research literature gap

How to find and fill gaps in the literature [Research Gaps Made Easy]

As we dive deeper into the realm of research, one term repeatedly echoes in the corridors of academia: “gap in literature.”

But what does it mean to find a gap in the literature, and why is it so crucial for your research project?

A gap in the literature refers to an area that hasn’t been studied or lacks substantial inquiry in your field of study. Identifying such gaps allows you to contribute fresh insights and innovation, thereby extending the existing body of knowledge.

It’s the cornerstone for every dissertation or research paper, setting the stage for an introduction that explicitly outlines the scope and aim of your investigation.

This gap review isn’t limited to what has been published in peer-reviewed journals; it may also include conference papers, dissertations, or technical reports, i.e., types of papers that provide an overview of ongoing research. 

This step is where your detective work comes in—by spotting trends, common methodologies, and unanswered questions, you can unearth an opportunity to explore an unexplored domain, thereby finding a research gap. 

Why Looking for Research Gaps is Essential

Looking for research gaps is essential as it enables the discovery of novel and unique contributions to a particular field.

By identifying these gaps, found through methods such as analyzing concluding remarks of recent papers, literature reviews, examining research groups’ non-peer-reviewed outputs, and utilizing specific search terms on Google Scholar, one can discern the trajectory of ongoing research and unearth opportunities for original inquiry.

These gaps highlight areas of potential innovation, unexplored paths, and disputed concepts, serving as the catalyst for valuable contributions and progression in the field. Hence, finding research gaps forms the basis of substantial and impactful scientific exploration.

Then your research can contribute by finding and filling the gap in knowledge. 

Method 1: Utilizing Concluding Remarks of Recent Research

When embarking on a quest to find research gaps, the concluding remarks of recent research papers can serve as an unexpected treasure map.

This section of a paper often contains insightful comments on the limitations of the work and speculates on future research directions.

These comments, although not directly pointing to a research gap, can hint at where the research is heading and what areas require further exploration.

Consider these remarks as signposts, pointing you towards uncharted territories in your field of interest.

For example, you may come across a conclusion in a recent paper on artificial intelligence that indicates a need for more research on ethical considerations. This gives you a direction to explore – the ethical implications of AI. 

However, it’s important to bear in mind that while these statements provide valuable leads, they aren’t definitive indicators of research gaps. They provide a starting point, a clue to the vast research puzzle.

Your task is to take these hints, explore further, and discern the most promising areas for your investigation. It’s a bit like being a detective, except your clues come from scholarly papers instead of crime scenes!

Method 2: Examining Research Groups and Non-peer Reviewed Outputs

If concluding remarks are signposts to potential research gaps, non-peer reviewed outputs such as preprints, conference presentations, and dissertations are detailed maps guiding you towards the frontier of research.

These resources reflect the real-time development in the field, giving you a sense of the “buzz” that surrounds hot topics.

These materials, presented but not formally published, offer a sneak peek into ongoing studies, providing you with a rich source of information to identify emerging trends and potential research gaps.

For instance, a presentation on the impact of climate change on mental health might reveal a new line of research that’s in its early stages.

One word of caution: while these resources can be enlightening, they have not undergone the rigorous peer review process that published articles have.

This means the quality of research may vary and the findings should be interpreted with a critical eye. Remember, the key is to pinpoint where the research is heading and then carve out your niche within that sphere.

Exploring non-peer reviewed outputs allows you to stay ahead of the curve, harnessing the opportunity to investigate and contribute to a burgeoning area of study before it becomes mainstream.

Method 3: Searching for ‘Promising’ and ‘Preliminary’ Results on Google Scholar

With a plethora of research at your fingertips, Google Scholar can serve as a remarkable tool in your quest to discover research gaps. The magic lies in a simple trick: search for the phrases “promising results” or “preliminary results” within your research area. Why these specific phrases? Scientists often use them when they have encouraging but not yet fully verified findings.

To illustrate, consider an example. Type “promising results and solar cell” into Google Scholar, and filter by recent publications.

The search results will show you recent studies where researchers have achieved promising outcomes but may not have fully developed their ideas or resolved all challenges.

These “promising” or “preliminary” results often represent areas ripe for further exploration.

They hint at a research question that has been opened but not fully answered. However, tread carefully.

While these findings can indeed point to potential research gaps, they can also lead to dead ends. It’s crucial to examine these leads with a critical eye and further corroborate them with a comprehensive review of related research.

Nevertheless, this approach provides a simple, effective starting point for identifying research gaps, serving as a launchpad for your explorations.

Method 4: Reading Around the Subject

Comprehensive reading forms the bedrock of effective research. When hunting for research gaps, you need to move beyond just the preliminary findings and delve deeper into the context surrounding these results.

This involves broadening your view and reading extensively around your topic of interest.

In the course of your reading, you will start identifying common themes, reoccurring questions, and shared challenges in the research.

Over time, patterns will emerge, helping you recognize areas where research is thin or missing.

For instance, in studying autonomous vehicles, you might find recurring questions about regulatory frameworks, pointing to a potential gap in the legal aspects of this technology.

However, this method is not about scanning through a huge volume of literature aimlessly. It involves strategic and critical reading, looking for patterns, inconsistencies, and areas where the existing literature falls short.

It’s akin to painting a picture where some parts are vividly detailed while others remain sketchy. Your goal is to identify these sketchy areas and fill in the details.

So grab your academic reading list, and start diving into the ocean of knowledge. Remember, it’s not just about the depth, but also the breadth of your reading, that will lead you to a meaningful research gap.

Method 5: Consulting with Current Researchers

Few methods are as effective in uncovering research gaps as engaging in conversations with active researchers in your field of interest.

Current researchers, whether they are PhD students, postdoctoral researchers, or supervisors, are often deeply engaged in ongoing studies and understand the current challenges in their respective fields.

Start by expressing genuine interest in their work. Rather than directly asking for research gaps, inquire about the challenges they are currently facing in their projects.

You can ask, “What are the current challenges in your research?”

Their responses can highlight potential areas of exploration, setting you on the path to identifying meaningful research gaps.

Moreover, supervisors, particularly those overseeing PhD and Master’s students, often have ideas for potential research topics. By asking the right questions, you can tap into their wealth of knowledge and identify fruitful areas of study.

While the act of discovering research gaps can feel like a solitary journey, it doesn’t have to be.

Engaging with others who are grappling with similar challenges can provide valuable insights and guide your path. After all, the world of research thrives on collaboration and shared intellectual curiosity.

Method 6: Utilizing Online Tools

The digital age has made uncovering research gaps easier, thanks to a plethora of online tools that help visualize the interconnectedness of research literature.

Platforms such as:

• Connected Papers,
• ResearchRabbit, and

allow you to see how different papers in your field relate to one another, thereby creating a web of knowledge.

Upon creating this visual web, you may notice that many papers point towards a certain area, but then abruptly stop. This could indicate a potential research gap, suggesting that the topic hasn’t been adequately addressed or has been sidelined for some reason.

By further reading around this apparent gap, you can understand if it’s a genuine knowledge deficit or merely a research path that was abandoned due to inherent challenges or a dead end.

These online tools provide a bird’s eye view of the literature, helping you understand the broader landscape of research in your area of interest.

By examining patterns and relationships among studies, you can effectively zero in on unexplored areas, making these tools a valuable asset in your quest for research gaps.

Method 7: Seeking Conflicting Ideas in the Literature

In scientific research, areas of conflict can often be fertile ground for finding research gaps. These are areas where there’s a considerable amount of disagreement or ongoing debate among researchers.

If you can bring a fresh perspective, a new technique, or a novel hypothesis to such a contentious issue, you may well be on your way to uncovering a significant research gap.

Take, for instance, an area in psychology where there is a heated debate about the influence of nature versus nurture.

If you can introduce a new dimension to the debate or a method to test a novel hypothesis, you could potentially fill a significant gap in the literature.

Investigating areas of conflict not only opens avenues for exploring research gaps, but it also provides opportunities for you to make substantial contributions to your field. The key is to be able to see the potential for a new angle and to muster the courage to dive into contentious waters.

However, engaging with conflicts in research requires careful navigation.

Striking the right balance between acknowledging existing research and championing new ideas is crucial.

In the end, resolving these conflicts or adding significant depth to the debate can be incredibly rewarding and contribute greatly to your field.

The Right Perspective Towards Research Gaps

The traditional understanding of research gaps often involves seeking out a ‘bubble’ of missing knowledge in the sea of existing research, a niche yet to be explored. However, in today’s fast-paced research environment, these bubbles are becoming increasingly rare.

The paradigm of finding research gaps is shifting. It’s no longer just about seeking out holes in existing knowledge, but about understanding the leading edge of research and the directions it could take. It involves not just filling in the gaps but extending the boundaries of knowledge.

To identify such opportunities, develop a comprehensive understanding of the research landscape, identify emerging trends, and keep a close eye on recent advancements.

Look for the tendrils of knowledge extending out into the unknown and think about how you can push them further. It might be a challenging task, but it offers the potential for making substantial, impactful contributions to your field. 

Remember, every great innovation begins at the edge of what is known. That’s where your research gap might be hiding.

Wrapping up – Literature and research gaps

Finding and filling a gap in the literature is a task crucial to every research project. It begins with a systematic review of existing literature – a quest to identify what has been studied and more importantly, what hasn’t.

You must delve into the rich terrain of literature in their field, from the seminal, citation-heavy research articles to the fresh perspective of conference papers. Identifying the gap in the literature necessitates a thorough evaluation of existing studies to refine your area of interest and map the scope and aim of your future research.

The purpose is to explicitly identify the gap that exists, so you can contribute to the body of knowledge by providing fresh insights. The process involves a series of steps, from consulting with faculty and experts in the field to identify potential trends and outdated methodologies, to being methodological in your approach to identify gaps that have emerged.

Upon finding a gap in the literature, we’ll ideally have a clearer picture of the research need and an opportunity to explore this unexplored domain.

It is important to remember that the task does not end with identifying the gap. The real challenge lies in drafting a research proposal that’s objective, answerable, and can quantify the impact of filling this gap. 

It’s important to consult with your advisor, and also look at commonly used parameters and preliminary evidence. Only then can we complete the task of turning an identified gap in the literature into a valuable contribution to your field, a contribution that’s peer-reviewed and adds to the body of knowledge.

To find a research gap is to stand on the shoulders of giants, looking beyond the existing research to further expand our understanding of the world.

Dr Andrew Stapleton has a Masters and PhD in Chemistry from the UK and Australia. He has many years of research experience and has worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow and Associate at a number of Universities. Although having secured funding for his own research, he left academia to help others with his YouTube channel all about the inner workings of academia and how to make it work for you.

Thank you for visiting Academia Insider.

We are here to help you navigate Academia as painlessly as possible. We are supported by our readers and by visiting you are helping us earn a small amount through ads and affiliate revenue - Thank you!

2024 © Academia Insider

info This is a space for the teal alert bar.

notifications This is a space for the yellow alert bar.

Research Process

• Brainstorming
• Explore Google This link opens in a new window
• Explore Web Resources
• Explore Background Information
• Explore Books
• Explore Scholarly Articles
• Narrowing a Topic
• Primary and Secondary Resources
• Academic, Popular & Trade Publications
• Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Journals
• Grey Literature
• Clinical Trials
• Evidence Based Treatment
• Scholarly Research
• Database Research Log
• Search Limits
• Keyword Searching
• Boolean Operators
• Phrase Searching
• Truncation & Wildcard Symbols
• Proximity Searching
• Field Codes
• Subject Terms and Database Thesauri
• Reading a Scientific Article
• Website Evaluation
• Article Keywords and Subject Terms
• Cited References
• Citing Articles
• Related Results
• Search Within Publication
• Database Alerts & RSS Feeds
• Personal Database Accounts
• Persistent URLs
• Literature Gap and Future Research
• Web of Knowledge
• Annual Reviews
• Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses
• Finding Seminal Works
• Exhausting the Literature
• Finding Dissertations
• Researching Theoretical Frameworks
• Research Methodology & Design
• Tests and Measurements
• Organizing Research & Citations This link opens in a new window
• Picking Where to Publish
• Bibliometrics
• Learn the Library This link opens in a new window

Research Articles

These examples below illustrate how researchers from different disciplines identified gaps in existing literature. For additional examples, try a NavigatorSearch using this search string: ("Literature review") AND (gap*)

• Addressing the Recent Developments and Potential Gaps in the Literature of Corporate Sustainability
• Applications of Psychological Science to Teaching and Learning: Gaps in the Literature
• Attitudes, Risk Factors, and Behaviours of Gambling Among Adolescents and Young People: A Literature Review and Gap Analysis
• Do Psychological Diversity Climate, HRM Practices, and Personality Traits (Big Five) Influence Multicultural Workforce Job Satisfaction and Performance? Current Scenario, Literature Gap, and Future Research Directions
• Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Identification of an Existing Gap in the Field
• Evidence and Gaps in the Literature on HIV/STI Prevention Interventions Targeting Migrants in Receiving Countries: A Scoping Review
• Homeless Indigenous Veterans and the Current Gaps in Knowledge: The State of the Literature
• A Literature Review and Gap Analysis of Emerging Technologies and New Trends in Gambling
• A Review of Higher Education Image and Reputation Literature: Knowledge Gaps and a Research Agenda
• Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019
• Where Should We Go From Here? Identified Gaps in the Literature in Psychosocial Interventions for Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder and Comorbid Anxiety

What is a ‘gap in the literature’?

The gap, also considered the missing piece or pieces in the research literature, is the area that has not yet been explored or is under-explored. This could be a population or sample (size, type, location, etc.), research method, data collection and/or analysis, or other research variables or conditions.

It is important to keep in mind, however, that just because you identify a gap in the research, it doesn't necessarily mean that your research question is worthy of exploration. You will want to make sure that your research will have valuable practical and/or theoretical implications. In other words, answering the research question could either improve existing practice and/or inform professional decision-making (Applied Degree), or it could revise, build upon, or create theoretical frameworks informing research design and practice (Ph.D Degree). See the Dissertation Center  for additional information about dissertation criteria at NU.

For a additional information on gap statements, see the following:

• How to Find a Gap in the Literature
• Write Like a Scientist: Gap Statements

How do you identify the gaps?

Conducting an exhaustive literature review is your first step. As you search for journal articles, you will need to read critically across the breadth of the literature to identify these gaps. You goal should be to find a ‘space’ or opening for contributing new research. The first step is gathering a broad range of research articles on your topic. You may want to look for research that approaches the topic from a variety of methods – qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. 

See the videos below for further instruction on identifying a gap in the literature.

Identifying a Gap in the Literature - Dr. Laurie Bedford

How Do You Identify Gaps in Literature? - SAGE Research Methods

Literature Gap & Future Research - Library Workshop

This workshop presents effective search techniques for identifying a gap in the literature and recommendations for future research.

Where can you locate research gaps?

As you begin to gather the literature, you will want to critically read for what has, and has not, been learned from the research. Use the Discussion and Future Research sections of the articles to understand what the researchers have found and where they point out future or additional research areas. This is similar to identifying a gap in the literature, however, future research statements come from a single study rather than an exhaustive search. You will want to check the literature to see if those research questions have already been answered.

Roadrunner Search

Identifying the gap in the research relies on an exhaustive review of the literature. Remember, researchers may not explicitly state that a gap in the literature exists; you may need to thoroughly review and assess the research to make that determination yourself.

