Must be completed to be eligible to sit for the departmental written comprehensive exams.
Code | Title | Credits |
---|---|---|
Epidemiologic Methods 1 (first term) | 5 | |
Epidemiologic Methods 2 (second term) | 5 | |
Epidemiologic Methods 3 (third term) | 5 |
Code | Title | Credits |
---|---|---|
Seminars in Research in Public Mental Health (all terms required for first year students) | 1 | |
Psychopathology for Public Health (first term) | 3 | |
Public Mental Health (first term) | 2 | |
Psychiatric Epidemiology (second term) | 3 | |
Social, Psychological, and Developmental Processes in the Etiology of Mental Disorders (third term) | 3 | |
PREVENTION of MENTAL DISORDERS: PUBLIC HEALTH InterVENTIONS (third term) | 3 | |
Introduction to Behavioral and Psychiatric Genetics (fourth term) | 3 | |
Brain and Behavior in Mental Disorders (fourth term) | 3 | |
Introduction to Mental Health Services (first term) | 3 | |
The Epidemiology of Substance Use and Related Problems (second term) | 3 | |
Statistics for Psychosocial Research: Measurement (first term) | 4 | |
Grant Writing for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (fourth term) | 3 | |
Writing Publishable Manuscripts for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (second year and beyond only - second term) | 2 | |
Doctoral Seminar in Public Mental Health (2nd year PhD students only) | 1 |
For Department of Mental Health doctoral students, a research analysis is required entailing one additional course credit. PH.330.840 Special Studies and Research Mental Health listing Dr. Volk as the mentor.
The School requires that at least 18 credit units must be satisfactorily completed in formal courses outside the student's primary department. Among these 18 credit units, no fewer than three courses (totaling at least 9 credits) must be satisfactorily completed in two or more departments of the Bloomberg School of Public Health. The remaining outside credit units may be earned in any department or division of the University. This requirement is usually satisfied with the biostatistics and epidemiology courses required by the department.
Candidates who have completed a master’s program at the Bloomberg School of Public Health may apply 12 credits from that program toward this School requirement. Contact the Academic Office for further information.
Introduction to Online Learning taken before the first year.
PH.550.860 Academic & Research Ethics at JHSPH (0 credit - pass/fail) required of all students in the first term of registration.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) connotes a broad range of career development topics that goes beyond the more narrowly focused “research ethics” and includes issues such as conflict of interest, authorship responsibilities, research misconduct, animal use and care, and human subjects research. RCR training requirements for JHPSH students are based on two circumstances: their degree program and their source of funding, which may overlap.
The two courses that satisfy either requirement are:
Registration in either course is recorded on the student’s transcript and serves as documentation of completion of the requirement.
Department of Mental Health candidates for the degree Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) must fulfill all University and School requirements. These include, but are not limited to, a minimum of four consecutive academic terms at the School in full-time residency (some programs require 6 terms), continuous registration throughout their tenure as a PhD student, satisfactory completion of a Departmental Written Comprehensive Examination, satisfactory performance on a University Preliminary Oral Examination, readiness to undertake research, and preparation and successful defense of a thesis based upon independent research.
PhD Students are required to be registered full-time for a minimum of 16 credits per term and courses must be taken for letter grade or pass/fail. Courses taken for audit do not count toward the 16-credit registration minimum.
Students having already earned credit at BSPH from a master's program or as a Special Student Limited within the past three years for any of the required courses may be able to use them toward satisfaction of doctoral course requirements.
For a full list of program policies, please visit the PhD in Mental Health page where students can find more information and links to our handbook.
The University places a seven-year maximum limit upon the period of doctoral study. The Department of Mental Health students are expected to complete all requirements in an average of 4-5 years.
The PhD program is designed to provide key knowledge and skill-based competencies in the field of public mental health. Upon successful completion of the PhD in Mental Health, students will have mastered the following competencies:
According to the requirements of the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH), all BSPH degree students must be grounded in foundational public health knowledge. Please view the list of specific CEPH requirements by degree type .
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
This Program brings together graduate researchers addressing mental health from diverse disciplinary perspectives - psychiatry, psychology, epidemiology and community mental health, history and philosophy of psychiatry, general practice, paediatrics, psychiatric nursing and social work, among others. Launched in March 2018, the Program is a joint initiative of the University of Melbourne's School of Psychological Sciences, Centre for Mental Health and the Department of Psychiatry. These were joined in 2020 by the Centre for Youth Mental Health and the Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health.
Our goal is to provide all University of Melbourne PhD students researching mental health with a platform to connect, share and discover new disciplines so that they can become fully-rounded researchers who can approach the field of mental health from a multi-disciplinary perspective.
The Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences is one of the most highly regarded schools of psychology in Australia. The School attracts some of the best students nationally and internationally to its broad range of APAC-accredited undergraduate, graduate, professional and research programs. The School's teaching is underpinned by excellence in research across a range of fields, including cognitive and behavioural neuroscience, quantitative psychology, social psychology, developmental psychology and clinical science.
The Centre for Mental Health is part of the Melbourne School of Population and Global Health and aims to improve mental health and mitigate the impact of mental illness at a population level. It does this through high-quality, collaborative, interdisciplinary research, academic teaching, professional and community education, and mental health system development. The Centre contributes to evidence-informed mental health policy and practice in Australia and internationally through the work of its three units:
The Centre's three units are involved in active and productive collaborations within the University and beyond. These relationships range from not-for-profit agencies like Mind Australia through to international NGOs such as the World Health Organization, and enables the translation of their research into policy and practice.
The Department of Psychiatry is committed to the prevention of mental illness and improved quality of life for individuals affected by mental illness, both nationally and internationally. The Department has unique strengths around biological and translational psychiatry research which are internationally recognised. Together with clinical collaborations and involvement in mental health policy and practice, this provides a stimulating environment for learning and research training programs. Their research is driven by pure and applied questions that require cross-disciplinary approaches and partnerships with diverse community organisations - especially those effected with mental illness. The research informs our teaching and clinical training and engagement with the wider community.
The Centre for Youth Mental Health brings together the experience and expertise of world leaders in the field of youth mental health and has become an internationally renowned research centre in this field. The Centre focuses on understanding the biological, psychological and social factors that influence onset, remission and relapse of mental illnesses in young people. Its research findings are actively translated into improved policy, practice and training that inform the development of better interventions, treatments and service systems for young people at different stages of mental ill-health. The multidisciplinary nature of its research provides a diverse and stimulating environment for students. The local and international collaborations with other universities and research institutes link it with a broader research community, with unique global perspectives and the opportunity for an exciting exchange of ideas.
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health (The Florey) is the largest brain research group in the southern hemisphere and one of the world’s top brain research centres. It is an independent medical research institute with strong connections to other research groups, globally. Our scientists are found at three research facilities, one on the grounds of the University of Melbourne in Parkville, one in the adjacent Royal Melbourne Hospital and the other at Austin Health in Heidelberg.
Mental health is a multidisciplinary, complex and rapidly growing research domain. Your years as a graduate researcher at the University of Melbourne are the perfect time for you to broaden your skill set, build your network and expand your understanding of this dynamic field. At the moment we have over 70 graduate researchers in our community who come from over a dozen different Centres and Schools within the University and we would love for you to join us!
In order for you to get to know others and learn from the MHPP community's wide variety of disciplines and expertise, we have an online platform with different channels offering a host of opportunities:
And more…
In addition, you can also use the MHPP as a unique opportunity to expand your CV by working on your transferable skills and help run an event or become a Mental Health PhD Program Event Coordinator ( not mandatory ).
Mhpp co-directors team.
“This PhD Program provides currently enrolled University of Melbourne PhD students working within the domain of mental health with the opportunity to become accomplished graduate researchers who are not only prepared to engage with their own discipline, but are equipped with the capacity to place their work in a broader multidisciplinary context within mental health.”
Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
“A PhD position is a big commitment and this program creates a platform to support a true cohort experience and provide a network of support, aimed to help PhD candidates working within the mental health domain through their doctorate and beyond.”
Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School
“Undertaking a PhD can be one of the most rewarding experiences in your life, yet sometimes, as one buries deeper into their topic, there is risk of feeling quite isolated and disconnected. The Mental Health PhD Program provides a wonderful opportunity to share the journey, connect with others with similar interests, and gain exposure to the broader mental health research landscape.”
Centre for Youth Mental Health
“The Mental Health PhD Program is a vibrant community of post-graduate students who share a common passion and interest in creating new knowledge in the field of mental health, but who come at this through different disciplines, lenses and research methodologies. This program provides a wonderful and unique opportunity for exposure to different ways of thinking about similar problems in a supportive, collaborative and engaging way.”
Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health
“To transform our understandings into mental health and metal ill-health, we really need multifaceted complimentary approaches that span preclinical tools to clinical approaches and services. This PhD Program provides a unique opportunity for students to be exposed to this breadth of multidisciplinary research that is available within Parkville and the University of Melbourne, and to share their PhD journey with a diverse cohort that will get them thinking about all the levels at which we need to tackle research in the mental health field.”
The Mental Health PhD Program now has a wonderful Operations Manager: Brendan Pearl (Department of Psychiatry). Brendan is involved in the organisation, coordination and promotion of many of our great events.
MHPP Event Coordinators
The Mental Health PhD Program has a new online platform with a team of Event Coordinators. This is a team of current MHPP PhD students who help organise events and provide a true cohort experience. The invaluable contributions of these wonderful MHPP members is what makes the Program truly great!
It is also a great way for members to work on their transferable skills, expand their CVs and create a vast multidisciplinary network with the University of Melbourne. If you would like to join the MHPP and are perhaps interested in taking on the role of Event Coordinator for some time during your PhD journey then please visit the application tab here . We would love to hear from you!
Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health
Centre for Mental Health
Department of General Practice
Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry
Department of Psychiatry
Please find below testimonials from some of our current graduate researchers about their experience of the Mental Health PhD Program.
If you are a mental health graduate researcher, this program is a fundamental building block to understanding how dynamic, complex, inspirational, positive and exciting the field of mental health can be.
Tam Dennis - Graduate Researcher at the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
I am very fortunate to be a part of this amazing community and highly recommend it for any PhD student in the area of mental health!
Kavisha Fernando - Graduate Researcher at the Department of Psychiatry
The Mental Health PhD Program (MHPP) is a wonderful program which promotes learning and professional development during your PhD journey.
Carra Simpson - Graduate Researcher at the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
What I like about the MHPP is that it provides a platform which is graduate-researcher driven and truly multidisciplinary; it provides opportunities for developing skills which we identify as useful and are above and beyond the scope of our individual departments.
Brendan Pearl - Graduate Researcher at the Department of Psychiatry
I recommend all students with a project related to mental health join the program, get involved and reap the benefits!
Hannah Savage -Graduate Researcher at the Department of Psychiatry
I highly recommend this program to any PhD students in the field of mental health research.
Phoebe Thomson - Graduate Researcher at the Department of Paediatrics
The Mental Health PhD Program creates an inspiring and supportive community of researchers who are united by a common passion for improving mental health and well-being.
Annai Charlton - Graduate Researcher at The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
The Mental Health PhD Program provides me with lots of different opportunities; networking, career development and the opportunity to ask experts from interdisciplinary fields for advice.
"The MHPP has helped me develop skills that I otherwise wouldn’t have developed, such as being able to communicate about research to people who work in related fields but use very different research techniques (animal work or qualitative research). It’s also a very social program, and I’ve met a lot of other very friendly PhD students. Being an off-campus PhD student, I sometimes felt a bit disconnected from the university, but this program has helped alleviate this feeling. The new online Teams platform is great, I get to check it whenever I want and there are optional events to join. I’ve found lots of them very useful and I ended spending about 1.5 hours a fortnight engaged with the program (5 minutes a day reading updates and chatting to other students and 1 hour attending an event such as an expert discussion, watching an interview or a coffee moment). I’m hoping to meet you soon and feel free to contact me if you have any questions!"
Yara Toenders - Graduate Researcher at the Centre for Youth Mental Health
Being a part of the MHPP community has been one of the best parts of my PhD.
Anna Ross, Graduate Researcher at the Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
The Mental Health PhD Program is offered by the University's School of Psychological Sciences, the Centre for Mental Health, the Department of Psychiatry, the Centre for Youth Mental Health and the Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health.
Graduate researchers at any stage of their PhD candidature and in any Department, Centre or School at the University of Melbourne are eligible to participate.
The Mental Health PhD Program is intended to be a supplement to the training graduate researchers receive in their home department. Program participants will remain enrolled in their current faculties and departments.
