german immigration research paper

• Architecture and Design
• Asian and Pacific Studies
• Business and Economics
• Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
• Computer Sciences
• Cultural Studies
• Engineering
• General Interest
• Geosciences
• Industrial Chemistry
• Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies
• Jewish Studies
• Library and Information Science, Book Studies
• Life Sciences
• Linguistics and Semiotics
• Literary Studies
• Materials Sciences
• Mathematics
• Social Sciences
• Sports and Recreation
• Theology and Religion
• Publish your article
• The role of authors
• Promoting your article
• Abstracting & indexing
• Publishing Ethics
• Why publish with De Gruyter
• How to publish with De Gruyter
• Our book series
• Our subject areas
• Your digital product at De Gruyter
• Contribute to our reference works
• Product information
• Tools & resources
• Product Information
• Promotional Materials
• Orders and Inquiries
• FAQ for Library Suppliers and Book Sellers
• Repository Policy
• Free access policy
• Open Access agreements
• Database portals
• For Authors
• Customer service
• People + Culture
• Journal Management
• How to join us
• Working at De Gruyter
• Mission & Vision
• De Gruyter Foundation
• De Gruyter Ebound
• Our Responsibility
• Partner publishers

Your purchase has been completed. Your documents are now available to view.

Growing Potentials for Migration Research using the German Socio-Economic Panel Study

This article highlights the potentials for migration research using the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP), a longitudinal panel dataset of private households in Germany running since 1984. We provide a concise overview of its basic features, describe the survey contents and research potentials, and demonstrate opportunities to link external data sources to the SOEP thereby presenting its diverse and impactful applications in migration research.

1 Introduction

Migration has become a common experience throughout the globalized world and a major topic of public and scientific debate. In the European Union, the 1985 Schengen agreement and the 1992 Treaty of Maastricht dramatically simplified movement between member states. In Germany, migration rose substantially 30 years ago with the fall of the Wall and permanently changed the country’s social and economic composition. The gross inflow of migrants to the Federal Republic of Germany in 2019 was the third highest in history, at 1.6 million people, after the years 2015 and 2016. This increase in migratory movements and deepening of European integration are only reflections of broader processes of economic and political globalization, which open up increasing opportunities to find better living conditions by moving abroad. Yet not only globalization but also humanitarian crises and ecological catastrophes are driving forces in many global migration movements.

Migration poses challenges to national economies in terms of labor supply, social security, and social cohesion (e.g., Freeman 1986 ) and requires targeted policy measures to foster integration. As migration often extends across multiple generations, evidence-based research on migration calls for longitudinal data that span the life course. Only with such data can researchers identify the causal mechanisms that drive migratory movements and underlie their individual and societal effects. Alongside administrative data, data from household panel studies and retrospective cohort studies provide a crucial basis for these kinds of longitudinal micro-analytical approaches to migration research. The main goal of household panel studies is to provide an accurate representation of national populations. Panel studies also have the advantage of low recall error thanks to their prospective longitudinal design ( Peters 1988 ). Because of this, they can track transnational movements across the life course. To address such longitudinal research questions, household studies in migrant-receiving countries must systematically incorporate migrants into their samples.

This article focuses on the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), a longitudinal survey of randomly sampled households in Germany, and provides an overview of its far-reaching potentials to observe migrant households in Germany ( Goebel et al. 2019 ). The SOEP has been underway since 1984, allowing researchers to study processes of transformation and change in Germany for almost four decades. Its mission is to provide information on diverse aspects of German society including income, wealth, labour market participation, life satisfaction, well-being, and other aspects of life ( Bauer et al. 2011; Bauer and Sinning 2011; Brell et al. 2020 ). To live up to this mission, the SOEP has been responding to exogenous changes in its underlying target population, including immigration, since its inception. According to its founding mission statement, a cornerstone of the SOEP is the systematic inclusion and oversampling the migrant population ( Krupp 2008 ). Up to the 35th wave in 2018, the SOEP has surveyed 96,461 individuals, 31,982 of whom have a background of migration. [1] Most of these individuals are part of the SOEP’s five specific migrant sub-samples, who are surveyed with targeted questionnaires allowing for systematic observation of migrants’ experiences in the Federal Republic of Germany. Besides individuals who migrated to Germany themselves (first generation immigrants), the SOEP also focuses on direct descendants of migrants (second generation immigrants) and thus captures various aspects of German immigration history. The SOEP is thus a unique data source for the study of immigration and integration trajectories in Germany, and provides researchers with reliable data on how immigration has affected the German economy and society over time. Each new wave of the SOEP increases these research potentials, especially in the area of migration.