However, there are techniques that you can use when searching in NavigatorSearch to help identify gaps in the literature. You may use search terms such as "literature gap " or "future research" "along with your subject keywords to pinpoint articles that include these types of statements.

Was this resource helpful?

• << Previous: Resources for a Literature Review
• Next: Web of Knowledge >>
• Last Updated: Aug 12, 2024 7:35 AM
• URL: https://resources.nu.edu/researchprocess

© Copyright 2024 National University. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy | Consumer Information

How To Find A Research Gap, Quickly

A step-by-step guide for new researchers

By: Derek Jansen (MBA) | Reviewer: Eunice Rautenbach (DTech) | April 2023

If you’ve got a dissertation, thesis or research project coming up, one of the first (and most important) things you’ll need to do is find a suitable research gap . In this post, we’ll share a straightforward process to help you uncover high-quality, original research gaps in a very time-efficient manner.

Overview: Finding Research Gaps

• What exactly is a research gap?
• Research gap vs research topic
• How to find potential research gaps
• How to evaluate research gaps (and topics)
• Key takeaways

What is a research gap?

As a starting point, it’s useful to first define what we mean by research gap, to ensure we’re all on the same page. The term “research gap” gets thrown around quite loosely by students and academics alike, so let’s clear that up.

Simply put, a research gap is any space where there’s a lack of solid, agreed-upon research regarding a specific topic, issue or phenomenon. In other words, there’s a lack of established knowledge and, consequently, a need for further research.

Let’s look at a hypothetical example to illustrate a research gap.

Within the existing research regarding factors affect job satisfaction , there may be a wealth of established and agreed-upon empirical work within a US and UK context , but very little research within Eastern nations such as Japan or Korea . Given that these nations have distinctly different national cultures and workforce compositions compared to the West, it’s plausible that the factors that contribute toward job satisfaction may also be different. Therefore, a research gap emerges for studies that explore this matter.

This example is purely hypothetical (and there’s probably plenty of research covering this already), but it illustrates the core point that a research gap reflects a lack of firmly established knowledge regarding a specific matter . Given this lack, an opportunity exists for researchers (like you) to go on and fill the gap.

So, it’s the same as a research topic?

Not quite – but they are connected. A research gap refers to an area where there’s a lack of settled research , whereas a research topic outlines the focus of a specific study . Despite being different things, these two are related because research gaps are the birthplace of research topics. In other words, by identifying a clear research gap, you have a foundation from which you can build a research topic for your specific study. Your study is unlikely to resolve the entire research gap on it’s own, but it will contribute towards it .

If you’d like to learn more, we’ve got a comprehensive post that covers research gaps (including the different types of research gaps), as well as an explainer video below.

How to find a research gap

Now that we’ve defined what a research gap is, it’s time to get down to the process of finding potential research gaps that you can use as a basis for potential research topics. Importantly, it’s worth noting that this is just one way (of many) to find a research gap (and consequently a topic). We’re not proposing that it’s the only way or best way, but it’s certainly a relatively quick way to identify opportunities.

Step 1: Identify your broad area of interest

The very first step to finding a research gap is to decide on your general area of interest . For example, if you were undertaking a dissertation as part of an MBA degree, you may decide that you’re interested in corporate reputation, HR strategy, or leadership styles. As you can see, these are broad categories – there’s no need to get super specific just yet. Of course, if there is something very specific that you’re interested in, that’s great – but don’t feel pressured to narrow it down too much right now.

Equally important is to make sure that this area of interest is allowed by your university or whichever institution you’ll be proposing your research to. This might sound dead obvious, but you’ll be surprised how many times we’ve seen students run down a path with great excitement, only to later learn that their university wants a very specific area of focus in terms of topic (and their area of interest doesn’t qualify).

Step 2: Do an initial literature scan

Once you’ve pinned down your broad area (or areas) of interest, the next step is to head over to Google Scholar to undertake an initial literature scan . If you’re not familiar with this tool, Google Scholar is a great starting point for finding academic literature on pretty much any topic, as it uses Google’s powerful search capabilities to hunt down relevant academic literature. It’s certainly not the be-all and end-all of literature search tools, but it’s a useful starting point .

Within Google Scholar, you’ll want to do a few searches using keywords that are relevant to your area of interest. Sticking with our earlier example, we could use the key phrase “job satisfaction”, or we may want to get a little more specific – perhaps “job satisfaction for millennials” or “job satisfaction in Japan”.

It’s always a good idea to play around with as many keywords/phrases as you can think up.  Take an iterative approach here and see which keywords yield the most relevant results for you. Keep each search open in a new tab, as this will help keep things organised for the next steps.

Once you’ve searched for a few different keywords/phrases, you’ll need to do some refining for each of the searches you undertook. Specifically, you’ll need to filter the results down to the most recent papers . You can do this by selecting the time period in the top left corner (see the example below).

Filtering to the current year is typically a good choice (especially for fast-moving research areas), but in some cases, you may need to filter to the last two years . If you’re undertaking this task in January or February, for example, you’ll likely need to select a two-year period.

Need a helping hand?

Step 3: Review and shortlist articles that interest you

Once you’ve run a few searches using different keywords and phrases, you’ll need to scan through the results to see what looks most relevant and interesting to you. At this stage, you can just look at the titles and abstracts (the description provided by Google Scholar) – don’t worry about reading the actual article just yet.

Next, select 5 – 10 articles that interest you and open them up. Here, we’re making the assumption that your university has provided you with access to a decent range of academic databases. In some cases, Google Scholar will link you directly to a PDF of the article, but in most cases, you’ll need paid access. If you don’t have this (for example, if you’re still applying to a university), you can look at two options:

Open-access articles – these are free articles which you can access without any journal subscription. A quick Google search (the regular Google) will help you find open-access journals in your area of interest, but you can also have a look at DOAJ and Elsevier Open Access.

DeepDyve – this is a monthly subscription service that allows you to get access to a broad range of journals. At the time of shooting this video, their monthly subscription is around $50 and they do offer a free trial, which may be sufficient for your project.

Step 4: Skim-read your article shortlist

Now, it’s time to dig into your article shortlist and do some reading. But don’t worry, you don’t need to read the articles from start to finish – you just need to focus on a few key sections.

Specifically, you’ll need to pay attention to the following:

• The abstract (which you’ve probably already read a portion of in Google Scholar)
• The introduction – this will give you a bit more detail about the context and background of the study, as well as what the researchers were trying to achieve (their research aims)
• The discussion or conclusion – this will tell you what the researchers found

By skimming through these three sections for each journal article on your shortlist, you’ll gain a reasonable idea of what each study was about, without having to dig into the painful details. Generally, these sections are usually quite short, so it shouldn’t take you too long.

Step 5: Go “FRIN hunting”

This is where the magic happens. Within each of the articles on your shortlist, you’ll want to search for a few very specific phrases , namely:

• Future research
• Further research
• Research opportunities
• Research directions

All of these terms are commonly found in what we call the “FRIN” section . FRIN stands for “further research is needed”. The FRIN is where the researchers explain what other researchers could do to build on their study, or just on the research area in general. In other words, the FRIN section is where you can find fresh opportunities for novel research . Most empirical studies will either have a dedicated FRIN section or paragraph, or they’ll allude to the FRIN toward the very end of the article. You’ll need to do a little scanning, but it’s usually pretty easy to spot.

It’s worth mentioning that naturally, the FRIN doesn’t hand you a list of research gaps on a platter. It’s not a silver bullet for finding research gaps – but it’s the closest thing to it. Realistically, the FRIN section helps you shortcut the gap-hunting process  by highlighting novel research avenues that are worth exploring.

This probably sounds a little conceptual, so let’s have a look at a few examples:

The impact of overeducation on job outcomes: Evidence from Saudi Arabia (Alzubaidi, 2020)

If you scroll down to the bottom of this article, you’ll see there’s a dedicated section called “Limitations and directions for future research”. Here they talk about the limitations of the study and provide suggestions about how future researchers could improve upon their work and overcome the limitations.

Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment (Maan et al, 2020)

In this article, within the limitations section, they provide a wonderfully systematic structure where they discuss each limitation, followed by a proposal as to how future studies can overcome the respective limitation. In doing so, they are providing very specific research opportunities for other researchers.

Medical professionals’ job satisfaction and telemedicine readiness during the COVID-19 pandemic: solutions to improve medical practice in Egypt (El-Mazahy et al, 2023)

In this article, they don’t have a dedicated section discussing the FRIN, but we can deduct it based on the limitations section. For example, they state that an evaluation of the knowledge about telemedicine and technology-related skills would have enabled studying their independent effect on the perception of telemedicine.

Follow this FRIN-seeking process for the articles you shortlisted and map out any potentially interesting research gaps . You may find that you need to look at a larger number of articles to find something interesting, or you might find that your area of interest shifts as you engage in the reading – this is perfectly natural. Take as much time as you need to develop a shortlist of potential research gaps that interest you.

Importantly, once you’ve developed a shortlist of potential research gaps, you need to return to Google Scholar to double-check that there aren’t fresh studies that have already addressed the gap. Remember, if you’re looking at papers from two years ago in a fast-moving field, someone else may have jumped on it . Nevertheless, there could still very well be a unique angle you could take – perhaps a contextual gap (e.g. a specific country, industry, etc.).

Ultimately, the need for originality will depend on your specific university’s requirements and the level of study. For example, if you’re doing an undergraduate research project, the originality requirements likely won’t be as gruelling as say a Masters or PhD project. So, make sure you have a clear understanding of what your university’s expectations are. A good way to do this is to look at past dissertations and theses for your specific programme. You can usually find these in the university library or by asking the faculty.

How to evaluate potential research gaps

Once you’ve developed a shortlist of potential research gaps (and resultant potential research topics) that interest you, you’ll need to systematically evaluate  them  to choose a winner. There are many factors to consider here, but some important ones include the following:

• Originality and value – is the topic sufficiently novel and will addressing it create value?
• Data access – will you be able to get access to the sample of interest?
• Costs – will there be additional costs involved for data collection and/or analysis?
• Timeframes – will you be able to collect and analyse the data within the timeframe required by your university?
• Supervisor support – is there a suitable supervisor available to support your project from start to finish?

To help you evaluate your options systematically, we’ve got a topic evaluation worksheet that allows you to score each potential topic against a comprehensive set of criteria. You can access the worksheet completely free of charge here .

Recap: Key Takeaways

We’ve covered quite a lot of ground in this post. Here are the key takeaways:

• A research gap is any space where there’s a lack of solid, agreed-upon research regarding a specific topic/issue/phenomenon.
• Unique research topics emerge from research gaps , so it’s essential to first identify high-quality research gaps before you attempt to define a topic.
• To find potential research gaps, start by seeking out recent journal articles on Google Scholar and pay particular attention to the FRIN section to identify novel opportunities.
• Once you have a shortlist of prospective research gaps and resultant topic ideas, evaluate them systematically using a comprehensive set of criteria.

If you’d like to get hands-on help finding a research gap and research topic, be sure to check out our private coaching service , where we hold your hand through the research journey, step by step.

Psst... there’s more!

This post was based on one of our popular Research Bootcamps . If you're working on a research project, you'll definitely want to check this out ...

Very useful for me, but i am still confusing review of literature review, how to find out topic related previous research.

Powerful notes! Thanks a lot.

This is helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thank you very much for this. It is really a great opportunity for me to learn the research journey.

Very Useful

It nice job

You have sharpened my articulations of these components to the core. Thanks so much.

It’s educative and an inspiring way of impacting research knowledge…

Thanks to the writer

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Print Friendly

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

How to Identify a Research Gap

5-minute read

• 10th January 2024

If you’ve been tasked with producing a thesis or dissertation, one of your first steps will be identifying a research gap. Although finding a research gap may sound daunting, don’t fret! In this post, we will define a research gap, discuss its importance, and offer a step-by-step guide that will provide you with the essential know-how to complete this critical step and move on to the rest of your research project.

What Is a Research Gap?

Simply put, a research gap is an area that hasn’t been explored in the existing literature. This could be an unexplored population, an untested method, or a condition that hasn’t been investigated yet. 

Why Is Identifying a Research Gap Important?

Identifying a research gap is a foundational step in the research process. It ensures that your research is significant and has the ability to advance knowledge within a specific area. It also helps you align your work with the current needs and challenges of your field. Identifying a research gap has many potential benefits.

1. Avoid Redundancy in Your Research

Understanding the existing literature helps researchers avoid duplication. This means you can steer clear of topics that have already been extensively studied. This ensures your work is novel and contributes something new to the field.

2. Guide the Research Design

Identifying a research gap helps shape your research design and questions. You can tailor your studies to specifically address the identified gap. This ensures that your work directly contributes to filling the void in knowledge.

3. Practical Applications

Research that addresses a gap is more likely to have practical applications and contributions. Whether in academia, industry, or policymaking, research that fills a gap in knowledge is often more applicable and can inform decision-making and practices in real-world contexts.

4. Field Advancements

Addressing a research gap can lead to advancements in the field . It may result in the development of new theories, methodologies, or technologies that push the boundaries of current understanding.

5. Strategic Research Planning

Identifying a research gap is crucial for strategic planning . It helps researchers and institutions prioritize areas that need attention so they can allocate resources effectively. This ensures that efforts are directed toward the most critical gaps in knowledge.

6. Academic and Professional Recognition

Researchers who successfully address significant research gaps often receive peer recognition within their academic and professional communities. This recognition can lead to opportunities for collaboration, funding, and career advancement.

How Do I Identify a Research Gap?

1. clearly define your research topic .

Begin by clearly defining your research topic. A well-scoped topic serves as the foundation for your studies. Make sure it’s not too broad or too narrow; striking the right balance will make it easier to identify gaps in existing literature.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

2. Conduct a Thorough Literature Review

A comprehensive literature review is a vital step in any research. Dive deep into the existing research related to your topic. Look for patterns, recurring themes, and consensus among scholars. Pay attention to areas where conflicting opinions or gaps in understanding emerge.

3. Evaluate Existing Studies

Critically evaluate the studies you encounter during your literature review. Assess the paradigms , methodologies, findings, and limitations of each. Note any discrepancies, unanswered questions, or areas where further investigation is warranted. These are potential indicators of research gaps.

4. Identify Unexplored Perspectives

Consider the perspectives presented in the existing literature. Are there alternative viewpoints or marginalized voices that haven’t been adequately explored? Identifying and incorporating diverse perspectives can often lead to uncharted territory and help you pinpoint a unique research gap.

Additional Tips

Stay up to date with emerging trends.

The field of research is dynamic, with new developments and emerging trends constantly shaping the landscape. Stay up to date with the latest publications, conferences, and discussions in your field and make sure to regularly check relevant academic search engines . Often, identifying a research gap involves being at the forefront of current debates and discussions.

Seek Guidance From Experts

Don’t hesitate to reach out to experts in your field for guidance. Attend conferences, workshops, or seminars where you can interact with seasoned researchers. Their insights and experience can provide valuable perspectives on potential research gaps that you may have overlooked. You can also seek advice from your academic advisor .

Use Research Tools and Analytics

Leverage tech tools to analyze patterns and trends in the existing literature. Tools like citation analysis, keyword mapping, and data visualization can help you identify gaps and areas with limited exploration.

Identifying a research gap is a skill that evolves with experience and dedication. By defining your research topic, meticulously navigating the existing literature, critically evaluating studies, and recognizing unexplored perspectives, you’ll be on your way to identifying a research gap that will serve as the foundation for your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

If you need any help with proofreading your research paper , we can help with our research paper editing services . You can even try a sample of our services for free . Good luck with all your research!