To be eligible, graduate researchers must be currently enrolled in a PhD, have their primary supervisor based at the University of Melbourne and be undertaking doctoral research on a topic related to mental health.
If you are not currently enrolled, you will need to apply separately for entry to a PhD in a relevant field. This will generally involve finding an appropriate supervisor in a suitable academic Department, School or Faculty. Once you have commenced your mental health-related PhD course, you can then register to join the Mental Health PhD Program.
Check that you meet the University's eligibility and entry requirements to undertake a PhD, and find instructions on how to apply on MDHS' Graduate Research pages . You can also read more general information about the MDHS PhD course .
The application procedure is currently closed. Due to unforeseen technical issues, the opening for 2021 applications has unfortunately been delayed until February 8, 2020. Our apologies for any inconvenience.
Applications to join the Program can be submitted throughout the year and graduate researchers can join the Program at any time during their candidature.
If you meet the eligibility criteria and you are interested in meeting your peers from throughout the University of Melbourne and creating a more multidisciplinary understanding of mental health research then please apply below. We look forward to welcoming you to our community!
Apply for the Program
If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us .
What will i get out of the program.
It has never been more important for PhD students to be strategic about career moves, build broad networks and master the right skills to get into their career of choice. The Mental Health PhD Program offers you a platform to:
We understand that as a PhD student you have a busy schedule and often competing demands, so we have created an online platform that you can access when and where you like. As a member of the MHPP, we kindly ask you to meet the following time commitment of around three hours per month:
As of 2020, the Mental Health PhD Program has a new model and formal proof of approval from your Primary Supervisor is no longer required. However, we strongly encourage you to discuss your enrolment into this specific program, as well as your professional development in general, with your supervisor before signing up.
This multidisciplinary PhD Program is an academic and professional development initiative for currently-enrolled PhD students who are researching a topic within Mental Health. Therefore, this program does not directly enrol students.
Eligible students will need to apply separately for entry to a PhD in a relevant field. This will typically involve finding an appropriate supervisor in a suitable academic Department, School or Faculty. Once students have commenced their mental health-related PhD course, they can register to join the Mental Health PhD Program, which is intended to be a supplement to the training that students receive in their home department.
If you need to terminate your enrolment you can do so by unsubscribing from the Mental Health PhD Program Newsletter.
Please email Anna Schroeder at [email protected] with any questions or feedback. I’d love to hear from you.
This interdisciplinary PhD Program provides participants with the opportunity to become accomplished graduate researchers who are not only prepared to engage with their own discipline, but are also equipped with the capacity to place their work in a broader multidisciplinary context within mental health, maximising their graduate career outcomes.
If you have any questions about the Program or our events, please contact the Program Coordinator Anna Schroeder at [email protected] .
Professor Nick Haslam Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
Professor Jane Pirkis Centre for Mental Health
Professor Chris Davey Department of Psychiatry
Associate Professor Kelly Allot Centre for Youth Mental Health
Professor Andrew Lawrence Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health
Brendan Pearl Department of Psychiatry
We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional cookies to help us measure web traffic and report on campaigns.
We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them.
Cookie settings
The PhD in Mental Health meets the needs of those wishing to gain a deep and critical insight into mental health theory, research and practice and to develop or enhance research skills while fulfilling their existing responsibilities. The programme is offered part-time and combines innovative distance learning with the option of face-to-face teaching at an annual autumn Academy held in Lancaster.
The programme brings together theory, research and practice related to various areas of mental health, including workplace mental health, public mental health, clinical mental health, and physical and mental health. Whether you are based within a healthcare setting, local government, education, research or management, the PhD in Mental Health is your chance to work with world-leading academics on the production of a thesis that makes an original contribution to knowledge within your area of professional practice.
This part-time, flexible doctorate runs over a minimum of four and a maximum of seven years. The programme begins with a five-day hybrid (online and face-to-face at Lancaster) Induction Academy. Each of the subsequent academic years start with a compulsory three-day autumn Academy, while the rest of the course is delivered via e-learning.
Years 1 and 2 consist of taught modules delivered online. In Year 1 students take a specialist module that covers the theory and practice of mental health followed by a module on research philosophy and a module on research design. Year 2 modules may include: Systematic Reviews, Data Analysis, Research Design and Practical Research Ethics.
From Year 3 onwards, students undertake an independent research study , which will conclude with the submission of a thesis that makes an original contribution to knowledge. The research project will be supervised from the University but can be undertaken in students’ own location or workplace. Supervision meetings take place using video conferencing software such as Microsoft Teams. During the annual autumn Academy students meet with supervisors face to face.
A number of mental health research groups work from Lancaster University’s prestigious Division of Health Research. For example, the Spectrum Centre, which has attracted more than £20m in funding since its launch, is the only specialist research centre in the UK dedicated to translational research into the psychosocial aspects of bipolar disorder and associated conditions (including recurrent depression, anxiety, and psychosis), as well as developments in their treatment. Other staff research interests include mental health in people with chronic physical conditions or difficulties and ensuring positive mental health among socially marginalised groups. We take a broad and inclusive approach towards mental health and include in our teaching research from academics working in areas such as organisational health and well-being and public mental health.
Our relationships with those who provide mental health services – e.g. in the UK, the NHS and the voluntary sector - combine with the current research interests of staff to inform the content of our modules. Service users will also be actively involved in the delivery of the taught component of your Doctorate.
Professor Steve Jones introduces Mental Health research at Lancaster University, and our multi-facetted approach to understanding mental health. He discusses how the Faculty's research influences practice, changing the debate around mental health and ultimately improving outcomes.
Academic requirements.
2:1 Hons degree (UK or equivalent) in an appropriate subject and relevant work experience.
We may also consider non-standard applicants, please contact us for information.
If you have studied outside of the UK, we would advise you to check our list of international qualifications before submitting your application.
As part of your application you will also need to provide a viable research proposal. Guidance for writing a research proposal can be found on our writing a research proposal webpage.
We may ask you to provide a recognised English language qualification, dependent upon your nationality and where you have studied previously.
We normally require an IELTS (Academic) Test with an overall score of at least 6.5, and a minimum of 6.0 in each element of the test. We also consider other English language qualifications .
Contact: Admissions Team +44 (0) 1524 592032 or email [email protected]
You will study a range of modules as part of your course, some examples of which are listed below.
Information contained on the website with respect to modules is correct at the time of publication, but changes may be necessary, for example as a result of student feedback, Professional Statutory and Regulatory Bodies' (PSRB) requirements, staff changes, and new research. Not all optional modules are available every year.
Induction academy.
The aim of this module is to provide students with an advanced introduction to the methods commonly used in health research. Students will gain knowledge and understanding of:
e-learning distance module
Autumn Term (weeks 1-10, October – December)
Credits: 30
Mode of assessment : 3000 word essay (75%) and a poster (25%).
This module introduces current topics and issues in mental health, covering theory (mechanisms underlying mental health), practice (psychosocial approaches to treating mental health problems), contemporary issues in mental health, and up-to-date research relating to these important topic areas.
The module will consist of weekly teaching and independent and collaborative learning activities covering concepts of mental health theory, research and practice with the following indicative content:
Theory - Mechanisms underlying mental health in a number of contexts (e.g., in the workplace, schools, clinical settings, community) and in different types of populations (e.g., severe and enduring mental health problems, people with other physical health conditions).
Research - methods for mental health research will critically appraised across all themes through engagement with and discussion about the evidence-base.
Practice - A number of approaches to preventing mental illness and improving mental health will be discussed. This includes individual therapy, self-management, family approaches, service user and relatives’ involvement, public health approaches, workplace interventions.
Deadline: January
Spring Term (weeks 1-10, January-March)
Mode of assessment : 5000 word essay
This module explores the philosophical underpinnings of research. It begins with an introduction to epistemology, i.e. the philosophical basis of knowledge and its development. It then considers the influence of different epistemological bases on research methodology and explores the role of theory and theoretical frameworks in the research process. It also examines the nature of the knowledge that underpins evidence-based policy and practice and introduces the fundamental principles of ethics.
Deadline: April
Sunmer Term (weeks 1-10, April-June)
Mode of assessment : 5000 word assignment consisting of two 2500 word components
This module introduces a range of methods used in health research. The focus is on justifying research design choices rather than practical skills in data analysis. The starting point is the development of meaningful and feasible research questions. The module then introduces a range of quantitative research designs and quantitative approaches to data collection. Next, the module looks at qualitative research designs and their relation to different epistemological positions, as well as how to integrate quantitative and qualitative methods into mixed methods research. The module also explores issues such as sampling and quality across different research designs.
Deadline: July
Spring term (weeks 1-10, January-March)
Mode of assessment : two pieces of written work (Qualitative data analysis, 2500 words; Quantitative data analysis, 2500 words)
This module is an introduction to the theory and practice of qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The module consists of two distinct parts: qualitative data analysis and quantitative data analysis. Within quantitative data analysis, there will be an option to take an introductory or an advanced unit.
The introductory quantitative unit covers data management and descriptive analyses and introduces students to inferential testing in general and statistical tests for comparisons between groups specifically. The advanced quantitative unit covers linear regression as well as regression methods for categorical dependent variables and longitudinal data before exploring quasi-experimental methods for policy evaluation and finally providing an opportunity to discuss more specific regression methods such count data models or duration analysis.
The qualitative unit focusses on the technique of thematic analysis, a highly flexible approach and useful foundation for researchers new to qualitative data analysis. The unit takes students through the stages of a qualitative data analysis: sorting and organising qualitative data, interrogating qualitative data, interpreting the data and finally writing accounts of qualitative data.
Summer Term (weeks 1-10, April-June)
Mode of assessment : A written assignment that includes: a) a 4000 word research proposal and b) a completed REAMS (Research Ethics Application Management System) application form and supporting documents.
This module completes the taught phase of Blended Learning PhD programmes. It enables students to put everything they have learned so far together and produce a research proposal that will provide the basis for the research phase of the programme.
The first part of the module – research design – starts by discussing the components of a research proposal according to different epistemologies and research methods. It then takes students through the process of developing their own proposal, starting with the topic and epistemological framework, through to the study design and data collection methods and finally the practical details.
The second part of the module – practical research ethics – teaches students how to think about their research proposal from an ethical perspective. It covers ethical guidelines and teaches students how to identify the purpose of a guideline, to enable them to translate their proposal into an ethical review application. Finally, students will prepare a practice research ethics application using the REAMS application review system.
Autumn term (weeks 1-10, October-December)
Mode of assessment : 5000 word assignment
This module provides an introduction to the principles and components of systematic reviewing. It takes students through the key steps of a systematic review. The starting point of the module is the construction of an appropriate review question. Next, the module discusses the (iterative) process of creating a search strategy that successfully identifies all relevant literature. The module then moves on to selecting appropriate methodological quality criteria, enabling students to develop their skills in critically appraising studies. After discussing how to prepare a data extraction form the module introduces a key component of a systematic review: synthesising the evidence. Finally, the module will teach students how to put everything together in a systematic review protocol.
Home Fee £4,350
International Fee £11,340
General fees and funding information
Additional costs.
There may be extra costs related to your course for items such as books, stationery, printing, photocopying, binding and general subsistence on trips and visits. Following graduation, you may need to pay a subscription to a professional body for some chosen careers.
Specific additional costs for studying at Lancaster are listed below.
Lancaster is proud to be one of only a handful of UK universities to have a collegiate system. Every student belongs to a college, and all students pay a small College Membership Fee which supports the running of college events and activities. Students on some distance-learning courses are not liable to pay a college fee.
For students starting in 2025, the fee is £40 for undergraduates and research students and £15 for students on one-year courses.
To support your studies, you will also require access to a computer, along with reliable internet access. You will be able to access a range of software and services from a Windows, Mac, Chromebook or Linux device. For certain degree programmes, you may need a specific device, or we may provide you with a laptop and appropriate software - details of which will be available on relevant programme pages. A dedicated IT support helpdesk is available in the event of any problems.
The University provides limited financial support to assist students who do not have the required IT equipment or broadband support in place.
For most taught postgraduate applications there is a non-refundable application fee of £40. We cannot consider applications until this fee has been paid, as advised on our online secure payment system. There is no application fee for postgraduate research applications.
For some of our courses you will need to pay a deposit to accept your offer and secure your place. We will let you know in your offer letter if a deposit is required and you will be given a deadline date when this is due to be paid.
The fee that you pay will depend on whether you are considered to be a home or international student. Read more about how we assign your fee status .
If you are studying on a programme of more than one year’s duration, tuition fees are reviewed annually and are not fixed for the duration of your studies. Read more about fees in subsequent years .
Health studies.
Take an innovative approach to distance learning combining interactive lectures, webinars and online collaboration, group work and self-directed study.
