2,000)

2010–11: 1st prize: Jared Hudson ($1,500); 2nd prize: Thomas Hendrickson ($500)

2009–10: 1st prize: Jared Hudson ($2,000)

2008–09: 1st prize: Jared Hudson ($1,500); 2nd prize: Antonia Pham Young ($500)

2007–08: 1st prize: Jared Hudson and Boris Rodin ($1,000 each)

2006–07: 1st prize: Jared Hudson ($2,000)

2005–06: 1st prize: Wilson Shearin ($1,500); 2nd prize: Kurt Lampe ($500)

2004–05: 1st prize: Kurt Lampe ($2,000)

2003–04: 1st prize: William Michal Short ($1,500); 2nd prize: J. C. Geissmann ($500)

2002–03: 1st prize:William Short ($2,000) 2001–02: 1st prize: Jon Christopher Geissmann ($1,000)

2000–01: 1st prize: Dylan Sailor ($1,000)

1999–00: 1st prize: Dylan Sailor ($1,000); 2nd prize: Amir Baghdadchi ($500)

1998–99: 1st prize: Dylan Sailor ($500)

1997–98: 1st prize: Dylan Sailor ($500)

Philo Sherman Bennett Prize in Political Science

The Philo Sherman Bennett Prize in Political Science is awarded for the best essay encompassing some aspect of politics other than international relations.

The prize is open to both graduates and undergraduates.

History of the Prize: Philo Sherman Bennett’s 1905 will stated: “I give and bequeath to Wm. J. Bryan of Lincoln the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00), in trust, however, to pay to twenty-five colleges or universities, to be selected by him, the sum of four hundred ($400.00) each, said sum of four hundred dollars ($400.00) to be invested by each college receiving the same and the annual proceeds used for a prize for the best essay discussing the principal of free government.” The Regents Minutes of August 8, 1905 recite the following: “Mr. Wm. Jennings Bryan informed the University that he was glad to leave the decision by the college authorities the details of the Bennett Essay Prize…”

Contest deadline is December 13th , 2024  at 4 PM.

2023–24: Alyssa Rene Heinze and Eero Samuel Arum ($1,500 each)

2022–23: Teoman Tecan ($2,500)

2021–22: Kristin Zuhone ($1,000)

2020–21:  Joseph Rodriquez and Shterna Friedman ($2,500 each) 

2019–20: Shterna Friedman and Julia Goddard ($2250 each)

2018–19: Shterna Friedman ($4500)

2017–18: Kristin Zuhone ($1000)

2016–17: No prize awarded

2015–16: Jeremy Cynamon ($1,000)

2014–15: Jeremy Cynamon ($1,000)

2013–14: Samuel Garrett Zeitlin ($1,000)

2012–13: Samuel Garrett Zeitlin ($1,000)

2011–12: Jeremy Pilaar ($1,000)

2010–11: Sang-Hwa Sara Lee and Alyssa Beltran ($500 each)

2009–10: Huan Gao and Mikhail Guttentag ($500 each)

2008–09: Daniel Katz ($1,000)

2007–08: Daniel Katz ($1,000 )

2006–07: Nan Zhang ($1,000)

2005–06: Caitlin Rose Fox-Hodess ($1,000)

2004–05: Caitlin Rose Fox-Hodess ($1,000)

2002–03: No award given

2001–02: Anthony Chen ($1,000)

2000–01: Tony Chen ($2,000)

1999–00: Robert S. Taylor ($1,500)

1998–99: Daniel Ho ($1,000)

1997–98: James Abrams ($1,000)

Owen D. Young Prize in International Relations

The Owen D. Young Prize in International Relations is awarded for the best essay dealing with some aspect of international relations.

A minimum of 4,000 words is required with a maximum word limit of 5,000 words. Open to undergraduates only.

History of the Prize: From the Regents’ Minutes of October 10, 1933: “Mr. Owen D. Young delivered the Charter Day Address in Berkeley on March 24, 1930, returned to the Regents his honorarium as such speaker and in addition donated the sum of $250. This was intended to be used for three prizes … to undergraduate students registered in the colleges at Berkeley … who offered the best three essays on the topic, ‘What can a college student do to further good understanding among the nations and thereby promote peace?’ Mr. Young, on June 2, 1931, [amended] the conditions of this … contest, [whereby] the remainder of his donation, to wit, $900, be set up as a permanent fund, the income therefrom to be devoted to an annual prize for the best essay on some aspect of international relations. The Committee on Prizes is authorized to change the topic of the essay from time to time as they may see fit to do so.” The Owen D. Young Prize was established in 1958.

2022–23: Caitlin Barotz ($800)

2021–22: Dil Sen ($1,400)

2 020–21: Francis (Siyuan) Chen and Kaitlyn Lombardo ($600 each)

2019–20: Rosemary Yin ($1,500)

2018–19: Will Alexander and Kevin Klyman ($700 each)

2017–18: 1st prize: Sarah O'Farrell ($700); 2nd prize: Justin DesRochers and Janani Mohan ($350 each)

2016–17: Suleman Khan ($1,000)

2015–16: Madison Chapman and William Michael Morrow ($750 each)

2014–15: Cameron Silverberg ($1,500)

2013–14: Caroline McCloskey ($1,500)

2012–13: Michelle Chern ($1,500)

2011–12: Maya Yizhaky ($1,500)

2010–11: Lauren Benichou ($1,500)

2009–10: Kenneth Tsang ($1,500)

2008–09: Timothy Barry ($1,500)

2007–08: No award given

2006–07: Ben Narodick ($1,200)

2005–06: Helen Hsueh ($1,200)

2004–05: No award given

2003–04: Miya Keren ($500)

2002–03: Jeff Lindemyer ($500)

2001–02: Albert Ofrecio ($500)

2000–01: No award given

1999–00: Daniel Ho ($500)

1998–99: Christopher Maier ($500)

1997–98: No entries received

Thomas G. Rosenmeyer Greek Translation Prize

The Thomas G. Rosenmeyer Greek Translation Prize is awarded to a graduate or undergraduate for the best translation of classical English into an appropriate classical Greek style.

Appropriate styles include those of Plato and of the classical Attic orators, but other styles appropriate to the content are not excluded, such as the style of Herodotus, or even verse composition. The selection will normally be formal English prose and will be 350 to 500 words in length.

History of the Prize: The Rosenmeyer Prize was established in 1995.

2023-2024 Thomas G. Rosenmeyer Greek Translation English Passage

2022–23: No award given

2021–22:  No award given

2020–21: Joshua Benjamins ($750)

2019–20: Joshua Benjamins and Daniel Squire ($1,500 each)

2018–19: Daniel Squire ($2,500)

2017–18: Daniel Squire ($1,000)

2016–17: Daniel Squire ($1,400)

2015–16: Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($1,000)

2014–15: 1st prize: Tom Recht ($750); 2nd prize: Michael Zellman-Rohrer ($250)

2013–14: Tom Recht and Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($500 each)

2012–13: Tom Recht and Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($500 each)

2011–12: Tom Recht ($700); Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($300)

2010–11: Tom Recht and Michael Zellmann-Rohrer ($500 each)

2009–10: Tom Recht ($1,000)

2008–09: Boris Rodin ($750); Honorable Mention: Joel Street ($250)

2007–08: Nardini Pandey ($500)

2006–07: Boris Rodin Maslov ($500)

2005–06: Boris Rodin Maslov ($500)

2004–05: Boris Rodin ($500)

2003–04: William Michael Short ($500)

2002–03: Jon Christopher Geissmann ($500)

2001–02: W. H. Shearin ($500)

2000–01: Dylan Sailor ($500)

1999–00: Dylan Sailor ($500)

1998–99: Dylan Sailor ($500)

1997–98: Dylan Sailor ($500)

Dorothy Rosenberg Memorial Prize in Lyric Poetry

The Dorothy Rosenberg Memorial Prize in Lyric Poetry will be awarded for composition of the best original unpublished lyric poem. Each entrant may submit only one poem; the length should not exceed thirty lines. A lyric poem is a poem that sings. It is usually quite short. When the poem is read aloud, it should inspire and delight by its heartfelt thought and feeling and the beauty of its language.

History of the Prize

When Dorothy Rosenberg died, her husband, Professor Marvin Rosenberg, established a fund to award this prize in her name.

Contest deadline is December 13th , 2024

2023-24: Noah Warren, William James Davidson and Mary Mussman ($1,000 each)

2022-23: Emily Peng, Landon Kramer ($1,500 each)

2021-22: Mary Mussman ($1,500), Annabelle Lampson ($1,000) and John James ($1,000)

2020-21: Mary Wilson($2,000), John James ($1,500) and Mary Mussman ($1,200)

2019–20: Yujane Chen and Aurelia Cojocaru ($3000)

2018–19: Lydia Liu ($3000)

2017–18: Selden Cummings, Nina Djukic, Anthony Tucci-Berube, Claire Marie Stancek, Jennifer Lorden ($1040)

2016–17: Julie Lee, Kaisle Hill, Brianna Alleyne, Katrina Hall, undergraduate winners; Evan Klavon, graduate winner ($840 each)

2015–16: Alani Hicks-Bartlett ($1,000); Evan Bauer, Raj Bhargava, Ismael Farooqui, Carter Bryce Keeling, and Alan Xu ($800 each)

2014–15: Christopher Miller and Mary Wilson, graduate winners ($1,000 each); Lillian Berger, Andrew David King, and S. Carlota Salvador Megias, undergraduate winners ($1,000 each)

2013–14: Jane Gregory, graduate winner ($2,000); Andrew David King, undergraduate winner ($2,000)

2012–13: Rachel Trocchio, graduate winner ($850); Laura Ferris, Andrew David King, Larry Narron, and Claire Tuna, undergraduate winners ($850 each)

2011–12: Samuel Garrett Zeitlin, graduate winner ($2,400); Bryce Thronburg, undergraduate winner ($2,400)

2010–11: Jane Gregory, graduate winner ($1,600); Taylor Hickok and Kayla Krut, undergraduate winners ($1,600 each)

2009–10: Gillian Osborne, graduate winner ($1,000); 1st prize, undergraduate: Anna Reeser ($2,000), 2nd prize, undergraduate: Steven Lance ($1,500), 3rd prize, undergraduate: Emma Tome ($1,000), Honorable Mention: Teresa Jimenez ($500)

2008–09: Matthew Melnicki and Alani Hicks-Bartlett graduate winners ($2,000 each); 1st prize, undergraduate: Steven Lance ($2,000); Honorable Mention: Joe Cadora ($1,000)

2007–08: Kate Klonowski and Matthew Melnicki ($2,000 each)

2006–07: Colin Dingler, graduate winner ($2,000); James May, undergraduate winner ($2,000); Honorable Mention: Marisa Libbon

2005–06: Michael Nicholson and Elizabeth Young ($1,000 each); Honorable Mention: Diana Y. Chien

2004–05: Edgar Garcia ($500)

2003–04: Edgar Garcia ($200)

2002–03: Michael Heinrich ($200)

2001–02: Lily Dwyer ($100)

2000–01: Emily Beall ($100)

1999–00: Mandy Kahn ($100)

1998–99: Caetlin Benson-Allott ($100)

1997–98: Kimberly Johnson ($100)

Elizabeth Mills Crothers Prize in Literary Composition

The Elizabeth Mills Crothers Prize in Literary Composition is awarded for excellence of composition in poetry, story writing, drama, or another field of literary composition. Judging is based on excellence of composition. Open to all graduate and undergraduate students.

This fund was accepted by the Regents on August 13, 1929. The Corpus thereof, in the amount of $3,000, was, by Judge George E. Crothers, pursuant to an agreement dated October 13, 1921, between Judge Crothers and the late Maria Elizabeth Mills, transferred to Mrs. Mills for the support of a fellowship in music in Mills College. This agreement provided that upon the death of Mrs. Mills the fund should pass to the Regents to support the Elizabeth Mills Crothers Prize in Literary Composition at the University of California.