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

Free email newsletter template.

Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...

6-minute read

How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal

If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

4-minute read

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates

Published on January 2, 2023 by Shona McCombes . Revised on September 11, 2023.

What is a literature review? A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic .

There are five key steps to writing a literature review:

• Search for relevant literature
• Evaluate sources
• Identify themes, debates, and gaps
• Outline the structure
• Write your literature review

A good literature review doesn’t just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes , and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of the state of knowledge on the subject.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

What is the purpose of a literature review, examples of literature reviews, step 1 – search for relevant literature, step 2 – evaluate and select sources, step 3 – identify themes, debates, and gaps, step 4 – outline your literature review’s structure, step 5 – write your literature review, free lecture slides, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions, introduction.

• Quick Run-through
• Step 1 & 2

When you write a thesis , dissertation , or research paper , you will likely have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing knowledge. The literature review gives you a chance to:

• Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and its scholarly context
• Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research
• Position your work in relation to other researchers and theorists
• Show how your research addresses a gap or contributes to a debate
• Evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate your knowledge of the scholarly debates around your topic.

Writing literature reviews is a particularly important skill if you want to apply for graduate school or pursue a career in research. We’ve written a step-by-step guide that you can follow below.

Don't submit your assignments before you do this

The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. Free citation check included.

Try for free

Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging! A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to write.

• Example literature review #1: “Why Do People Migrate? A Review of the Theoretical Literature” ( Theoretical literature review about the development of economic migration theory from the 1950s to today.)
• Example literature review #2: “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines” ( Methodological literature review about interdisciplinary knowledge acquisition and production.)
• Example literature review #3: “The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Thematic literature review about the effects of technology on language acquisition.)
• Example literature review #4: “Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review” ( Chronological literature review about how the concept of listening skills has changed over time.)

You can also check out our templates with literature review examples and sample outlines at the links below.

Download Word doc Download Google doc

Before you begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic .

If you are writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature related to your research problem and questions .

Make a list of keywords

Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related terms. You can add to this list as you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.

• Social media, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok
• Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental health
• Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth

Search for relevant sources

Use your keywords to begin searching for sources. Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include:

• Your university’s library catalogue
• Google Scholar
• Project Muse (humanities and social sciences)
• Medline (life sciences and biomedicine)
• EconLit (economics)
• Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science)

You can also use boolean operators to help narrow down your search.

Make sure to read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find other relevant sources.

You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.

For each publication, ask yourself:

• What question or problem is the author addressing?
• What are the key concepts and how are they defined?
• What are the key theories, models, and methods?
• Does the research use established frameworks or take an innovative approach?
• What are the results and conclusions of the study?
• How does the publication relate to other literature in the field? Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the research?

Make sure the sources you use are credible , and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.

You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. Click on either button below to download.

Take notes and cite your sources

As you read, you should also begin the writing process. Take notes that you can later incorporate into the text of your literature review.

It is important to keep track of your sources with citations to avoid plagiarism . It can be helpful to make an annotated bibliography , where you compile full citation information and write a paragraph of summary and analysis for each source. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process.

To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for:

• Trends and patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time?
• Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature?
• Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree?
• Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field?
• Gaps: what is missing from the literature? Are there weaknesses that need to be addressed?

This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge.

• Most research has focused on young women.
• There is an increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media.
• But there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is a gap that you could address in your own research.

There are various approaches to organizing the body of a literature review. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).

Chronological

The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarizing sources in order.

Try to analyze patterns, turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred.

If you have found some recurring central themes, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic.

For example, if you are reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access.

Methodological

If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods , you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. For example:

• Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research
• Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship
• Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources

Theoretical

A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework . You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.

You might argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach, or combine various theoretical concepts to create a framework for your research.

Like any other academic text , your literature review should have an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion . What you include in each depends on the objective of your literature review.

The introduction should clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review.

Depending on the length of your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. You can use a subheading for each theme, time period, or methodological approach.

As you write, you can follow these tips:

• Summarize and synthesize: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent whole
• Analyze and interpret: don’t just paraphrase other researchers — add your own interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation to the literature as a whole
• Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
• Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transition words and topic sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts

In the conclusion, you should summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance.

When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread thoroughly before submitting. Not a language expert? Check out Scribbr’s professional proofreading services !

This article has been adapted into lecture slides that you can use to teach your students about writing a literature review.

Scribbr slides are free to use, customize, and distribute for educational purposes.

Open Google Slides Download PowerPoint

If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Sampling methods
• Simple random sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Cluster sampling
• Likert scales
• Reproducibility

 Statistics

• Null hypothesis
• Statistical power
• Probability distribution
• Effect size
• Poisson distribution

Research bias

• Optimism bias
• Cognitive bias
• Implicit bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Anchoring bias
• Explicit bias

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations , theses, and research papers . Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other  academic texts , with an introduction , a main body, and a conclusion .

An  annotated bibliography is a list of  source references that has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a  paper .  

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, September 11). How to Write a Literature Review | Guide, Examples, & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 9, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, what is a theoretical framework | guide to organizing, what is a research methodology | steps & tips, how to write a research proposal | examples & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

How to identify research gaps

Anthony Newman

About this video

Researching is an ongoing task, as it requires you to think of something nobody else has thought of before. This is where the research gap comes into play.

We will explain what a research gap is, provide you with steps on how to identify these research gaps, as well as provide you several tools that can help you identify them.

About the presenter

Senior Publisher, Life Sciences, Elsevier

Anthony Newman is a Senior Publisher with Elsevier and is based in Amsterdam. Each year he presents numerous Author Workshops and other similar trainings worldwide. He is currently responsible for fifteen biochemistry and laboratory medicine journals, he joined Elsevier over thirty years ago and has been Publisher for more than twenty of those years. Before then he was the marketing communications manager for the biochemistry journals of Elsevier.  By training he is a polymer chemist and was active in the surface coating industry before leaving London and moving to Amsterdam in 1987 to join Elsevier.

Researcher Academy on Twitter

Identifying Research Gaps to Pursue Innovative Research

This article is an excerpt from a lecture given by my Ph.D. guide, a researcher in public health. She advised us on how to identify research gaps to pursue innovative research in our fields.

What is a Research Gap?

Today we are talking about the research gap: what is it, how to identify it, and how to make use of it so that you can pursue innovative research. Now, how many of you have ever felt you had discovered a new and exciting research question , only to find that it had already been written about? I have experienced this more times than I can count. Graduate studies come with pressure to add new knowledge to the field. We can contribute to the progress and knowledge of humanity. To do this, we need to first learn to identify research gaps in the existing literature.

A research gap is, simply, a topic or area for which missing or insufficient information limits the ability to reach a conclusion for a question. It should not be confused with a research question, however. For example, if we ask the research question of what the healthiest diet for humans is, we would find many studies and possible answers to this question. On the other hand, if we were to ask the research question of what are the effects of antidepressants on pregnant women, we would not find much-existing data. This is a research gap. When we identify a research gap, we identify a direction for potentially new and exciting research.

How to Identify Research Gap?

Considering the volume of existing research, identifying research gaps can seem overwhelming or even impossible. I don’t have time to read every paper published on public health. Similarly, you guys don’t have time to read every paper. So how can you identify a research gap?

There are different techniques in various disciplines, but we can reduce most of them down to a few steps, which are:

• Identify your key motivating issue/question
• Identify key terms associated with this issue
• Review the literature, searching for these key terms and identifying relevant publications
• Review the literature cited by the key publications which you located in the above step
• Identify issues not addressed by  the literature relating to your critical  motivating issue

It is the last step which we all find the most challenging. It can be difficult to figure out what an article is  not  saying. I like to keep a list of notes of biased or inconsistent information. You could also track what authors write as “directions for future research,” which often can point us towards the existing gaps.

Different Types of Research Gaps

Identifying research gaps is an essential step in conducting research, as it helps researchers to refine their research questions and to focus their research efforts on areas where there is a need for more knowledge or understanding.

1. Knowledge gaps

These are gaps in knowledge or understanding of a subject, where more research is needed to fill the gaps. For example, there may be a lack of understanding of the mechanisms behind a particular disease or how a specific technology works.

2. Conceptual gaps

These are gaps in the conceptual framework or theoretical understanding of a subject. For example, there may be a need for more research to understand the relationship between two concepts or to refine a theoretical framework.

3. Methodological gaps

These are gaps in the methods used to study a particular subject. For example, there may be a need for more research to develop new research methods or to refine existing methods to address specific research questions.

4. Data gaps

These are gaps in the data available on a particular subject. For example, there may be a need for more research to collect data on a specific population or to develop new measures to collect data on a particular construct.

5. Practical gaps

These are gaps in the application of research findings to practical situations. For example, there may be a need for more research to understand how to implement evidence-based practices in real-world settings or to identify barriers to implementing such practices.

Examples of Research Gap

Limited understanding of the underlying mechanisms of a disease:.

Despite significant research on a particular disease, there may be a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of the disease. For example, although much research has been done on Alzheimer’s disease, the exact mechanisms that lead to the disease are not yet fully understood.

Inconsistencies in the findings of previous research:

When previous research on a particular topic has inconsistent findings, there may be a need for further research to clarify or resolve these inconsistencies. For example, previous research on the effectiveness of a particular treatment for a medical condition may have produced inconsistent findings, indicating a need for further research to determine the true effectiveness of the treatment.

Limited research on emerging technologies:

As new technologies emerge, there may be limited research on their applications, benefits, and potential drawbacks. For example, with the increasing use of artificial intelligence in various industries, there is a need for further research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of AI.

How to Deal with Literature Gap?

Once you have identified the literature gaps, it is critical to prioritize. You may find many questions which remain to be answered in the literature. Often one question must be answered before the next can be addressed. In prioritizing the gaps, you have identified, you should consider your funding agency or stakeholders, the needs of the field, and the relevance of your questions to what is currently being studied. Also, consider your own resources and ability to conduct the research you’re considering. Once you have done this, you can narrow your search down to an appropriate question.

Tools to Help Your Search

There are thousands of new articles published every day, and staying up to date on the literature can be overwhelming. You should take advantage of the technology that is available. Some services include  PubCrawler ,  Feedly ,  Google Scholar , and PubMed updates. Stay up to date on social media forums where scholars share new discoveries, such as Twitter. Reference managers such as  Mendeley  can help you keep your references well-organized. I personally have had success using Google Scholar and PubMed to stay current on new developments and track which gaps remain in my personal areas of interest.

The most important thing I want to impress upon you today is that you will struggle to  choose a research topic  that is innovative and exciting if you don’t know the existing literature well. This is why identifying research gaps starts with an extensive and thorough  literature review . But give yourself some boundaries.  You don’t need to read every paper that has ever been written on a topic. You may find yourself thinking you’re on the right track and then suddenly coming across a paper that you had intended to write! It happens to everyone- it happens to me quite often. Don’t give up- keep reading and you’ll find what you’re looking for.

Class dismissed!

How do you identify research gaps? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Frequently Asked Questions

A research gap can be identified by looking for a topic or area with missing or insufficient information that limits the ability to reach a conclusion for a question.

Identifying a research gap is important as it provides a direction for potentially new research or helps bridge the gap in existing literature.

Gap in research is a topic or area with missing or insufficient information. A research gap limits the ability to reach a conclusion for a question.

Thank u for your suggestion.

Very useful tips specially for a beginner

Thank you. This is helpful. I find that I’m overwhelmed with literatures. As I read on a particular topic, and in a particular direction I find that other conflicting issues, topic a and ideas keep popping up, making me more confused.

I am very grateful for your advice. It’s just on point.

The clearest, exhaustive, and brief explanation I have ever read.

Thanks for sharing

Thank you very much.The work is brief and understandable

Thank you it is very informative

Thanks for sharing this educative article

Thank you for such informative explanation.

Great job smart guy! Really outdid yourself!

Nice one! I thank you for this as it is just what I was looking for!😃🤟

Thank you so much for this. Much appreciated

Thank you so much.

Thankyou for ur briefing…its so helpful

Thank you so much .I’ved learn a lot from this.❤️

Very exciting and useful piece for researchers.

Your are awesome, it’s a great article.

Rate this article Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular Articles

• Reporting Research

Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for data interpretation

In research, choosing the right approach to understand data is crucial for deriving meaningful insights.…

Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right approach

The process of choosing the right research design can put ourselves at the crossroads of…

• Career Corner

Unlocking the Power of Networking in Academic Conferences

Embarking on your first academic conference experience? Fear not, we got you covered! Academic conferences…

Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making

Research recommendations play a crucial role in guiding scholars and researchers toward fruitful avenues of…

• AI in Academia

Disclosing the Use of Generative AI: Best practices for authors in manuscript preparation

The rapid proliferation of generative and other AI-based tools in research writing has ignited an…

Avoiding the AI Trap: Pitfalls of relying on ChatGPT for PhD applications

10 Ways to Help Students Restore Focus on Learning

Switching Your Major As a Researcher: Things to Consider Before Making the Decision

Sign-up to read more

Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:

• 2000+ blog articles
• 50+ Webinars
• 10+ Expert podcasts
• 50+ Infographics
• 10+ Checklists
• Research Guides

We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.

• Industry News
• Publishing Research
• Promoting Research
• Diversity and Inclusion
• Infographics
• Expert Video Library
• Other Resources
• Enago Learn
• Upcoming & On-Demand Webinars
• Peer Review Week 2024
• Open Access Week 2023
• Conference Videos
• Enago Report
• Journal Finder
• Enago Plagiarism & AI Grammar Check
• Editing Services
• Publication Support Services
• Research Impact
• Translation Services
• Publication solutions
• AI-Based Solutions
• Thought Leadership
• Call for Articles
• Call for Speakers
• Author Training
• Edit Profile

I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

Which among these features would you prefer the most in a peer review assistant?

• Research Process
• Manuscript Preparation
• Manuscript Review
• Publication Process
• Publication Recognition
• Language Editing Services
• Translation Services

What is a Research Gap

• 3 minute read
• 294.3K views

Table of Contents

If you are a young researcher, or even still finishing your studies, you’ll probably notice that your academic environment revolves around certain research topics, probably linked to your department or to the interest of your mentor and direct colleagues. For example, if your department is currently doing research in nanotechnology applied to medicine, it is only natural that you feel compelled to follow this line of research. Hopefully, it’s something you feel familiar with and interested in – although you might take your own twists and turns along your career.

Many scientists end up continuing their academic legacy during their professional careers, writing about their own practical experiences in the field and adapting classic methodologies to a present context. However, each and every researcher dreams about being a pioneer in a subject one day, by discovering a topic that hasn’t been approached before by any other scientist. This is a research gap.

Research gaps are particularly useful for the advance of science, in general. Finding a research gap and having the means to develop a complete and sustained study on it can be very rewarding for the scientist (or team of scientists), not to mention how its new findings can positively impact our whole society.

How to Find a Gap in Research

How many times have you felt that you have finally formulated THAT new and exciting question, only to find out later that it had been addressed before? Probably more times than you can count.