Work with world-leading academics to make an original contribution to your area of professional practice.
Benefit from an international peer group that could include educators, mental health practitioners and policy-makers.
The PhD in Mental Health is offered part-time via blended learning . Teaching and research activities are carried out through a combination of face-to-face and online interaction, allowing you to undertake the majority of study from your own location whilst fulfilling your existing responsibilities. You will benefit from being part of a UK and internationally-based peer group working across a range of sectors.
Face-to-face interactions take place at an annual residential autumn Academy while taught modules are delivered via distance learning using our virtual learning environment and include discussion forums, collaborative digital spaces and video conferencing. All students have access to a hub space that facilitates interaction with their cohort and with students on related programmes, creating a virtual information space that’s also sociable. An academic tutor will support you during the taught phase and two supervisors provide you with support in the research phase.
The Division of Health Research have been offering blended learning postgraduate programmes since 2010. We have many successful graduates and currently around 200 continuing students on a range of programmes who have benefited in progressing their careers from the high quality postgraduate education we provide.
Our mental health research covers a wide range of research areas and activities, including bipolar disorder and related conditions, chronic illness and care approaches.
The Spectrum Centre is the only specialist research centre in the UK dedicated to translational research into the psychosocial aspects of bipolar disorder and associated conditions.
We hold the Athena SWAN Silver Award, recognising our commitment to advancing the careers of women in higher education and research.
The information on this site relates primarily to 2025/2026 entry to the University and every effort has been taken to ensure the information is correct at the time of publication.
The University will use all reasonable effort to deliver the courses as described, but the University reserves the right to make changes to advertised courses. In exceptional circumstances that are beyond the University’s reasonable control (Force Majeure Events), we may need to amend the programmes and provision advertised. In this event, the University will take reasonable steps to minimise the disruption to your studies. If a course is withdrawn or if there are any fundamental changes to your course, we will give you reasonable notice and you will be entitled to request that you are considered for an alternative course or withdraw your application. You are advised to revisit our website for up-to-date course information before you submit your application.
More information on limits to the University’s liability can be found in our legal information .
We believe in the importance of a strong and productive partnership between our students and staff. In order to ensure your time at Lancaster is a positive experience we have worked with the Students’ Union to articulate this relationship and the standards to which the University and its students aspire. View our Charter and other policies .
A highly-ranked university with a global reputation.
Your college will be your home away from home.
Career support for our students through university and beyond.
Lancaster has so much to offer. On our campus, in our city and in our community, you’ll find your place – whoever you are.
Lancaster is easy to get to and surrounded by natural beauty.
Our campus and the surrounding area is a great place to call home.
Build your global community on campus and around the world.
Services to help you fulfil your potential at Lancaster.
Research degrees (phd).
The Centre for Global Mental Health specialises in providing high quality PhD training opportunities in topics related to Global Mental Health, and offers students a broad range of possible PhD supervisors to gain the skills they will need for a career in mental health research. The research projects are mainly based in low and middle income countries, with supervision provided locally as well as by academics based in the UK.
Students register at either the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN), King’s College London, or the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), depending on which institution their lead supervisor is based. Joint supervision across institutions is possible, although students will be registered at only 1 institution (the institution of their lead supervisor), and will receive their degree from this institution.
Staff in the CGMH work on the following themes
Application steps
1. Clarify your research topic
2. Identify a prospective supervisor
3. Identify how your research degree will be funded
4. Draft your research proposal outline
5. Check that you meet, or are expecting to meet the institutions general entry requirements
6. Check the application deadlines associated with your chosen programme
7. Apply online using the instituitons application portal
Daiane machado, temitope ademosu.
Can pursuing a ph.d. impact mental health.
St. Paul, Minnesota, Billboard advertisement for care facility to help treat mental illness. (Photo ... [+] by: Michael Siluk/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)
What happens when you put together a group of super achievers who are accustomed to being the best into a new environment called a Ph.D. program? Scott Turow’s One L provides a window into that environment at Harvard Law School, one that mirrors many of the trials and tribulations that many graduate students face across multiple fields.
U.S. survey data in prior published research indicates that about 14.9% of Ph.D. students in economics and 10 to 13.5% of Ph.D. students in political science have received mental health treatment. However, because it is not possible to randomly assign people to a Ph.D. program and then follow them over time, it is also unclear whether these students who sought out mental health treatment already had issues to begin with prior to entering the programs.
Now, a new working paper by Sanna Bergvall, Clara Fernstrom, Eva Ranehill, and Anna Sandberg at Lund University using Swedish population-wide and longitudinal administrative records tries to estimate whether this higher incidence of mental health uptake among Ph.D. students is due to selection or perhaps due to doing a Ph.D. itself. They do this by showing that prior to entering the Ph.D., prospective students have similar reported mental health issues as a matched sample of master’s degree students in the same field. However, by following both groups of students past the onset of the Ph.D. program starting, the authors document that there is a significant increase in the use of psychiatric medication among the Ph.D. students.
This finding generally holds across fields, with variation, such as a notable exception for the medical and health sciences. Overall, groups that were most susceptible to obtaining psychiatric medication during their Ph.D. were older people, women, and those with a previous history of using psychiatric medications.
The authors of the new study note that in 2016, 13.5% of their sample of active Ph.D. students received psychiatric medication. This is quite similar to the studies in economics and political science showing between 10 to 14.9% of Ph.D. students received mental health treatment. Additionally, the authors of this new study argue that because they are recording diagnosed mental health problems, the percentage reporting may be an underestimate.
Best 5% interest savings accounts of 2024.
The authors conclude: “If PhD studies negatively impact mental health, this likely decrease both academic productivity and causes a selection of researchers not only based on academic aptitude, but also mental resilience.”
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
UCL Institute of Mental Health
About the programme, frequently asked questions, how to apply, supervisors and steering committee, supporting students.
This programme, funded in 2019, is the first of its kind in the UK, representing an investment of over £5m by the Wellcome Trust. It is based in the UCL Institute of Mental Health, and will recruit six students per year from 2020-2024.
Click here to access our FAQs
Director Jonathan Roiser: [email protected]
Co-directors Alexandra Pitman: [email protected] Sunjeev Kamboj: [email protected]
For general information: [email protected]
No longer accepting applications.
Visit our student-led website to found out more about the students on the programme:
Visit our website
Read the latest blogs written by our PhD students whilst studying on the programme:
Visit our blog site
Phd-phs in social and behavioral sciences.
Prospective doctoral students interested in the Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences should apply to the Doctor of Philosophy ( PhD ) Program in Population Health Sciences and choose Social & Behavioral Sciences as their Field of Study.
The PhD in Population Health Sciences is offered under the aegis of the Harvard Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (GSAS) and is awarded by the Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Students in this program will gain broad, interdisciplinary knowledge in quantitative and qualitative methods of enquiry for understanding the health of populations, and developmental approaches to population health science. In addition, students will belong to one of the following Fields of Study associated with the departments of: Environmental Health , Epidemiology , Global Health and Population , Nutrition , or Social and Behavioral Sciences .
For further details on the PhD program, please visit this website .
2023-24 SBS-PhD Curriculum Guide
For applicants that are applying into the PhD in Population Health Sciences check out this admission requirement checklist .
Yes. All applicants are required to submit GRE scores as part of their application submission. This is a change from our pandemic policy. As with other application components, the GRE will be considered as part of an applicant’s holistic application, in combination with all submitted materials.
Advisors for PhD students in the PHS program are chosen after we know who will be joining us in the new cohort. Generally, the assignment takes place in early to mid-May. An essential part of the PhD admissions process is the consideration of appropriate mentoring faculty for the applicant. Therefore applicants do not get prior advising commitments from a potential faculty mentor prior to applying to the program. We recommend listing up to three faculty members of interest in your personal statement, articulating how your current research interests align with the faculty listed.
Our program has a strong emphasis on quantitative methods so showing preparation in this area is strongly recommended. The doctoral program in SBS is very quantitative-focused and we do require students to take a year of Quantitative Research Methods in Population Health Sciences (PHS 2000 A + B). Although the committee looks at the application holistically, some emphasis is placed on how well applicants do in specific course areas such as Biostats, EPI and the social sciences.
It’s always helpful to the admissions committee to be able to assess quantitative skills in an applicant’s background and that is usually demonstrated through coursework, professional experiences and letters of recommendation.
While applications are looked at holistically, the admissions committee does place an emphasis on prior coursework in biostatistics, epidemiology and the social sciences, so highlighting these types of courses in your application will be useful. Additionally, it could be helpful if one of your recommenders is a professor from your last degree program who can comment positively on your quantitative abilities. Your statement of purpose is a chance for you to tell the committee about your motivation for pursuing doctoral work in SBS and to describe yourself as a researcher. A key part of the admissions review process is making sure there is appropriate mentorship, so we suggest naming up to three SBS faculty whose interests align with your own. You can read about the faculty here .
You may find the information on this page helpful as you prepare your application.
You can submit a substitution form with the course syllabus for courses you have taken in your Master’s program. Substitution requests are carefully reviewed by the instructor of the required HSPH course to determine if the course is truly equivalent.
You can get some information on faculty research by viewing their profiles on the department website.
You can read about the research areas of current students here .
Browser does not support script.
Go to…
October 2023
Our PhD programme is available to health professionals (including but not limited to doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, allied healthcare practitioners) across a diverse range of topics relevant to mental health science. We seek to diversify the mental health research workforce and actively welcome applicants from three under-represented groups: people with lived experience of mental disorders, diverse racial and ethnic groups, and nurses.
Please read the How to Apply section of our website carefully for details on the programme structure, application process and full eligibility criteria. You will also be able to access the online application form on this site, along with guidance to help you complete the application. Please note that the applications close at 13:00 (GMT) on 1 December 2022 .
See: Leadership & Supervision
See: Funding, Eligibility & How to Apply
See: King’s PhD Programme in Mental Health Research for Health Professionals
Funded by Wellcome and King’s College London
We have recently recorded two recruitment webinars with the Programme Director and Co-Directors to talk about the programme in more detail that are now available on our website . We also have a list of FAQs answering most common questions that you may find helpful. You can get in touch with us by email at [email protected] in case you have any further questions.
Thursday 1st December 2022
w/c 8 May 2023
View a prospectus.
Learn more about the degree programmes on offer at King's. Download or view a prospectus in PDF format.
Receive email updates about our courses, events, fees and funding, studying in London, how to apply and more.
There are no recruitment events currently available.
Alternatively, use our A–Z index
Tackle the biggest challenges in biology, medicine and health in a world leading research environment, and prepare for your future career.
Attend an open day
Year of entry: 2025
We require applicants to hold, or be about to obtain, an Upper Second class Honours degree, or the equivalent qualification gained outside the UK, in a related subject area for entry to a PhD programme. A Lower Second class Honours degree may be considered if applicants also hold a Master's degree with a Merit classification.
Full entry requirements
Apply online
Before applying you must:
Visit our Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Postgraduate Research page to find out more.
Full-time | Part-time | Full-time distance learning | Part-time distance learning | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PhD | Y | Y | N | N |
MPhil | Y | Y | N | N |
Visit our Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health Postgraduate Research page to find out about upcoming open days and events.
Fees for entry in 2025 have not yet been set. For reference, the fees for the academic year beginning September 2024 were as follows:
Further information for EU students can be found on our dedicated EU page.
Programmes in related subject areas.
Use the links below to view lists of programmes in related subject areas.
Academic entry qualification overview, english language.
For applicants whose first language is not English, or if you have not studied recently in the UK, you must provide evidence of how you meet the English Language requirement.
We mainly accept IELTS or TOEFL tests. Please note IELTS and TOEFL are only valid for two years.
We require a minimum IELTS score of 6.5 overall or TOEFL (iBT) 90. Each component of the English test should meet the minimum requirement of IELTS 5.5 in all components, TOEFL (iBT 22). For the writing component , we expect you to have achieved a minimum of 6.0 (IELTS).
If your IELTS or TOEFL expires before the start of your programme, you will need to take another official English test before we can issue you with a CAS for your visa application. This is a requirement of UKVI.
For more information about English language tests see English language requirements .
Please contact us at [email protected] for further information.
Other international entry requirements, application and selection, how to apply, advice to applicants.
Before you start your application, you should:
If you already have funding:
Supporting documents
You'll also need to make sure you have the following documents before you apply:
Visit our ‘How to apply’ page to find out more about the information required for each of these supporting documents.
Any missing information may delay the processing of your application.
You must submit your application for a postgraduate research programme before the relevant deadline to be considered. You will not be able to apply after these deadlines have passed.