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 2 of this article provides an overview of basic features of the SOEP, including a description of the sample composition, the sampling and weighting approaches of the SOEP migrant samples, and of the dataset structure. Section 3 describes the survey and illustrates research potentials. Section 4 outlines opportunities for linking external data sources to the SOEP, and Section 5 concludes this article.

2 Basic Features of the SOEP

The general target population of the SOEP consists of private households in Germany. Since 1984, around 96,461 individuals resident in 42,263 households have been interviewed at least once about their lives (see Figure 1 for the number of interviews in each survey year). The SOEP consists of several distinct sub-samples that have been added sequentially over time. Starting with the baseline Samples A (general population sample) and B (migrant sample) in 1984, the SOEP research group has subsequently reacted to panel attrition (refresher Samples E, F, H, J, K, N), changes in the target population resulting from events such as German reunification (East-Sample C), and to rising immigration to Germany (Samples D, M1-M5). Other samples focus, for instance, on people with high income or high net wealth (Samples G, P), households situated in big cities (Sample O), low income families and families with children (Samples L1–L3), or LGB families (Sample Q), some of which represent relatively small populations that require disproportional sampling to make them visible for in-depth analysis.

Number of valid individual interviews by survey year and migration background.

2.1 Migrants and Refugees in SOEP: 1984–2018

In its effort to capture immigration to Germany, the SOEP study includes a large share of immigrants (both cross-sectionally and over time), allowing for detailed analysis of sub-groups and for analysis in comparison to the non-migrant population. In the initial 1984 sample, five southern European countries—the so-called “guest worker” countries—were oversampled (households with Italian, Spanish, Greek, [Ex-]Yugoslavian or Turkish household heads). Hence, as Figure 1 shows, immigrants and their descendants have always been a substantial part of the SOEP. Over the course of the 36 survey years, a total of 25,869 people with a direct (first-generation) and 6,113 individuals with an indirect (second-generation) migration background have been part of a SOEP household.

Figure 2 shows the countries of origin of all SOEP respondents. In line with Germany’s immigration history, the SOEP data mostly cover immigration flows from southern Europe (e.g., guest workers) and since 1995, from new eastern EU member states, the former Soviet Union (late expatriates, ethnic Germans), and the Middle East (refugees).

Number of valid individual interviews by country of origin.

2.2 Sampling, Weighting, and Fieldwork

Most of the SOEP samples are two-stage random samples. In a first step, the SOEP group merges, for instance, addresses to regional clusters (Primary Sampling Units, PSUs). The sampling of PSUs is commonly stratified by region (e.g., federal states) and in some cases by urban/rural areas in order to ensure that German regions are comprehensively covered. Usually, in the second stage, individuals or addresses are sampled randomly from selected SSUs (secondary sampling units). Because the SOEP is a household study, not only the sampled respondent (anchor respondent), but all adult members of the household are interviewed and basic information on the educational participation of children is collected.

In order to ensure sufficient sample size for small sub-populations in the migrant samples (e.g., female refugees, elderly refugees), the SOEP in most cases applies disproportionate sampling on the SSU level. Such disproportionate sampling probabilities are corrected by means of design weighting. However, the weighting adjustment not only accounts for the sampling design, but allows for integrating the SOEP’s various sub-samples. We generally recommend using the SOEP as a whole and not just specific sub-samples, as in some cases the target populations are not mutually exclusive (for an overview, see Kroh et al. 2014 ). In Germany, sampling migrants is generally challenging because there is no comprehensive database containing all first and second generation immigrants in Germany. While the German central registry of foreigners contains all non-German nationals who reside in Germany for a period of three months or more, former migrants who have acquired German citizenship cannot be identified in this register. The SOEP therefore relies on a variety of sampling frames and techniques. Table 1 summarizes key sampling characteristics for each migrant sample.