There are some steps you can take to help identify research gaps, since it is impossible to go through all the information and research available nowadays:

• Select a topic or question that motivates you: Research can take a long time and surely a large amount of physical, intellectual and emotional effort, therefore choose a topic that can keep you motivated throughout the process.
• Find keywords and related terms to your selected topic: Besides synthesizing the topic to its essential core, this will help you in the next step.
• Use the identified keywords to search literature: From your findings in the above step, identify relevant publications and cited literature in those publications.
• Look for topics or issues that are missing or not addressed within (or related to) your main topic.
• Read systematic reviews: These documents plunge deeply into scholarly literature and identify trends and paradigm shifts in fields of study. Sometimes they reveal areas or topics that need more attention from researchers and scientists.

Keeping track of all the new literature being published every day is an impossible mission. Remember that there is technology to make your daily tasks easier, and reviewing literature can be one of them. Some online databases offer up-to-date publication lists with quite effective search features:

• Elsevier’s Scope
• Google Scholar

Of course, these tools may be more or less effective depending on knowledge fields. There might be even better ones for your specific topic of research; you can learn about them from more experienced colleagues or mentors.

Find out how FINER research framework can help you formulate your research question.

Literature Gap

The expression “literature gap” is used with the same intention as “research gap.” When there is a gap in the research itself, there will also naturally be a gap in the literature. Nevertheless, it is important to stress out the importance of language or text formulations that can help identify a research/literature gap or, on the other hand, making clear that a research gap is being addressed.

When looking for research gaps across publications you may have noticed sentences like:

…has/have not been… (studied/reported/elucidated) …is required/needed… …the key question is/remains… …it is important to address…

These expressions often indicate gaps; issues or topics related to the main question that still hasn’t been subject to a scientific study. Therefore, it is important to take notice of them: who knows if one of these sentences is hiding your way to fame.

Language Editing Services by Elsevier Author Services:

Systematic Review VS Meta-Analysis

Literature Review in Research Writing

You may also like.

Descriptive Research Design and Its Myriad Uses

Five Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Biomedical Research Paper

Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering Accessible

To Err is Not Human: The Dangers of AI-assisted Academic Writing

When Data Speak, Listen: Importance of Data Collection and Analysis Methods

Choosing the Right Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers

Why is data validation important in research?

Writing a good review article

Input your search keywords and press Enter.

Welcome to the new OASIS website! We have academic skills, library skills, math and statistics support, and writing resources all together in one new home.

• Walden University
• Faculty Portal

Library Guide to Capstone Literature Reviews: Find a Research Gap

Find a research gap: tips to get started.

Finding a research gap is not an easy process and there is no one linear path. These tips and suggestions are just examples of possible ways to begin. 

In Ph.D. dissertations, students identify a gap in research. In other programs, students identify a gap in practice. The literature review for a gap in practice will show the context of the problem and the current state of the research. 

Research gap definition

A research gap exists when:

• a question or problem has not been answered by existing studies/research in the field 
• a concept or new idea has not been studied at all
• all the existing literature on a topic is outdated 
• a specific population/location/age group etc has not been studied 

A research gap should be:

• grounded in the literature
• amenable to scientific study
• Litmus Test for a Doctoral-Level Research Problem (Word) This tool helps students determine if they have identified a doctoral level research problem.

Identify a research gap

To find a gap you must become very familiar with a particular field of study. This will involve a lot of research and reading, because a gap is defined by what does (and does not) surround it.

• Search the research literature and dissertations (search all university dissertations, not just Walden!).
• Understand your topic! Review background information in books and encyclopedias . 
• Look for literature reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
• Take notes on concepts, themes, and subject terms . 
• Look closely at each article's limitations, conclusions, and recommendations for future research. 
• Organize, analyze, and repeat! 

• Quick Answer: How do I find dissertations on a topic?

Start with broad searches

Use the Library Search (formerly Thoreau)  to do a broad search with just one concept at a time . Broad searches give you an idea of the academic conversation surrounding your topic.

• Try the terms you know (keywords) first.
• Look at the Subject Terms (controlled language) to brainstorm terms. 
• Subject terms help you understand what terms are most used, and what other terms to try.
• No matter what your topic is, not every researcher will be using the same terms. Keep an eye open for additional ways to describe your topic.
• Guide: Subject Terms & Index Searches: Index Overview

Keep a list of terms

• Create a list of terms
• Example list of terms

This list will be a record of what terms are: 

• related to or represent your topic
• synonyms or antonyms
• more or less commonly used
• keywords (natural language) or subject terms (controlled language)
• Synonyms & antonyms (database search skills)
• Turn keywords into subject terms

Term I started with:

culturally aware 

Subject terms I discovered:

cultural awareness (SU) 

cultural sensitivity (SU) 

cultural competence (SU) 

Search with different combinations of terms

• Combine search terms list
• Combine search terms table
• Video: Search by Themes

Since a research gap is defined by the absence of research on a topic, you will search for articles on everything that relates to your topic. 

• List out all the themes related to your gap.
• Search different combinations of the themes as you discover them 

For example, suppose your research gap is on the work-life balance of tenured and tenure-track women in engineering professions. In that case, you might try searching different combinations of concepts, such as: 

• women and STEM 
• STEM or science or technology or engineering or mathematics
• female engineering professors 
• tenure-track women in STEM
• work-life balance and women in STEM
• work-life balance and women professors
• work-life balance and tenure 

Topic adapted from one of the award winning Walden dissertations. 

• Walden University Award Winning Dissertations
• Gossage, Lily Giang-Tien, "Work-Life Balance of Tenured and Tenure-Track Women Engineering Professors" (2019). Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. 6435.

Break your topic into themes and try combining the terms from different themes in different ways. For example: 

Theme 1 and Theme 4

Theme 2 and Theme 1

Theme 3 and Theme 4

Video: Search by Themes (YouTube)

(2 min 40 sec) Recorded April 2014 Transcript

Track where more research is needed

Most research articles will identify where more research is needed. To identify research trends, use the literature review matrix to track where further research is needed. 

• Download or create your own Literature Review Matrix (examples in links below).
• Do some general database searches on broad topics.
• Find an article that looks interesting.
• When you read the article, pay attention to the conclusions and limitations sections.
• Use the Literature Review Matrix to track where  'more research is needed' or 'further research needed'. NOTE:  you might need to add a column to the template.
• As you fill in the matrix you should see trends where more research is needed.

There is no consistent section in research articles where the authors identify where more research is needed. Pay attention to these sections: 

• limitations
• conclusions
• recommendations for future research 
• Literature Review Matrix Templates: learn how to keep a record of what you have read
• Literature Review Matrix (Excel) with color coding Sample template for organizing and synthesizing your research
• Previous Page: Scope
• Next Page: Get & Stay Organized
• Office of Student Disability Services

Walden Resources

Departments.

• Academic Residencies
• Academic Skills
• Career Planning and Development
• Customer Care Team
• Field Experience
• Military Services
• Student Success Advising
• Writing Skills

Centers and Offices

• Center for Social Change
• Office of Academic Support and Instructional Services
• Office of Degree Acceleration
• Office of Research and Doctoral Services
• Office of Student Affairs

Student Resources

• Doctoral Writing Assessment
• Form & Style Review
• Quick Answers
• ScholarWorks
• SKIL Courses and Workshops
• Walden Bookstore
• Walden Catalog & Student Handbook
• Student Safety/Title IX
• Legal & Consumer Information
• Website Terms and Conditions
• Cookie Policy
• Accessibility
• Accreditation
• State Authorization
• Net Price Calculator
• Cost of Attendance
• Contact Walden

Walden University is a member of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. www.adtalem.com Walden University is certified to operate by SCHEV © 2024 Walden University LLC. All rights reserved.

Graduate Research Guide

• Getting Started
• Books, Monographs, and Media
• Articles and Databases
• Journals of Interest
• Theses and Dissertations
• Literature Reviews

Gaps in the Literature

• Understanding Your Sources
• Finding Data
• Writing and Citing

Gaps In the Literature

• What Are Gaps in the Literature?

Is a Gap Worth Researching?

Finding Gaps

Identifying Gaps

Gaps in the literature are missing pieces or insufficient information in the published research on a topic. These are areas that have opportunities for further research because they are unexplored, under-explored, or outdated. Also, it can be a topic that has not yet been addressed, or it has not been researched enough.

• How to Find A Gap in the Literature

  It is important to keep in mind that just because you identify a gap in the research, it doesn't necessarily mean that your research question is worthy of exploration. You will want to ensure that your research will have valuable practical and/or theoretical implications. In other words, does answering the research question improve existing practice and/or inform professional decision-making, or could it revise, build upon, or create  theoretical frameworks  informing research design and practice?

Gaps can be missing or incomplete:

• Population or sample: size, type, location etc…
• Research methods: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed
• Data collection or analysis
• Research variables or conditions

Conduct a thorough literature search to find a broad range of research articles on your topic. Search  research databases ; you can find recommended databases for your subject area in  research guides by subject  for your course or program.

• How to Find A Gap In the Literature

Conducting an exhaustive literature review is your first step. As you search for journal articles, you will need to read critically across the breadth of the literature to identify these gaps. You goal should be to find a ‘space’ or opening for contributing new research. The first step is gathering a broad range of research articles on your topic. You may want to look for research that approaches the topic from a variety of methods – qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods.

  If you do not find articles in your literature search, this may indicate a gap.   If you do find articles, the goal is to find a gap for contributing new research. Author's signal that there is a gap within an article by using phrases such as:

• Has not been clarified, studied, reported, or elucidated
• Further research is required or needed
• Is not well reported
• Suggestions for further research
• Key question is or remains
• It is important to address
• Poorly understood or known
• Lack of studies

• << Previous: Literature Reviews
• Next: Understanding Your Sources >>
• Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 9:33 AM
• URL: https://ulm.libguides.com/GradResearchGuide

• Open access
• Published: 11 September 2024

Adult co-creators’ emotional and psychological experiences of the co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review protocol

• Lauren McCaffrey   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2524-977X 1 ,
• Bryan McCann 1 ,
• Maria Giné-Garriga 2 ,
• Qingfan An 3 ,
• Greet Cardon 4 ,
• Sebastien François Martin Chastin 1 , 4 ,
• Rabab Chrifou 4 ,
• Sonia Lippke 5 ,
• Quentin Loisel 1 ,
• Giuliana Raffaella Longworth 2 ,
• Katrina Messiha 6 ,
• Mira Vogelsang 1 ,
• Emily Whyte 1 &
• Philippa Margaret Dall 1  

Systematic Reviews volume  13 , Article number:  231 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

63 Accesses

4 Altmetric

Metrics details

There is a growing investment in the use of co-creation, reflected by an increase in co-created products, services, and interventions. At the same time, a growing recognition of the significance of co-creators’ experience can be detected but there is a gap in the aggregation of the literature with regard to experience. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to uncover the breadth of existing empirical research on co-creation experience, how it has been defined and assessed, and its key emotional and psychological characteristics in the context of co-created products, services, or interventions among adults.

The development of the search strategy was guided by the research question, Arksey, and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology guidelines, and through collaboration with members of the Health CASCADE consortium. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full and presented both narratively and by use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram. Comprehensive searches of relevant electronic databases (e.g. Scopus) will be conducted to identify relevant papers. Snowball searches to identify additional papers through included full-text papers will be done using the artificial intelligence tool, namely, Connected Papers. All review steps will involve at least two reviewers. Studies in English, Dutch, Chinese, Spanish, and French, published from the year 1970 onwards, will be considered. Microsoft Excel software will be used to record and chart extracted data.

The resulting scoping review could provide useful insights into adult co-creators’ experience of participating in the co-creation process. An increased understanding of the role of emotional and psychological experiences of participating in co-creation processes may help to inform the co-creation process and lead to potential benefits for the co-creators and co-created outcome.

Systematic review registration

10.5281/zenodo.7665851.

Peer Review reports

Co-creation can be defined as “any act of collective creativity that involves a broad range of relevant and affected actors in creative problem-solving that aims to produce a desired outcome” [ 1 ]. Co-creation is increasingly acknowledged as a promising approach to address complex ‘wicked’ societal problems and develop more contextually relevant interventions to improve outcomes in a variety of settings [ 2 ]. By facilitating communication across sectors, integrating diverse forms of knowledge and expertise, and enabling local ownership, co-creation can be useful in a broad range of fields including, healthcare, community, and education [ 3 ].

The co-creation process is guided by participatory methodologies [ 4 ]. The goal of participatory research is to engage all those who are the subject of the research in all stages of the research [ 5 ]. Participatory research acknowledges the value of their contribution in a practical and collaborative way [ 5 ]. Co-creation builds on these participatory methodologies, to address the power imbalances stemming from social inequities and uses empowerment approaches to address and meet the needs of citizens [ 3 ]. Co-creation is more specific than the broad concept of participation, which also refers to passive involvement [ 6 ]. The ultimate goal of co-creation is to actively involve all relevant and affected stakeholders in all aspects of the co-creation process, such as planning or conducting [ 7 ].

Whilst the co-creation behaviour of participants in a co-creation process is mostly documented in the co-creation literature, the emotional and psychological experience of participating in the co-creation process has been given less attention [ 8 , 9 ]. Co-creation behaviour is argued to comprise multiple behavioural dimensions that fall under two higher-order factors, namely, participation behaviour and citizenship behaviour [ 10 ]. The behavioural dimensions of participation behaviour include information seeking and sharing, responsible behaviour, and personal interaction. The dimensions of citizenship behaviour include feedback, advocacy, helping, and tolerance [ 10 ]. On the other hand, the co-creators’ experiences of participating in the co-creation process, hereby shortened to co-creation experience, capture co-creators’ emotional and psychological states; highlight the interactive component; and involve a continuous process as opposed to a single fixed-time event [ 9 ]. In brief, the co-creation experience, as defined for the purposes of this review, is the co-creators’ emotional and psychological states during active participation and interaction when engaging in the co-creation process [ 9 ]. Co-creation experience differs from co-creation behaviour due to its focus on the feelings and cognitions derived from the act of undertaking the co-creation behaviour [ 9 ].

Research indicates that active involvement in the co-creation process can have profound positive effects on increased health and performance outcomes, satisfaction, and well-being [ 11 , 12 ]. For example, Leask et al. [ 13 ] reported older adults having positive experiences engaging with the co-creation of a health intervention, describing that participants’ role as co-researchers made it enjoyable, interesting, and rewarding. Similar findings from Rooijen et al. [ 14 ] indicated that participants felt empowered, liked the interactive characteristic of meetings, and felt they were valued contributors with a shared responsibility for the project. Positive emotional states like happiness or gratitude can foster trust, which is important for building relationships, whereas negative emotional states, like anger, uncertainty, and frustration, can decrease trust [ 15 ]. Building relationships is an important aspect of the co-creation process, in which experiencing positive emotions helps to create new relationships [ 16 ]. Therefore, positive emotions could also contribute to the functioning of the co-creation group(s) and the successful development of products like intervention components, tools, and further actions.

There are instances when co-creators can experience the co-creation process negatively. There exists some research to indicate how failed co-created services recovered can impact co-creators in terms of future intention to co-create, role clarity, and motivation [ 17 ]. However, there might be a lack of, or a lack of visibility of, literature documenting the negative emotional and psychological experiences associated with the co-creation process because of publication bias. Individual and interpersonal experience including group dynamics are central to the creation of value and innovation and this justifies the need to study the role of human experience in the context of co-creation [ 18 , 19 ]. Figure  1 provides a visual depiction of the proposed connection between co-creation experience and the other elements of co-creation.