Candidates will be required to attend an interview with their prospective supervisor as well as an independent Postgraduate Tutor. If it is not possible for you to attend in person, we are able to interview by Zoom/video conferencing.
Programme details, programme description.
Our PhD/MPhil Mental Health programme enables you to undertake a research project that will improve understanding of Mental Health.
Our postgraduate researchprogrammes in mental healthare based on individually tailored projects. Applicants are specifically matched with a primary academic supervisor according to their research interest and background.
All of our postgraduate research students have more than one supervisor, and our dynamic multidisciplinary supervisory teams typically cover a wide and diverse range of academic disciplines beyond mental health and psychology, including nursing, pharmacy, epidemiology and biostatics, informatics, health economics, sociology and qualitative research.
Our academics have internationally outstanding knowledge and expertise in conducting research studies in mental health across the life course. Particular strengths include:
Training and development
All of our postgraduate researchers attend the Doctoral Academy Training Programme delivered by the Researcher Development team . The programme provides key transferable skills and equips our postgraduate researchers with the tools to progress beyond their research degree into influential positions within academia, industry and consultancy. The emphasis is on enhancing skills critical to developing early-stage researchers and professionals, whether they relate to effective communication, disseminating research findings and project management skills.
Applicants are specifically matched with a Primary Supervisor and individual project based on their research interests and background.
International applicants interested in this research area can also consider our PhD programme with integrated teaching certificate .
This unique programme will enable you to gain a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching and Learning, whilst also carrying out independent research on your chosen project.
Funded programmes and projects are promoted throughout the year. Funding is available through UK Research Councils, charities and industry. We also have other internal awards and scholarships for the most outstanding applicants from within the UK and overseas.
For more information on available the types of funding we have available, please visit the funded programmes and funding opportunities pages.
Disability support, career opportunities.
Your postgraduate research degree will open up a range of career opportunities after you graduate. Find out more on the Careers page.
Postgraduate research degree
You will join a research community that is leading the way in how we look at mental health care and communication. Research will be enhanced by the outcome focused environment of our Centre for Mental Health Research
Starting date | Deadline for application |
---|---|
Oct 2024 1 October 2024 | Applications are accepted throughout the year. |
Feb 2025 1 February 2025 | Applications are accepted throughout the year. |
Our links with Bart's Trust, UCL Partners and others has helped create research-active clinical academic posts, ensuring research is undertaken under the supervision of respected clinical experts.
As an PhD/MPhil researcher at City’s Centre for Mental Health Research , you will be contributing to a body of knowledge and expertise. Making a direct impact on people’s health and well-being.
Our research on Mental Health addresses the complex links between mental and physical ill-health. We cover including some of the biggest healthcare challenges facing society, such as dementia and depression.
We work closely with clinicians, patients, carers and service managers across a range of disciplines to carry out research to improve mental health care and communication for people of all ages in all settings.
Our pioneering approach to involving patients and carers throughout the research process has earned us an international reputation. Bolstered by strong links with government bodies and major health charities.
Doctoral level study involves independent academic research, supported by supervisors, that makes an original contribution to knowledge within the discipline.
There are two main routes to doctoral-level research degrees (PhD) within the School.
The main approach - MPhil/PhD by major thesis - centres on conducting original research and presenting this in a thesis of around 70,000 words (and no longer than 100,000 words).
An alternative route to doctoral qualification is PhD by publication. This involves the candidate either linking together a coherent body of previously conducted research papers with a critical commentary (PhD by prior publication) or preparing and submitting a series of papers for peer reviewed publication during the period of registration (PhD by prospective publication).
Further details of these two routes are given below:
The standard route involves the accepted candidate pursuing a research project under the guidance of their supervisors over a period of 3 years (full-time) or 4-6 years (part-time).
MPhil and PhD study will commonly involve a structured programme of research activity. Comprising systematic literature review, pilot or developmental study, and main study phases.
Prior publication: Candidates who have already published a series of significant research papers submit these together with an accompanying analytical commentary. This body of work must be principally the candidate's own work.
The number and range of publications must be sufficient. This is to demonstrate that the work forms a coherent contribution to knowledge or scholarship within the particular field. This typically involves around six papers.
Prospective publication: Candidates publish several (generally around four to six papers, dependent on their depth, quality, significance and impact) significant research papers. You will address various aspects of your research topic during their period of PhD registration.
You will publish several (generally around four to six papers, dependent on their depth, quality, significance and impact) significant research papers. You will address various aspects of your research topic during their period of PhD registration.
These published (or accepted for publication) papers together with a critical analysis which draws together your published work will be submitted in a single thesis of between 40,000 and 80,000 words. (including the publications). This word count might vary by subject discipline.
As with the prior publication route, the accompanying critical commentary identifies your knowledge and skills acquisition, their part in developing the research, and the relevance and importance of the work within the submitted publication series.
For full details about the City PhD programme structure, please see the Guide for Research Students .
Entry requirements.
Entry requirements vary by subject area and applicants should approach academic staff working in their area of interest. Here you can discuss your proposal ahead of submitting an application.
Applicants should normally hold an upper second class honours degree or the equivalent from an international institution. Where the applicant's academic profile shows no evidence of training in research methods, it will normally be recommended that students first complete an MSc or MRes programme. This is to prepare them for MPhil/PhD studies.
Substantial employment or research experience may be considered for some subject areas alongside or in place of academic qualifications.
For applicants whose first language is not English, an IELTS score of at least 7 (with a minimum of 7.0 in writing) is required.
For more information see our main entry requirements page.
If you are not from the European Economic Area / Switzerland and you are coming to study in the UK, you may need to apply for a visa or entry clearance to come to the UK to study.
The way that you apply may vary depending on the length of your course. There are different rules for:
For more information see our main Visa page .
Full-time Home/UK: £5,500 per year
Part-time Home/UK: £2,750 per year
Full-time International: £14,500 per year
Part-time International: £7,250 per year
Fees for doctoral candidates are charged annually and cover registration, supervision and examination.
Fees are subject to review each year and may vary during your period of registration. Where applicable, fees for City's programmes will be subject to inflationary increases in each academic year of study commencing in September . Our policy for these increases is set out in our terms and conditions of study .
Prospective students are encouraged to explore doctoral Grants and funding opportunities such as:
Our bursaries are non-repayable sums of money granted by the University, usually based on need.
Our loans are repayable sums of money granted by the University or other body.
Our scholarships are when the University pays towards your Study fees. You may also be eligible for further funding.
Fully funded ESRC studentships are currently available to Doctoral Researchers for entry in October 2024 through the SENSS Doctoral Training Partnership .
The Government has introduced a new Postgraduate Doctoral Loans scheme which can provide a loan of up to £25,000.
This will be over three years to support study for a doctoral degree.
A Postgraduate Doctoral Loan can help with course fees and living costs while you study. It can be used alongside any other forms of support you may be able to receive.
For more information, please see our Postgraduate Doctoral Loans page .
Some of our degrees may involve additional expenses which are not covered by your tuition fees. Find out more about additional expenses .
City has a well-established structure and processes to support your research .
MPhil/PhD students can become integral members of the School’s research teams based in their Research Centres. Our centres assist students in completing their studies. A range of research groups are available to support MPhil/PhD students.
MPhil/PhD students are assigned to a team of supervisors, usually two academics who are expert in the field of the student's study. Students meet regularly with supervisors, reviewing, their learning needs and planning, work towards progression.
Full-time students will meet with their supervisors at least twice a term part time students at least once a term to record notes from these meetings and other indicators of progress on the web-based system, Research And Progress (RAP) .
Progress is monitored by an annual review, where students have the opportunity to discuss their research design and written work with an advisor. They also have access to support from Senior Tutors.
All students working towards a PhD (other than those undertaking doctoral study by prior publication or as a structured programme) initially register for MPhil studies. When their study has developed, they may apply to be upgraded to PhD student status which nvolves an oral examination.
Upgrading occurs between 12 and 18 months for full time study and between 24 and 30 months for part time study.
Research students are supported by student representatives who meet with the student-staff liaison committee. Here they can respond to any student concerns that cannot be addressed by supervisors.
All MPhil/PhD students can access a wide range of MSc modules and other training programmes across City, normally without charge.
Workshops, seminars and retreats are organised for students across the School and within particular areas.
Institution-wide research activities can also contribute to your development as a researcher. An annual programme of research and enterprise development activities is also run for students.
The City Doctoral College can provide more information about graduate degrees.
In the first, instance, we recommend that you visit the School of Health & Psychological Sciences and the relevant Research Centre. Here you can read about our research and establish areas of specific staff interest. This will enable you to identify whether the School of Health & Psychological Sciences at City is the best place for your study.
Details of relevant academic staff can be found here .
Following this you need to submit a formal online application with a curriculum vitae and a 1-2 page proposal of study. This should include:
Background and rationale including other work in the area leading up to the PhD study.
Proposed methodology such as aims, design, participant groups, measures, analysis.
Potential outcomes of the research in terms of academic outputs (papers and presentations) and real world impact (e.g., its potential usefulness for teachers/ speech language therapists etc.).
We realise that at this stage you may not have a completely clear plan of study, and that the proposal is likely to change after you begin study. The proposal gives us an idea of your writing and organisational ability, motivation and rationale for the study and potential wider benefits.
See here for guidance on writing your research proposal .
Select one of the available starting dates to start your application.
For further application enquiries please contact our PGR enquiries team .
Agency, social identity & justice in mental health: a collaboration with young people, clinicians & academics across philosophy, ethics & neuroscience.
The project has established a new collaboration to investigate agency, identity and justice in youth mental health.
Research centre: Centre for Mental Health Research
Academic: Professor Rose McCabe
Status: Ongoing project
View case study site
This research will try an approach that is different from what health services currently do. It will carry out several research studies, involving patients and different health professionals.
This research will assess to what extent women from ethnic minorities do not attend appointments at specialist services and how they are referred to two Mother and Baby psychiatric hospital units.
Status: Completed project
The BOOST trial aims to establish whether parents with enduring difficulties in managing emotions and relationships, consent to and complete this video feedback intervention
Academic: Professor Sally McManus
The project aims to develop a set of music-assisted intervention programmes to increase spoken language ability in 24-60-month old nonverbal or minimally verbal children with autism spectrum disorder.
Academic: Dr Jacqueline Sin
This research aims to develop a new approach to help patients with depression. We will see if DIALOG+ is acceptable by asking people with depression their opinions on the approach.
This study will be the first to examine staff and team communication in mental health wards, identifying the communication that leads to successful de-escalation.
Academics: Dr Mary Lavelle and Professor Rose McCabe
The aim of this coproduction project is to develop resources to support help-seeking and aid communication about health needs between asylum seekers and refugees and primary healthcare practitioners.
Academics: Susannah Hermaszewska and Dr Jacqueline Sin
This study will be the first to use Experience-based Co-design and Photovoice to explore how community assets can be best incorporated in co-designing an alcohol intervention for future evaluation.
The study will investigate how to better support people who attend Emergency Departments (EDs) who have thoughts of taking their own lives or have harmed themselves.
Academics: Professor Rose McCabe and
This study builds on the 5-year NIHR-funded ENRICH peer support research programme to optimise implementation of peer support in mental health services and so maximise benefits.
Academic: Steve Gillard
The first part of the PhD will be to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions for self-harm compared to comparison types of treatment in males versus females.
Academics: Dr Kirsten Barnicot and Professor Rose McCabe
See our full list of academic staff and potential supervisors in Department of Nursing.
Senior Lecturer in Mental Health Nursing
Department of Nursing
Senior Lecturer in Health Services Research
Senior Lecturer
Shps doctoral enquiries.
+44 (0) 20 7040 5972
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
You have full access to this article via your institution.
Performance management — captured here in photographs from Frank Gilbreth — has long contributed to ill health in researchers. Credit: Kheel Centre
Two years ago, a student responding to Nature ’s biennial PhD survey called on universities to provide a quiet room for “crying time” when the pressures caused by graduate study become overwhelming. At that time , 29% of 5,700 respondents listed their mental health as an area of concern — and just under half of those had sought help for anxiety or depression caused by their PhD study.
Things seem to be getting worse.
Respondents to our latest survey of 6,300 graduate students from around the world, published this week, revealed that 71% are generally satisfied with their experience of research, but that some 36% had sought help for anxiety or depression related to their PhD.
These findings echo those of a survey of 50,000 graduate students in the United Kingdom also published this week. Respondents to this survey, carried out by Advance HE, a higher-education management training organization based in York, UK, were similarly positive about their research experiences, but 86% report marked levels of anxiety — a much higher percentage than in the general population. Similar data helped to prompt the first international conference dedicated to the mental health and well-being of early-career researchers in May. Tellingly, the event sold out .