2023-24: Aleeza Adnan ($1,200), Ayesha Asad, Mina Choi and Maisie Wiltshire-Gordon ($600 each)

2022-22: Nina Djukic ($1,500), Sophia Egert-Smith, Mary Mussman ($750 each)

2021-22: Drew Kiser ($1,000); Ryan Lackey ($500)

2020–21: Jennifer Tamayo ($900); Ryan Lackey, Noah Warren, Nessa Ordukhani, Mary Mussman ($500 each)

2019–20: Lucy Eaton ($1,000); Mary Mussman, Noah Warren, Sabrina Jaszi ($650 each)

2018–19: Clara Jimenez, Mary Mussman, Tessa Rissacher, Noah Warren ($750 each)

2017–18: 1st Prize: Mary Wilson ($2000); 2nd Prize: Evan Bauer, Selden Cummings, Nina Djukic, Zachary Kiebach($800 each)

2016–17: 1st prize: Rosetta Young ($600); 2nd prize: Jesslyn Whittell ($400); 3rd prize: Shelby Gregg ($300); Finalists: Sheryl Barbera and Khamillah Zimmer ($250 each); Honorable Mention: Mary Wilson, Laura Ferris, Hannah Ling, Julia Apffel, Evan Bauer, Sean Dennison, and Balark Mallik ($100 each)

2015–16: 1st prize: Carter Bryce Keeling ($2,000); 2nd prize: Claire Marie Stancek ($1,000); 3rd prize: Rachel King ($1,000); Finalists: Roxanne Forbes, Griffin Morin-Tornheim, Leah Tyus, and Anthony Williams ($250 each)

2014–15: 1st prize: Andrew David ($2,500); 2nd prize: Stanford Shoor ($500); 3rd prize: Rachel Trocchio ($500); 4th prize: Mary Wilson ($500)

2013–14: 1st prize: Ismail Muhammad ($1,500); 2nd prize: Manjing Zhang ($1,000); 3rd prize: Jessica Cox ($750); 4th prize: Tara Fatemi ($500); 5th prize: Michael A. Shaw ($250)

2012–13: Allison Berke, Cora Bernard, Myles Parker Osborne, Kayla Krut, and Eli Wirtschafter ($800 each)

2011–12: 1st prize: Gabriel Thibodeau ($1,500); 2nd prize: Kayla Krut ($1,000); 3rd prize: Yi (Jenny) Xie and Zoe Pollak ($750 each)

2010–11: Kelsa Trom and Tom Recht ($150 each)

2009–10: Faith Gardner, Angelene Smith, David Krolikoski, and Natalie Tsang ($800 each)

2008–09: Mia You ($600); Angelene Smith, Jennifer Reimer, Thomas Gamburg and Natalie Tsang ($350 each)

2007–08: Joseph Cadora, Jude Dizon, Adrienne Johnson and Nalini Rae G Sareen ($250 each)

2006–07: Martine Charnow, Zachary Tomaszewski, and Sara Lahue ($300 each)

2005–06: Geoffrey Greer ($500); Joseph Scalici, Jacqueline Palhegy, Keleigh Friedrich, Trevor Adrian, Emi Ikkanda ($150 each)

2004–05: Jacqueline Palhegy ($500); Leslie MacMillan, Erica Kidder Jensen and Edgar Garcia ($150 each)

2003–04: 1st prize: Bernice Santiago and Katherine Willett ($350 each); 2nd prize: Brandelyn Castine ($200); 3rd prize: Roger Porter ($100)

2002–03: Winners for poetry: Ellen Samuels ($250), Rachel Teukolsky ($175), Laura Wetherington ($175); Winners for Prose: James Ramey ($250), Maria Elena Howard ($150)

2001–02: Jennifer Hasa and Soyoung Jung ($1,000 each)

2000–01: Jennifer Ahn and Karen Lee ($1,000 each)

1999–00: 1st prize: Azin Arefi-Anbarani and Matthew Gleeson ($900 each)

1998–99: 1st prize: Bruce Maritano, Benjamin Russack, Caleb Smith, Frank B. Wilderson III, and Lin Zou ($300 each)

1997–98: 1st prize: Jennifer Stroud ($500); 2nd prize: Asali Solomon ($300); 3rd prize: Bryce Maritano ($200); runner-up: Michael Holt and Yuval Sharon ($100 each)

1996–97: 1st prize: Caleb Smith ($400); 2nd prize: Anh Bui ($200); 3rd prize: Asali Solomon and Julia Cho ($175 each); 4th prize: Ola Metwally ($150)

1995–96: 1st prize: Judy Kemelman ($300); 2nd prize: Amy Graff and Karin Spirn ($250 each); 3rd prize: Viet Nguyen and Hamilton Tran ($200 each); 4th prize: Philip Huynh and Bryan Malessa ($150 each)

1994–95: 1st prize: Cynthia Lin ($500); 2nd prize: Elizabeth Scarboro and Karin Spirn ($350 each); 3rd prize: Lysley Tenorio, Lyn Dilorio, and Jack Wooster ($200 each); 4th prize: Cat Dale and Jessica Hahn ($100 each)

Emily Chamberlain Cook Prize in Poetry

The Emily Chamberlain Cook Prize in Poetry is awarded for the most outstanding single unpublished poem.

Both graduate and undergraduate students are free to write up to 26 lines in length, in any meter, and upon any subject. Up to four winners may be chosen at the judge’s discretion.

Yale University Professor Albert S. Cook, formerly on the UC Berkeley faculty, endowed this prize with $1,000. As noted in the August 10, 1909, minutes of the Regents of the University of California, Professor Cook specified that “it is highly desirable” that the prize be awarded “for a poem which reflects honor upon the University, when viewed in the light of the best precedents furnished by England and this country.” Professor Cook further specified that “the University shall be free at any time to reprint the poem as it may choose.”

2023–24: Nina Alessandra Djukic ($1,200), Mary Mussman and Naima Karczmar ($500 each)

2022–23: Mary Mussman, Jessica Laser, and Andy Choi ($400 each)

2021–22: Annabelle Lampson ($800), John James, and Noah Warren ($600 each)

2020–21: Lamiya Gulamhusein, Dominique Salapare, Madelyn Peterson, and Max Kaisler ($625 each)

2019–20: Jennifer Tamayo, Max Kaisler, Lashon A. Daley and Noah Warren ($600 each)

2018–19: Mary Mussman, Mary Wilson, and Dylan Furcall ($800 each)

2017–18: Daniel Benjamin, Anthony Tucci-Berube ($1,100 each)

2016–17: Mary Wilson and Mary Mussman ($1,100 each)

2015–16: 1st prize: Rachel Trocchino ($1,400); 2nd prize: Nathaniel Dolton-Thornton ($700)

2014–15: 1st prize: Andy Nguy ($1,000); 2nd prize: Yaul Perez-Stable Husni ($600); 3rd prize: Alani Hicks Bartlett ($500)

2013–14: 1st prize: Jennifer Lorden, Clint Anderson, Lisa Levin, Michael Shaw ($500 each)

2012–13: 1st prize: Evan Klavon ($1,000); 2nd prize: Rachel Trocchio ($500); Honorable Mention: Andrew David King and Allison Yates ($250 each)

2011–12: Darius Carrick, Andrew David King, Pamela Glazier, and Vanessa Ing ($350 each)

2010–11: Laura Ferris, Kathryn Hindenlang, Tara Phillips, and Patricia Yen ($525 each)

2009–10: Joe Cadora, Ashley Lystne, Eamon O'Connor, and Gillian Osborne ($550 each)

2008–09: Natasha Arora, Pamela Krayenbuhl, Steven Lance, and Craig Perez ($500 each)

2007–08: Meredith Higgins and Clifford Mak ($150)

2006–07: Hillary Gravendyk, Jeremy Graves, Marisa Libbon, and Yosefa Raz ($300 each)

2005–06: Olivia Friedman ($300)

2004–05: Edgar Garcia, Dorian Gesler, and Shanyin Chang ($300 each)

2003–04: Ellen Samuels , Laura Wetherington, Christine Harrison, and Jessica Zychowicz ($300 each)

2002–03: Kimberly Johnson ($300)

2001–02: Sandra Lim, Marisa Libbon, Yasmin Golan, & Lynley Lys ($300 each)

2000–01: Emily Beall ($600), David Ruderman ($400), Jasmine Bina ($200)

1999–00: Julie Anderson, Ben Chaika, Elizabeth Hillman, and Kimberly Johnson ($300 each)

1998–99: 1st prize: Kimberly Johnson ($500); 2nd prize: Gibson Fay-LeBlanc ($500)

1997–98: 1st prize: Nadia Nurhussein ($300); runners-up: Emily Abendroth, Robyn Brooks, Delphine Hwang, and Padraig Riley ($150 each)

Roselyn Schneider Eisner Prizes

In 1963, Samuel Marks established an endowment of $250,000 for the advancement of the arts on the Berkeley campus, in memory of his stepdaughter, Roselyn Schneider Eisner, an artist and sculptor. The Chancellor’s Advisory Committee on the Arts recommended the money be used to establish prizes in each of the Creative Arts.

Photo Imaging

The Eisner Prizes in Photo-Imaging are open to all UC Berkeley graduates and undergraduates of any major.

Contest deadlines vary. Please check the Prizes and Honors home page for this prize’s deadline.

• Eisner Photo-Imaging Prize Rules add Please review the General Rules for Competitive Prizes . Additional rules for the Eisner Photo-Imaging Prize contest are listed below. Submission link: Competitive Prizes Submission You may submit 1 to 3 black-and-white or color images. Submissions must be anonymous. Include the last  four digits of your student ID number on your file name and the total number of photographic images you're entering (e.g., "#1234 1 of 3," "#1234 2 of 3," "#1234 3 of 3"). Submissions may show either a body of work or 3 photos exploring 3 different themes. Judges will look for the artistic dimensions of the photos presented, including the creative uses of color ( tone values if you are showing black and white prints), lighting, graphic composition and framing .

Film and Video

The Eisner Prizes in Film and Video contest is open to both graduates and undergraduates in any department.

One to three films may be submitted, but the judges will only view up to 30 minutes of film for each applicant.

Contest deadlines vary. Please check the Prizes and Honors page for this prize’s deadline.

• Eisner Film and Video Prize Rules add Please review the General Rules for Competitive Prizes . The Eisner Film and Video Prize contest also has additional rules listed below. Students can submit films as a Quicktime file on a flash/thumb drive or via a working URL on either Youtube or Vimeo. The applicant must make sure the URL is open and working, and that the thumb drive is both PC and MAC compatible You may submit 1 – 3 entries but are encouraged to submit only your best work. All film submissions must be in finished form, ready for public exhibition. Unfinished works or work-in-progress will not be considered. At least one submission must have been made during the period of your enrollment as a student on the Berkeley campus. Judges will not view more than 30 minutes of film or video. All submissions must be of the entire film, excerpts will not be accepted for consideration. To be eligible, you need to be enrolled full-time in a degree-granting program for at least one regular semester of the academic year (not including Summer Sessions). Filing for a degree does not constitute enrollment for that academic year. Visiting students are not eligible to apply for prizes. A previous winner of this contest may not enter the following year. Film or video submissions must be labeled with the last four digits of the entrant's student ID (SID) number, the film's title, running time and the original format of the entry (16mm, VHS, URL, thumb drive file. etc.). Also, a brief (one paragraph, typewritten) film description should accompany the submission. The maker's name must not appear on the entry or on the film credits. The Prizes Office, 210 Sproul Hall, will hold film and video entries for pickup until mid-May.

The Eisner Prizes in Poetry and Prose contests are open to all UC Berkeley graduates and undergraduates in any department.

Prose submissions may include novels, plays, or a collection of short stories. Prose submissions should be a substantial body of work with a representative 20–30 pages earmarked. Poetry submissions should be a collection of poems with a minimum of 25 pages to a maximum of 40 pages. Entries must be paginated, stapled and include a table of contents and a title page. This contest may contain submissions that have won in other contests in previous years. However, entries to these contests must consist of a majority of new work not having previously won in any campus contest or simultaneously submitted elsewhere.

Contest deadlines vary. Please check the Prizes and Honors home page for this prize's deadline.

2023–24: Poetry: Andrew David King ($3,000), John James ($1,500) and Noah Warren ($1,500)

Prose: Andrew David King ($1,250) and Maisie Wiltshire-Gordon ($1,250)

2022–23: Poetry: Andrew David King ($3,000), Mary Mussman ($2,000) and Noah Warren ($1,000)

Prose: Landon Kramer ($2,000) and Andy Choi ($2,000)

2021–22: Poetry: Mary Mussman ($3,000), Noah Warren ($1,500) and John James ($1,500)

Prose: No Prizes awarded

2020–21: Poetry: Jennifer Tamayo ($5000)

2019–20: Poetry: Christian Nagler ($5000)

Prose: Elodie Townsend and Sabrina Jaszi ($2,500 each)

2018–19: Poetry: Dylan Cox and Mary Wilson ($5000 each)

Prose: No Prizes Awarded

2017–18: Poetry: Shonushka Sawant ($3000) and Daniel Benjamin ($2000)

Prose: Clair Marie Stancek and Zackary Kiebach ($2,500 each)

2016–17: Poetry: 1st prize: Sahvanna Mazon ($3,000); 2nd prize: Shonushka Sawant ($2,000)

Prose: Zackary Kiebach ($2,000)

2015–16: Poetry: 1st prize: David A. Hernandez ($3,000); 2nd prize: Nathaniel Dolton-Thornton ($2,000)

Prose: Emma Rosenbaum ($2,000)

2014–15: Poetry: Christopher Patrick Miller and Claire Marie Stancek ($2,500 each)

Prose: Andrew David King and Natasha Von Kaenel ($2,500 each)

2013–14: Poetry: Kristopher Kersey, Julia Tianjiao Wang, and David Vandeloo ($2,000 each);

Prose: Andrew David King ($4,000)

2012–13: Poetry: Rebecca Gaydos, Andrew David King, and Ryan Tucker ($2,000 each);

Prose: Kelly Clancy and Rosetta Young ($2,000 each)

2011–12: Poetry: Christopher P. Miller and Yosefa Raz ($3,000 each);

Prose: Brian J. Loo and Leila Mansouri ($2,000 each)

2010–11: Poetry: Rachel Beck, Jane Gregory, S Christopher Miller, and Swati Rana ($2,500 each);

Prose: No award given

2009–10: Poetry: Steven Lance, Gillian Osborne, and Lynn Xu ($2,000 each);

Prose: Nina Estreich and Danica Li ($2,000 each)

2008–09: Poetry: Gillian Osborne and Lijia Xie ($3,000 each);

Prose: 11 entries; Joe Cadora ($4,000)

2007–08: Poetry: Hillary Gravendyk and Chad Vogler ($5,000 each);

Prose: 4 entries; No award given

2006–07: Poetry: Elizabeth Marie Young and Margaret Ronda ($2,500 each);

Prose: Melissa Fall ($5,000)

2005–06: Poetry: Hilary Gravendyk Burrill ($6,000);

Prose: Elaine Castillo and Mark Massoud ($2,000 each)

2004–05: Poetry: Margaret Ronda and Tung-Hui Hu ($2,500 each);

Prose: 1st prize: Neil Colin Satterlund ($3,000); 2nd prize: Katherine Ann Willett ($2,000); Honorable Mention: Dorothy Couchman

2003–04: Poetry: 1st prize: Jennifer Scappetone ($3,000); 2nd prize: Lynn Ziyu Xu ($2,000);

Prose: 1st prize: Elaine Castillo ($2,500); 2nd prize: Ellen Samuels ($2,500)

2002–03: Poetry: Timothy Wood, Julie Carr, and Warren Liu ($2,000 each);

Prose: Elaine Castillo and Frank B. Wildersn III ($2,000 each)

2001–02: Poetry: Jessica Fisher ($3,000) and Anne Walker ($2,000);

Prose: Yekaterina Kosova ($3,000) and Lucia Facone ($2,000)

2000–01: Poetry: 1st prize: Brian Glaser ($3,000); 2nd prize: Jennifer Scappettone ($2,000); Honorable Mention: Ellen Samuels;

Prose: 1st prize: Ann Simon ($3,000); 2nd prize: Yuval Sharon ($2,000); Honorable Mention: Jose Alaniz

1999–00: Poetry: Jessica Fisher, Nadia Nurhussein, and Anne F. Walker ($1,400 each);

Prose: Jose Alaniz and Karen A. Lee ($1,400 each)

1998–99: Poetry: Kim Johnson and Roxana Popescu ($2,333 each);

Prose: Damion Searls ($2,333)

1997–98: Poetry: Ola Metwally, Mathew Struthers, and Karen An-Hwei Lee ($2,333 each);

Prose: Chris Minter ($2,333)

Florence Mason Palmer Prize

The Florence Mason Palmer Memorial Prize is awarded for the best essay of up to 5,000 words dealing with some aspect of international relations.