Suggested model of the relationship between co-creation experience, processes, behaviour, outcomes, impact, and future co-creation

However, so far, there is a gap regarding the aggregation of the literature pertaining to co-creation experience. Therefore, the purpose of this scoping review is to uncover the breadth of existing empirical research on co-creation experience, how it has been defined, and assessed and its key characteristics in the context of co-created products, services, or interventions among adults. As the focus is on the participant’s experience of the process and not the outcome, no limits have been applied to the co-creation context. Scoping reviews are exploratory in nature and systematically map available literature on a broad topic to identify key concepts, theories, sources of evidence, and research gaps [ 20 ]. A scoping review has been identified as an appropriate means to address this broad research question given that, to the authors’ knowledge, there has been no systematic review of co-creation experience literature, the phenomenon is not well understood or utilised, and studies span a wide variety of fields. The aim of the current scoping review is to deliver an evidence-based review of co-creators’ experiences of co-creating. This review will guide future research to advance evidence-based co-creation methods and inform guidance aimed at enhancing positive experiences for those participating in co-creation.

Research question

What is the current state of the science regarding adult co-creators’ emotional and psychological experiences of participating in co-creation?

The objectives of this review are to:

Determine the extent of research on co-creation experience.

Uncover the range of and key characteristics of emotional and psychological experiences documented in the literature to date.

Identify any explicit or implicit underlying psychological theories drawn upon to explain the potential mechanism of the experience of co-creation.

Document any tools or technology used during the co-creation process that impacted the experience during co-creation or to make co-creation more successful .

Methodology

This scoping review protocol is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist (see Additional file 1).

Search strategy

The search strategy comprises three main stages (see Fig.  2 ). The first stage involved searching the newly created Health CASCADE Co-creation Database. This database was created by members of the Health CASCADE network and was aimed at collecting in one place the entire corpus of literature pertaining to participatory research and co-creation (1). This database was created using CINAHL, PubMed and all databases accessible via ProQuest through Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU) institutional licence (17 databases in total, APA PsycArticles®, APA PsycInfo®, Art, Design & Architecture Collection, British Periodicals, Coronavirus Research Database, Early Modern Books, Ebook Central, Entertainment Industry Magazine Archive, Humanities Index, Periodicals Archive Online, ProQuest One AcademicTrial-Limited time only, PTSDpubs, SciTech Premium Collection, Social Science Premium Collection, Sports Medicine & Education Index, The Vogue Archive, and The Women's Wear Daily Archive). The key search terms used in this search strategy are found in Table  1 . ASReview, an artificial intelligence (AI) aided platform that helps find relevant records was used for screening the records to be included in this database. The AI performs a textual analysis of the provided records, based on active learning and prioritization. Given the large volume of records retrieved from PubMed, CINAHL, and all databases available through ProQuest with GCU access, AI was necessary to speed up the screening process. There are over 13,000 records contained in this database, with all titles and abstracts containing at least one of the search terms.

Stages of search strategy

The Health CASCADE Co-creation Database was searched using free-text terms relating to co-creation experience (see Table  2 ). Search terms have been developed in reference to the research question and through consultation with members of the Health CASCADE consortium. The search will be piloted to check the appropriateness of keywords and to ensure known studies are identified.

The second stage of the search strategy is to use both sets of search terms (see Tables  1 and 2 ) in Scopus using the Boolean operator AND to combine the two sets. This is to provide additional robustness to the search. Due to the large volume of records retrieved (> 35,000) when combining the two sets of search terms, it is necessary to omit some search terms used to create the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database. Four search terms will be retained “co-creat*”, “co-production”, “co-design” and “experience-based design”. These search terms are specifically chosen because co-production and co-design are commonly used interchangeably with the term co-creation [ 21 ]. In addition, “experience-based design” is retained due to the obvious focus on the experience. We will include articles that meet our inclusion criteria for co-creation, regardless of the terminology used to describe the methodology. For pragmatic reasons, sources of unpublished empirical studies (including grey literature, theses, and dissertations) will not be searched for. The draft search strategy for Scopus is available in Additional file 2.

The final stage of the search is to employ snowballing to capture any additional articles that may be potentially missed. An artificial intelligence tool called Connected Papers [ 22 ] will be used to identify papers that (1) the included paper has cited (backward reference searching), and (2) papers that have since cited the included paper (forward reference searching).

The article selection process is considered an iterative process, whereby the search strategy will be initially broad and then refined based on abstracts retrieved and as reviewer familiarity with the literature increases. The concept of co-creation is defined differently depending on the setting and context and is often used interchangeably with similar, yet distinct concepts, but equally lacking a clear universal understanding [ 21 ]. Therefore, to account for the overlaps in terminology a broad scope will be initially implemented.

As recommended by Arksey and O’Malley [ 23 ], decisions on how to set search parameters will be made after a general scope of the field has been gained. Hence, this stage will require the reviewer(s) to engage in a reflexive way and repeat steps to ensure a comprehensive literature search with more sensitive searches [ 23 , 24 ].

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

All study participants in the included papers must be adults, described as people aged 18 years and over with no upper limit. Children/adolescents are not included in this study as research indicates that there are differences between their emotional experiences in terms of emotional intensity and stability [ 25 ].

Empirical articles (i.e. primary research studies) include any qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research designs that include a description of the co-created product, service, or intervention and an evaluation of the co-creators’ co-creation experience. Although scoping reviews can draw on evidence from non-empirical sources, this review imposes limits to include empirical sources only as empirical sources would be most useful and appropriate for contributing to an evidence-based understanding of co-creation methods.

Any context that involves the co-creation of a product, service, or intervention will be considered.

The Health CASCADE Co-creation Database is limited to searching records between 1st January 1970 and 1st December 2021. The search in Scopus will include records from 1st January 1970 until the date of the search.

The Health CASCADE Co-creation Database is limited to only include materials that are written in English. However, for the search conducted in Scopus, publications in English, Spanish, Dutch, French, and Chinese languages will also be considered, as the research team has proficient fluency in these languages.

Data extraction

Following the database search, articles will be exported as a CSV file for removal of duplicates in Excel. The articles will be imported and screened in Rayyan. The title and abstract of all studies will be screened independently by several reviewers (LMcC, QA, QL, EW, GRL, RC, and MV) and irrelevant studies will be removed. All titles and abstracts will be double-screened. Full-text articles of studies identified as potentially relevant for inclusion will subsequently be sought and screened by several reviewers (LMcC, QA, QL, EW, GRL, RC, MV, and KM) against the agreed set of criteria. Differences of opinion regarding inclusion or exclusion will be resolved by discussion and reaching a consensus or by a third reviewer. The results of the search and the study inclusion process will be reported in full in the final scoping review and presented both narratively and by use of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) flow diagram.

To determine the extent of research on co-creation experience (objective 1), details about co-creation more generally will first be extracted. This includes:

Study’s definition of co-creation and co-creation experience (if available).

The context or setting.

Data about the participants (number, type, and characteristics of co-creators’ involved).

Description of the co-creation process undertaken (including number of sessions, level of participation).

Purpose of co-creation.

Outcome of the co-created intervention, service, or product.

The key characteristics of psychological and emotional experience including positive and negative components (objective 2) will be extracted.

The psychological theory underpinning the co-creation experience identified by the authors of the studies (objective 3) will be recorded.

Information about the technology or tools that had an impact on the co-creation experience (objective 4) will be extracted.

Additional descriptive information such as discipline and date of publication will also be extracted.

The above-extracted information will be entered into an Excel spreadsheet developed by the authors. This data extraction Excel spreadsheet may be modified and revised as necessary during the process of extracting data from the included evidence sources to ensure that key findings relevant to the review question are addressed.

Quality assessment

There exists debate as to whether a scoping review should contain an assessment of study quality [ 26 ]. A quality assessment component will be included in this review in relation to the sufficiency of reporting the process of co-creating an intervention, service, or product. This tool (see Table  3 ) has been adapted from Leask et al.’s [ 4 ] ‘checklist for reporting intervention co-creation’ and Eyles et al.’s [ 27 ] amended version of a checklist for reporting non-pharmacological interventions. The reason for including this checklist is two-fold. Firstly, the scoping review may contain a variety of study designs and the focus is not solely on the outcomes, but rather on the process [ 27 ]. Secondly, as explained above, the concept of co-creation is used interchangeably with other similar overlapping concepts, such that some processes may be described as co-creation when they are in fact not (according to the definition used in this review) or vice versa. Therefore, by incorporating this checklist, it will become clearer as to the type or extent of co-creation processes that were implemented and whether they were clearly reported within each individual source of empirical evidence. However, given that a scoping review aims to present an overview of the extant literature on a particular topic without synthesis from individual studies, no study will be excluded on the basis of the quality of reporting co-created interventions.

Strategy for data analysis

The PRISMA-ScR will be used to guide the reporting of the scoping review [ 28 ]. Whilst, the synthesis of the results from included sources of evidence is more appropriately done with a systematic review, the analysis of data in scoping reviews is generally descriptive in nature [ 29 ]. A narrative summary of extracted data will be produced along with the tabulated and/or charted results described in relation to the review question and objectives. Descriptive techniques, such as basic coding of data to particular categories, are recommended as a useful approach when the purpose is to identify concepts or key characteristics related to the concept [ 20 ]. Data will be analysed using the well-established method of thematic analysis [ 30 ]. This method is characterised by identifying and reporting recurring themes within the data and is a suitable analytic method because it allows for patterns of experience to be recorded, such as understanding adults’ experiences of participating in co-creation. We intend to extract relevant co-creation experience data from the result sections of articles, including verbatim participant quotations. For quantitative data, such as questionnaires, we will attempt to extract the item statements and code them alongside the qualitative data.

The purpose of this scoping review is to uncover the breadth of existing empirical research on co-creation experience with a focus on emotional aspects and from a psychological perspective. An increased understanding of the role of experiences of participating in co-creation processes may help to inform the development and use of co-creation processes and lead to potential benefits for the co-creators’ and co-created outcome.

This scoping review has some limitations, which reflect the balance between conducting a wide search to discover the breadth of existing literature and the pragmatic constraints of conducting the review. This scoping review searches for published peer-reviewed work from SCOPUS and the Health CASCADE Co-creation Database. Other databases could be searched but for pragmatic reasons, these two databases were selected for their breadth and relevancy. Another limitation is that it was necessary to restrict the search terms for capturing ‘co-creation’ for the search in Scopus to maintain a manageable number of records retrieved to screen by the research team. However, authors may use different terms or descriptions. For instance, variations of terms like co-creation, co-design, and co-production, whether written with a dash or space can affect the number of articles retrieved. Boundaries on the search terms relating to experience were also formed, for example, specific emotions were not included in the search string, due to the large range of possible emotions that can be experienced, which would make the search unwieldy. We also have not used any of the advanced search features of the databases, such as proximity searching, which could potentially improve the specificity.

A strength of this review is the comprehensive snowballing search strategy to capture additional relevant papers. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and to scientific conferences. The plan for dissemination includes digital science communication platforms and presentations.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

Artificial intelligence

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis–extension for scoping reviews

Agnello DM, Loisel QEA, An Q, et al. Establishing a health CASCADE–curated open-access database to consolidate knowledge about co-creation: novel artificial intelligence–assisted methodology based on systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25(1): e45059. https://doi.org/10.2196/45059 .

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

von Heimburg D, Cluley V. Advancing complexity-informed health promotion: a scoping review to link health promotion and co-creation. Health Promot Int. 2020;36(2):581–600.

Article   Google Scholar  

Sherriff S, Miller H, Tong A, Williamson A, Muthayya S, Sally R, et al. Building trust and sharing power for co-creation in Aboriginal health research: a stakeholder interview study. Evid Policy J Res Debate Pract. 2019.

Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Altenburg TM, Cardon G, Chinapaw MJM, et al. Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5(1):2.

Wright MT, Springett J, Kongats K. What is participatory health research? In: Wright MT, Kongats K, editors. Participatory Health Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018.

Voorberg WH, Bekkers VJJM, Tummers LG. A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Manag Rev. 2015;17(9):1333–57.

Torfing J, Sørensen E, Røiseland A. Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits, and ways forward. Adm Soc. 2016;51(5):795–825.

Leclercq T, Hammedi W, Poncin I. Ten years of value cocreation: an integrative review. Rech Appl En Mark Engl Ed. 2016;31(3):26–60.

Google Scholar  

Zhang P, Meng F, So KKF. Cocreation experience in peer-to-peer accommodations: Conceptualization and scale development. J Travel Res. 2021;60(6):1333–51.

Yi Y, Gong T. Customer value co-creation behavior: scale development and validation. J Bus Res. 2012;66(9):1279–84.

Partouche-Sebban J, Rezaee Vessal S, Bernhard F. When co-creation pays off: the effect of co-creation on well-being, work performance and team resilience. J Bus Ind Mark. 2021;37(8).

Sharma S, Conduit J, Rao HS. Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being outcomes from co-creation roles: a study of vulnerable customers. J Serv Mark. 2017;31(4/5):397–411.

Leask CF, Sandlund M, Skelton DA, Chastin SF. Co-creating a tailored public health intervention to reduce older adults’ sedentary behaviour. Health Educ J. 2017;76(5):595–608.

van Rooijen M, Lenzen S, Dalemans R, Beurskens A, Moser A. Stakeholder engagement from problem analysis to implementation strategies for a patient-reported experience measure in disability care: a qualitative study on the process and experiences. Health Expect. 2021;24(1):53–65.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Dunn JR, Schweitzer ME. Feeling and believing: the influence of emotion on trust. J Personal Soc Psychol Manag Proc. 2005;88(5):736–48.

Waugh CE, Fredrickson BL. Nice to know you: positive emotions, self–other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. J Posit Psychol. 2006;1(2):93–106.

Dong B, Evans KR, Zou S. The effects of customer participation in co-created service recovery. J Acad Mark Sci. 2008;36(1):123–37.

Ramaswamy V. It’s about human experiences… and beyond, to co-creation. Ind Mark Manag. 2011;40(2):195–6.

Ramaswamy V. Co-creation of value — towards an expanded paradigm of value creation. Mark Rev St Gallen. 2009;26(6):11–7.

Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020Oct;18(10):2119–26.

Halvorsrud K, Kucharska J, Adlington K, Rüdell K, Brown Hajdukova E, Nazroo J, et al. Identifying evidence of effectiveness in the co-creation of research: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the international healthcare literature. J Public Health. 2021;43(1):197–208.

Tarnavsky-Eitan, A, Smolyansky E, Knaan-Harpaz I, Perets S. Connected Papers. 2020. https://www.connectedpapers.com/about . Accessed 26 May 2022.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.

Bailen NH, Green LM, Thompson RJ. Understanding emotion in adolescents: a review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity. Emot Rev. 2019;11(1):63–73.

Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85.

Eyles H, Jull A, Dobson R, Firestone R, Whittaker R, Te Morenga L, et al. Co-design of mHealth delivered interventions: a systematic review to assess key methods and processes. Curr Nutr Rep. 2016;5(3):160–7.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. In: JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020.

Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Health CASCADE consortium.