How can graduate students be both broadly satisfied, but also — and increasingly — unwell? One clue can be found elsewhere in our survey. One-fifth of respondents reported being bullied; and one-fifth also reported experiencing harassment or discrimination.
Could universities be taking more effective action? Undoubtedly. Are they? Not enough. Of the respondents who reported concerns, one-quarter said that their institution had provided support, but one-third said that they had had to seek help elsewhere.
There’s another, and probably overarching, reason for otherwise satisfied students to be stressed to the point of ill health. Increasingly, in many countries, career success is gauge by a spectrum of measurements that include publications, citations, funding, contributions to conferences and, now, whether a person’s research has a positive impact on people, the economy or the environment. Early-career jobs tend to be precarious. To progress, a researcher needs to be hitting the right notes in regard to the measures listed above in addition to learning the nuts and bolts of their research topics — concerns articulated in a series of columns and blog posts from the research community published last month.
Most students embark on a PhD as the foundation of an academic career. They choose such careers partly because of the freedom and autonomy to discover and invent. But problems can arise when autonomy in such matters is reduced or removed — which is what happens when targets for funding, impact and publications become part of universities’ formal monitoring and evaluation systems. Moreover, when a student’s supervisor is also the judge of their success or failure, it’s no surprise that many students feel unable to open up to them about vulnerabilities or mental-health concerns.
The solution to this emerging crisis does not lie solely in institutions doing more to provide on-campus mental-health support and more training for supervisors — essential though such actions are. It also lies in recognizing that mental ill-health is, at least in part, a consequence of an excessive focus on measuring performance — something that funders, academic institutions, journals and publishers must all take responsibility for.
Much has been written about how to overhaul the system and find a better way to define success in research, including promoting the many non-academic careers that are open to researchers. But on the ground, the truth is that the system is making young people ill and they need our help. The research community needs to be protecting and empowering the next generation of researchers. Without systemic change to research cultures, we will otherwise drive them away.
Nature 575 , 257-258 (2019)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03489-1
Reprints and permissions
I botched my poster presentation — how do I perform better next time?
Career Feature 27 SEP 24
Researchers in Hungary raise fears of brain drain after ‘body blow’ EU funding suspension
Career News 26 SEP 24
How I apply Indigenous wisdom to Western science and nurture Native American students
Career Q&A 25 SEP 24
Seven work–life balance tips from a part-time PhD student
Career Column 24 SEP 24
My identity was stolen by a predatory conference
Correspondence 17 SEP 24
UK university departments on the brink as higher-education funding crisis deepens
Career Feature 25 SEP 24
Universities are not just businesses, but an investment in future generations
Editorial 25 SEP 24
More measures needed to ease funding competition in China
Correspondence 24 SEP 24
Top-notch talents, leading talents in science and technology, and young and middle-aged outstanding talents.
Xinxiang, Henan, China
Xinxiang Medical University
Job Opportunities: Leading talents, young talents, overseas outstanding young scholars, postdoctoral researchers.
Wuhan, Hubei, China
School of Optical and Electronic Information, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
We seek exceptional candidates to lead vigorous independent research programs working in any area of neurobiology.
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
School of Life Sciences, Westlake University
Faculty positions in molecular agrobiology, including plant (crop) molecular biology, crop genomics and agrobiotechnology and etc.
Beijing, China
School of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Peking University
6 major schools are now hiring faculty members.
Shanghai, China
ShanghaiTech University
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.
For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here .
Loading metrics
Open Access
Peer-reviewed
Research Article
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
* E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliations Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, sustainAbility Ph.D. Initiative at the Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Roles Writing – review & editing
Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Mental health issues among Ph.D. students are prevalent and on the rise, with multiple studies showing that Ph.D. students are more likely to experience symptoms of mental health-related issues than the general population. However, the data is still sparse. This study aims to investigate the mental health of 589 Ph.D. students at a public university in Germany using a mixed quantitative and qualitative approach. We administered a web-based self-report questionnaire to gather data on the mental health status, investigated mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety, and potential areas for improvement of the mental health and well-being of Ph.D. students. Our results revealed that one-third of the participants were above the cut-off for depression and that factors such as perceived stress and self-doubt were prominent predictors of the mental health status of Ph.D. students. Additionally, we found job insecurity and low job satisfaction to be predictors of stress and anxiety. Many participants in our study reported working more than full-time while being employed part-time. Importantly, deficient supervision was found to have a negative effect on Ph.D. students’ mental health. The study’s results are in line with those of earlier investigations of mental health in academia, which likewise reveal significant levels of depression and anxiety among Ph.D. students. Overall, the findings provide a greater knowledge of the underlying reasons and potential interventions required for advancing the mental health problems experienced by Ph.D. students. The results of this research can guide the development of effective strategies to support the mental health of Ph.D. students.
Citation: Friedrich J, Bareis A, Bross M, Bürger Z, Cortés Rodríguez Á, Effenberger N, et al. (2023) “How is your thesis going?”–Ph.D. students’ perspectives on mental health and stress in academia. PLoS ONE 18(7): e0288103. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103
Editor: Khader Ahmad Almhdawi, Jordan University of Science and Technology Faculty of Applied Medical Science, JORDAN
Received: March 23, 2023; Accepted: June 20, 2023; Published: July 3, 2023
Copyright: © 2023 Friedrich et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The anonymized data set is available at https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12914 . All code for the analysis can be found at https://github.com/coschroeder/mental_health_analysis .
Funding: We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Work situations can be demanding and have a profound influence on employees’ mental health and well-being across different sectors and disciplines [ 1 ]. Multiple studies show that the mental health status of people working in academia and especially that of Ph.D. students seems to be particularly detrimental when compared to the public [e.g., 2 , 3 ]. Disorders such as anxiety and depression are on the rise in the general population [ 4 , 5 ]. Multiple studies show that this is even more severe in academia [ 6 – 10 ] and in particular Ph.D. students are affected by mental health problems [ 11 , 12 ]. Worldwide surveys grant support for Ph.D. students’ suboptimal and alarming mental health situations [ 13 , 14 ].
A comprehensive study with more than 2000 participants (90% Ph.D. students, 10% Master students) from over 200 institutions across different countries showed that graduate students were more than six times more likely to experience symptoms of depression and anxiety than the general public [ 2 ]. Furthermore, a global-scale meta-analysis [ 3 ] and several other studies concerned with the mental health of Ph.D. students in different countries, e.g., the United States [ 7 , 9 ], the United Kingdom [ 6 ], France [ 15 ], Poland [ 8 ], Belgium [ 16 ] or Germany [ 11 , 12 ] voice concerns about the mental health situation of Ph.D. students. Recent research conducted in Belgium has consistently found a higher prevalence of mental health problems among Ph.D. students compared to different groups of other highly educated individuals [ 16 ]. In the same study, 50% of the Ph.D. students reported that they suffer from some form of mental health problem, and every third is at risk of a common psychiatric disorder [ 16 ]. A similar picture is forming in Germany. For example, the prevalence of at least moderate depression among doctoral researchers at the Max Planck Society, one of the biggest academic societies in Germany, was between 9.6% and 11.6% higher than in the age-related general population [ 11 ].
Recent studies describe not only a high prevalence but also a rising tendency of mental health issues among Ph.D. students. In a study from 2017, 12% of the respondents reported seeking help for depression or anxiety related to their Ph.D. [ 13 ], while in 2019, the result was even more drastic, as 36% of the respondents reported that having searched for help for those same reasons [ 14 ]. Several studies among doctoral researchers within the Max Planck Society show similar results. For instance, a survey in 2019 showed that the average of the Ph.D. students were at risk for an anxiety disorder and another sample from 2020 provided even more robust support for this claim [ 11 , 12 ]. Furthermore, the mean depression score increased from 2019 to 2020 in both samples [ 11 ].
Given these alarming statistics, several studies addressed risks and resources for increased mental health issues. Other studies have revealed that gender, perceived work-life balance, and mentorship quality are correlated with mental health issues [ 2 , 17 ]. Specifically, female gender [ 17 ] and transgender/gender-nonconforming Ph.D. students are, on average, more likely to suffer from mental health issues [ 2 ]. In contrast, a positive and supportive mentoring relationship or a supervisor’s leadership style, and a good work-life balance are positively associated with better mental health [ 2 , 16 ]. While some authors [ 18 ] reported a negative correlation between the Ph.D. stage and mental health, with students at later stages disclosing greater levels of distress, others [ 16 ] did not find significant differences in this regard. Moreover, another report identified that Ph.D. students’ satisfaction levels strongly correlate with their relationship with their supervisors, number of publications, hours worked, and received guidance from advisors [ 19 ]. Furthermore, several studies showed a positive correlation between job satisfaction [ 20 , 21 ] as well as a negative correlation between job insecurity [ 22 ] and mental health or perceived stress, also in Ph.D. students.
Taken together, the alarming findings on the psychological status of Ph.D. students around the globe cannot be denied. However, data on the situation of Ph.D. students in Germany are scarce [ 11 , 12 , 23 ]; thus, comparisons of different universities within a country can hardly be made. However, addressing those differences is particularly relevant since the working conditions, concerning contract types, financial situations or supervision vary strongly among different countries, geographical regions and universities or institutions [ 24 ]. Furthermore, little is known about the reasons for this precarious situation and where exactly the need for action lies [ 25 ]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct a survey among Ph.D. students at a university in the southwest of Germany to assess Ph.D. students’ mental health status. Additionally, the present study also reveals information on the extent of the need for additional support services and pinpoints the specific areas where these services ought to be emphasized. In order to help identify relevant indicators, this investigation provides empirically sound findings on the mental health situation of Ph.D. students in Germany.
Sample and procedure.
Overall, 589 participants (60.3% female, 0.8% of diverse gender, M Age = 28.8, SD Age = 3.48, range 17–48 years) out of a total of enrolled 2552 Ph.D. students (response rate: 23.1%; actual numbers of Ph.D. students at the University of Tübingen higher as some Ph.D. students are not enrolled) took part in an online survey from October to December 2021. Instructions, items, and scales were all presented in English. Participants could answer the open questions in German or English and were comprised of Ph.D. students across various stages of their Ph.D. at the University of Tübingen without further exclusion criteria. The online questionnaire was sent to Ph.D. students’ email addresses via mailing distribution lists in cooperation with the central institution for strategic researcher development (Graduate Academy) of the University of Tübingen and with Ph.D. representatives of different faculties. Ethics approval was obtained by the “Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Economics and Social Science of the University of Tübingen” and written informed consent was given by the participants.
The distribution of faculty affiliation of the participants was heterogeneous with shares of 61.8% Science, 12.4% Humanities, 11.7% Economics and Social Sciences. These numbers reflect the different sizes of faculties and are roughly aligned with the relative numbers of students (41.7% Science, 24.8% Medicine, 16.2% Humanities, 7.5% Economics and Social Sciences), with a clear underrepresentation of the Medical Faculty. Faculties with less than 20 participants or participants with multiple answers were grouped into one category for further analysis (Others 14.1%, see S1 Table ). 67.9% of the participants were German and in total, 82.9% came from European countries. During data collection, the participants were at different stages of their Ph.D. ranging from 0 to over 130 months with a mean time of two and a half years (30.0 months) of Ph.D. progress.
First, demographic data and background information on the current Ph.D. situation were collected. In a second part, to get a differentiated view, we included different measures to operationalize the mental health status of Ph.D. students. The quantitative questionnaire assessed 1) general health, generalized anxiety disorder, as well as internally reviewed self-generated questions, 2) life and job satisfaction, and quantitative job insecurity, and 3) stressors (institutional and systemic), causes of stress and potential solutions. This study also collected information regarding the degree of participants’ familiarity with the mental health resources available at the university, e.g., points of contacts for counseling, in order to evaluate whether Ph.D. students make use of these services. Moreover, participants were asked to name additional services that they may consider necessary.
General health was assessed by two items of the Perceived Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) [ 26 ]. Participants were asked to indicate how frequently they had experienced depressed moods and anhedonia over the past four weeks on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (nearly every day). Additionally, they were presented with seven items of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) [ 27 ] capturing the severity of various anxiety signs like nervousness, restlessness, and easy irritation on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (nearly every day). Both scales were used in this combination in a previous study in German higher education [ 28 ]. Furthermore, we included two binary questions on whether the participants are currently in psychotherapy and if they have ever been diagnosed with a mental disorder.