Open to women undergraduates only.

Established in 1958.

2023–24: Catherine Regan and Sabreen Nuru ($2,500 each)

2022–23:  Caitlin Barotz ($3,000)

2020–21: 1st prize: Kaitlyn Lombardo 2nd prize: Jordan Webb ($3,000 each) ; Honorable Mention: Nawal Seedat and Tara Madhav ($1,500 each)

2019–20: 1st prize: Esther Smith ($4000); Honorable Mention: Nicole Mendoza and Tara Madhav ($2000 each)

2018–19: 1st prize: Sarah Sheets ($4000); 2nd prize: Adriana Weiss and Negeen Khandel ($1000 each)

2017–18: 1st prize: Sarah O'Farrell ($1000); 2nd prize: Lily Greenberg Call and Janani Mohan ($600 each)

2016–17: Zijing Song ($750)

2015–16: Shruthi Gopal ($1,000)

2014–15: 1st prize: Simrit Dhillon ($750); 2nd prize: Mikaela Rear and Lucy Song ($500 each)

2013–14: 1st prize: Tali Gires and Melody Alemansour ($750 each); 2nd prize:  Rebecca Moon and Carina Tai ($500 each)

2012–13: Naomi Egel ($2,500)

2011–12: 1st prize: Jamie Andreson ($2,500); 2nd prize: Maya Yizhaky ($1,500); 3rd prize: Sara Lee ($1,000)

2010–11: No award given

2009–10: 3rd prize only: Ryan Cohen ($500)

2008–09: 1st prize:  Roushani Mansoor, Sarah Weiner, and Lauren Powell ($1,500 each)

2006–07: 1st prize:  Hasina Badani ($2,000)

2005–06: 1st prize:  Elizabeth Mattiuzzi and Julia Gin ($2,500 each)

2004–05: 1st prize: Nancy Si-Ming Liu ($3,000); 2nd prize: Gabriela Maguire ($2,000)

2003–04: 1st prize: Henluen Wang ($300); 2nd prize: Deepa D. Shah ($200)

2002–03: 1st prize: Kristina Kempkey ($300); 2nd prize: Lily Bradley ($200)

2001–02: 1st prize: Whitney Ward ($500)

1999–00: 1st prize: Aeryn Seto ($2,300)

1998–99: 1st prize: Arianne Chernock ($1,000)

1997–98: 2nd prize only: Kathleen Mikulis ($800)

Ina Coolbrith Memorial Poetry Prize

The Ina Coolbrith Memorial Poetry Prize is awarded for the best unpublished poem or group of poems by an undergraduate student at University of California campuses, University of the Pacific, Mills College, Stanford University, Santa Clara University, and St. Mary’s College.

Each participating school may submit three entries to UC Berkeley to compete in the overall contest. For information regarding the submission instructions for other campuses, read Information for Other Participating Campuses below.

On March 18, 1933, a fund of $1,000 contributed by various donors was offered to the Regents for a poetry prize in memory of Ina Coolbrith, Poet Laureate of the State of California. The Ina Coolbrith Memorial Fund was accepted by the Regents on May 11, 1933.

Please review the General Rules for Competitive Prizes (for Berkeley students).

Ina Donna Coolbrith (1841–1928)

Born Josephine Donna Smith, oldest daughter of Don Carlos and Agnes Coolbrith Smith, in Nauvoo, Illinois, March 10, 1841, she entered California through the Beckwourth Pass in a covered wagon train in 1852. Her first poems were published in the Los Angeles Times in 1854. After a brief and tragic marriage at 17, and the death of her child, she moved in the 1860s to San Francisco, where she worked as a journalist on the Overland Monthly . Later she was librarian of the Mechanics Institute Library and the Bohemian Club library, and was the first librarian of the Oakland Public Library. She lost her San Francisco home and all her possessions in the earthquake and fire of 1906. Through the generosity of the best-known California writers of the day, another home was built on Russian Hill, where she lived until the infirmities of age led her to share the home of her niece in Berkeley in 1923. She died there on February 29, 1928.

Ina Coolbrith received many honors, including Poet Laureate of the State of California. She was the first person asked to write a Commencement Ode for the University of California and the first woman member of San Francisco's Bohemian Club. In 1924, Mills College awarded her an honorary Master of Arts degree; as a young woman she had attended Mills, known at the time as Benicia College for Women. On the day of her funeral the Legislature adjourned in her memory and afterward named a 7,900-foot peak near Beckwourth Pass "Mount Ina Coolbrith."

Ina Coolbrith corresponded with Tennyson, Whittier, Longfellow, and Lowell, and was close friends with Mark Twain, Bret Harte, Gertrude Atherton, Joaquin Miller, Charles Warren Stoddard, and William Keith. Jack London called her his "literary mother." Isadora Duncan recalled in her memoirs "the beauty and fire of the poet's eyes."

At the Panama-Pacific International Exposition in 1915 she was appointed President of the Congress of Authors and Journalists. At the Exposition a formal presentation of a laurel wreath was made to her by Dr. Benjamin Ide Wheeler, president of the University of California, and the Board of Regents, with the title "loved, laurel-crowned poet of California."

Some of Ina Coolbrith's most powerful poems were written after her 80th birthday. Her published works include A Perfect Day and Other Poems , Songs from the Golden Gate , and the posthumously published Wings of Sunset .

Each participating campus may submit three entries selected from submissions on their campus. An entry may be a single poem or a group of poems. While the judging to select the overall contest winners rotates from campus to campus, each campus must first forward its entries to UC Berkeley by the contest deadline. The overall contest judge will receive the entries from Berkeley in early February and will be asked to select the contest winners by early March.

The poems need to be typewritten. Include the following information in the upper-right corner of each manuscript:

The last four digits of the student’s campus identification number

The name of the contest

Write entrant information on a separate sheet and include the following:

Local address

Permanent address

Phone number

Email address

Last four digits of student’s campus identification number

Contest name

Title of poem(s)

Since manuscripts cannot be returned and may go astray in the mail, please retain a duplicate.

Winning manuscripts are filed in the University Archives at the Bancroft Library on the UC Berkeley campus.

Entries may be sent to:

Coordinator, Committee on Prizes

Undergraduate Scholarships, Prizes, and Honors

210 Sproul Hall #1964

University of California

Berkeley, CA 94720

[email protected]

(5l0) 642-6888

2021–22: No prize given

2020–21: No prize given

2019–20: 1st prize: Anthony DiCarlo, UC Davis ($600); 2nd prize: Jessica Pham, UCLA ($400); 3rd prize: Rhiannon Wilson, UCLA ($100); Honorable Mention : Jona Peters, Mills College

2018–19: 1st prize: Maia Vicek, Miles College ($1250); Honorable Mentions: Avery Ardent, UC San Diego ($250); Amanda Vong, UC Santa Cruz ($250); Cu Fleshman, UC Irvine ($250)

2017–18: 1st prize: Riley O'Connell, Santa Clara University ($500); 2nd prize: Steffi Pressesky, UC Santa Cruz ($250); 3rd prize Monica Pereles, UC Merced ($250)

2016–17: Serena Balk, UC San Diego; Delphine Candland, UCLA; Kevin Alexander Perez, UC Santa Cruz ($300 each)

2015–16: 1st prize: Nathaniel Dolton-Thornton, UC Berkeley ($500); 2nd prize: Conor MacKenzie Kelly, UC Santa Cruz ($300); 3rd prize: Taelor Ramos, Mills College ($200)

2014–15: 1st prize: Christian Gella, UC San Diego ($1,100); 2nd prize: Katherine Duckworth, Mills College, Antony Fangary, UC Davis, Michelle Felmlee-Gartner, St. Mary's College, and Nilufal Karimi, UC San Diego ($100 each)

2013–14: 1st prize: Claire Bresnahan, Mills College, and Terry Taplin, St. Mary's College ($200 each); 2nd prize: Zoe Goldstein, UCLA, and Olivia Mertz, Mills College ($150 each); 3rd prize: Sabrina Barreto, Santa Clara University, Andrew David King, UC Berkeley, and Desmond Vanderfin, St. Mary's College ($100 each)

2012–13: 1st prize: Jacquelin Balderrama, UC Riverside ($400); 2nd prize: Laura Isabella Sylvan, Santa Clara University ($300); 3rd prize: Sabrina Barreto, Santa Clara University, Molly LaFleur, UC Santa Cruz; and Jacob Minasian, St. Mary's College ($100 each)

2011–12: 1st prize: John Liles, UCSD ($300); 2nd prize: Danni Gorden, UC Berkeley, and Ainsley Kelly, Santa Clara University ($200 each); 3rd prize: Andrew David King, UC Berkeley, Gabriel Malikian, UCLA, April Peletta, UCLA, and Kevin Zambrano, UCSB ($75 each)

2010–11: 1st prize: Nathan McClain, UCLA ($400); 2nd prize: Todd McClintock, UC Davis ($300); 3rd prize: Lynn Wang, UC Irvine and Kazumi Chin, UC Riverside, ($150 each); UC Berkeley winners: Kathryn Hindenlang and Christine Deakers

2009–10: 1st prize: Wesley Holtermann, UCSB ($400); 2nd prize: Katrina Kaplan, UC Berkeley, and Briony Gylgayton, UC Davis ($150) each; 3rd prize: Angela Eun Ji Koh, UCI, Isabelle Avila, UC Merced, and Jared Sandusky-Alford, UC Berkeley, ($100 each)

2008–09: 1st prize: Steven Lance, UC Berkeley ($400); 2nd prize: Esteban Ismael Alvarado, UC Riverside, and Marianna Tekosky, UCLA ($200 each); 3rd prize: Eden Orlando, UCSC, and Kevin Eldridge, UC Riverside, ($100 each)

2007–08: 1st prize: Katie Quarles, UCSC ($300); 2nd R. XiXi Hu, UCLA ($200)

2006–07: Julia Jackson, Mills College ($500)

2005–06: Athena Nilssen, UCLA and Crystal Reed, UCSB ($200 each); Honorable Mention: Renee K. Nelson, UCSC ($100)

2004–05: 1st prize: Jennifer Liou, UCI ($250); 2nd prize: Neil Ferron, Santa Clara University ($150); 3rd prize: Laura Mattingly, UCSC ($100)

2003–04: 1st prize: Jamie Michele Gill, UC Davis, and Laura Wetherington, UC Berkeley ($150 each); 2nd prize: Olivia Friedman, UC Berkeley, and Tina Sohaili, UCI ($100 each)

2002–03: 1st prize: Amaranth Borsuk, UCLA ($300); 2nd prize: Christina Ross, UC Irvine ($200)

2001–02: 1st prize: Kristen Holden, UCSC ($250); 2nd prize: Pepper Luboff, UC Berkeley ($150); 3rd prize: Yasmin Golan, UC Berkeley ($100)

2000–01: 1st prize: Hannah Love, Mills College ($300), 2nd prize: Elsie Rivas, Santa Clara University ($200), Allyson Seal and John Cross, UCLA ($50 each)

1999–00: Francesca Hersh, UCSC, Maggi Michel, UCLA, Aeryn Seto, UC Berkeley, Virginia Whitney Weigand, UC Davis ($100 each)

1998–99: 1st prize: Gareth S. Lee, Santa Clara University, ($250); 2nd prize: Kristen Robertson, Mills College ($150); 3rd prize: Jasmine Donahaye, UC Berkeley ($100)

1997–98: 1st prize: Emma Marxer, Mills College ($150); 2nd prize: E. Tracy Grinnell, Mills College ($100); 3rd prize: Ronald Laran, UC Davis, Lisa Visendi, St. Mary's, and Shannon Welch, UCSC ($50 each); Honorable Mention: Laura-Marie Taylor, UCSB

Lili Fabili and Eric Hoffer Essay Prize

The Lili Fabilli and Eric Hoffer Essay Prize is awarded for the best essays of 500 words or fewer on a topic chosen by the Committee on Prizes.

The contest is open to students, faculty, and staff of the UC Berkeley campus of the University of California. Prizes awarded to faculty and staff are paid through the Berkeley payroll system and taxes are taken out of the disbursement.

Chat GPT: savior or curse?