The PhD studies of Lauren McCaffrey are funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement n° 956501.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

Lauren McCaffrey, Bryan McCann, Sebastien François Martin Chastin, Quentin Loisel, Mira Vogelsang, Emily Whyte & Philippa Margaret Dall

Faculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences Blanquerna, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain

Maria Giné-Garriga & Giuliana Raffaella Longworth

Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Greet Cardon, Sebastien François Martin Chastin & Rabab Chrifou

Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany

Sonia Lippke

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Katrina Messiha

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

LMcC coordinated and conceived the study. LMcC, PMD, BMcC, and MGG have made substantive contributions to developing this protocol and the review question. LMcC, PMD, BMcC, MGG, QA, QL, EW, GRL, MV, RC, and KM jointly developed the search strategy. LMcC drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren McCaffrey .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: prisma-p 2015 checklist., additional file 2: search strategy–scopus., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

McCaffrey, L., McCann, B., Giné-Garriga, M. et al. Adult co-creators’ emotional and psychological experiences of the co-creation process: a Health CASCADE scoping review protocol. Syst Rev 13 , 231 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02643-9

Download citation

Received : 10 August 2022

Accepted : 22 August 2024

Published : 11 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02643-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Co-creation experience
• Psychological response
• Scoping review

Systematic Reviews

ISSN: 2046-4053

• Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
• General enquiries: [email protected]

Advertisement

Smart scheduling for next generation manufacturing systems: a systematic literature review

• Published: 09 September 2024

Cite this article

• Shriprasad Chorghe   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-6144 1 ,
• Rishi Kumar   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5745-8747 1 ,
• Makarand S. Kulkarni   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1930-5555 2 ,
• Vibhor Pandhare   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-6165 1 &
• Bhupesh Kumar Lad   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7828-0116 1  

96 Accesses

Explore all metrics

In the current scenario, smart scheduling has become an essential requirement to generate dynamic schedules, prescribe, and adjust scheduling plans in response to dynamic events such as machine failures, unpredictable demand, customer order cancellations, worker unavailability, and mass customization. Such scheduling techniques must also take advantage of intelligence continuously being built for next-generation manufacturing systems. This study presents a systematic literature review on smart scheduling, analysing 123 identified literature from 2010 to May 2024 using the PRISMA technique. The analysis includes scientometric and content analysis to identify paradigm shifts in development (concepts, methodologies, practices) along with their maturity levels, and provides recommendations for the next generation of smart scheduling. This study is significant for advancing knowledge and addressing current and future needs/requirements in smart scheduling. This would serve as a reference in understanding the maturity status of various developments, assist researchers and practitioners in identifying research gaps, and direct future advancements in the smart scheduling domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A Systematic Review of Manufacturing Scheduling for the Industry 4.0

Quality 4.0: a review of big data challenges in manufacturing

A Bibliometric Analysis of Smart Manufacturing and Way Forward

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Azab, E., Nafea, M., Shihata, L. A., & Mashaly, M. (2021). A machine-learning-assisted simulation approach for incorporating predictive maintenance in dynamic flow-shop scheduling. Applied Sciences (Switzerland) , 11 (24). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411725

Bagheri Rad, N., & Behnamian, J. (2023). Real-time multi-factory scheduling in industry 4.0 with virtual alliances. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106636

Barenji, A. V., Barenji, R. V., Roudi, D., & Hashemipour, M. (2017). A dynamic multi-agent-based scheduling approach for SMEs. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 89 (9–12), 3123–3137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9299-4

Article   Google Scholar  

Bencheikh, G., Letouzey, A., & Desforges, X. (2022). An approach for joint scheduling of production and predictive maintenance activities. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 64 , 546–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.08.005

Bouazza, W., Sallez, Y., & Trentesaux, D. (2021). Dynamic scheduling of manufacturing systems: A product-driven approach using hyper-heuristics. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 34 (6), 641–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1925969

Bueno, A., Godinho Filho, M., & Frank, A. G. (2020). Smart production planning and control in the industry 4.0 context: A systematic literature review. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106774

Castillo, M., Monroy, R., & Ahmad, R. (2022). Scientometric analysis and systematic review of smart manufacturing technologies applied to the 3D printing polymer material extrusion system. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-02049-1

Chen, C., Kong, L., T., & Kan, W. (2023). Identifying the promising production planning and scheduling method for manufacturing in industry 4.0: A literature review. Production and Manufacturing Research , 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2023.2279329

Cupek, R., Ziebinski, A., Huczala, L., & Erdogan, H. (2016). Agent-based manufacturing execution systems for short-series production scheduling. Computers in Industry , 82 , 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.07.009

Darwish, L. R., El-Wakad, M. T., & Farag, M. M. (2021). Towards sustainable industry 4.0: A green real-time IIoT multitask scheduling architecture for distributed 3D printing services. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 61 , 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.004

Destouet, C., Tlahig, H., Bettayeb, B., & Mazari, B. (2023). Flexible job shop scheduling problem under industry 5.0: A survey on human reintegration, environmental consideration and resilience improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 67 , 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.01.004

Didden, J. B. H. C., Dang, Q. V., & Adan, I. J. B. F. (2023). Decentralized learning multi-agent system for online machine shop scheduling problem. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 67 , 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.02.004

Ebufegha, A., & Li, S. (2021). Multi-Agent System Model for Dynamic Scheduling in Flexibile Job Shops. 2021 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC52266.2021.9715441

Echsler Minguillon, F., & Stricker, N. (2020). Robust predictive–reactive scheduling and its effect on machine disturbance mitigation. CIRP Annals , 69 (1), 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.03.019

Erol, R., Sahin, C., Baykasoglu, A., & Kaplanoglu, V. (2012). A multi-agent based approach to dynamic scheduling of machines and automated guided vehicles in manufacturing systems. Applied Soft Computing Journal , 12 (6), 1720–1732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.02.001

Feng, Y., Wang, Q., Gao, Y., Cheng, J., & Tan, J. (2018). Energy-efficient job-shop dynamic scheduling system based on the Cyber-physical Energy-Monitoring System. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions , 6 , 52238–52247. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2869048

Firme, B., Figueiredo, J., Sousa, J. M. C., & Vieira, S. M. (2023). Agent-based hybrid tabu-search heuristic for dynamic scheduling. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , 126 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107146

Floody, A. R. J., M. A. F. R., & Arisha, A. (2018). A scientometric analysis of Knowledge Management Research and Practice literature: 2003–2015. Knowledge Management Research & Practice , 16 (1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2017.1405776

Ghaleb, M., & Taghipour, S. (2023). Dynamic shop-floor scheduling using real-time information: A case study from the thermoplastic industry. Computers and Operations Research , 152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.106134

Ghaleb, M., Zolfagharinia, H., & Taghipour, S. (2020). Real-time production scheduling in the Industry-4.0 context: Addressing uncertainties in job arrivals and machine breakdowns. Computers and Operations Research , 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105031

Ghaleb, M., Taghipour, S., & Zolfagharinia, H. (2021). Real-time integrated production-scheduling and maintenance-planning in a flexible job shop with machine deterioration and condition-based maintenance. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 61 , 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.018

Gil, C. B., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Deep reinforcement Learning Approach for Material Scheduling considering high-dimensional environment of Hybrid Flow-Shop Problem. Applied Sciences , 12 (18). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12189332

Grassi, A., Guizzi, G., Santillo, L. C., & Vespoli, S. (2021). Assessing the performances of a novel decentralised scheduling approach in industry 4.0 and cloud manufacturing contexts. International Journal of Production Research , 59 (20), 6034–6053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1799105

Gu, W., Li, Y., Tang, D., Wang, X., & Yuan, M. (2022). Using real-time manufacturing data to schedule a smart factory via reinforcement learning. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108406

Gui, Y., Tang, D., Zhu, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2023). Dynamic scheduling for flexible job shop using a deep reinforcement learning approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109255

He, N., Zhang, D. Z., & Li, Q. (2014). Agent-based hierarchical production planning and scheduling in make-to-order manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Economics , 149 , 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.022

Heydari, M., & Aazami, A. (2018). Minimizing the maximum tardiness and makespan criteria in a job shop scheduling problem with sequence dependent setup times. Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering , 11 (2), 134–150. https://www.jise.ir/article_57040.html

Google Scholar  

Hu, L., Liu, Z., Hu, W., Wang, Y., Tan, J., & Wu, F. (2020). Petri-net-based dynamic scheduling of flexible manufacturing system via deep reinforcement learning with graph convolutional network. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 55 , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.02.004

Iqbal, N., Khan, A. N., Imran, Rizwan, A., Qayyum, F., Malik, S., Ahmad, R., & Kim, D. H. (2022). Enhanced time-constraint aware tasks scheduling mechanism based on predictive optimization for efficient load balancing in smart manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 64 , 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.015

Jian, C., Ping, J., & Zhang, M. (2021). A cloud edge-based two-level hybrid scheduling learning model in cloud manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research , 59 (16), 4836–4850. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1779371

Jiang, Z., Yuan, S., Ma, J., & Wang, Q. (2022). The evolution of production scheduling from industry 3.0 through industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (11), 3534–3554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1925772

Jiang, B., Ma, Y., Chen, L., Huang, B., Huang, Y., & Guan, L. (2023). A review on Intelligent Scheduling and optimization for flexible job shop. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems , 21 (10), 3127–3150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-023-0578-1

Johnson, D., Chen, G., & Lu, Y. (2022). Multi-agent reinforcement learning for real-time dynamic production scheduling in a Robot Assembly Cell. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 7 (3), 7684–7691. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3184795

Khadiri, H., Sekkat, S., & Herrou, B. (2022). An Intelligent Method for the Scheduling of Cyber Physical Production systems. Management and Production Engineering Review , 13 (1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.24425/mper.2022.140875

Khan, A. N., Iqbal, N., Rizwan, A., Malik, S., Ahmad, R., & Kim, D. H. (2022). A criticality-aware dynamic Task Scheduling mechanism for efficient resource load balancing in constrained Smart Manufacturing Environment. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions , 10 , 50933–50946. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3173157

Kianpour, P., Gupta, D., Krishnan, K. K., & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2021). Automated job shop scheduling with dynamic processing times and due dates using project management and industry 4.0. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering , 38 (7), 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2021.1937725

Klein, M., Löcklin, A., Jazdi, N., & Weyrich, M. (2018). A negotiation based approach for agent based production scheduling. Procedia Manufacturing , 17 , 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.054

Krenczyk, D., & Paprocka, I. (2023). Integration of Discrete Simulation, Prediction, and optimization methods for a production line Digital Twin Design. Materials , 16 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16062339

Kumara, H. Y. S., S. T. S. B., & Tsung, F. (2019). The internet of things for smart manufacturing: A review. IISE Transactions , 51 (11), 1190–1216. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2018.1555383

Li, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Dynamic scheduling of multi-memory process flexible job shop problem based on digital twin. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109498

Li, Y. M. S., F. Q. X. L., & Liu, J. (2022). A data-driven scheduling knowledge management method for smart shop floor. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 35 (7), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2022.2025622

Li, Y., Carabelli, S., Fadda, E., Manerba, D., Tadei, R., & Terzo, O. (2020). Machine learning and optimization for production rescheduling in industry 4.0. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 110 (9–10), 2445–2463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05850-5

Li, M., Li, M., Ding, H., Ling, S., & Huang, G. Q. (2022). Graduation-inspired synchronization for industry 4.0 planning, scheduling, and execution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 64 , 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.017

Li, Y., Tao, Z., Wang, L., Du, B., Guo, J., & Pang, S. (2023). Digital twin-based job shop anomaly detection and dynamic scheduling. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102443

Lohmer, J., & Lasch, R. (2021). Production planning and scheduling in multi-factory production networks: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research , 59 (7), 2028–2054. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1797207

Luo, S. (2020). Dynamic scheduling for flexible job shop with new job insertions by deep reinforcement learning. Applied Soft Computing Journal , 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106208

Luo, Q., Deng, Q., Xie, G., & Gong, G. (2023). A pareto-based two-stage evolutionary algorithm for flexible job shop scheduling problem with worker cooperation flexibility. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 82 , 102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2023.102534

Ma, S., Zhang, Y., Lv, J., Ge, Y., Yang, H., & Li, L. (2020). Big data driven predictive production planning for energy-intensive manufacturing industries. Energy , 211 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118320

Ma, H., Huang, X., Hu, Z., Chen, Y., Qian, D., Deng, J., & Hua, L. (2023a). Multi-objective production scheduling optimization and management control system of complex aerospace components: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 127 (11), 4973–4993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11707-4

Maoudj, A., Bouzouia, B., Hentout, A., Kouider, A., & Toumi, R. (2019). Distributed multi-agent scheduling and control system for robotic flexible assembly cells. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , 30 (4), 1629–1644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1345-z

Marzia, S., AlejandroVital-Soto, & Azab, A. (2023). Automated process planning and dynamic scheduling for smart manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Manufacturing Letters , 35 , 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2023.07.013

Mendia, I., Gil-Lopez, S., Grau, I., & Del Ser, J. (2022). A novel approach for the detection of anomalous energy consumption patterns in industrial cyber-physical systems. Expert Systems . https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12959

Mihoubi, B., Bouzouia, B., & Gaham, M. (2020). Reactive scheduling approach for solving a realistic flexible job shop scheduling problem. International Journal of Production Research , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1790686

Mou, J., Gao, L., Li, X., Pan, Q., & Mu, J. (2017). Multi-objective inverse scheduling optimization of single-machine shop system with uncertain due-dates and processing times. Cluster Computing , 20 (1), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-016-0717-z

Mourtzis, D., Zogopoulos, V., & Xanthi, F. (2019). Augmented reality application to support the assembly of highly customized products and to adapt to production re-scheduling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 105 (9), 3899–3910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03941-6

Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Zogopoulos, V. (2021). Integrated and adaptive AR maintenance and shop-floor rescheduling. Computers in Industry , 125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103383

Nouiri, M., Trentesaux, D., & Bekrar, A. (2019). Towards energy efficient scheduling of manufacturing systems through collaboration between cyber physical production and energy systems. Energies , 12 (23). https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234448

Nouiri, M., Bekrar, A., & Trentesaux, D. (2020). An energy-efficient scheduling and rescheduling method for production and logistics systems†. International Journal of Production Research , 58 (11), 3263–3283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1660826

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery , 88 , 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Pandhare, V., Negri, E., Ragazzini, L., Cattaneo, L., Macchi, M., & Lee, J. (2024). Digital twin-enabled robust production scheduling for equipment in degraded state. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 74 , 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.04.027

Parente, M., Figueira, G., Amorim, P., & Marques, A. (2020). Production scheduling in the context of industry 4.0: Review and trends. International Journal of Production Research , 58 (17), 5401–5431. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1718794

Prashar, A., Tortorella, G. L., & Fogliatto, F. S. (2022). Production scheduling in industry 4.0: Morphological analysis of the literature and future research agenda. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 65 , 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.08.008

Priore, P., Ponte, B., Puente, J., & Gómez, A. (2018). Learning-based scheduling of flexible manufacturing systems using ensemble methods. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 126 , 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.034

Qian, C., Zhang, Y., Jiang, C., Pan, S., & Rong, Y. (2020). A real-time data-driven collaborative mechanism in fixed-position assembly systems for smart manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101841

Qiao, F., Liu, J., & Ma, Y. (2021). Industrial big-data-driven and CPS-based adaptive production scheduling for smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research , 59 (23), 7139–7159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1836417

Qin, Z., & Lu, Y. (2021). Self-organizing manufacturing network: A paradigm towards smart manufacturing in mass personalization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 60 , 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.04.016

Ramadan, M., Salah, B., Othman, M., & Ayubali, A. A. (2020). Industry 4.0-based real-time scheduling and dispatching in lean manufacturing systems. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 12 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062272

Ren, W., Yan, Y., Hu, Y., & Guan, Y. (2022). Joint optimisation for dynamic flexible job-shop scheduling problem with transportation time and resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (18), 5675–5696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1968526