The condensed version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [ 29 ] was used to get the degree of stressful situations in life in the last twelve months or since the start of the Ph.D. [ 30 ]. The response scale ranged from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), the following being a sample item: “… how often have you felt that you were unable to control the important things in your life?” To check the internal consistency of the four items, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha which was .79.
Three items on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) were used to measure job satisfaction [ 31 ], where a higher mean score indicated higher job satisfaction. A sample item is: “I am satisfied with my job.” Cronbach’s alpha was .86. Additionally, we added one item concerning general life satisfaction [adapted from 32 ] with the same response categories to get a more holistic insight.
To assess the fear of losing the job itself, quantitative job insecurity was measured with three items (e.g., “I am worried about having to leave my job before I would like to.”) [ 33 ] on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). We calculated a mean score with higher scores indicating higher job insecurity. Cronbach’s alpha was .80.
For institutional stressors, we focused mainly on the role of supervision and included eight questions, four were framed using positive wording and four with negative wording, each with a scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (all of the time). We summarized these questions in two constructs (positive support/negative support) which had Cronbach’s alphas of .85 and .76, respectively. As for systemic stressors, we included two questions on long-term contracts and on future perspectives, again using a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
To cover the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implemented regulations, we included two questions to evaluate whether the pandemic affected the students’ general situation. On the one hand, participants were asked to pick the statement that best describes the effects of the pandemic in general (“yes, it improved my general situation”, “yes, it worsened my general situation”, “yes, but it neither worsened nor improved my general situation”, “no”), and on the other hand, they were asked to evaluate whether the particular answers provided in this survey had been affected by the pandemic from 1 (very likely) to 5 (very unlikely).
Causes of stress and potential solutions..
We included three open-ended questions in the questionnaire to get a deeper understanding of the perceived causes of stress, potential ways to improve mental health, and ways to improve the overall situation of Ph.D. students. The questions were: (1) “What is/are the cause(s) of your stress?” (2) “What would need to change to improve your mental health status?” (3) “What could be done to improve your situation?” Participants could mention as many points as they wanted (without any word limit). To analyze these questions, we built categories by following the model of inductive category development [ 34 ]. Two raters screened the first and last 20 responses in the data set and created categories for reoccurring topics (for a list containing all categories see S5 – S7 Tables). In the next steps, two new raters rated all open answers with the developed categories and added additional categories if needed. Applicable categories were rated with 1 (“category was mentioned”) or 0 (“category was not mentioned”). For example, the following response to question (1) “[My] supervisor is on maternity leave with open end, i.e. I have no one to talk to about my topic and have almost nothing so far […] I feel like I’m not good enough at this, not sure I will be able to succeed–everyone else has other projects and publications except me–no topic-related network” was rated with 1 in the following four categories: supervision (quality & quantity), social integration & interactions (private & professional), self-perception (internal factors), and perceived lack of relevant competences & experience–(sense) of progress and success. The full list of categories and inter-rater reliability as measured by Krippendorf’s Alpha is reported in Table 3 [ 35 ].
The largest part of the participants (65.5%) was temporarily employed, 12.1% got a scholarship, 7.6% were permanently employed, and 6.5% were not employed at all. The mean for total contract length was 34.3 months, with a range between two and 72 months. About 10.5% of the participants had a contract for only 12 months or shorter. A similar large variation was found in the percentage of employment with a mean of 63%, ranging from 10% to 100% of employment. For workload, we found a mean of 36.0 hours of Ph.D.-related work per week with a standard deviation of 15.6 hours. After taking a closer look at high workloads, we found that 31.3% of the participants work 45 hours or more (21.5% work 50 hours and more) per week. On top of their Ph.D. work, many Ph.D. students work in other jobs, which combined with the hours spent for Ph.D.-related work, summed up to the mean of 44.1 overall working hours per week. A detailed description can be found in S1 Table .
In an explorative manner, we compared the mean differences of the most important variables between different faculties. Most of the analyzed variables did not show significant differences. Still, we want to stress that the highly imbalanced sample sizes (see S3 Table ) could lead to false negative outcomes due to the small numbers of participants in some groups. However, we found that the mean job insecurity was significantly different between faculties ( p < .001, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test) with comparable low job insecurity in the faculties of law ( M = 2.10, SD = 1.22) and theology ( M = 2.38, SD = 1.19) and high insecurity in the faculty of humanities ( M = 3.32, SD = 0.91).
In total, 41.9% of the participants stated that their general situation worsened due to the pandemic, while 28.5% stated that the pandemic affected but it neither worsened nor improved their general situation. 33.5% of the participants stated that their responses in this study were “very likely” or “likely” to be affected by the pandemic, with a mean of 2.97 ( SD = 1.26).
The mean of the sum score for PHQ-2 in our study was 2.32 which is below the cut-off of three for major depression [ 26 ]. Yet, 33.1% of the participants were above the cut-off. For the GAD-7, the sum score for the study’s sample was 8.49. Cut points of 5 might be interpreted as mild, cut points of 10 as moderate and 15 as severe levels of anxiety [ 27 ], which implies a mild risk level for generalized anxiety with the suggestion of a follow-up examination in this sample. When asking for mental disorders, we found that 19.9% of the participants ( n = 99) have already been diagnosed with a mental disorder and 15.5% ( n = 77) are currently in psychotherapy. The sum score for the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) of 7.79 (with Min = 0, Max = 15) was above the total sum score compared to a representative British sample (6.11) [ 36 ] and a representative German community sample (4.79 for PSS-4) [ 37 ]. Job satisfaction of our participants with a total sum score of 10.06 was lower compared to a sum score of 12.79 in a German sample of workers in small- and medium sized enterprises [ 38 ]. The mean score for job satisfaction was 3.35, also lower than in a sample of Ph.D. students in Belgium (3.9) [ 39 ]. Job insecurity was with a total sum score of 8.76 higher compared to the German small- and medium sized enterprises sample (5.67) [ 38 ]. Consistently, more than 80% of the Ph.D. students in our study were worried about the lack of permanent or long-term contracts in academia ( M = 4.25, SD = 1.09; 5 indicating a strong agreement). Nevertheless, around half of the participants (54.5%) believed that having a Ph.D. would help them find a good job ( M = 3.49, SD = 0.97). We found a mean score of 3.48 ( SD = 0.98) for the positive support questions which is above average over response levels. Around 57.1% of the Ph.D. students felt supported by their supervisor “most” or “all of the time”. Around 55.7% felt comfortable when contacting the supervisor for support. The negative support construct was with a mean score of 2.18 below average: 46.7% of the participants had never felt looked down, and 62.6% had never felt mistreated by their supervisor. Nevertheless, 28.6% of the Ph.D. students answered feelings of degradation and 19.1% felt mistreated more than “some of the time”. When it comes to the frequency of the meetings with the supervisor, the mean reported a value of 2.4 laying somewhere between having meetings once a month (2) and at least every three months (3). However, 18.2% reported meeting their supervisor only once every six months or less. For sample items and detailed values see S2 Table .
When we analyzed the relationship between the studied outcomes, we found that all major constructs correlated significantly (see Table 1 ). High correlations occurred between the items of the related PHQ-2 and GAD-7 as well as their connections to the PSS. Understandably, the two institutional support dimensions were highly correlated ( r = -.69).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.t001
To predict potential driving factors for the two more direct mental health measurements, namely depression and anxiety, and for perceived stress, we employed linear regression models with these three constructs as response variables controlling for age and gender. We included relevant risk factors and stressors such as job insecurity, perceived stress, negative support and resources such as job and life satisfaction, and positive support to get a comprehensible overview over predictors. All analyses were carried out in R statistics version 4.1.3.
For depression, significant predictors were job satisfaction (β = -0.1, SE = 0.04, p < .05), life satisfaction (β = -0.3, SE = 0.04, p < .001), perceived stress (β = 0.4, SE = 0.05, p < .001) and negative institutional support (β = 0.11, SE = 0.05, p < .05, see Table 2 ). The model explained 46.7% of the variance, F (8, 482) = 54.5, p < .01.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.t002
For anxiety, all studied variables except job satisfaction and positive support were significant predictors with a variance explanation of 36.0%, F (8, 392) = 29.5, p < .01 (see Table 2 ). Noticeable was the strong influence of perceived stress on anxiety. Specifically, we observed that with an increase of one unit in perceived stress, the level of GAD-7 increased by 2.02 units and was in line with the high correlation ( r = .52, p < .01, Table 2 ).
For perceived stress, we found that job insecurity (β = 0.15, SE = 0.02, p < .01), life satisfaction (β = -0.32, SE = 0.03, p < .01) as well as negative institutional support (β = 0.13, SE = 0.04, p < .01) were significant predictors with a model variance explanation of 42.7%, F (4, 486) = 53.5, p < .01. The detailed results for this regression analysis can be found in S4 Table .
In the following, we report the main categories with short sample quotes as well as the mean frequency of the two raters (see Table 3 ; details in S5 – S7 Tables). The inter-rater reliability as indicated by Krippendorff’s alpha for the top five categories of all questions was above α ≥ .67, except for the category Manageable Workload for question MH06_1 (see Table 3 ) with α = .62; CI [0.50; 0.74]. A threshold of .67 is commonly considered as the lower conceivable limit that still allows tentative conclusions [ 40 ].
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.t003
The question “What is/are the cause(s) of your stress?” was answered by n = 446 participants. To cover the breadth of the responses, we built 18 categories. The most frequently mentioned categories were Workload & Time Pressure (mean rating frequency = 211), Self-Perception ( M = 132.5), Job-Insecurity ( M = 93), Social Integration & Interactions ( M = 91), and Supervision Quality & Quantity ( M = 88.5). The category Workload & Time Pressure includes all responses referring to the amount of work and/or deadlines. The category Self-Perception includes responses that indicate a perceived lack of competences or other personal doubts, concerns, and worries (e.g., “Since I started my Ph.D. I have almost constantly felt stupid”, “feeling like not belonging in academia, lack of self-confidence, feeling of making too little progress”). The category Job Insecurity reflects responses regarding contract length and general uncertainty about future employment (e.g., “scholarship is to be ended”, “Not knowing how things will work out after the PhD”, “Hopelessness of scientific career because there are too few full-time positions”). The category Social Integration & Interactions covers responses regarding the integration and sense of belonging in the work environment (e.g., “not valued by colleagues”, “being socially isolated at work”) as well as social issues in the private life (e.g., “Mostly my personal life, or often the lack thereof”, “problems with parents”). The category Supervision Quality & Quantity was used to capture all supervision-related responses including comments about the lack of support, feedback, frequency of meetings, or supervisors’ interest in the topics (e.g., “no clear communication with supervisor”, “lack of support from supervisor, even gossiping about me behind my back”).
When asked “What would need to change to improve your mental health status?”, the Ph.D. students’ responses ( n = 307) included various topics, some addressing compensation and income-related aspects, others highlighting supportive supervision. Overall, the responses lead to twelve different categories. Most answers referred to Supportive Supervision ( M = 98.5), followed by Job Security/Contract ( M = 59). Sample quotes with respect to supervision are e.g., “more feedback from supervisor or even more interest in my topic” or “more regular support by supervisor”. The category Job Security/Contract contains comments with respect to contract length and aspects for future employment (e.g., “no more worries about not being able to get my contract renewed”). The category Manageable Workload ( M = 56.5) includes all responses around work-life balance (e.g., “having also activities beside work”, “clear work hours”). The fourth category was Compensation & Financial Security ( M = 35) and included all income- and compensation-related aspects of the job (e.g., “Be paid 100% would be a start”, “Get paid for all the time at work”). The category Less Additional Tasks ( M = 27.5) was used to specifically cover responses mentioning the number of additional tasks within the job (“Less work in teaching/work unrelated to PhD”).
In addition to the previous question, which focused on general ways to improve the mental health status, we asked the Ph.D. students the following question: “What could be done to improve your situation?” Based on the themes and topics mentioned in the responses ( n = 281) we built eleven categories. The categories mentioned the most were Job-Security & Compensation ( M = 85.5), followed by Supportive Supervision ( M = 68), Services and Support System ( M = 39.5), Decrease Pressure to Perform ( M = 39.5), and Manageable Workload ( M = 36). The category Job-Security & Compensation includes responses like “chances of getting a long-term job in academia, not just the three-year programs” or “Fair payment (half of students get 50% others 65% even at the same institute)”. For the category Supportive Supervision “Regular meetings with people who are supportive & have an expertise in my research topic” can serve as a sample quote. The category Services and Support System was built to cover the responses named a solution outside the working group and team, such as “it would be helpful to see a university-based psychologist outside of the regular working hours” or “more courses (or better communications about them) about stress management”. The next category was labeled Decrease Pressure to Perform and included all responses that highlighted a high level of perceived pressure, such as “the performance pressure (every talk at a seminar is a job talk) is a big problem” or “Instead of pressuring academics to publish as much as possible, there should be more focus on the quality instead of the quantity of their articles/publication”. The last category, Manageable Workload , contained answers with respect to the amount of work (e.g., “Normal working hours, having really free-time without having the feeling that I should be working, it should be normal to take all vacation days”).