In a letter dated April 13, 1970, Eric Hoffer wrote to the Regents of the University of California: "I intend to give to the Berkeley campus of the University of California at least $10,000 in July 1970. The income of the fund shall be devoted to providing an annual prize or prizes for 500-word essays written by students, faculty, or staff at the Berkeley campus of the University. The sole criteria for the prizes shall be originality of thought and excellence in writing. This fund shall be known as the Lili Fabilli and Eric Hoffer Essay Prize." Hoffer felt very strongly that every idea could be expressed in a few words. Hoffer's own remarks follow:

2023–24: Ryan Lackey ($3,000), Annie Foo ($2,000) and Mary Mussman ($1,000) 

2022–23: 1st prize: Ryan Lackey ($3,000); 2nd prize: Bryan Jones ($2,000); 3rd prize: Andrew Kiser ($1,000)

2021–22:  1st prize: Ryan Lackey and Mary Mussman ($3000 each); 2nd prize: ($2000)

2020–21:  1st prize: Alex Brostoff ($3000); 2nd prize: Alysu Liu ($2000); 3rd prize: Michael Papias  ($1000); 4th prize: Drew Kiser, Landon Iannamico and Roshonda Walker ($500 each)

2019–20: 1st Prize: Rebecca Brunner and Marcelo Garzo ($2000 each); 2nd Prize: Jordan Diac Depasquale and Bryan K Jones ($1000 each); 3rd Prize: Luisa M. Giulianetti, Ryan Lackey, Isaac Engelberg and Laura Marostica ($500 each)

Topic: Confidence Without Attitude

2018–19: 1st prize: Elliott Lewis ($1000 each); Sourabh Harihar, Justin Hudak, Tara Madhav, Max Stevenson, Charlie Tidmarsh ($600 each); 3rd prize: Lily Call, Evan Cui, Rudraveer Vinay Reddy ($200 each)

Topic: The End of Civil Discourse?

2017–18: 1st prize: Katherine Beniger, Alexandra Maloney, JaVonte Morris-Wilson, David Olin, Jack Sadler ($700 each); 2nd prize: Maggie Mead, Ishani Joshi ($300 each); 3rd prize: Evan Bauer, Irina Popescu, Hideyasu Kurose, Rudraveer Reddy ($225 each)

Topic: Is Free Speech Free? 

2016–17: 1st prize: Maura Nolan, Evan Bauer, Luis Edward Tenorio, Noah Whiteman ($650 each); 2nd prize: Kristina Chan, Ariana Lightner, Brit Moller, Irina Popescu, Michele Rabkin ($250 each); 3rd prize: Bryan Jones, William McGregor, Carter Keeling ($100 each)

Topic: Advice to the new Chancellor

2015–16: Evan Bauer, Eric Dasmalchi, Natya Dharmosetio, Paige M. Johnson, Mihir Joshi, Pawanjot Kaur, Peiting Carrie Li, William McGregor (staff), Phillip Merlo, and Sharada Narayan ($500)

Topic: A Public University

2014–15: Alexandra Kopel, Bruno Mikanowski, and Carolyn Winter/ Staff ($1,500 each)

Topic: Carillon Ringing 

2013–14: Andrew David King and Ramona del Pozo ($1,000 each)

Topic: What I Don't Know

2012–13: 51 entries; Lindsay Bergstrom (staff), Timothy Borjian, Pierre Bourbonnais, Kelly Clancy, Gail Ford (staff), and Leah Romm ($800 each)

Topic: Gravity

2011–12: Kathy Bradley (staff), Joe Homer, Alex Setzepfandt (staff), and Sara Thoi ($1,000 each)

Topic: Persuade Me

2010–11: 1st prize: Shareena Samson (staff) ($1,200); 2nd prize: Patricia Argueza, Jing "Jonathan" Wong, and Alina Xu ($600 each)

Topic: The End of Civility

2009–10: Bryan Jones (staff), Salman Qasim, and Viola Tang ($1,650 each)

Topic: Whose University?

2008–09: Linda Finch-Hicks (staff), Jacob Mikanowski, Kofi Boakye, and Jeremy Suizo ($750 each)

Topic: Rock, Paper, Scissors

2007–08: Joseph Cadora, Jacob Mikanowski, and Xialou Ning ($1,000 each)

Topic: In Defense of Sloth

2006–07: Samuel E. Pittman ($1,500) and Xiaolu Ning ($1,500)

Topic: Whatever You Say, Say Nothing

2005–06: Karen Sullivan, Jacqueline Palhegyi, and Zachary Gordon ($1,000 each)

Topic: Looking Forward to Looking Back

2004–05: Erin Cooper, Lawrence Ruth (staff), and Sandra Wulff (staff) ($1,000 each)

Topic: What I'd Really Like to Do Is...

2003–04: 1st prize: Casey Dominguez ($1,000); 2nd prize: Ken Prola ($750); 3rd prize: Ana Martinez ($500); 4th prize: Sarang Dalal and Michele Rabkin ($375 each)

Topic: What Were They Thinking?

2002–03: 1st prize: Ana Martinez and Michael Rancer (staff) ($750 each); 2nd prize: Julie Rodriguez (staff) and Carol Wood (staff) ($500 each)

Topic: Self-Deception: Benefits and Consequences

2001–02: Eric Walton, Joanne Sandstrom (staff), Joseph Kim, Nellie Haddad (staff) ($750 each); Honorable Mentions: Jimmy Tran, Carol Wood (staff), Lynley Lys, and Karen Lam

Topic: If Only

2000–01: Zack Rogow ($1,000); Ken Chen, Cassandra Dunn, Zachary Gordon, and Pat Soberanis ($800 each)

Topic: Are Books Dead?

1999–00: Casey Knudsen ($1,000); Amanda Cundiff, Eric McGhee, Serban Nacu, and Sissel Waage ($500 each)

Topic: Networks

1998–99: 1st prize: Kathryn Renee Albe, Paul Klein, Joanne Palamountain, Sissel Waage, and Zack Rogow ($500 each)

Topic: Brushstrokes

1997–98: 1st prize: Virginia Matzek ($1,250); 2nd prize: Dominic Ang ($750)

Topic: Where There Is Light . . .

1996–97: Kathy Gether

Topic: Hello 2000

1995–96: 1st prize: Anna Moore (staff) and Maureen Morley (staff) ($1,000 each)

Topic: Fired With Enthusiasm

1994–95: 1st prize: Chris Haight (staff) and Reed Evans ($1,000 each)

Topics: A Moment's Notice and How Beautiful

1993–94: 1st prize: Roberto Landazuri ($1,000); 2nd prize: Ingrid Zommers and Jim Lake (staff) ($500 each)

Topic: What's Next?

1992–93: 1st prize: Steve Tillis, Letitia Carper (staff), David Krogh (staff), and David Schweidel (staff) ($250 each)

Topic: What an Original Idea!

1991–92: 1st prize: Christopher Galvin and Steve Tillis ($700 each); 2nd place: Celia Carlson and William Corley ($300 each)

Topic: What a Century!

1990–91: 1st prize: Michael Ditmore; 2nd prize: Daniel Lee; 3rd prize: Shirley Hodgkinson and Ramah Commanday

Topic: The Sin of Cain

1989–90: 1st prize: Tim Edwards; 2nd prize: Paul Jaminet, David Krogh, and Joanne Sandstrom

Topic: The Thankful/The Thankless

1988–89: 1st prize: Ramah Commanday; 2nd prize: Kathy Newman and George Huang

Topic: Smoldering Embers

1987–88: 1st prize: John Nebrhass, Kathy Newman, Anthony Robinson-While, and William Webber

Topic: Presidential Campaigns

1986–87: 1st prize: John Hatton; 2nd prize: Dave Erickson and Stuart Wald

Topic: Hair Shirts

1985–86: 1st prize: Charlotte Redemann; 2nd prize: Doris Lynch

Topic: Patterns

1984–85: 1st prize: Kirin Narayan; 2nd prize: Benjamin Watson; Honorable Mention: Christie McCarthy (staff), Carol Pitts, and Helen Workman (staff)

Topic: Pets and Animals

1983–84: 1st prize: Debra Cooper; 2nd prize: Donald Green; Honorable Mention: Elizabeth Anderson, Ann Elliott, Christine Feldhorn, Andrew Lunt, Ellen Nakashima, Thomas Simmons, Alan Stephen, and Monica Zorovich

Topic: California

1982–83: 1st prize: Richard Reinhardt; 2nd prize: Susan E. Bailey

Topic: Trees

1981–82: 1st prize: Lizbeth L. Hasse; 2nd prize: Barry Taxman. Essay prizes without a topic awarded to: 1st prize: Professor David Littlejohn; 2nd prize: Matthew M. Neal; Honorable Mention: Joanne Sandstrom and Jeffrey Norris Klink

Topic: Our Most Over-Valued Institution

1980–81: Christopher Rayner and Jennifer L. Walden ($250 each)

Topic: Should California Be Split into Two States?

1979–80: Richard Ogar ($500)

Topic: Should Public Laws Regulate Private Vice?

1978–79: No award given

Topic: Where Should Humankind Go Next?

1977–78: Paul Chernoff ($500)

Topic: In What Additional Field Should a Nobel Prize Be Awarded?

1976–77: S.M. Blair ($500)

Topic: Should There Be Olympic Games in the Future?

1975–76: Jeffrey Lewis Gold ($500)

Topic: What Image or Figure Redefining and Symbolizing the American Dream Can We Offer in 1976?

1974–75: S.M. Blair ($500)

Topic: What Is the Place of Grade Winning in an Education?

1973–74: Ingrid Maidel Krohn ($500)

Topic: How Do We Change Our Attitudes in the Face of Diminishing Natural Resources?

1972–73: John Thomas Gage ($500)

Topic: Is Zero Population Growth an Invasion of Privacy or a Collective Necessity?

1971–72: Leslie Morris Golden ($500)

Topics: F.S.M., People's Park, and Cambodia: Whither the Direction and What Are the Functions of the Contemporary University?

1970–71: Bryan Louis Pfaffenberger ($500)

Topic: The Modern City: Survival or Suicide?

Nicola de Lorenzo Prize in Music Composition

The Nicola De Lorenzo Prize in Music Composition is awarded for the best original completed musical composition.

The prize competition is open to both graduate and undergraduate students of any major. The composition is required to be a piece composed during your matriculation at UC Berkeley. Submit a score and, if possible, a recording of the composition. For music that is not notated (such as fixed media pieces, improvised performances, and so on), submit a recording with a note about the work and why it is not notated. All entries will be judged blind—your name should not appear on recordings or scores.

The Nicola De Lorenzo Prize in Music Composition was established in 1958.

2023–24: Eda Er and Owen Klein ($1,500 each)

2022–23: Alfred Jimenez, Dionysius Nataraja, Owen Klein ($1,000 each)

2021–22: Andrew Harlan, Alfred Jimenez ($2,000 each), Leo W. Yang ($500)

2020 –21: No award given

2019–20: Hwa-Chan Yu, Maija Hynninen, James Stone, Curtis Dahn ($1125)

2018–19: Selim Goncu, James Stone, Clara Olivares, Jeremy Wexler, Maija Hynninen ($1000)

2017–18: Oren Boneh, Selim Goncu, Antonio Juan Marcos Cavazos, Trevor Van de Velde ($1000)

2016–17: 1st Prize: Lily Chen ($1,200); 2nd Prize: Scott Rubin,Selim Gonchu ($800); 3rd Prize: Kayla Cashetta ($700)

2015–16: 1st prize: Antonio Juan-Marcos Cavazos ($1,000); 2nd prize: Ursula Kwong-Brown, Jeremy Wexler, Hwa-Chan Yu, and Zhoushu Herakleitos Ziporyn ($500); 3rd prize: Kayla Cashetta, and Scott Rubin ($250)

2014–15: 1st prize: Amadeus Regucera ($2,500); 2nd prize: Lily Chen ($1,000)

2013–14: 1st prize: Lily Chen ($1,750); 2nd prize: Amadeus Regucera ($1,250); 3rd prize: Andrew V. Ly ($500)

2012–13: 1st prize: Matthew Schumaker ($3,000); 2nd prize: Thatchatham Silsupan ($1,000); 3rd prize: Jose Rafael Valle Gomes da Costa ($500)

2011–12: 1st prize: Javier Jimmy Lopez and Amadeus Regucera ($1,300 each); 2nd prize: Thatchatam Silsupan, Matthew Goodheart, and Sivan Eldar ($800 each)

2010–11: 1st prize: Javier Jimmy Lopez ($1,000); 2nd prize: David Coll, Robin Estrada, Jen Wang, Daniel Cullen ($750 each); 3rd prize: Nils Bultmann, Matt Schumaker ($500 each)

2009–10: 1st prize: Amadeus Regucera ($2,000); 2nd prize: Evelyn Ficarra and Heather Frasch ($1,200 each); 3rd prize: Gabrielle Angeles ($600)

2008–09: 1st prize: Matthew Goodheart ($2,000); 2nd prize Amadeus Regucera, David Coll and Robin Estrada ($1,000 each)

2007–08: 1st prize: Robert Yamasato and Heather Frasch ($2,000 each); 2nd prize: Jimmy Lopez ($1,000)

2006–07: 1st prize: Aaron Einbond, Robert Yamasato, and Mason Bates ($1,666 each)

2005–06: 1st prize: Mason Bates and Aaron Einbond ($2,500 each)

2004–05: 1st prize: Yiorgos Vassilandonakis and Mason Bates ($2,000 each); 2nd prize: Aaron Einbond ($1,000)

2003–04: 1st prize: Fernando Benadon ($750); 2nd prize: Jean Ahn, David Bithell and Brian Kane ($250 each)

2002–03: 1st prize: Reynold Tharp ($750) and Mason Bates ($750)

2001–02: 1st prize: Keeril Makan ($750); 2nd prize: Mason Bates, Brian Kane, and Philipp Blume ($250 each)

1999–00: 1st prize: Brian Current ($700); 2nd prize: Fernando Benadon, Dmitri Tymoczko, and Michael Zbyszyriski ($600 each)

1998–99: 1st prize: Fernando Benadon, Brian Current, Keeril Makan, and Dmitri Tymoczko ($500 each)

1997–98: 1st prize: Eitan Steinberg ($800); 2nd prize: Keeril Makan ($700); 3rd prize: Reynold Tharp ($500)

Anne and Benjamin Goor Prize in Jewish Studies

The Anne and Benjamin Goor Prize in Jewish Studies is awarded annually to two graduate and two undergraduate students for essays on research in any area of Jewish Studies.