Rohaninejad, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Vahedi-Nouri, B., Hanzálek, Z., & Shirazian, S. (2022). A hybrid learning-based meta-heuristic algorithm for scheduling of an additive manufacturing system consisting of parallel SLM machines. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (20), 6205–6225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1987550

Romero-Silva, R., & Hernández-López, G. (2020). Shop-floor scheduling as a competitive advantage: A study on the relevance of cyber-physical systems in different manufacturing contexts. International Journal of Production Economics , 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107555

Rossit, D., & Tohmé, F. (2018). Scheduling research contributions to Smart manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters , 15 , 111–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2017.12.005

Rossit, D. A., Tohmé, F., & Frutos, M. (2019a). Industry 4.0: Smart Scheduling. International Journal of Production Research , 57 (12), 3802–3813. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1504248

Rossit, D. A., Tohmé, F., & Frutos, M. (2019b). Production planning and scheduling in Cyber-physical Production systems: A review. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 32 (4–5), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2019.1605199

Rossit, D. A., Tohmé, F., & Frutos, M. (2019c). A data-driven scheduling approach to smart manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Information Integration , 15 , 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2019.04.003

Salman Saeidlou, M. S., & Jules, G. D. (2019). Knowledge and agent-based system for decentralised scheduling in manufacturing. Cogent Engineering , 6 (1), 1582309. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2019.1582309

Schweitzer, F., Bitsch, G., & Louw, L. (2023). Choosing solution strategies for Scheduling Automated guided vehicles in Production using machine learning. Applied Sciences , 13 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13020806

Seeger, P. M., Yahouni, Z., & Alpan, G. (2022). Literature review on using data mining in production planning and scheduling within the context of cyber physical systems. Journal of Industrial Information Integration , 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100371

Serrano-Ruiz, J. C., Mula, J., & Poler, R. (2021). Smart manufacturing scheduling: A literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 61 , 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.011

Serrano-Ruiz, J. C., Mula, J., & Poler, R. (2022). Development of a multidimensional conceptual model for job shop smart manufacturing scheduling from the industry 4.0 perspective. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 63 , 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.03.011

Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management , 17 , 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609

Shen, W. (2002). Distributed manufacturing scheduling using intelligent agents. IEEE Intelligent Systems , 17 (1), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.988492

Shi, L., Guo, G., & Song, X. (2021). Multi-agent based dynamic scheduling optimisation of the sustainable hybrid flow shop in a ubiquitous environment. International Journal of Production Research , 59 (2), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1699671

Shiue, Y. R., Lee, K. C., & Su, C. T. (2022). Development of dynamic scheduling in semiconductor manufacturing using a Q-learning approach. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 35 (10–11), 1188–1204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.1946849

Sun, Y. L. S., X. V. W., & Wang, L. (2022). An iterative combinatorial auction mechanism for multi-agent parallel machine scheduling. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (1), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1950938

Tang, Q. N. D., H. Z., & Sun, H. (2022). A multi-agent and internet of things framework of digital twin for optimized manufacturing control. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing , 35 (10–11), 1205–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2021.2004619

Tang, D., Dai, M., Salido, M. A., & Giret, A. (2016). Energy-efficient dynamic scheduling for a flexible flow shop using an improved particle swarm optimization. Computers in Industry , 81 , 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.10.001

Tliba, K., Diallo, T. M. L., Penas, O., Ben Khalifa, R., Ben Yahia, N., & Choley, J. Y. (2023). Digital twin-driven dynamic scheduling of a hybrid flow shop. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , 34 (5), 2281–2306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-022-01922-3

Toptal, A., & Sabuncuoglu, I. (2010). Distributed scheduling: A review of concepts and applications. International Journal of Production Research , 48 (18), 5235–5262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903121065

Upasani, K., Bakshi, M., Pandhare, V., & Lad, B. K. (2017). Distributed maintenance planning in manufacturing industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering , 108 , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.027

Usman, S., & Lu, C. (2024). Job-shop scheduling with limited flexible workers considering ergonomic factors using an improved multi-objective discrete Jaya algorithm. Computers & Operations Research , 162 , 106456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2023.106456

Villalonga, A., Negri, E., Biscardo, G., Castano, F., Haber, R. E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2021). A decision-making framework for dynamic scheduling of cyber-physical production systems based on digital twins. Annual Reviews in Control , 51 , 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.04.008

Wan, J., Chen, B., Wang, S., Xia, M., Li, D., & Liu, C. (2018). Fog Computing for Energy-Aware load balancing and scheduling in Smart Factory. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , 14 (10), 4548–4556. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2818932

Wang, Z., Hu, H., Gong, J., & Ma, X. (2018). Synchronizing production scheduling with resources allocation for precast components in a multi-agent system environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 49 , 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.09.004

Wang, X., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., Li, F., Chen, Z., Zhao, C., & Bai, T. (2022b). Dynamic scheduling of tasks in cloud manufacturing with multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 65 , 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.08.004

Wang, J., Liu, Y., Ren, S., Wang, C., & Ma, S. (2023). Edge computing-based real-time scheduling for digital twin flexible job shop with variable time window. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102435

Weiss-Cohen, M., Mitnovizky, M., & Shpitalni, M. (2017). Manufacturing systems: Using agents with local intelligence to maximize factory profit. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology , 18 , 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2016.11.005

Wen, X., Lian, X., Qian, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., & Li, H. (2022). Dynamic scheduling method for integrated process planning and scheduling problem with machine fault. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 77 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102334

Wu, X., Tian, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). The internet of things enabled shop floor scheduling and process control Method based on Petri nets. Ieee Access : Practical Innovations, Open Solutions , 7 , 27432–27442. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900117

Wu, X., Cao, Z., & Wu, S. (2021). Real-time hybrid Flow Shop Scheduling Approach in Smart Manufacturing Environment. Complex System Modeling and Simulation , 1 (4), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.23919/CSMS.2021.0024

Xu, L. Z., & Xie, Q. S. (2021). Dynamic production scheduling of digital twin job-shop based on edge computing. Journal of Information Science and Engineering , 37 (1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.6688/JISE.202101_37(1).0007

Yan, Q., Wang, H., & Wu, F. (2022). Digital twin-enabled dynamic scheduling with preventive maintenance using a double-layer Q-learning algorithm. Computers and Operations Research , 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2022.105823

Yang, S., & Xu, Z. (2022). Intelligent scheduling and reconfiguration via deep reinforcement learning in smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (16), 4936–4953. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1943037

Yin, L., Zhang, W., & Zhou, T. (2023). Machine Health-Driven Dynamic Scheduling of Hybrid Jobs for Flexible Manufacturing Shop. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing , 24 (5), 797–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00784-w

Zhang, H., Zhao, F., & Sutherland, J. W. (2015). Energy-efficient scheduling of multiple manufacturing factories under real-time electricity pricing. CIRP Annals , 64 (1), 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2015.04.049

Zhang, S., Tang, F., Li, X., Liu, J., & Zhang, B. (2021). A hybrid multi-objective approach for real-time flexible production scheduling and rescheduling under dynamic environment in industry 4.0 context. Computers and Operations Research , 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2021.105267

Zhang, Y., Zhu, H., Tang, D., Zhou, T., & Gui, Y. (2022b). Dynamic job shop scheduling based on deep reinforcement learning for multi-agent manufacturing systems. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing , 78 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102412

Zhang, Y., Liang, Y., Jia, B., & Wang, P. (2023). Scheduling and process optimization for Blockchain-Enabled Cloud Manufacturing using dynamic selection evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , 19 (2), 1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2022.3188835

Zhou, B., & Zhao, Z. (2022). A hybrid fuzzy-neural-based dynamic scheduling method for part feeding of mixed-model assembly lines. Computers and Industrial Engineering , 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107794

Zhou, L., Jiang, Z., Geng, N., Niu, Y., Cui, F., Liu, K., & Qi, N. (2022b). Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research , 60 (2), 808–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.2017055

Zonta, T., da Costa, C. A., Zeiser, F. A., de Oliveira Ramos, G., Kunst, R., & da Rosa Righi, R. (2022). A predictive maintenance model for optimizing production schedule using deep neural networks. Journal of Manufacturing Systems , 62 , 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.12.013

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by CHANAKYA Fellowships of IITI DRISHTI CPS Foundation under the National Mission on Interdisciplinary Cyber Physical System (NM-ICPS) of Department of Science and Technology, Government of India.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, India

Shriprasad Chorghe, Rishi Kumar, Vibhor Pandhare & Bhupesh Kumar Lad

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India

Makarand S. Kulkarni

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rishi Kumar .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Chorghe, S., Kumar, R., Kulkarni, M.S. et al. Smart scheduling for next generation manufacturing systems: a systematic literature review. J Intell Manuf (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02484-2

Download citation

Received : 19 March 2024

Accepted : 17 August 2024

Published : 09 September 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-024-02484-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Smart scheduling
• Industry 4.0
• Literature review
• Smart manufacturing
• Cyber physical system
• Dynamic scheduling
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Multimodal resources and approaches for teaching young adolescents: a review of the literature.

1. Introduction

1.1. the seminal and building research on multimodal pedagogies, 1.2. young adolescents and multimodality, 2. materials and methods.

• Multimodality in education, Young adolescents or teenagers, Visual literacies
• Multimodality in education, Young adolescents or teenagers, Photography
• Multimodality in education, Young adolescents or teenagers, Art
• Multimodality in education, Learning Disabilities
• Multimodality, Self-expression, Identity
• Year of publication (2013–2023)
• Type of research
• Purpose of study/participants (young adolescents)
• Intervention/student activity (classroom-based)
• Measures/data sources
• Pedagogical implications (classroom-based)

3.1. Multimodal Pedagogy for Language and Literacy Development

3.1.1. developing language, 3.1.2. developing reading and viewing of multimodal texts, 3.1.3. developing the designing of multimodal texts, 3.2. multimodal pedagogy for content learning, 3.2.1. making content accessible for all students, 3.2.2. teaching reading, writing, and creating with course content, 3.2.3. exploring issues and abstract concepts, 3.3. multimodal pedagogy for expression and identity opportunities, 3.3.1. supporting empowerment and identity development using multimodal pedagogy, 3.3.2. expressing personal responses to literature using multimodal pedagogy, 4. discussion.

• What is the impact of multimodal pedagogy on content literacy and learning achievement for young adolescents?
• What is the impact of multimodal pedagogy on young adolescents’ motivation and interest in reading, writing, and developing content area knowledge?
• How can teachers develop the knowledge needed to instruct students in using and critiquing multimodal texts?
• What strategies can teachers use to prepare students to read/view and critique multimodal texts?
• How can multimodal pedagogy support the learning of students with diverse language and learning needs?
• What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of multimodal pedagogy?