Characteristics of migrant samples.

1 Central Register of Foreigners (AZR).

2 Association of German Market and Social Research Institutes (ADM).

3 Integrated Employment Biographies (IEB).

2.3 Dataset Structure

The structure of the data allows researchers to analyze SOEP data in two dimensions. [2] With each survey year representing a data wave, the first option is cross-sectional analysis of any given survey wave. Second, the longitudinal nature of the data can be exploited either in the “wide” or “long” data format. Furthermore, since 2012, the SOEP group has provided user-friendly datasets in the long format and harmonizes variables over time. For instance, the SOEP group generates a variable displaying the migration background of a respondent, and provides information on income prior to the launch of the euro in 2001 in euros. Longitudinal analysis is straightforward with the SOEPlong format.

The SOEP contains a great variety of datasets on different observational levels, including original datasets, datasets containing generated variables (e.g. ISCED), and spell data. For empirical analyses, these may be combined using merging procedures on the basis of relevant dataset identifiers (e.g., pid (time-constant personal identifier), hid (time-constant household identifier)). Moreover, due to the household concept of the study, family context information can be added to analyses on the individual level by way of partner, child, and parent identifiers. Table 2 describes the six different types of datasets in the SOEP and lists some relevant examples. All datasets are available free of charge to universities and research institutes for both research and teaching purposes in various data formats (see Goebel et al. 2019 ).

Type of SOEP datasets.

3 Research Potentials

Migration and integration are complex, multi-faceted processes that affect the lives of those who experience them in numerous ways. The questionnaire content of the SOEP tries to cover this complexity, allowing researchers to closely study migrants’ living circumstances over time.

Even before the more recent special samples of migrants and refugees were added to the study population in 2013 and 2016, respectively, the SOEP’s questionnaires offered deep insights into immigrants’ country of origin, process of arrival in Germany and patterns of integration. Table A1 provides an overview of key dimensions of the SOEP’s survey content for its migrant population. As Table A1 shows, since the study’s inception in 1984, the SOEP has collected data on crucial aspects of migrants’ backgrounds, including country of birth and citizenship status, as well as aspects of their lives in Germany. Migrants have been asked, for instance, about their German language proficiency and sense of national or ethnic identity ( Dustmann 1994; Dustmann and Van Soest 2001 ), allowing for analysis of the processes of cognitive and social assimilation ( Constant and Zimmermann 2008; Diehl and Schnell 2006 ). Furthermore, since the addition of Sample D in 1994, the questionnaires items dealing with the individual’s experience of immigrating to Germany have been systematically expanded to include additional information on matters such as residence status and social links to Germany prior to immigration. Based on these contents, studies have examined the immigrant-native wage gap, the transferability of human capital, immigrants’ saving behavior or remittances to relatives in their home countries, the effects of naturalization and citizenship, social networks, and the influence of macroeconomic conditions in home countries on immigrants’ well-being ( Akay et al. 2017; Aldashev et al. 2012; Basilio et al. 2009; Bauer and Sinning 2011; Eisnecker 2019; Gathmann and Keller 2018; Olney 2015; Riphahn and Saif 2019 ).

With the addition of samples M1–2, the SOEP—in cooperation with the Institute for Employment Research (IAB)—has begun to collect even more detailed information on the unique living circumstances of migrants and their descendants, and since 2013, the migrant-specific questionnaire content has been significantly expanded (see Table A1 ). To this end, the SOEP has used concepts that are well established in the literature and has applied Esser’s (1980, 2001, 2006) concept of social integration as a basis for developing additional survey content. According to Esser (1980) , “social integration” is a conglomerate of four dimensions: cultural adaption, positioning (individuals’ rights, residence titles, etc.), interaction, and identification. These four aspects of integration are reflected in the SOEP’s questionnaires ( Esser 2008 ), which contain multiple indicators for each dimension of Esser’s theoretical framework (see Table A1 ). However, the extensive questionnaire content also makes it possible to study other theoretical constructs related to migrants’ integration.