Creative works are not eligible. The essays must have been written after the previous year’s submission deadline and must have been written while the authors are registered students in good standing at UC Berkeley. For those years in which one or more prizes are not awarded, the prize money shall be made available for prize augmentation or additional prizes in another year, as recommended by the judges. There may be no more than two winning submissions by a single student.

The Benjamin Goor Prize in Jewish Studies was established in 1977 in memory of Benjamin Goor by his wife, Anne, to support programs and research in Jewish Studies. In 2005, upon the occasion of Anne’s death, the prize was renamed the Anne and Benjamin Goor Prize in Jewish Studies. Anne and Benjamin Goor were an integral part of the Jewish community in Phoenix, during and after World War II. During the war, their home was a kosher Shabbat and Passover haven for servicemen stationed at nearby bases. Anne was active in synagogue activities, B’nai B’rith Women, and Hadassah, serving as chapter president. She received many awards for her contributions to these organizations.

The Goor Prize is administered by Center for Jewish Studies. 

2021–22: Juliette Rosenthal, graduate winner and Meghana Kumar, undergraduate winner ($2,000)

2020–21: Oren Yirmiya, graduate winner ($1,500) and Wyatt Grauman, undergraduate winner ($1,500)

2019–20: Chloe Piazza, graduate winner and Walker Laughlin, undergraduate winner ($2,000)

2018–19: Yael Segalovits Eshel and Jennifer Stover-Kemp ($1,500); Gilad Barach, Sarah Goldwasser, and Andrew Kuznetsov ($1,000)

2017–18: Zachary Handler, Alexis Polevoi, Alan Elbaum, Sheer Ganor ($1,500)

2016–17: Balark Mallik, Jennifer Kemp, Danny Luzon, Simone Stirner ($1,000)

2015–16: Danny Luzon and Raphael Magarik, graduate winners ($1,000); Nathan Wexler, undergraduate winner ($1,000)

2014–15: Sheer Ganor and Danny Luzon, graduate winners ($2,000); no undergraduate winners selected

2013–14: Nicholas Baer and Anna Elena Torres, graduate winners ($1,000); Elijah Granet and Lisa Levin, undergraduate winners ($1,000)

2012–13: Noah Greenfied and Eyal Bassan, graduate winners ($1,000); no undergraduate winner selected

2011–12: Shira Wilkof and Celina Piser, graduate winners ($475); no undergraduate winner selected

2010–11: Alex Hendricks and Cameron McKee, undergraduate winners ($475); no graduate winner selected

2009–10: Yosefa Raz, graduate winner ($475); Judah Mirvish, undergraduate winner ($475)

2008–09: Zehavit Stern and Benjamin Wurgaft, graduate winners ($475); no undergraduate winner selected

2006–07: Noam Manor and Maya Barzilai, graduate winners ($475); Stephanie Robin Grossman, undergraduate winner ($475)

2005–06: Amos Bitzan and Samuel Thrope, graduate winners ($475); Rachel Wamsley, undergraduate winner ($475)

2004–05: Naomi Shulman, graduate winner; no undergraduate winner selected

2003–04: Lital Levy, graduate winner ($475); David Singer, undergraduate winner ($475)

2002–03: Benjamin Wurgaft and Lital Levy ($475)

2001–02: Rachel Havrelock, graduate winner ($475); Tara Sage Wilstein, undergraduate winner, ($475)

2000–01: Adriana Valencia, Lital Levy, and Lena Salameh shared $475 prize

1999–00: No award given

1998–99: Adriane B. Leveen and Lital Levy, graduate winners ($475); Jack Draper, undergraduate winner ($475)

1997–98: Gil Hochberg and Shachar Pinsker ($475)

UC Berkeley Library Update

Day: February 15, 2021

Nyu jordan center’s 2021 graduate student essay competition (fy).

See the announcement below:

“ The Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia and All the Russias  are pleased to announce the second annual Graduate Student Essay Competition. Enter for a chance to get published on the blog and win cash prizes! We invite 750-1200 word submissions from full- or part-time M.A. and Ph.D. students from any accredited academic institution in the United States, on any topic and sub-discipline within Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies, broadly defined. Cultural criticism; public-facing treatments of scholarly work; political analysis; book, film, or event reviews; and more are welcome.

All submissions must be in English and observe the blog’s  submission guidelines  and full competition rules .

Essays are due no later than April 15th at 11:59 PM EST and must be submitted via  this Google form .

Seven (7) winners will be selected based on their pieces’ originality, clarity, and argumentation, as well as their correspondence to the blog’s general tone and interests as stipulated in the submission guidelines linked above. Winners will receive, respectively, $500 (first prize); $250 (second prize); $100 (third prize); and $50 (runners-up). Winners and runners-up will have their essays published in  All the Russias.

Competition results will be announced by Summer 2021.

Please direct any questions to  [email protected] .”

Source: https://jordanrussiacenter.org/news/draft-call-for-submissions-atrs-graduate-student-essay-competition/

Trial: Maps and Travel Literature

Berkeley Grad Slam Competition

About grad slam.

Grad Slam is a UC-sponsored competition designed to showcase graduate student research for a general audience in three-minute talks. Think mini-Ted Talks. Entrants compete in preliminary rounds on their UC campus, with prizes awarded at each stage of the selection process. 

The Berkeley Grad Slam 2024 campus competition will take place on Tuesday, April 9, 3:00 – 5:00 p.m. via Zoom.

How to enter the Berkeley Grad Slam

Full instructions on how to enter, including submission deadlines and information session dates, can be found on, How Does the Competition Work .

Why should I enter Grad Slam?

Professional Development: Grad Slam is a unique opportunity for graduate students to practice pitching original research to general audiences. To prepare their talks, participants have the opportunity to attend workshops and receive one-on-one coaching to develop oratorical skills, dynamic deliveries, and compelling content when presenting their academic research. 

Networking: Through Grad Slam, participants will meet and engage with a diverse body of UC Berkeley staff, faculty, graduate students, and valued associates (donors, alumni, media, politicians, community members, and more). 

Impact: Participants have the opportunity to make the importance and relevance of their research visible to a non-specialist audience. 

Prizes: All campus semi-finalists receive at least $300, with the first-place, second-place, and People’s Choice winners taking home $3,000, $1000, and $750 respectively. The campus first-place winner advances to the UC-wide event and the possibility of even more cash prizes.

UC-Wide Grad Slam Championship

In early May, Berkeley’s champion will compete against graduate student peers at the UC-wide championship competition. Competitors will be judged by notable leaders in industry, government, and media.

The top three presentations will receive cash prizes with first place recognized as the winner of the prestigious UCOP Grad Slam “Slammy” award.

Helpful Information

• How Does the Competition Work, Rules, and more  
• Preparing for Grad Slam Step-by-Step  
• Take a look at last year’s event !

Learn from Previous Berkeley Finalists

2024 Berkeley winner, Victoria Chevee

Victoria is a sixth-year Ph.D. candidate in the Molecular and Cell Biology program. She is interested in microbes and how they interact with their hosts, particularly when it comes to pathogens. Her work currently focuses on bacterial replication and dissemination during infections that affect the brain.

2023 Berkeley winner, Madison Browne

Madison Browne explores a non-invasive light therapy for Alzheimer’s Disease. With a passion for developing diagnostic and therapeutic tools to improve quality of life for those suffering from brain disorders, Madison plans to devote her career to this cause.

2022 Berkeley winner, Justin Lee

Justin Lee ‘s presentation on Jamming the SARS-CoV-2 Copy Machine, won him not only the 2022 UC Berkeley Grad Slam first place prize, but also the 2022 UC systemwide competition, bringing the “Slammy” back to Berkeley.

2021 Berkeley winner, Adélaïde Bernard

Adelaide Bernard won in first place of campus Grad Slam competition and also took home 3rd place at the system wide competition! Adelaide studies how cells in our brain sense our energy status and modulate hunger and weight gain. As a non-native English speaker, being part of this competition and getting to share her research to a broad audience was a very exciting challenge.

2019 Berkeley winner, Nancy Freitas

Nancy Freitas , a first year master’s student in the Energy and Resources Group, impressed the audience and judges alike with her talk, “Microbes in the Arctic,” which described how climate change is activating billions of microbial organisms that lay dormant in Arctic permafrost. “It is my hope that my research will motivate humans, which are much smarter, and much larger than microbes,” Nancy said.

2018 Berkeley winner, Joe Charbonnet

Joe Charbonnet , also took home the Slammy in the UC systemwide competition! Joe’s research described how sand coated with manganese oxide can be used to remove contaminants from stormwater. Joe is currently field-testing the use of this sand to replenish California’s underground aquifers. “This technology helps cities save their rain for a sunny day,” his talk concluded.

Berkeley’s 2017 winner, Kelly Swanson

Kelly Swanson , presented her research on creating a smaller, more affordable alternative to the Large Hadron Collider, which allows scientists to discover new particles and observe their movement, but is 17 miles round. “These machines have been instrumental in answering questions about our universe, but they are becoming prohibitively large and expensive,” Kelly said. Her new approach, a laser plasma accelerator, is just palm-sized.

Berkeley's 2016 winner, Kelsey Sakimoto

Kelsey Sakimoto , presented his research on creating a better, more efficient version of photosynthesis at the interface of chemistry and biology. Kelsey has taught bacteria “to grow and cover their bodies with tiny semi-conductor nanocrystals” which function as solar panels. This cyborg “bacterial army” can “grow and photosynthesize food, fuels, pharmaceuticals, and plastics using solar energy” more efficiently than chlorophyll and at a fraction of the cost of solar panels.

Read about past years’s competition:

Meet Our Grad Slam 2023 Campus Winners

Bringing Home the Slammy! Q&A with 2022 Berkeley Campus and UC Systemwide Grad Slam Winner Justin Lee

Q&A with 2021 Berkeley Grad Slam Winner Adélaïde Bernard

Berkeley’s Champion for the 2019 UC-Wide Grad Slam Competition Chosen

Berkeley’s Champion for the 2018 UC-Wide Grad Slam Championship Chosen

Berkeley’s Joe Charbonnet Brings Home the 2018 Slammy!

Winning Grad Slam Took Months of Preparation, Plus Some Quick Thinking!

Watch the full 2023 Berkeley Grad Slam here !

Berkeley Prize 2022

Sponsor: UC Berkeley Type: open, international, three-stage Eligibility: Students in undergraduate accredited architecture programs Language: English Fee: none Probable Timetable: 15 September 2021 – Competition launch 1 November 2021 – (Stage One) 500-word essay proposal due. Mid-December, 2021 – Essay Semifinalists announced. February 2022 (Stage Two) Essay Semifinalists’  2,500-word essays due. Early-March, 2022 – Essay Finalists announced. Mid-April, 2022 Essay winners and Community Service Fellowship winners announced. Awards: TbD (Previous Berkeley Prizes have included awards up to $25,000 Jury: TbD Challenge: This year’s topic: DESIGN GUIDED BY CLIENTS’ NEEDS: Applying Social Factors Research to Architecture “Architecture Students: Independent study? Research project? Think about teaming with another undergraduate student in the social sciences to respond to the Question.”

Competition website: www.BerkeleyPrize.org For questions: [email protected]

2022 Annual is here!

• 2022 annual now available in pdf format look inside ., • half price on 2011 , 2012 ,    2013 ,  2014 , and 2015 annuals., recent competitions.

Don’t miss these on-going open competitions, now posted to the website:

• 2024 Architecture at Zero Competition

• Finnish Architecture and Crafts Museum

• Masai Mara Conservation Centre, Kenya

35 years of COMPETITIONS 

Recalling some of the most memorable, both built and unbuilt.

The world has experienced a limited number of open competitions over the past three decades, but even with diminishing numbers, some stand out among projects in their categories that can’t be ignored for the high quality and degree of creativity they revealed. Included among those are several invited competitions that were extraordinary in their efforts to explore new avenues of institutional and museum design. Some might ask why the Vietnam Memorial is not mentioned here. Only included in our list are competitions that were covered by us, beginning in 1990 with COMPETITIONS magazine to the present day. As for what category a project under construction (Science Island), might belong to or fundraising still in progress (San Jose’s Urban Confluence or the Cold War Memorial competition, Wisconsin), we would classify the former as “built” and wait and see what happens with the latter—keeping our fingers crossed for a positive outcome.

Read More…

Young Architects in Competitions

When competitions and a new generation of ideas elevate architectural quality.

by Jean-Pierre Chupin and G. Stanley Collyer published by Potential Architecture Books, Montreal, Canada 2020 271 illustrations in color and black & white Available in PDF and eBook formats  ISBN 9781988962047

What do the Vietnam Memorial, the St. Louis Arch, and the Sydney Opera House have in common?  These world renowned landmarks were all designed by architects under the age of 40, and in each case they were selected through open competitions. At their best, design competitions can provide a singular opportunity for young and unknown architects to make their mark on the built environment and launch productive, fruitful careers. But what happens when design competitions are engineered to favor the established and experienced practitioners from the very outset?  

This comprehensive new book written by Jean-Pierre Chupin (Canadian Competitions Catalogue) and Stanley Collyer (COMPETITIONS) highlights for the crucial role competitions have played in fostering the careers of young architects, and makes an argument against the trend of invited competitions and RFQs.  The authors take an in-depth look at past competitions won by young architects and planners, and survey the state of competitions through the world on a region by region basis. The end result is a compelling argument for an inclusive approach to conducting international design competitions.  