Author Contributions

Institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Cazden, C.; Cope, B.; Fairclough, N.; Gee, J.; Kalantzis, M.; Kress, G.; Luke, A.; Luke, C.; Michaels, S.; Nakata, M. A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harv. Educ. Rev. 1996 , 66 , 60–92. [ Google Scholar ]
• Street, B. The Implications of the ‘New Literacy Studies’ for Literacy Education. Eng. Educ. 1997 , 31 , 45–59. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Luke, C. New Literacies in Teacher Education. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2000 , 43 , 424–435. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kalantzis, M.; Cope, B. Literacies ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kress, G. Literacy in the New Media Age ; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kress, G.; van Leeuwen, T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design ; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Serafini, F. Multimodal Literacy: From Theories to Practices. Lang. Arts 2015 , 92 , 412–423. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Serafini, F.; Clausen, J. Typography as Semiotic Resource. J. Vis. Lit. 2012 , 31 , 12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gee, J.P. The New Literacy Studies. In The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies ; Rowsell, J., Pahl, K., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2015; pp. 3–48. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kress, G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication ; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lotherington, H.; Jenson, J. Teaching Multimodal and Digital Literacy in L2 Settings: New Literacies, New Basics, New Pedagogies. Annu. Rev. Appl. Linguist. 2011 , 31 , 226–246. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Canagarajah, A.S. Codemeshing in Academic Writing: Identifying Teachable Strategies of Translanguaging. Mod. Lang. J. 2011 , 95 , 401–417. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cope, B.; Kalantzis, M. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures ; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lim, F.V.; Tan-Chia, L. Designing Learning for Multimodal Literacy: Teaching Viewing and Representing ; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bishop, P.A.; Harrison, L.M. The Successful Middle School: This We Believe ; Association for Middle Level Education (AMLE): Columbus, OH, USA, 2023. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bell, A.; Ewaida, M.; Lynch, M.; Zenkov, K. Student Perspectives on Quality Teaching: Words and Images. Voices Middle 2011 , 19 , 32–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wissman, K. Supreme Efforts of Care and Honest Utterance: Grasping the Singular Power of the Spoken Word in School Spaces. Penn GSE Perspect. Urban Educ. 2010 , 7 , 49–53. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lewkowich, D. Readers of Comics and the Recursive Nature of Adolescent Emotion: Exploring the Productive Relation of Visual Response and Memory in Teacher Education. Lit. Res. Instr. 2019 , 58 , 295–316. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Boche, B. Multiliteracies in the Classroom: Emerging Conceptions of First-Year Teachers. J. Lang. Lit. Edu. 2014 , 10 , 114–135. [ Google Scholar ]
• Moeller, R.A. A Question of Legitimacy: A Graphic Novel as “Real” Reading. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2016 , 59 , 709–717. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Falk-Ross, F.; Linder, R. Multimodal Reading and Design: Preservice and Practicing Teachers’ Graphic Narratives for Students. Lang. Arts 2024 , 101 , 240–263. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Loerts, T.; Belcher, C. Pedagogy in the Context of Multiliteracies: A Longitudinal Study of New Educators. Aus. J. Lang. Lit. 2024 , 47 , 107–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mertens, S.B.; Caskey, M.M.; Bishop, P.; Flowers, N.; Strahan, D.; Andrews, G.; Daniel, L. The MLER SIG Research Agenda. 2016. Available online: http://mlersig.net/mler-sig-research-agenda-project (accessed on 12 June 2024).
• Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2005 , 4 , 356–367. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Reviews of the Literature: Methods and Purposes. Inter. J. Adult Voc. Educ. Tech. 2016 , 7 , 62–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.; Saldaña, J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 4th ed.; Sage Publishing: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brugar, K.A.; Roberts, K.L.; Jiménez, L.M.; Meyer, C.K. More than Mere Motivation: Learning Specific Content through Multimodal Narratives. Lit. Res. Instr. 2018 , 57 , 183–208. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jennings, K.A.; Rule, A.C.; Vander-Zanden, S.M. Fifth Graders’ Enjoyment, Interest, and Comprehension of Graphic Novels Compared to Heavily-Illustrated and Traditional Novels. Inter. Elec. J. Elem. Educ. 2014 , 6 , 257–274. [ Google Scholar ]
• Price-Dennis, D. Developing Curriculum to Support Black Girls’ Literacies in Digital Spaces. Eng. Educ. 2016 , 48 , 337–361. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pacheco, M.B.; Smith, B.E. Across Languages, Modes, and Identities: Bilingual Adolescents’ Multimodal Codemeshing in the Literacy Classroom. Biling. Res. J. 2015 , 38 , 292–312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Schmier, S. Popular Culture in a Digital Media Studies Classroom. Literacy 2014 , 48 , 39–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Howell, E. Expanding Argument Instruction: Incorporating Multimodality and Digital Tools. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2018 , 61 , 533–542. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, L. Critical Encounters in a Middle School English Language Arts Classroom: Using Graphic Novels to Teach Critical Thinking & Reading for Peace Education. Multi. Educ. 2017 , 25 , 22–28. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pellegrino, A.M.; Zenkov, K.; Calamito, N. “Pay Attention and Take Some Notes”: Middle School Youth, Multimodal Instruction, and Notions of Citizenship. J. Soc. Stud. Res. 2013 , 37 , 221–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Reid, S.F.; Moses, L. Students Become Comic Book Author-Illustrators: Composing with Words and Images in a Fourth-Grade Writers’ Workshop. Read. Teach. 2020 , 73 , 461–472. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Smith, B.E. Mediational modalities: Adolescents Collaboratively Interpreting Literature through Digital Multimodal Composing. Res. Teach. Eng. 2019 , 53 , 197–222. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harvey, M.; Deuel, A.; Marlatt, R. ‘To Be, or Not to Be’: Modernizing Shakespeare with Multimodal Learning Stations. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2020 , 63 , 559–568. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Espinet, I.; Chapman-Santiago, C. “When People Don’t Know Me, They Think…”: Fostering a Multimodal Translanguaging Space That Leverages Students’ Voices. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2020 , 66 , 91–99. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chisholm, J.S.; Shelton, A.L.; Sheffield, C.C. Mediating Emotive Empathy with Informational Text: Three Students’ Think-Aloud Protocols of Gettysburg, the Graphic Novel. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2017 , 61 , 289–298. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dallacqua, A.K. Wondering About Rapunzel: Reading and Responding to Feminist Fairy Tales with Seventh Graders. Child. Lit. in Educ. 2019 , 50 , 261–277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garcia, O. Translanguaging and Latinx Bilingual Readers. Read. Teach. 2020 , 73 , 557–562. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cavallaro, C.J.; Sembiante, S. Facilitating Culturally Sustaining, Functional Literacy Practices in a Middle School ESOL Reading Program: A Design-Based Study. Lang. Educ. 2021 , 35 , 160–179. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kennedy, L.M.; Oviatt, R.L.; De Costa, P.I. Refugee Youth’s Identity Expressions and Multimodal Literacy Practices in a Third Space. J. Res. Child. Educ. 2019 , 33 , 56–70. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lai, T. Inside Out and Back Again ; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pyo, J. Bridging In-School and Out-of-School Literacies: An Adolescent EL’s Composition of a Multimodal Project. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2016 , 59 , 421–430. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jackson, A.W.; Davis, G.A. Turning Points 2000: Educating Adolescents in the 21st Century ; Teachers College Press: New York, NY, USA, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Bender, A.A. Making Meaning with Graphic Novels. Mid. Grad. Res. J. 2018 , 12 , 83–97. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brenna, B. How Graphic Novels Support Reading Comprehension Strategy Development in Children. Literacy 2013 , 47 , 88–94. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Satrapi, M. Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood ; Pantheon: New York, NY, USA, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hale, S.; Hale, D.; Hale, N. Rapunzel’s Revenge ; Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hale, S.; Hale, D.; Hale, N. Calamity Jack ; Bloomsbury: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dallacqua, A.K.; Low, D.E. Cupcakes and Beefcakes: Students’ Readings of Gender in Superhero Texts. Gend. Educ. 2021 , 33 , 68–85. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qiao, X.; Moses, L.; Kelly, L.B. Literate Identity Negotiations and Supportive Teacher Discourse Moves in a Comic Writing Workshop. Pedagog. Int. J. 2022 , 17 , 206–226. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karchmer-Klein, R.; Shinas, V.H. Adolescents’ Navigation of Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Modes When Reading a Digital Narrative. J. Res. Read. 2019 , 42 , 469–484. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pantaleo, S. The Multimodal Meaning-Making of Elementary Students in Social Studies. Aus. J. Lang. Lit. 2021 , 44 , 35–47. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ehret, C.; Hollett, T. (Re)placing school: Middle School Students’ Countermobilities while Composing with Ipods. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2013 , 57 , 110–119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chisholm, J.S.; Whitmore, K.F. Bodies in Space/Bodies in Motion/Bodies in Character: Adolescents Bear Witness to Anne Frank. Inter. J. Educ. Arts 2016 , 17 , 1–30. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dalton, B.; Robinson, K.H.; Lovvorn, J.F.; Smith, B.E.; Alvey, T.; Mo, E.; Uccelli, P.; Proctor, C.P. Fifth-Grade Students’ Digital Retellings and the Common Core: Modal Use and Design Intentionality. Elem. Sch. J. 2015 , 115 , 548–569. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hitchcock, C.H.; Rao, K.; Chang, C.C.; Yuen, J.W.L. Using Multimedia Tools and Scaffolds to Support Writing. Rural Spec. Educ. Q. 2016 , 35 , 10–23. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Townsend, D.; Brock, C.; Morrison, J.D. Engaging in Vocabulary Learning in Science: The Promise of Multimodal Instruction. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2018 , 40 , 328–347. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhang, Y. Multimodal Teacher Input and Science Learning in a Middle School Sheltered Classroom. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2015 , 53 , 7–30. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pierson, A.E.; Clark, D.B.; Brady, C.E. Scientific Modeling and Translanguaging: A Multilingual and Multimodal Approach to Support Science Learning and Engagement. Sci. Educ. 2021 , 105 , 776–813. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hale, N. One Dead Spy ; Abrams: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Butzer, C.M. Gettysburg: The Graphic Novel ; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pratt, S.M.; Coleman, J.M.; Dantzler, J.A. A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Fourth-Graders’ Comprehension and Their Reported Strategies for Reading Science Texts. Lit. Res. Instr. 2023 , 62 , 16–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nixon, R.S.; Wimmer, J.J.; Smith, L.K. Teaching Multiple Modes of Representation in Middle-School Science Classrooms: Impact on Student Learning and Multimodal Use. Sch. Sci. Math. 2015 , 115 , 186–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Albom, M. Tuesdays with Morrie: An Old Man, A Young Man and Life’s Greatest Lesson ; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, H. To Kill a Mockingbird ; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [ Google Scholar ]
• Steinbeck, J. Of Mice and Men ; Pearson Longman: New York, NY, USA, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, V.J.; Meloche, A.; Grant, A.; Neuman, D.; DeCarlo, M.J.T. “My Thoughts on Gun Violence”: An Urban Adolescent’s Display of Agency and Multimodal Literacies. J. Adolesc. Adult. Lit. 2019 , 63 , 157–168. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dallacqua, A.K. Reading Comics Collaboratively and Challenging Literacy Norms. Lit. Res. Instr. 2020 , 59 , 169–190. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Honeyford, M.A. From ‘Aquí’ and ‘Allá’: Symbolic Convergence in the Multimodal Literacy Practices of Adolescent Immigrant Students. J. Lit. Res. 2014 , 46 , 194–233. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Frank, A.; Frank, O. Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl ; Doubleday: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [ Google Scholar ]
• Greitens, E. The Warrior’s Heart: Becoming a Man of Compassion and Courage ; Clarion Books: New York, NY, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]

Share and Cite

Linder, R.; Falk-Ross, F. Multimodal Resources and Approaches for Teaching Young Adolescents: A Review of the Literature. Educ. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091010

Linder R, Falk-Ross F. Multimodal Resources and Approaches for Teaching Young Adolescents: A Review of the Literature. Education Sciences . 2024; 14(9):1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091010

Linder, Roberta, and Francine Falk-Ross. 2024. "Multimodal Resources and Approaches for Teaching Young Adolescents: A Review of the Literature" Education Sciences 14, no. 9: 1010. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091010

Article Metrics

Further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• Perspect Med Educ
• v.7(1); 2018 Feb

Writing an effective literature review

Lorelei lingard.

Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Health Sciences Addition, Western University, London, Ontario Canada

In the Writer’s Craft section we offer simple tips to improve your writing in one of three areas: Energy, Clarity and Persuasiveness. Each entry focuses on a key writing feature or strategy, illustrates how it commonly goes wrong, teaches the grammatical underpinnings necessary to understand it and offers suggestions to wield it effectively. We encourage readers to share comments on or suggestions for this section on Twitter, using the hashtag: #how’syourwriting?

This Writer’s Craft instalment is the first in a two-part series that offers strategies for effectively presenting the literature review section of a research manuscript. This piece alerts writers to the importance of not only summarizing what is known but also identifying precisely what is not, in order to explicitly signal the relevance of their research. In this instalment, I will introduce readers to the mapping the gap metaphor, the knowledge claims heuristic, and the need to characterize the gap.

Mapping the gap

The purpose of the literature review section of a manuscript is not to report what is known about your topic. The purpose is to identify what remains unknown— what academic writing scholar Janet Giltrow has called the ‘knowledge deficit’ — thus establishing the need for your research study [ 1 ]. In an earlier Writer’s Craft instalment, the Problem-Gap-Hook heuristic was introduced as a way of opening your paper with a clear statement of the problem that your work grapples with, the gap in our current knowledge about that problem, and the reason the gap matters [ 2 ]. This article explains how to use the literature review section of your paper to build and characterize the Gap claim in your Problem-Gap-Hook. The metaphor of ‘mapping the gap’ is a way of thinking about how to select and arrange your review of the existing literature so that readers can recognize why your research needed to be done, and why its results constitute a meaningful advance on what was already known about the topic.

Many writers have learned that the literature review should describe what is known. The trouble with this approach is that it can produce a laundry list of facts-in-the-world that does not persuade the reader that the current study is a necessary next step. Instead, think of your literature review as painting in a map of your research domain: as you review existing knowledge, you are painting in sections of the map, but your goal is not to end with the whole map fully painted. That would mean there is nothing more we need to know about the topic, and that leaves no room for your research. What you want to end up with is a map in which painted sections surround and emphasize a white space, a gap in what is known that matters. Conceptualizing your literature review this way helps to ensure that it achieves its dual goal: of presenting what is known and pointing out what is not—the latter of these goals is necessary for your literature review to establish the necessity and importance of the research you are about to describe in the methods section which will immediately follow the literature review.

To a novice researcher or graduate student, this may seem counterintuitive. Hopefully you have invested significant time in reading the existing literature, and you are understandably keen to demonstrate that you’ve read everything ever published about your topic! Be careful, though, not to use the literature review section to regurgitate all of your reading in manuscript form. For one thing, it creates a laundry list of facts that makes for horrible reading. But there are three other reasons for avoiding this approach. First, you don’t have the space. In published medical education research papers, the literature review is quite short, ranging from a few paragraphs to a few pages, so you can’t summarize everything you’ve read. Second, you’re preaching to the converted. If you approach your paper as a contribution to an ongoing scholarly conversation,[ 2 ] then your literature review should summarize just the aspects of that conversation that are required to situate your conversational turn as informed and relevant. Third, the key to relevance is to point to a gap in what is known. To do so, you summarize what is known for the express purpose of identifying what is not known . Seen this way, the literature review should exert a gravitational pull on the reader, leading them inexorably to the white space on the map of knowledge you’ve painted for them. That white space is the space that your research fills.

Knowledge claims

To help writers move beyond the laundry list, the notion of ‘knowledge claims’ can be useful. A knowledge claim is a way of presenting the growing understanding of the community of researchers who have been exploring your topic. These are not disembodied facts, but rather incremental insights that some in the field may agree with and some may not, depending on their different methodological and disciplinary approaches to the topic. Treating the literature review as a story of the knowledge claims being made by researchers in the field can help writers with one of the most sophisticated aspects of a literature review—locating the knowledge being reviewed. Where does it come from? What is debated? How do different methodologies influence the knowledge being accumulated? And so on.

Consider this example of the knowledge claims (KC), Gap and Hook for the literature review section of a research paper on distributed healthcare teamwork:

KC: We know that poor team communication can cause errors. KC: And we know that team training can be effective in improving team communication. KC: This knowledge has prompted a push to incorporate teamwork training principles into health professions education curricula. KC: However, most of what we know about team training research has come from research with co-located teams—i. e., teams whose members work together in time and space. Gap: Little is known about how teamwork training principles would apply in distributed teams, whose members work asynchronously and are spread across different locations. Hook: Given that much healthcare teamwork is distributed rather than co-located, our curricula will be severely lacking until we create refined teamwork training principles that reflect distributed as well as co-located work contexts.

The ‘We know that …’ structure illustrated in this example is a template for helping you draft and organize. In your final version, your knowledge claims will be expressed with more sophistication. For instance, ‘We know that poor team communication can cause errors’ will become something like ‘Over a decade of patient safety research has demonstrated that poor team communication is the dominant cause of medical errors.’ This simple template of knowledge claims, though, provides an outline for the paragraphs in your literature review, each of which will provide detailed evidence to illustrate a knowledge claim. Using this approach, the order of the paragraphs in the literature review is strategic and persuasive, leading the reader to the gap claim that positions the relevance of the current study. To expand your vocabulary for creating such knowledge claims, linking them logically and positioning yourself amid them, I highly recommend Graff and Birkenstein’s little handbook of ‘templates’ [ 3 ].

As you organize your knowledge claims, you will also want to consider whether you are trying to map the gap in a well-studied field, or a relatively understudied one. The rhetorical challenge is different in each case. In a well-studied field, like professionalism in medical education, you must make a strong, explicit case for the existence of a gap. Readers may come to your paper tired of hearing about this topic and tempted to think we can’t possibly need more knowledge about it. Listing the knowledge claims can help you organize them most effectively and determine which pieces of knowledge may be unnecessary to map the white space your research attempts to fill. This does not mean that you leave out relevant information: your literature review must still be accurate. But, since you will not be able to include everything, selecting carefully among the possible knowledge claims is essential to producing a coherent, well-argued literature review.

Characterizing the gap

Once you’ve identified the gap, your literature review must characterize it. What kind of gap have you found? There are many ways to characterize a gap, but some of the more common include:

• a pure knowledge deficit—‘no one has looked at the relationship between longitudinal integrated clerkships and medical student abuse’
• a shortcoming in the scholarship, often due to philosophical or methodological tendencies and oversights—‘scholars have interpreted x from a cognitivist perspective, but ignored the humanist perspective’ or ‘to date, we have surveyed the frequency of medical errors committed by residents, but we have not explored their subjective experience of such errors’
• a controversy—‘scholars disagree on the definition of professionalism in medicine …’
• a pervasive and unproven assumption—‘the theme of technological heroism—technology will solve what ails teamwork—is ubiquitous in the literature, but what is that belief based on?’

To characterize the kind of gap, you need to know the literature thoroughly. That means more than understanding each paper individually; you also need to be placing each paper in relation to others. This may require changing your note-taking technique while you’re reading; take notes on what each paper contributes to knowledge, but also on how it relates to other papers you’ve read, and what it suggests about the kind of gap that is emerging.

In summary, think of your literature review as mapping the gap rather than simply summarizing the known. And pay attention to characterizing the kind of gap you’ve mapped. This strategy can help to make your literature review into a compelling argument rather than a list of facts. It can remind you of the danger of describing so fully what is known that the reader is left with the sense that there is no pressing need to know more. And it can help you to establish a coherence between the kind of gap you’ve identified and the study methodology you will use to fill it.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mark Goldszmidt for his feedback on an early version of this manuscript.

PhD, is director of the Centre for Education Research & Innovation at Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, and professor for the Department of Medicine at Western University in London, Ontario, Canada.