With respect to the open answers, it can be summarized that the factors named as causes for stress and the possible solutions cover a wide range of topics. However, there are reoccurring topics across all three questions, such as supervision, workload, and job security. The role of supervision is a reemerging motif in the qualitative content analysis. While the quality and quantity of supervision were seen as a cause of stress, supportive supervision has a positive impact on the mental health status as well as the whole situation of the Ph.D. students. Furthermore, job insecurity was mentioned as an important stressor, while stable contracts and appropriate compensation for the work and fewer extra tasks were also added for improvement. Workload and time pressure were the most often stated causes of stress, followed by self-doubts and worries about not having enough competencies for the job. A manageable workload, fewer additional tasks, and a lower pressure to perform were indicated by the participants as valuable improvements.
The conducted survey investigates the mental health of Ph.D. students at a university in the southwest of Germany and gives insights into what causes stress and mental health disorders and where there is a need for further support services. Our qualitative and quantitative analyses revealed interesting and consistent results on the alarming situation of the mental health of Ph.D. students.
First, our quantitative results revealed that one-third of the participants were above the cut-off for depression which is an indicator of a high risk of depression that should be checked by a health professional. On average, the surveyed Ph.D. students were at a mild risk level for an anxiety disorder. While our study design does not allow us to diagnose mental illnesses, it identifies problems that need to be pursued further. It reveals some unhealthy working conditions and increased risks for mental illnesses. Our qualitative and quantitative results showed consistently that many of the most prominent issues for our study’s participants are personal factors such as perceived stress, life satisfaction and self-doubt, but modulated by structural deficits such as financial and job security as well as workload and time pressure. The quantitative analyses revealed that life satisfaction, perceived stress and negative support are the main predictors for anxiety disorders as well as depression. Additionally, low job satisfaction was a significant predictor of depression and job insecurity for anxiety. Furthermore, we identified job insecurity, life satisfaction as well as negative institutional support as predictors for perceived stress.
Second and besides mental health problems, our quantitative analyses showed how supervision and the work environment played a role in the mental health and general well-being of Ph.D. students. Deficient supervision could affect Ph.D. students’ perceived job insecurity and job dissatisfaction. Although good supervision was not a predictor for satisfaction, being comfortable with contacting the supervisor could lower the perceived stress. This shows the importance of the supervisor-student relationship and highlights the importance of the social work environment, which was also mentioned by study participants in the open-end questions. While the categories in the qualitative analyses mainly served to find recurring themes, they can also be used to distinguish between different levels. Some participants reflected causes of stress on a personal level (e.g., self-perception). In contrast, others set the focus on the supervisor level or working group level, or even on the more structural abstract level of the academic system.
Third, our study does not only investigate the mental health situation of Ph.D. students, but we also analyze how the situation and mental health status could be improved. Many suggestions were straightforward given the results of the causes of stress, i.e., bad supervision should be improved, and a secure income should be guaranteed. However, we were also able to show that Ph.D. students wish to make use of services and support systems that could be provided by the university. Furthermore, less pressure to perform and a manageable workload with fewer additional tasks besides the Ph.D. project might decrease the stress level and improve mental health status.
Overall, detrimental mental health is a known problem in academia, and we show another example of its extent as well as opportunities for improvement at a German university.
Data on Ph.D. students’ situation in Germany are scarce, and we, therefore, perform a broader comparison with Ph.D. students around the world. However, the results of this comparison should be taken with caution as our questionnaire and time of survey conduction are unique. We focus mainly on PHQ-2 [ 26 ] and GAD-7 [ 27 ], for which other studies in Germany during the pandemic showed that–compared to pre-COVID-19 reference values–these measurements were significantly increased [ 41 ]. Two studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic include the same scales [ 41 , 42 ] and reveal similar results for the general population in Germany, while in our later study from October to December 2021, the risk for anxiety and depression is slightly higher. In our study, one-third of the participants (33.1%) was above the cut-off for major depression, compared to the studies in a 1.5-year earlier timeframe, where 14.1% (March to May 2020; n = 15704, 70.7% female gender; 42.6% university education) [ 42 ] and 21.4% (March to July 2020; n = 16918; 69.7% female gender; 42.4% university education [ 41 ] of the participants with diverse occupations were above the cut-off. Furthermore, in our study, 39.2% of the participants were at the mild risk level for anxiety compared to 27.4% of the participants in an earlier study [ 41 ]. This shows the increase in depression and anxiety during the pandemic and even higher numbers in our study compared with the German general population. Nevertheless, compared to a survey at public research universities in the United States from May to July 2020, the number of doctoral students screened for major depressive disorder symptoms with the same measurements PHQ-2 was higher with 36% [ 43 ], indicating high numbers of mental issues in academia in several countries.
While using the same scales and items for job satisfaction and job insecurity, our study showed worse sum scores compared to a sample of employers and employees in small- and medium sized enterprises in Germany (December 2020 to May 2021; n = 828; 53.7% female gender, M = 41.5 years; 38.8% higher education entrance qualification) [ 38 ]. It seems that Ph.D. students have higher job insecurity and job dissatisfaction compared to workers in diverse branches and occupations. This may result from different contract types, as workers, especially in industrial sectors, have long-term contracts. The recurrent factor of time pressure and workload, also mentioned in the open-end questions, is backed up by the raw numbers of the contract types and working hours, which may also lead to job dissatisfaction. Although the mean contract type in our study is 63%, the mean number of hours dedicated to Ph.D. work ( M = 36.0, SD = 15.6 hours) is almost in the range of a full-time position. What is more, the participants reported a total weekly workload ( M = 44.1, SD = 11.4 hours) that exceeds a typical full-time position in Germany [ 44 ]. The discrepancy between Ph.D. work and corresponding contract types results in a mean of 12.1 hours of overwork per week (based on a 38.5-hour full-time contract, which is the standard contract for Ph.D. students in Germany). This is in line with previous studies where the authors found a mean of 12.6 hours of overwork per week for Ph.D. students in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics disciplines in Germany [ 45 ]. However, the authors did not include any further work obligations and corrected for contract types with low percentages, and thus the results are difficult to compare directly. Furthermore, we used gender as a control variable, which turned out to be statistically significant for anxiety and stress. This is in line with related work where the female gender was reported to be higher correlated with mental disorders [ 2 , 17 , 46 , 47 ].
Generalization..
While we aimed for our study to reflect the current situation for Ph.D. students as best as possible, there are points that are limiting the generalization of the results or are beyond the scope of this survey. First, we collected the data between October and December 2021, a time at which the ordinance on protection against risks of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (“Coronavirus-Schutzverordnung”) [ 48 ] was still in place in Germany and influenced private and working life. About one-third (33.5%) of our study population stated that it is very likely or likely that the pandemic affected their answers. Nonetheless, a pandemic is a situation that can reoccur and is only one more reason to proactively set up a resilient Ph.D. graduation system. Another research group [ 49 ] investigated how mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and concluded that the pandemic could even be seen as a chance to improve mental health services [ 49 ]. Nevertheless, we would like to point out that generalizing from a mental health study conducted during a pandemic may be difficult.
Overall, around 23% of all Ph.D. students at the University of Tübingen [ 50 ] participated in our study, which is slightly below the response rate in other similar studies [e.g., 16 ]. Considering that university students are very frequently invited to various questionnaires and studies, and given that our survey lasted approximately 20 minutes, it can be argued that the participants were motivated to invest time into their responses. However, our study population remains small compared to the total number of Ph.D. students in Germany. Moreover, we want to emphasize the likely sample bias in our data. We recruited participants mainly via mailing lists and our project therefore probably has especially appealed to people who are already interested in health or aware of mental health issues. However, given our relatively large coverage of almost a quarter of all Ph.D. students at the University of Tübingen, even a selective sample can give us insights into overall tendencies. The transferability of our results to other German universities or even universities in other countries is also not guaranteed as the academic systems can largely differ. Additionally, the results of this study are influenced by the overall living conditions the Ph.D. students experience. As Tübingen is a small town in the southwest of Germany, a comparison to larger cities or other countries might not be viable as the conditions probably differ largely.
Finally, even within one university, the generalization of our results is further limited by the uneven distribution of the participants across faculties. Most participants (61.8%) were from the Science Faculty, which is also the largest department (in terms of the highest total number of students) at the University of Tübingen. This skewness limits the faculty-wise comparisons, and we would expect to find interesting insights into the different graduate programs by conducting detailed comparisons. These differences could not only arise from different academic traditions but also from the highly varying expectations on the scope of a Ph.D. thesis. It follows that more detailed and systematic monitoring and data collection in national and international surveys are needed.
In a cross-sectional study, we investigate the current situation of Ph.D. students. While this is a valid and important instrument to access the current state, it cannot give us information about the dynamic changes in the transition phase between undergraduate studies and the Ph.D. as well as across the Ph.D. [ 51 ]. To track these changes or make comparisons over time, a longitudinal study design or propensity score matching procedures [ 52 ] could give further insights. It is therefore desirable to establish regular surveys and monitoring systems either on a university level or in a national survey to provide information on the impact of undertaken actions and implemented changes. We used a mixed quantitative and qualitative research approach. While this provides information on distinct levels, there are some pitfalls. For example, the open answer categories were defined post-hoc. While this gives the possibility for the participants to express their thoughts freely, it makes a systematic analysis more difficult, and the analysis might be biased by the evaluators. Overall, it is important to summarize and statistically analyze our study results on an overall level, but it must not be forgotten that every person and Ph.D. project is individual.
The overall scarce data, paired with worrisome flashlights on the mental health situation of Ph.D. students in different countries, highlights the need for more systematic monitoring of mental health in academia. For this purpose, standardized as well as domain-specific scales for Ph.D. students need to be established and longitudinal data needs to be collected. This would enable researchers to measure the effect of larger environmental changes (such as the COVID-19 pandemic or economic developments) and to measure the impact of interventions targeted to improve the situation. At the same time, we propose including qualitative measurements to assess unknown variables and the unique situation each Ph.D. student faces. These could also inform the development of additional quantitative measurable constructs to reflect the dynamic situation in academia. Such monitoring systems can either be implemented at the university level to give detailed insights into the situation at a specific university or on a national level to get an overall impression of Ph.D. students’ health issues. Optimally, a survey should be promoted from an independent self-governing institution dedicated to advancing science and research. While the demands for a better mental health situation for Ph.D. students are obvious, systematical and political changes need to be addressed in the research community and in academia.
Our mixed methods research approach allows us not only to find out more about the issues of Ph.D. students but also to draw conclusions about what is needed to improve their situation. However, finding solutions to a recognized problem is not a straightforward task, and complex problems often require a step-by-step solution. Therefore, we assume that more practical implications, which could be indicated by an established monitoring system, will be necessary once the first steps have been taken.
In general, we can group interventions into at least four levels that can influence each other: the Ph.D. students themselves, the supervisors, the universities or research institutions, and the greater political context and academic culture. Building on the responses about potential improvements and additional services, we identified the following practical implications:
On an individual level, the main interventions could happen in capacity building (e.g., in time/project management, self-reflection or mental health awareness) but also by being more proactive about changing working modes (e.g., establishing collaborations or a peer counseling system) or by improving the social environment. This could additionally lead to a change in self-perception, for which direct interventions might be more difficult. At this point, we want to highlight that changes on the individual level aim to prevent the development of mental health problems and strengthen the resilience of Ph.D. students. They can at no point replace professional support once such problems have been manifested.
The level of supervision seems to be the most urgent and promising target for an improvement of Ph.D. students’ situation. As supervisors are usually defining a project and its goals, but also additional teaching or other tasks, they are responsible for setting the workload and time constraints. Not only the hard constraints of the working conditions but also the quality of supervision was often mentioned to be highly deficient. Possible interventions could target improving the skills in personnel management of supervisors. But also, clear supervision requirements and guidelines could be imposed by the university. Such agreements (including expectations on the thesis, supervision times and conciliation mechanisms) might be an option to enhance the agreements in a supervisor-student relationship. While these suggestions are not new, and some of them are theoretically established in some university departments, our study results suggest that they are often ignored or not properly implemented, and more binding agreements and control mechanisms need to be made. Establishing additional external supervision, where for example the personnel management is reflected, might also give new perspectives and enhance demanding situations. At this point, it has to be considered that there are strong dependencies between Ph.D. students and their supervisors since, in many cases, it is the supervisors who have a major impact on the outcome of a Ph.D. thesis, such as the final grade. It remains challenging how Ph.D. students can criticize the supervising situation without negatively impacting the personal relationship with their supervisors.