Download Young Architects in Competitions for free at the following link: 

https://crc.umontreal.ca/en/publications-libre-acces/

New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan

New Kaohsiung Port and Cruise Terminal, Taiwan (2011-2020) Reiser+Umemoto RUR Architecture PC/ Jesse Reiser – U.S.A. with Fei & Cheng Associates/Philip T.C. Fei – R.O.C. (Tendener) This was probably the last international open competition result that was built in Taiwan. A later competition for the Keelung Harbor Service Building Competition, won by Neil Denari of the U.S., the result of a shortlisting procedure, was not built. The fact that the project by RUR was eventually completed—the result of the RUR/Fei & Cheng’s winning entry there—certainly goes back to the collaborative role of those to firms in winning the 2008 Taipei Pop Music Center competition, a collaboration that should not be underestimated in setting the stage for this competition.

Read  more…

Seoripul Open Storage Museum in Seoul

In visiting any museum, one might wonder what important works of art are out of view in storage, possibly not considered high profile enough to see the light of day? In Korea, an answer to this question is in the making.

It can come as no surprise that museums are running out of storage space. This is not just the case with long established “western” museums, but elsewhere throughout the world as well. In Seoul, South Korea, such an issue has been addressed by planning for a new kind of storage facility, the Seouipul Open Storage Museum. The new institution will house artworks and artifacts of three major museums in Seoul: the Seoul Museum of Modern Art, the Seoul Museum of History, and the Seoul Museum of Craft Art.

Read more…

Take Back the City Competition

Belfast looks toward an equitable and sustainable housing model.

If one were to look for a theme that is common to most affordable housing models, public access has been based primarily on income, or to be more precise, the very lack of it. Here it is no different, with Belfast’s homeless problem posing a major concern. But the competition also hopes to address another of Belfast’s decades-long issues—its religious divide. There is an underlying assumption here that religion will play no part in a selection process. The competition’s local sponsor was “Take Back the City,” its membership consisting mainly of social advocates. In setting priorities for the housing model, the group interviewed potential future dwellers as well as stakeholders to determine the nature of this model. Among those actions taken was the “photo- mapping of available land in Belfast, which could be used to tackle the housing crisis. Since 2020, (the group) hosted seminars that brought together international experts and homeless people with the goal of finding solutions. Surveys and workshops involving local people, housing associations and council duty-bearers have explored the potential of the Mackie’s site.” This research was the basis for the competition launched in 2022.

Alster Swimming Pool Restoration, Hamburg

Linking Two Competitions with Three Modernist Projects

Hardly a week goes by without the news of another architectural icon being threatened with demolition. A modernist swimming pool in Hamburg, Germany belonged in this category, even though the concrete shell roof had been placed under landmark status. When the possibility of being replaced by a high-rise building, it came to the notice of architects at von Gerkan Marg Partners (gmp), who in collaboration with schlaich bergermann partner (sbp), developed a feasibility study that became the basis for the decision to retain and refurbish the building.

More Articles

Copyright © 2024 Competitions

All Rights Reserved Competitions, 1731 Fernwood Avenue, Louisville, Ky 40250 U.S.A

Ph: (502) 792-2088

Website: https://competitions.org

E: [email protected]

Privacy Policy: Privacy Policy

Cookie and Consent Policy: Cookie and Consent Policy

Disclaimer: Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE : Unless otherwise indicated, photographs of buildings and projects are from professional or institutional archives. All reproduction is prohibited unless authorized by the architects, designers, office managers, consortia or archives centers concerned. The Competitions-Archive LLC is not held responsible for any omissions or inaccuracies, but appreciate all comments and pertinent information that will permit necessary modifications during future updates.

Miller Institute

Fab Five: Standout Students and Professor Chosen for Coveted International Law Program (03/04/2024)

3Ls and Salzburg Cutler Fellows Heidi Kong, Sophie Lombardo, Paloma Palmer, and Angela Chen spent two packed days in Washington, D.C., exploring global issues, presenting their work, and building connections.

‘Human Rights Law Should Fill This Gap’: Professor Saira Mohamed Wins Berlin Prize (05/15/2023)

She’ll spend the fall semester in Germany working on a project about failure of international human rights law to adequately address the treatment of soldiers by their states.

EU Court of Justice Judge Details Challenges for Human Rights, Tech Regulation, Privacy Law, and More (04/12/2023)

Thomas von Danwitz gives Berkeley Law’s annual Irving G. Tragen Lecture on Comparative Law, takes part in a panel on data privacy, and visits our “Borderlines” podcast.

© 2024 UC Regents, UC Berkeley School of Law, All Rights Reserved.

• Student & Alumni Work
• What It’s Like To Be Here
• A Revolutionary Past & Vibrant Future
• Master’s of Journalism
• Concurrent Degrees
• For Undergrads
• For Mid-Career Journalists
• Costs & Funding
• News & Events
• Faculty & Lecturers
• Media Guide to Faculty Experts
• Reserve Radio & TV Studio

Alumni honored with 2023 Peabody Awards nominations

May 1, 2024

Violet Du Feng

Five Berkeley Journalism alums are nominated for Peabody Awards, an honor that celebrates the most compelling and empowering stories released in broadcasting and streaming media in 2023.

Nominees were chosen by the Peabody Awards Board of Jurors from more than 1,100 entries from television, podcasts/radio and the web.

Celebrated filmmaker Violet Du Feng (’04) was nominated for best documentary for Independent Lens’ Hidden Letters  (PBS), which reveals how modern women in China are working to maintain the tradition of Nüshu, a secret calligraphy language used to communicate during a time when many women were kept from literacy. The film premiered in competition at the 2022 Tribeca Film Festival, won ten international festival awards, was shortlisted for the Oscars in the Documentary Feature Film category and was broadcast in more than 15 countries.

Lacy Roberts

Lacy Roberts (’17) is the editor of “ The Big Dig ” from PRX and WGBH, nominated for best radio/podcast. The nine-episode series takes on the subject of American infrastructure and makes it riveting by going deep on Boston’s large-scale “Big Dig” project, a highway tunneling effort that became infamous for its ballooning price and ever-lengthening timeline, though in the end delivering on its promises.

Three recent graduates, Production Manager Steven Rascón (’22), Production Assistant Kori Suzuki (’23) and Kathryn Styer Martinez (’23) of the post-production team, worked on “Reveal” from The Center for Investigative Reporting’s “ The COVID Tracking Project ” (PRX) nominated for best radio/podcast.

The COVID Tracking Project — a massive volunteer effort to document tests, hospitalizations and deaths — tracked the presence of the virus and deaths, becoming a de facto source of data amid the chaos of COVID-19. The series addresses crucial concerns about why the U.S. had to rely on volunteerism, rather than federal and state public health institutions, to receive critical COVID data during the worst public health crisis in a century.

Steven Rascón, Kori Suzuki and Kathryn Styer Martinez

Du Feng is an Emmy Award-winning independent documentarian who has directed, produced, and executive produced more than ten films over the past decade. Her films have been invited to more than 100 international film festivals. She started her career as a co-producer on the critically acclaimed 2007 film “Nanking”, which won a Sundance Special Jury Award, a Peabody Award and an Emmy Award; was distributed theatrically in 30 countries and was the highest-grossing documentary in China.

Roberts is a deeply experienced independent podcast producer and story editor. She’s edited and produced for the best in the podcasting business: CNN, NBC, Crooked Media, IHeart, Kaleidoscope, TED and more. Before going independent, she was the managing producer at Brooklyn-based podcast production company Transmitter Media. In 2017, she co-directed “ We Became Fragments “, a short documentary film featured in The New York Times Op-Docs Season 6 that was a finalist for a Livingston Award. Her freelance work has also been seen and heard in the New York Times, The Atlantic, PBS NewsHour, and NPR affiliates around the country.

Rascón is the production manager for the radio show and podcast “Reveal” from the Center for Investigative Reporting. He also produced the KQED podcast, “ On Our Watch: New Folsom ,” a serial investigation into the death of two whistleblowers inside California’s most dangerous prison, which aired on NPR stations such as KQED, Capital Public Radio, WHYY and KCRW. Rascón also helped produce the Peabody-nominated “Reveal” podcast series “ Mississippi Goddam .”

Suzuki is a Japanese American journalist and documentary photographer based in San Diego, California. He is currently a staff reporter at KPBS, the NPR station in San Diego, California. His job is through the new California Local Fellowship, and he covers a regional beat that includes South San Diego County and the Imperial Valley. He previously worked as an associate audio producer for “Reveal,” a visuals intern for KQED Public Media and The Seattle Times, and an audio intern for The Washington Post.

Martínez is an award-winning, nationally recognized journalist. She joined Oregon Public Broadcasting as a full-time, permanent staff reporter based in Bend this April. She has worked in local news for KQED, The Press Democrat, Minnesota Public Radio News as a Toni Randolph Fellow where her reporting won an award from the Midwest Broadcast Journalists Association and KPFA News in Berkeley, where she got her start. She was named a Jim Marshall Photojournalism Fellow at Berkeley Journalism in 2023 and a Greater Good Science Center reporting fellow in 2021. She was the production assistant with “Reveal” from the Center for Investigative Reporting throughout her time at Berkeley Journalism. She worked on award-winning and Peabody nominated projects “ Mississippi Goddam ” and the award-winning “ After Ayotzinapa ” series. She helped produce and contributed reporting to “ Buried Secrets ,” a series by ICT (formerly Indian Country Today) senior correspondent Mary Annette Pember for “Reveal”.

The winners of the 84th annual Peabody Awards will be announced on May 9 and celebrated on Sunday, June 9 at a ceremony at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel in Los Angeles. This will be Peabody’s first in-person ceremony since 2019, as well as the first time ever in its history that the Awards will take place in Los Angeles.

Upcoming Events

Dean's Newsletter

March 27, 2024

Quarterly Newsletter From Dean Geeta Anand

Spring 2024 Dear Berkeley Journalism community: With great optimism about the future of our school, I share with you news of the largest gift in the history of Berkeley Journalism:…

Quarterly Newsletter from Dean Geeta Anand

June 15, 2023

November 30, 2022

Programs & Resources

Undergraduate journalism minor.

Learn about our new year-around minor in journalism

Berkeley Journalism + Haas School of Business Journalism Program

Investigative reporting program.

Committed to reporting stories that expose injustice and abuse of power

California Local News Fellowship

Two-year fellowship matching early-career journalists with California newsrooms

Stay Up To Date

Get the latest news.

The 2021 Essay Prize Competition. An essay contest in Three stages open to all current full-time registered students in an undergraduate architecture degree program, undergraduates majoring in architecture, or diploma students in accredited schools of architecture worldwide. 25,000 USD Purse.

The BERKELEY PRIZE Competition was established in 1998, made possible by a generous gift of JUDITH LEE STRONACH to the Department of Architecture in the College of Environmental Design at the University of California, Berkeley. ... The 2023 Essay Prize Competition. ... 2021. Jacob Schlüssel & Ting-Chun Yang. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen ...

The BERKELEY PRIZE Competition was established in 1998, made possible by a generous gift of JUDITH LEE STRONACH to the Department of Architecture in the College of Environmental Design at the University of California, Berkeley. ... September 15, 2021: Launch of 2022 Essay Competition. November 1, 2021 (Stage One) 500-word essay proposal due ...

The 2022 Essay Prize Competition. An essay contest in Three stages open to all current full-time registered students in an undergraduate architecture degree program, undergraduates majoring in architecture, or diploma students in accredited schools of architecture worldwide. 25,000 USD Purse.

Each year the Berkeley Prize Committee invites a distinguished professor or scholar in the field of architecture or the related social sciences to write about some aspect of the year's Berkeley Prize topic. They are meant to help focus students' thoughts on the issues surrounding the year's Question. They are a model for excellence in writing.

The 2021 Berkeley Prize focuses on the topic: "ARCHITECTS IN SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY.". A record 258 Essay Competition proposals of 500 words each, written by 359 individual undergraduate students collaborating in one and two-person teams from 36 countries were received in response to this year's Question.

The BERKELEY PRIZE Competition was established in 1998, made possible by a generous gift of JUDITH LEE STRONACH to the Department of Architecture in the College of Environmental Design at the University of California, Berkeley. ... 2021 Essay Prize Competition First Prize Essay. Reva Saksena and Mallika Sarabhai: "To Pride From Prejudice: An ...

The BERKELEY PRIZE Competition was established in 1998, made possible by a generous gift of JUDITH LEE STRONACH to the Department of Architecture in the College of Environmental Design at the University of California, Berkeley. ... Essay Prize Competition; ... 2022; 2021; 2020; 2019; 2018; 2017; 2016; 2015; 2014; 2013; 2012; 2011; 2010; 2009 ...

The BERKELEY PRIZE Competition was established in 1998, made possible by a generous gift of JUDITH LEE STRONACH to the Department of Architecture in the College of Environmental Design at the University of California, Berkeley. ... Early-March, 2021: Essay Finalists announced. March 12, 2021: Community Service Fellowship proposals due. Mid ...

Fellowship Competitions. BERKELEY PRIZE Travel Fellowship (2004-2019; 2023-).This award recognizes the vital role that exposure to other cultures and environments plays in helping to demonstrate the reality and importance of the social art of architecture.All Semifinalists for the Essay Competition are eligible to submit proposals demonstrating how they would use the opportunity to travel to ...

A group of readers, composed of Committee members and invited colleagues, selects five-to-eight of the best essays and sends these Finalist essays to a jury of international academics and architects to select the winners. At the conclusion of the Essay Competition submittals, all Semifinalists are also invited to submit for a BERKELEY PRIZE ...

For the Finalists, there is the "best of the best" First, Second and Third Prizes, and five Honorable Mentions totaling 35,000USD. In addition, and in lieu of applying for this year's necessarily cancelled BERKELEY PRIZE Travel Fellowship Competition, all Semifinalists will receive a cash award of 500USD. In total, 52 students are ...