Since 2016, refugee-specific samples (M3–5) have also been part of the SOEP. Similar to the migrant samples discussed above, the questionnaires distributed to this sub-population aim at understanding their unique situations and challenges and therefore cover the periods before, during, and after migration. Examples are the refugee’s route to Germany, the asylum process, shared accommodations and attendance of integration classes, mental health, subjective well-being, labor market access, educational attainment, personality, and value orientations (see Table A1 ; Guichard 2020; Hahn et al. 2019; Jacobsen 2019; Jacobsen and Fuchs 2020; Kosyakova and Brücker 2020; Löbel 2020 ; Siegert in press; Walther et al. 2020 ). [3]

To allow for comparative analyses between the host society and newcomers, migrants also receive part of the same standard SOEP survey instruments as non-migrants. This makes it possible to study aspects that are not specific to migration, such as well-being, within these populations. For some aspects of integration, such as employment and German language proficiency, retrospectively provided, pre-migration data is also available. This allows for analysis of changes in migrants’ lives since their arrival in Germany ( Krieger 2020b ).

Besides providing novel and unique data on migrants in Germany, the SOEP also provides an opportunity to study different cross-cultural survey methodological tools. In its work with the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) and the Research Centre of the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF-FZ) the SOEP has used novel sampling frames such as the Integrated Employment Biographies and the Central Register of Foreigners and novel sampling techniques such as onomastic procedures. Further, all questionnaires are translated into the most important languages of the target population. These vary depending on the samples’ composition and include, among others, Turkish, High Arabic, and English (see Table 1 ). All of these features make SOEP a unique tool to learn about the practical application of cross-cultural survey methods and to observe changes and improvements in their application over time ( Eisnecker and Kroh 2017; Jacobsen and Fuchs 2020; Liebau et al. 2018 ).

4 Augmenting the Basic SOEP Data

4.1 linking soep data with additional data sources.

There are numerous options to augment the SOEP data with data from other sources that provide contextual or regional information. For instance, the SOEP offers unique potentials for spatial analysis. By using information on respondents’ region of residence, researchers can link SOEP data with spatial indicators at different levels, including states, spatial planning units, counties, municipalities, and postal codes. Since 2000, exact geo-locations are available within a specialized secured setting at the SOEP Research Data Center ( Goebel 2020 ). Recent examples of such spatial analyses include, for example, Dill et al. (2015), Krieger (2020a), Lersch (2013), Sager (2012), and Schaffner and Treude (2018) .

There are a number of projects that seek to combine the advantages of administrative data with the benefits of survey information by linking the SOEP data with data from administrative sources: One is the Linked Employer-Employee Study (SOEP-LEE, see Weinhardt et al. 2017 ) and another is SOEP-RV, which combines SOEP data with individual-level data from the German pension insurance. Another important project, IEB-SOEP, adds administrative information from the Integrated Employment Biographies to SOEP migration samples M1/M2 ( Brücker et al. 2014 ). This enables researchers to add administrative information on long biographical periods to the SOEP data and thus analyze the labor market integration of immigrants in Germany. The refugee Samples M3–M5 can also be linked to the IEBs ( Keita and Trübswetter 2020 ).

Furthermore, it is possible to use the SOEP to conduct cross-country comparative research. For instance, the Cross-National Equivalent File (CNEF) [4] is an international panel dataset providing harmonized information on education, employment, income, health, and life satisfaction. The information stems from longitudinal household panel studies in a number of countries including Australia, Germany, Great Britain, Canada, South Korea, Russia, Switzerland, and the United States.