Further interventions on the level of universities and research institutions might include support in bureaucratic processes and providing more information on different contact points (e.g., for mental health services). It is obvious that the aforementioned interventions (such as capacity building courses for Ph.D. students and supervisors) are dependent on the support of the central facilities of the research institution. Furthermore, highlighting the high prevalence of mental health problems, for example, at mandatory introductory sessions for Ph.D. students, might help to raise awareness about this topic. This could help unexperienced young researchers to notice signs of anxiety and depression early on before these mental disorders manifest. Finally, public events on this topic could reduce the stigma associated with it, making it easier for affected Ph.D. students to seek help. Such events might also be used to remind the students that it is important to take care not only of their physical but also mental health, for instance, by strengthening social relationships and pursuing hobbies which are not work-related.
Lastly, there are also changes in the political setting and academic culture needed. This includes a fair payment system, reasonable control of contract lengths and extensions, and more perspectives for long-term positions in academia. Considering that the vast majority of Ph.D. students will end up in positions outside of academia, it could be beneficial to better prepare students for careers in alternative job markets, such as industry. Such interventions might directly influence the job insecurity and job dissatisfaction of Ph.D. students. In Germany, the current regulations for temporary academic employment are being evaluated [ 53 ], but even propositions from the conference of university rectors [ 54 ] seem not to be sufficient for fundamental changes. These changes would also need a shift in the academic culture [ 55 ], in which “publish or perish” is still a guiding theme leading to high pressure to perform. Working on a cultural shift is a task for all scientists. This will lead to a more sustainable work culture from which all stakeholders might benefit.
All in all, there is an interplay and dependence of all mentioned levels. Importantly, most problems mentioned in the survey can result from shortcomings on multiple levels, and therefore interventions on more than one level are needed for a satisfying solution. For example, changes to improve the mental health situation on an individual level can be dependent on the consent of the supervisor and can also be negatively impacted by already existing mental health issues. In addition to individual responsibility for health, it is important to systematically target prevention and change the system on the aforementioned levels so that Ph.D. students are better and more quickly supported when mental health problems arise.
This study shows once again the detrimental mental health situation of Ph.D. students in academia. By analyzing the mental health of Ph.D. students at a German university, we found alarming hints of depressive and anxious tendencies that are in line with other comparable studies. Furthermore, we have identified main stressors, such as perceived stress or self-doubts, and resources, such as a positive student-supervisor relationship. Understanding conditional factors and being able to improve the situation depend on such identifications. With our study, we provide first insights of the status quo for the University chair, the Graduate Academy, and other stakeholders in the academic system. We invite them to inspect the results and suggestions responsibly so that actions to assess and improve the conditions for Ph.D. students’ mental health and well-being can be taken in the future. Based on our data, additional offers for Ph.D. students, as well as their supervisors, should be created and existing ones sustainably modified. Positive conditions and resources for mental health and well-being will not restrict to academia but will affect all areas of life. While an increased mental health state is an indispensable value on its own, additional benefits can be created for research, teaching, practice, and society. As such, mental health is a big part of sustainable living and should have a high priority for all people. While this is already acknowledged in the sustainable development goals, further steps need to be taken to raise awareness and provide support throughout society.
S1 table. sample items and descriptives of ph.d. students ( n = 589): percentage (%), mean ( m ), standard deviation ( sd ), minimum and maximum ( min - max )..
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s001
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s002
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s003
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s004
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s005
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s006
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288103.s007
We would like to express our gratitude to all participants of the survey as well to the sustainAbility Ph.D. initiative at the University of Tübingen. We thank Dr. Stephanie Rosenstiel for support with the ethics approval and Prof. Dr. Birgit Derntl and Prof. Dr. Andreas Fallgatter for their helpful feedback on the conception of the questionnaire. We thank Mumina Javed and Monja Neuser for their support in the early phase of the project.
Welcome and thank you for your interest in the Department of Mental Health.
The Department and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health have a great deal to offer prospective students. We invite you to learn more and connect with current students .
The Department of Mental Health offers educational programs that lead to the doctor of philosophy (PhD) and the master of health science (MHS) degrees. We also offer postdoctoral training, two certificate programs and a special Summer Institute.
The Department of Mental Health offers a doctoral level program, a master's program in health science and a combined bachelors/masters program.
The MHS is a nine-month degree program that provides a foundation in the research methods and content-area knowledge essential to public mental health.
The PhD program provides advanced training in the application of research methods to understand and enhance public mental health.
The Bachelor's/MHS program gives Public Health Studies majors at Johns Hopkins University an opportunity to seamlessly extend their undergraduate studies to graduate-level coursework and research.
Postdoctoral training.
The Department of Mental Health offers opportunities for postdoctoral training, including three training programs funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and one funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) , which complement the research-based training of doctoral students and postdoctoral fellows. The department also participates in an interdisciplinary program, funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). In addition, individual faculty may be able to support postdoctoral fellows through a research grant. See the Funded Training Programs .
Public mental health research.
Our certificate program provides graduate training in understanding the causes and consequences of mental disorders in populations. The goals of the program are to increase the epidemiologic expertise of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals, as well as the number of epidemiologists, biostatisticians and health policy makers interested in psychiatric disorders.
The certificate introduces current issues in mental health policy including economic evaluation of mental and substance disorders and their treatments; access to mental health care treatments and utilization patterns; and mental health care financing, insurance, and delivery system issues in the US. It is open to Johns Hopkins University graduate students interested in policy, advocacy, and research careers within the field of mental health and junior and mid-level public health professionals interested in expanding their knowledge base and expertise in mental health services and economics and related policy issues.
Summer institute in mental health research.
Summer Institute in Mental Health Research participants will understand the latest findings on the occurrences of mental health and substance use disorders in the population and their implications for public mental health; know the steps involved in the scientific, empirical evaluation of services and interventions targeted for mental health outcomes; and acquire the skills and knowledge needed in using the state of the art methodological tools for collecting and analyzing mental health data.
As part of its growing online educational program, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health offers Massive Open Online Courses – also known as MOOCs -- in collaboration with Coursera. Department of Mental Health faculty are teaching the following MOOC this term:
Major Depression in the Population: A Public Health Approach
This course is about the framework of public health as applied to the specific psychiatric disorder of major depression. View a video for more details about this course.
Department of Mental Health Faculty : William Eaton, PhD, Wietse A. Tol, PhD and Ramin Mojtabai, MD Course Description : Illustrates the principles of public health applied to depressive disorder, including principles of epidemiology, transcultural psychiatry, health services research and prevention.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Overview: Mental Health Topic Ideas. Mood disorders. Anxiety disorders. Psychotic disorders. Personality disorders. Obsessive-compulsive disorders. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Neurodevelopmental disorders. Eating disorders.
The PhD degree is a research-oriented doctoral degree. In the first two years, students take core courses in the Departments of Mental Health, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, in research ethics, and attend weekly department seminars. Students must complete a written comprehensive exam (in January of their second year), a preliminary exam, two ...
Best Mental Health Topics for Your Dissertation. Topic 1: Kids and their relatives with cancer: psychological challenges. Topic 2: Hematopoietic device reaction in ophthalmology patient's radiation therapy. Topic 3: Psychological effects of cyberbullying Vs. physical bullying: A counter study. Topic 4: Whether or not predictive processing is ...
Conduct disorder among children. Role of therapy in behavioural disorders. Eating and drinking habits and mental health. Addictive behaviour patterns for teenagers in high school. Discuss mental implications of gambling and sex addiction. Impact of maladaptive behaviours on the society. Extreme mood changes.
Examples of systemic racism-related psychology research topics include: Access to mental health resources based on race. The prevalence of BIPOC mental health therapists in a chosen area. The impact of systemic racism on mental health and self-worth. Racism training for mental health workers.
PH.330.660. Grant Writing for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (fourth term) 3. PH.330.611. Writing Publishable Manuscripts for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (second year and beyond only - second term) 2. PH.330.605. Doctoral Seminar in Public Mental Health (2nd year PhD students only) 1.
Research Areas. The Department of Mental Health covers a wide array of topics related to mental health, mental illness, and substance abuse. We emphasize ongoing research that enriches and stimulates the teaching programs. All students and fellows are encouraged to participate in at least one research group. Faculty and students from multiple ...
The Mental Health PhD Program has also allowed me to form strong bonds with other PhD students and meet eminent researchers in the mental health field." ... is an academic and professional development initiative for currently-enrolled PhD students who are researching a topic within Mental Health. Therefore, this program does not directly enrol ...
PhD. An international first, the PhD in Mental Health meets the needs of those wishing to gain a deep and critical insight into mental health theory, research and practice and to develop or enhance research skills whilst fulfilling their existing responsibilities. The programme is offered part-time and combines innovative distance learning with ...
The PhD program in Social and Behavioral Sciences is designed for individuals seeking training for careers as social and behavioral scientists, health educators, and health promotion or communication specialists in the public health arena. The curriculum centers on the application of social and behavioral science perspectives to research on ...
King's PhD Programme in Mental Health Research for Health Professionals. King's College London. The applications are now open for October 2025 entry in the King's PhD Programme in Mental Health Research for Health Professionals, funded by Wellcome and King's College London. Read more. Funded PhD Programme (UK Students Only) 4 Year PhD ...
And it has hosted two sessions on mental-health topics. "PAWS isn't a programme that specifically set out to improve mental health in the sciences, but by building a community and having ...
The Centre for Global Mental Health specialises in providing high quality PhD training opportunities in topics related to Global Mental Health, and offers students a broad range of possible PhD supervisors to gain the skills they will need for a career in mental health research. The research projects are mainly based in low and middle income ...
U.S. survey data in prior published research indicates that about 14.9% of Ph.D. students in economics and 10 to 13.5% of Ph.D. students in political science have received mental health treatment ...
The UCL Wellcome 4-year PhD in Mental Health Science is an opportunity for students to train in a wide range of fields relevant to mental health research. This programme, funded in 2019, is the first of its kind in the UK, representing an investment of over £5m by the Wellcome Trust. It is based in the UCL Institute of Mental Health, and will ...
PhD-PHS in Social and Behavioral Sciences. Prospective doctoral students interested in the Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences should apply to the Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program in Population Health Sciences and choose Social & Behavioral Sciences as their Field of Study.The PhD in Population Health Sciences is offered under the aegis of the Harvard Graduate School of Arts and ...
King's PhD Programme in Mental Health Research for Health Professionals Start date. October 2023. Programme. Our PhD programme is available to health professionals (including but not limited to doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, allied healthcare practitioners) across a diverse range of topics relevant to mental health science.
We are the only department of mental health in a school of public health in the U.S. We bring together experts across disciplines—from childhood adversity to aging, workplace health to global health—to understand mental health, prevent and manage mental health and substance use disorders, and advocate for improved access to mental health ...
Our PhD/MPhil Mental Health programme enables you to undertake a research project that will improve understanding of Mental Health. Our postgraduate researchprogrammes in mental healthare based on individually tailored projects. Applicants are specifically matched with a primary academic supervisor according to their research interest and ...
SHPS Doctoral Enquiries. +44 (0) 20 7040 5972. [email protected]. Help us to improve this page. A PhD/MPhil in Mental Health at City, University of London offers you the opportunity to carry out research that will make a real difference to people's lives.
At that time, 29% of 5,700 respondents listed their mental health as an area of concern — and just under half of those had sought help for anxiety or depression caused by their PhD study. Things ...
Mental health issues among Ph.D. students are prevalent and on the rise, with multiple studies showing that Ph.D. students are more likely to experience symptoms of mental health-related issues than the general population. However, the data is still sparse. This study aims to investigate the mental health of 589 Ph.D. students at a public university in Germany using a mixed quantitative and ...
The Department of Mental Health offers a doctoral level program, a master's program in health science and a combined bachelors/masters program. Master's Master of Health Science (MHS) in Mental Health. The MHS is a nine-month degree program that provides a foundation in the research methods and content-area knowledge essential to public mental ...
How Trained Service Professionals and Self-Advocacy Makes a Difference for Youth with Mental Health, Substance Abuse, or Co-occurring Issues. Statistics reflecting the number of youth suffering from mental health, substance abuse, and co-occurring disorders highlight the necessity for schools, families, support staff, and communities to work together to develop targeted, coordinated, and ...