To Enter. Here are the ground rules: The purpose of your Community Service project is to further your understanding of the social art of architecture by allowing you to implement some aspect of this year's topic you have identified in your Berkeley Prize Essay competition proposal.. Your proposal should be for one of the following two options:. To develop a detailed action plan indicating the ...

Competition type: essay General competition goals: Through distinct competitions - the perennial Essay Competition and various Fellowship Competitions - the international Berkeley Prize competition encourages undergraduate architecture students worldwide to go into their communities for the purpose of thinking and writing about issues ...

Berkeley Prize 2021. November 1, 2020 - (Stage One) 500-word essay proposal due. Mid-December, 2020 - Essay Semifinalists announced. February 1, 2021 (Stage Two) Essay Semifinalists' 2,500-word essays due. February 8, 2021 - Launch of Community Service Fellowship Competition for Essay Semifinalists. Early-March, 2021 - Essay Finalists ...

DUE DATE: November 23 at 11:59 p.m. Please send your response as a PDF to [email protected] with the subject line: "F21 HS Essay Contest [Your Name]". This contest is open to all high school students grades 9-12.Feel free to message us on Facebook or email us ( [email protected] ) with any questions. Good luck!

The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition - Architecture Competitions Every Student Should Know About The Berkeley Essay Prize Competition stands as a beacon for nurturing critical thinking and scholarly discourse in the field of architecture. Organized by the Berkeley Undergraduate Prize for Architectural Design Excellence, this competition invites undergraduate students across the globe to ...

Congratulations to our Spring 2021 High School Essay Contest runner up, Adam Hosein! ADAM HOSEIN - SEPTEMBER 25TH, 2021. The coronavirus pandemic has created a paradigm shift in the way that the world operates. Due to the challenges imposed by this crisis, billions across the world have adapted their lifestyles, resulting in changes to the ...

Competitive Prize Contests 2025. The Prizes Program at UC Berkeley ( [email protected] ) is an important forum for rewarding creative expression and scholarly achievement by Berkeley's finest students. Winners receive both recognition and a cash prize, which is coordinated with the winner's financial aid package.

Congratulations to our Spring 2021 Undergraduate Essay Contest-Runner up, Sipho Langa! SIPHO LANGA - APRIL 4TH, 2021. The impact of the work-from-home policies implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have permeated the lives of many.

See the announcement below: "The Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of Russia and All the Russias are pleased to announce the second annual Graduate Student Essay Competition. Enter for a chance to get published on the blog and win cash prizes! We invite 750-1200 word submissions from full- or part-time M.A. and Ph.D. students from any accredited academic institution in the United States ...

DUE DATE: Friday, April 19 at 11:59 PM (PST) Please send your response as a PDF to berkeleyeconreview@ gmail.com with the subject line: "SP23 HS Essay Contest Submission [Your Name]". This contest is open to all high school students grades 9-12. Feel free to message us on Facebook or email us ( berkeleyeconreview@ gmail.com) with any questions.

2021 Berkeley winner, Adélaïde Bernard. Adelaide Bernard won in first place of campus Grad Slam competition and also took home 3rd place at the system wide competition! Adelaide studies how cells in our brain sense our energy status and modulate hunger and weight gain. As a non-native English speaker, being part of this competition and getting to share her research to a broad audience was a ...

Berkeley Prize 2022. 1 November 2021 - (Stage One) 500-word essay proposal due. Mid-December, 2021 - Essay Semifinalists announced. February 2022 (Stage Two) Essay Semifinalists' 2,500-word essays due. Early-March, 2022 - Essay Finalists announced. Mid-April, 2022 Essay winners and Community Service Fellowship winners announced.

2021-2022 Academic Calendar; 2020-2021 Academic Calendar; ... McBaine Honors Moot Court Competition 2024 Photo Essay; Previous Years' McBaine Competitions; Past McBaine Winners; ... Thomas von Danwitz gives Berkeley Law's annual Irving G. Tragen Lecture on Comparative Law, takes part in a panel on data privacy, and visits our "Borderlines ...

The film premiered in competition at the 2022 Tribeca Film Festival, won ten international festival awards, and was broadcast in more than 15 countries. ... Jim Marshall Photojournalism Fellow at Berkeley Journalism in 2023 and a Greater Good Science Center reporting fellow in 2021. She was the production assistant with "Reveal" from the ...

My Father Essay

My father is the most important man in our family and his conduct and behaviour has a great influence on me. He is the one who works to keep the family well fed and educated. Apart from being our financial backbone he is a great psychological help too. His presence gives a sense of security to all the family members and provides emotional comfort. Besides, he also acts as a moral teacher and also as a guide when required. My father guides me on the issues related to education, life and friends. His opinion is really valuable and has never ever failed.

Long and Short Essay on My Father in English

A kid generally attaches from his/her parents from childhood. Children generally understand their father a real hero and a good friend of the life who always instruct them to go on the right path.

Below we have given short and Long Essay on My Father in English for your information and knowledge. After going through these essays you will know what is the role of a father in a family, what are his responsibilities, why is his presence much needed in a family etc.

These essays will prove helpful in school essays, debate and speech giving.

My Father Essay 1 (100 words)

My father is an ideal person of my life. He is my real hero and my best friend ever. He always helps me a lot in my any difficulty. He is an internet marketing manager in a limited company in New Delhi. He is very famous person in his office as well as in the society because of his gentleness and politeness.

He is very intelligent man and always helps others in their problems. He is the boss of my family and gives advice and instruction to every family member. He solves problems of the neighbours. He takes me to school on every PTM and discusses my performance with my teacher.

My Father Essay 2 (150 words)

My father is very kind-hearted person and my real hero and best friend. He always shares with me his all the bad an happy moments. He tells me that he discuss his all life events to me to give me experience and take right steps in the absence of him. He wants to make me a good person in the life and most importantly a successful person by following all the etiquettes, humanity and ethics of the life. He is the person who always helps the needy people in the society or anywhere on the way. He teaches me about how to get fit, healthy, happy and a peaceful person all through the life.

He is the good adviser in my family, every family member takes advice from him whenever they get problem. He is the head of the family and always takes first seat while eating food at dining table.

My Father Essay 3 (200 words)

My father is very loving and dutiful person. I always learn from his life and his experiences. He tells me about his all the struggle of life and his success. He is the person who teaches me about etiquettes, humanity and ethics. He helps me to get out of the bed every morning and helps me in getting prepared for the school at right time. My mom prepares my breakfast and lunch however my father helps me in getting ready.

He comes from office every evening at 6 pm with lots of joy and happiness. He is very active person and starts playing badminton with us just after coming from the office. He brings chocolates curcure, fruits, beautiful toys, picture books, comedy books, clothes, shoes and other required stationeries for study.

He takes us out of the home every Sunday morning in the park or other favourite places to make our holiday a happy holiday. We take delicious breakfast at every Sunday morning and be together whole day with lots of activities. Sometimes we go to the picnic or famous sightseeing for long time with all family members. In my winter and summer vacations, my father takes us (me, my sister, mom and grandparents) to the hill stations, seaside and hotels for some rest or recreations.

My Father Essay 4 (250 words)

My father is very lovely father of the world. He is my real hero, best friend, my inspiration and best person of my life I ever seen. He is the person who helps me a lot in getting prepared for the school, getting rise of the bed and getting my home work done well.

He always cares for me and calls to my mom in the afternoon to know that whether I have come from school at right time or not. He is very healthy, fit, happiest, peaceful and punctual person. He always goes to the office at right time and teaches us too to go to school at right time. He teaches us the value of time in the life and says that if one wastes his/her time, time ruin his/her life.

He is very nice person and helps my neighbours in their difficult time. He loves, cares and respects my mom always and never quarrel her. He always supports her and helps sometime in the kitchen during her illness. He respects and loves my grandparents and teaches us to care for them. He tells us that old people are like God for us, we should care, love and respect them.

We should never avoid old persons in their difficult time as this time comes in everyone’s life once. He tells us that we should always help needy people of any age group all though the life according to our status. He takes 15 mins of us every day to tell us about the ethics and other good habits.

My Father Essay 5 (300 words)

My father is my best friend and real hero of my life. I generally call him Dad. He is the most special person in my life. He is a very good sports person and artist. He does paintings in his spare time and promotes us also to do paintings. He tells us that we should anything extra like music, singing, sports activity, painting, dancing, cartoon making, etc because such extra activities keeps us busy in our spare time and helps us to be peaceful all through the life. By profession, he is an internet marketing manager (a software Engineer) in a limited company in New Delhi.

He never thinks to be back in helping needy people and always ready to help them especially old people. He is my best friend and discusses my all problems. Whenever I become fed up, he ask me the reason very peacefully and takes me to the top floor, let me sit in his side, keep his hand on my shoulder and discuss his own experiences of life, his faults an drawbacks including his success in order to make me realize that what I am doing wrong or right.

He teaches us about ethics of the life and importance of elders and the life time. He tells us that we should never make any person unhappy in our life and always help needy people especially old people.

He always cares of my grandparents and tells us that old people are like precious assets of the home, without them we are like children without mother and fish without water. He always gives very good examples to make us understand anything very easily. At every weekend means at Sunday, he takes us outside of the home to the park for picnic where we all enjoy a lot by having some outdoor activities and sports. We generally play badminton as an outdoor game and carom board as an indoor game.

My Father Essay 6 (400 words)

The person I admire ever in my life is only my lovely father. I still remember all my childhood memories with my father. He was the real reason of my happiness and joy. What I am is because of him as my mother was always busy in the kitchen and other household activities and it was my father who has joy with me and my sister. I understand he is very unique Dad in the world. I am feeling of being so lucky to have such father in my life. I always praise to god to give me such opportunity to take birth in the family with good father.

He is very polite and peaceful person. He never scolded me and takes my all mistakes very easily and makes me realize my all mistakes very politely. He is the boss of my family and helps each and every family member to take good decision in the bad time. He always shares his life drawbacks and achievements with me to let us know. He has his own business of online marketing but never force me to do go in the same field or attract me towards his own business instead he always promote to do what I want in my life. He is really a good dad not because he helps me but because of his knowledge, strength, helping nature and most importantly his way of handling people.

He always respects his parents means my grandparents and cares for them all time. I still remember that when I was little, my grandparents were generally talked to me about my father naughtiness in his childhood but they told me that your father is very good person in his life, be like him. It is my father who wants to see everyone happy in the family and always asks whenever anyone becomes sad and solves his/her problems. He loves and cares my mom and suggests her to take rest when she gets tired of doing all the household chores. My dad is my inspiration, he always becomes ready to help me in my school tasks and even go to every PTM to discuss my behaviour and performance in the class.

My father was born in very poor family however currently he is one of the richest people in the city because of his patience, hard works and helping nature. My friends generally tell me so lucky of being the son of such father. I usually laugh on such type of comments and tell my father, he also laughs and says that what they are telling is not true but the truth is that I am so lucky to have son like you. He tells me that, my son always be what you want and always believe in you.

Related Information:

My Family Essay

Myself Essay

Essay on Importance of Family

Essay on My Father My Hero

Essay on Grandparents

Essay on Mother

Essay on Good Mother

Essay on I Love My Family

Related Posts

Money essay, music essay, importance of education essay, education essay, newspaper essay, my hobby essay, leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Play & Activities
• Life Skills
• Learning & Education
• Play & Learning

• Growth & Development
• Rhymes & Songs
• Preschool Locator

My Father Essay For Class 1, 2 and 3 Kids

Key Points to Remember When Writing an Essay on ‘My Father’ for Lower Primary Classes

10 lines on ‘my father’ in english, short essay on ‘my father’, long essay on ‘my father’ for kids, what your 1st, 2nd or 3rd grader will learn from writing the essay.

Essay writing is a very important activity for the development of your child. And, some of the easiest topics they can write on can be about their families, such as an essay on ‘My Father’. When your child writes an essay, they first think about all the points related to the topic. Then, they express those thoughts on paper in short and simple sentences. This develops their thinking process, helps them learn the basics of grammar, and improves their writing skills and creativity. Also, for a child, their father is often the most important person in the child’s life, along with the mother. Therefore, the essay is bound to have a personal touch, which makes it indeed more special. Here are a few pointers that kids in Class 1, 2, and 3 can use to write an essay on ‘My Father’ and ensure their piece stands out.

Let us cover some main points that your child should consider while writing an essay on this topic:

• The father’s name.
• What the father does for a living.
• What the father does at home.
• How the father is with everyone at home.
• How the father spends his off days.
• The lessons the father gives the child.
• The child’s bond with their father.

Besides the mother, the father is the most important person in a child’s life. The bonding between a father and child is a very special one. Below are ten lines on ‘My Father’ essay for Class 1 and Class 2.

• My father’s name is Mr XYZ.
• He is a businessman.
• He is very organised and clean.
• He is very loving and kind.
• He is also very disciplined.
• My father is hardworking.
• He loves animals.
• He loves plants.
• He is very helpful and cooperative.
• He motivates me.

As mentioned earlier, the father is a significant member of every family, and the child observes everything the father does. So, how can a child express their observation about their father? Through an essay, of course. Here’s an example for you.

My father’s name is Mr XYZ. He owns a business. He is passionate about his work. He is a well-organised person. He is punctual. My father does yoga every morning. He keeps everything clean in the house. He respects everyone. He is very hardworking. He takes care of all of us in the family. My father loves animals and helps them. He helps poor people also. My father is very kind. He is active throughout the day. He is courageous. When he sees anything wrong, he speaks up. He is a strict follower of honesty. He has principles, and he follows them. My father is the pillar of support and strength for our family. He is always there for us. He teaches us good manners. He is jolly and makes us laugh, too. My father is a very good person.

For a child, writing a long-form essay becomes easier when they have the points ready. Once your child has followed the tips given above, they can try their hand at writing a long essay, too. Here’s an example.

