Moral foundations of pro-choice and pro-life women - PMC
Our research demonstrates that pro-choice and pro-life women differed in moral foundations when (a) they revealed abstract moral foundations (pro-life women cared more about loyalty, authority, and purity than pro-choice women) and (b) when they made moral judgments closed to real-life problems (e.g., pro-choice women were more concerned than ...
Pro-Choice Does Not Mean Pro-Abortion: An Argument for ...
Pro-Choice Does Not Mean Pro-Abortion: An Argument for Abortion Rights Featuring the Rev. Carlton Veazey. Since the Supreme Court’s historic 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, the issue of a woman’s right to an abortion has fostered one of the most contentious moral and political debates in America.
Abortion as a moral good - The Lancet
Concluding that abortion does not violate the principle of non-maleficence makes it morally acceptable. This view explains why many pro-choicepeople see conception as a moral invitation rather than a moral obligation.
The Ethical Dilemma of Abortion | Journal of Student Research ...
This paper discusses the extremely complex and important topic and dilemma of abortion. Specifically, that the pro-life versus pro-choicedilemma is an imperative one that continues to cause ethical tensions in the United States. For this reason, this issue and dilemma warrants close scrutiny.
Women’s Rights and Unborn Life: The Development of Pro-Choice ...
Abstract. Since the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion in the. Unites States, the debate over abortion has been a prominent feature of the American political. landscape. While much research has investigated the difference between pro-choice and pro-life.
Abortion Care in the United States — Current Evidence and ...
People spend the majority of their reproductive lifespan avoiding pregnancy, and abortion is common — one in four people capable of pregnancy in the United States will have had at least one...
A research on abortion: ethics, legislation and socio-medical ...
This article presents a research study on abortion from a theoretical and empirical point of view. The theoretical part is based on the method of social documents analysis, and presents a complex perspective on abortion, highlighting items of medical, ethical, moral, religious, social, economic and legal elements.
Pro-choice and Pro-life Are Not Enough: An Investigation of ...
Consistent across all individual difference measures, pro-choice individuals were different from pro-life people in an expected way. Pro-choice individuals were more erotophilic, less sexist, less religious, and less authoritarian than pro-life participants.
Pro-choice and Pro-life Are Not Enough: An Investigation of ...
It is insufficient to dichotomize attitudes toward abortion as either pro-life or pro-choice; this research suggests that, at minimum, there is a substantial intermediate group of...
Pro-Life, Pro-Choice: Shared Values in the Abortion Debate on ...
In this provocative and accessible book, the author defends apro-choice perspective but also takes seriously pro-life concernsabout the moral value of the human...
COMMENTS
Our research demonstrates that pro-choice and pro-life women differed in moral foundations when (a) they revealed abstract moral foundations (pro-life women cared more about loyalty, authority, and purity than pro-choice women) and (b) when they made moral judgments closed to real-life problems (e.g., pro-choice women were more concerned than ...
Pro-Choice Does Not Mean Pro-Abortion: An Argument for Abortion Rights Featuring the Rev. Carlton Veazey. Since the Supreme Court’s historic 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade, the issue of a woman’s right to an abortion has fostered one of the most contentious moral and political debates in America.
Concluding that abortion does not violate the principle of non-maleficence makes it morally acceptable. This view explains why many pro-choice people see conception as a moral invitation rather than a moral obligation.
This paper discusses the extremely complex and important topic and dilemma of abortion. Specifically, that the pro-life versus pro-choice dilemma is an imperative one that continues to cause ethical tensions in the United States. For this reason, this issue and dilemma warrants close scrutiny.
Abstract. Since the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion in the. Unites States, the debate over abortion has been a prominent feature of the American political. landscape. While much research has investigated the difference between pro-choice and pro-life.
People spend the majority of their reproductive lifespan avoiding pregnancy, and abortion is common — one in four people capable of pregnancy in the United States will have had at least one...
This article presents a research study on abortion from a theoretical and empirical point of view. The theoretical part is based on the method of social documents analysis, and presents a complex perspective on abortion, highlighting items of medical, ethical, moral, religious, social, economic and legal elements.
Consistent across all individual difference measures, pro-choice individuals were different from pro-life people in an expected way. Pro-choice individuals were more erotophilic, less sexist, less religious, and less authoritarian than pro-life participants.
It is insufficient to dichotomize attitudes toward abortion as either pro-life or pro-choice; this research suggests that, at minimum, there is a substantial intermediate group of...
In this provocative and accessible book, the author defends apro-choice perspective but also takes seriously pro-life concernsabout the moral value of the human...