My father’s name is Mr XYZ. He owns a business. He is very passionate about his work. My father is also extremely punctual and well-organised. He encourages my brother and me to maintain time. He shows us how to keep our clothes, books, and stationery organised. My father is an honest man. He gives us examples of how honesty is the best policy. My father is active throughout the day. He says that laziness is our enemy.

My father takes care of my mother, brother, and my grandparents. He respects every person, whether they are adults or children. He obeys our grandparents with so much respect. He says that when he was a child, they took great care of him. So, now it is his turn to take care of them. He takes a lot of care of our furry friend, Julie, too. My brother and I accompany my father every night when he goes out to feed the strays in our community. He also gives grains to pigeons every morning. Sometimes some cows pass by, and we feed them. He says that animals cannot seek help because they cannot speak. So, humans must help them. My father also distributes blankets to homeless people every winter.

My father loves plants. Last year he encouraged us to collect seeds of all the mangoes we ate. Then we balled them with mud and stored them in a sack in the corner of our garden. Then one day, my father took us on a long drive. We stopped at intervals and threw those seeds far away. My father says that some of these seeds will grow into trees one day.

My father is a simple man. He says it’s always good to live a simple life. He helps my brother and me with our studies. He always motivates us. He motivates my mother to do well in her business, too. He never scolds us if we don’t do well in an exam. Instead, he motivates us and says that we should always give our hundred percent in the preparation, and after that, we should not be bothered about the results. My father also often says that mistakes are lessons. We should always learn from them and not repeat them. He helps my mother with all the household chores. He also helps her in the kitchen.

My father makes delicious food. The steamed dumplings he makes are my favourite. Every weekend he takes us for a picnic. My brother, Julie, and I have a lot of fun at the picnics. Whenever he gets some time, he also joins us when we play on our lawn. My father is our support system. My brother and I can discuss anything with him. He doesn’t scold us. If we do anything we shouldn’t do, he explains to us politely. My father is my superhero. I love my father.

Essay writing is an activity that will help your child in the long run. It will develop many faculties in your child. When your child is asked to write an essay on their dad, they will first think about the points they want to write. Then, they will put those thoughts on paper in short and simple sentences. Writing a composition on ‘My Father’ will help the child understand the value of their father more prominently. So, writing a descriptive essay about their father becomes a very special activity for the child.

Essay writing will help your child even in later academic years. When your child starts writing compositions from an early age, they develop better writing skills. This is very beneficial for the child. When writing an essay on ‘My Father’, the child will reflect on their bond with their father and the many things their father does to make their life better. Encourage your little one to write a short or long paragraph on this topic which is always so special for a child.

Essay On ‘My Parents’ for Class 1, 2 and 3 My Pet Essay in English for Grade 1, 2 and 3 Children How to Write An Essay On My Grandmother for Lower Primary Classes

• Essays for Class 1
• Essays for Class 2
• Essays for Class 3

5 Recommended Books To Add To Your Child’s Reading List and Why

5 absolute must-watch movies and shows for kids, 15 indoor toys that have multiple uses and benefits, leave a reply cancel reply.

Log in to leave a comment

Most Popular

The best toys for newborns according to developmental paediatricians, the best toys for three-month-old baby brain development, recent comments.

FirstCry Intelli Education is an Early Learning brand, with products and services designed by educators with decades of experience, to equip children with skills that will help them succeed in the world of tomorrow.

Story Related Activities Designed to Bring the Story to Life and Create Fun Memories.

Online Preschool is the Only Way Your Child's Learning Can Continue This Year, Don't Wait Any Longer - Get Started!

©2021 All rights reserved

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Use

Welcome to the world of Intelli!

We have some FREE Activity E-books waiting for you. Fill in your details below so we can send you tailor- made activities for you and your little one.

Welcome to the world of intelli!

FREE guides and worksheets coming your way on whatsapp. Subscribe Below !!

THANK YOU!!!

Here are your free guides and worksheets.

1 Essay Quaid E Azam In Urdu For Class 3

He was a man of his words and the greatest spokesman, he always stood like a rock in front of opponents and never lay down. Gandhi called him an impossible man due to his determinacy over his principles. Mohammad Ali Jinnah the founder of Pakistan , was born on December 25, 1876, in a house known as Wazir Mansion located in Karachi . He struggled a lot for the freedom of the Muslims of sub-continent and on the behalf of his extraordinary efforts, he was rewarded with the title of Quaid-e-Azam the father of the nation by maulana Mazharuddin. Then he started his efforts for the freedom of Muslims of British India and planned to create an independent state where Muslims could feel the breath of freedom. The advocate general of Bombay invited him to work for his bar and after six months offered a salary of 1500 rupees per month, which was the huge amount that time but he gently refuses the offer and stated that he planned to earn 1500 daily and proved it possible in future by his flawless efforts. It was due to his wise leadership and vigorous effort that Pakistan came into being on August 14, 1947. At the age of 20 he enrolled in Bombay high court when he came back to British India, he was the youngest one to enter the bar, where he started to take interest in political affairs of the nation and became famous in the next three years. But as a Governor-General of newly state Pakistan, he fixed 1 rupee as his monthly salary. Jinnah started his political career with Indian National Congress in 1906, then after seven years, he joined the Muslim League. His father s name was Jinnah Poonja, and Mother was Mithibai, he belongs to a mer- chant family. Jinnah said Think a hundred times before you make a decision, but once that decision is taken, stand by it as one man. .

He went to England for higher education and got admission at Lincoln s Inn law school in London. Quaid e Azam Mo- hammad Ali Jinnah received his early education from Sindh Madarsat ul Islam and Christian missionary school. In 1930 he became an undisputed leader of all the Muslims of sub-continent and started to lead Muslim League in 1933. He was fighting with tuberculosis for many years but never made it his weakness, died on September 11, 1948, just 13 months after the creation of this beloved homeland. Essay on Quaid e Azam. After the Pakistan Resolution passed, he worked day and night and did not worried about his health which was going down day by day, but he kept it secret and never disclosed it to anyone, his sacrifice was not for his own interest but for the whole Muslim nation.

He was fighting with tuberculosis for many years but never made it his weakness, died on September 11, 1948, just 13 months after the creation of this beloved homeland. Essay on Quaid e Azam. After the Pakistan Resolution passed, he worked day and night and did not worried about his health which was going down day by day, but he kept it secret and never disclosed it to anyone, his sacrifice was not for his own interest but for the whole Muslim nation.

Jinnah said Think a hundred times before you make a decision, but once that decision is taken, stand by it as one man. .

. Composition About My Family Pdf Essay On Causes And Effects Of Global Warming In 300 Words Why 14 Days Quarantine In Covid 19 Speech Essay About Depression What Are The Advantages Of Online Learning Essay About Life Conclusion Essay About School And Life Essay About Causes Water Pollution Essay On Quarantine Life Essay For Knowledge Is Power

Essay on My Family In Urdu

Back to: Urdu Essays List 3

میرے خاندان پر ایک مضمون

• لفظ “کمبہ” مختلف ثقافتوں اور نسلوں کے درمیان انوکھے اور خصوصی ریشتہ کا حامل ہے۔ جیسا کہ ایک خاندان میں کوئی بھی ہو لیکن اپنے خون سے قریبی تعلق رکھتا ہے، بطور والدین، ​​بچے، ماموں، خالہ، چاچا، چاچی، پھوپی اور کزن۔ اگرچہ کچھ لوگوں میں بدنیتی بھی آ جاتی ہے لیکن پھر بھی رشتے باقی رہتے ہیں۔ “خون پانی سے زیادہ گاڑھا ہوتا ہے،” اس وجہ سے ہی کہا جاتا ہے کہ رشتے خون کے ہیں۔ خون کے رشتے سے خاندانی رکاوٹ یا پابندی نہیں ہوتی۔ میرے ذہن میں ایک خاندان محض لوگوں کا ایک ایسا گروہ ہے جو ایک دوسرے سے غیر مشروط اور ہمیشہ بنا کسی امید اور بنا کسی مطلب کے ایک دوسرے کا خیال کرتا ہے، سپورٹ کرتا ہے اور مدد کرتا ہے۔ اس طرح جب لوگ اکٹھے ہوتے ہیں تو ایک خاندان مضبوط رشتوں اور رشتے داروں کے ذریعے اپنے ممبروں کو متحد کرتا ہے۔
• میرا کنبہ ایک مشترکہ اور بڑا کنبہ ہے۔ شہر میں رہتے ہوئے بھی کنبہ کے تمام افراد ایک ساتھ رہتے ہیں۔ میرا کنبہ دادا دادی، ماں بابا، چاچا اور چاچی اور پھوپی پر مشتمل ہے اور ہم تین بہن بھائی ہیں۔ تو میرے کنبہ میں کل گیارہ ممبر ہیں۔ کنبے کے تمام افراد پیار کے ساتھ رہتے ہیں۔ ہمارا کنبہ ایک مثالی اور خوش کن کنبہ ہے۔
• دادا دادی کنبے کے بزرگ اور معزز ممبر ہیں۔ گھر کے دوسرے سبھی افراد بھی ان کا بہت احترام کرتے ہیں۔ سب انکے مشوروں پر عمل کرنا اپنا فرض سمجھتے ہیں۔ دادا پہلے استاد تھے اب ریٹائر ہوگئے ہیں۔ وہ ہمیں باقاعدگی سے بہن بھائیوں کے درمیان محبت کی تعلیم دیتے ہیں۔ دادی جی مذہبی جبلت کی ایک خاتون ہیں اور اپنا زیادہ تر وقت عبادت میں صرف کرتی ہیں۔ بہر حال وہ سب کے لئے بھی وقت نکالتی ہیں۔ وہ زیادہ سے زیادہ گھر کے کام میں ماں اور پھوپی کی مدد کرتی ہیں۔ وہ میری ماں کو کنبہ کی بہو نہیں بلکہ اپنی بیٹی سمجھتی ہیں۔
• میرے والد پیشے سے ہومیوپیتھک ڈاکٹر ہیں۔ شہر میں ان کا اپنا کلینک ہے جس کا وہ باقاعدگی سے دورہ کرتے ہیں۔ ان کی دوا مریضوں کو بہت فائدہ دیتی ہے۔ میرے چاچا جی بجلی کے محکمہ میں انجینئر ہیں۔ اس طرح سے میرے کنبے کو اچھی ماہانہ آمدنی ہوتی ہے اور کنبہ کی ضروریات آسانی سے پوری ہو جاتی ہیں۔ میری والدہ اور پھوپی گھر کے کام کاج کرتی ہیں۔ ہم تین بھائی اور بہنیں ہیں جو دو مختلف اسکولوں میں زیر تعلیم ہیں۔ ہم گھر میں مل کر پڑھتے اور کھیلتے ہیں۔
• میرے خاندان میں نظم و ضبط اور قانون کو بہت اہمیت دی جاتی ہے۔ بڑوں کا احترام ، چھوٹوں سے پیار کرنا اور شفقت کرنا ہمارے خاندان کی روایت ہے۔ تمام کام عام طور پر وقت پر ہوتے ہیں۔ کھانے، پڑھنے، کھیلنے اور سونے کا وقت متعین ہے۔ اگر کوئی بیمار پڑتا ہے تو دوسرے لوگ اس کی خدمت میں حاضر ہو جاتے ہیں۔ اگر کوئی پریشانی پیش آتی ہے تو ہمارا پورا کنبہ متحد ہوکر اس پریشانی کا سامنا کرتا ہے۔
• میرا کنبہ پڑوسیوں کے ساتھ رہتا ہے۔ ہم ہمیشہ ہمسایہ کے غم اور تکلیف میں شریک ہوتے ہیں۔ والد پڑوسیوں کا مفت میں ہی علاج کرتے ہیں۔ دادا پڑوس کے بچوں کو جمع کرتے ہیں اور انہیں پڑھاتے ہیں۔ میرا کنبہ معاشرتی کاموں میں بہت زیادہ حصہ لیتا ہے۔ ان خصوصیات کی وجہ سے میرے اہل خانہ کو پڑوس میں بہت احترام اور پیار ملتا ہے۔ پڑوسی یہاں ہماری یکجہتی کی مثال دیتے ہیں جو ہمارے لئے فخر کی بات ہے۔
• ہمارے کنبہ میں مہمانوں کے ساتھ اچھا سلوک کیا جاتا ہے۔ دوست اور مہمان اکثر ایک بڑے کنبے کی وجہ سے آتے ہیں۔ ان کی راحت اور سہولت کا بھی خیال رکھا جاتا ہے۔ ہم قدیم ہندوستانی تصور “اتتھی دیوو بھوا” کو بہت اہمیت دیتے ہیں۔
• میرے کنبے میں کوئی جھگڑا نہیں ہوتا ہے۔ اگر پڑوسی آپس میں لڑتے ہیں تو ہم حیرت زدہ ہوتے ہیں۔ یہاں تک کہ اگر میرے اہل خانہ میں باہمی تنازعہ ہوتا ہے تو اس کو پرامن طور پر حل کیا جاتا ہے۔ اگر بچے کسی بات پر جھگڑا کرتے ہیں تو ان کے اختلافات کو دور کیا جاتا ہے۔ اس طرح چھوٹی رکاوٹوں کو باہمی ہم آہنگی اور محبت کے ساتھ ختم کیا جاتا ہے۔
• اس طرح سے میرا کنبہ خوش کن خاندان ہے۔ اس خوشحالی کا راز نظم و ضبط ، خاندانی پیار اور وقار کی پابندی ہے۔ ایک دوسرے کے ساتھ ہمدردی کا احساس خاندان کو ایک مضبوط بنیاد پر قائم رکھے ہوئے ہے۔ ایسے خاندان میں جہاں ہمیشہ خوشیوں کا احساس ہو وہاں سکون سے رہنا ممکن ہے۔