4.2 SOEP Related Study: Mentoring of Refugees (MORE)

Further, the SOEP regularly implements related studies. For instance, the SOEP-related study Mentoring of Refugees (MORE) [5] explores whether and how friendships and contact with locals affects refugees’ integration into Germany ( Jursch et al. 2020; Legewie et al. 2019 ). As part of this project, in 2017, respondents in Samples M3–M5 were asked whether they would be interested in participating in the non-profit initiative Start with a Friend (SwaF). SwaF is a social start-up founded in 2014 in Berlin. Its mission is to connect recently arrived refugees with locals in Germany with the ultimate goal of initiating long-lasting friendships between the two parties. Participants are advised to meet with their partner for two to three hours on a weekly basis. Participants can freely decide how they wish to spend this time together; some meet to do sports, others to visit museums or exhibitions.

In 2017, SwaF was active in 14 German cities. [6] Respondents in Samples M3–M5 who resided in one of these cities ( N  = 733) were asked whether they would be interested in program participation. Those who expressed interest ( N  = 446) were subsequently randomly assigned to either the group of participants (treatment group, N  = 234, 52%) or the group of non-participants (control group, N  = 212, 48%). Accordingly, MORE is designed as a randomized controlled trial. Following randomization, interviewers registered refugees who were assigned to the treatment group on SwaF’s website to transmit their contact information to program organizers. This administrative step was successful for 215 refugees. In kick-off meetings with the 127 refugees assigned to treatment, SwaF asked about their hopes and expectations for the mentoring relationship in order to be able to find a suitable local mentor. Based on these insights, 85 refugees were assigned a local mentor. The remaining 130 refugees could not be matched to a local for various reasons; among others due to fading interest or insufficient German language skills on the part of the refugees.

As part of the 36th SOEP wave, datasets related to MORE will be released in February 2021. First, these data include information on which refugees were assigned to the treatment versus control group. This information can be matched to the SOEP in order to compare refugee outcomes before and after treatment and assess the impact of SwaF (information included in $p, see Table 2 ). Second, during the matching process, SwaF coordinators kept track of key steps in the matching process, including dates of registration, first meeting and matching, as well as refugees’ and locals’ hopes and expectations concerning the program (dataset: more_docu). Finally, three waves of online survey were conducted with local mentors (at the initiation of the match, after six weeks, and after four months). These data allow for insights into the mentoring relationships and how refugee-local pairs spent their time together (dataset: more_local).

5 Concluding Remarks and Outlook

The SOEP sets national and international standards in the field of migration research from a life course perspective. From the start of this household panel study in 1984, it has included survey content on immigrants and their unique biographies and has responded to changes in the German population by sequentially adding several distinct (migration) sub-samples.

As the SOEP migrant samples have grown over time, the content of questionnaires on migrant-specific life circumstances has also increased. This currently makes it possible for researchers to analyze diverse aspects of immigrants’ lives—their routes to Germany, their mental health, employment, and language skills. Migrants’ and refugees’ outcomes can further be compared to those of natives or be analyzed in relation to spatial information. As the SOEP employs a household concept and thus interviews all household members, it is also possible to analyze multiple generations of immigrant families. Finally, the SOEP offers great potential for cross-cultural survey methodological research.

In 2020, the SOEP responded to the spread of the virus COVID-19 by interviewing households in Germany during the lockdown. As part of the research project SOEP-CoV, the migration samples M1–2 were also interviewed, allowing unique insights into immigrant life during the pandemic. Overall, the SOEP is a unique data source that strives to gather knowledge about migrants in innovative ways and that offers unique opportunities for multidisciplinary migration research.

Funding source: Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Janina Britzke, Benjamin Jursch, Markus Grabka and Deborah Ann Bowen for their support and editing.

Research funding: The SOEP, as a member institute of the Leibniz Association, is funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) and the governments of the Länder.

SOEP survey content on migrants.

Grey, SOEP-CORE; light blue, M1/2; dark blue, M3–5; yellow, SOEP-CORE & M1/2; orange, CORE & M3–5; purple, M1–5; green, SOEP-CORE & M1–5.

Akay, A., Bargain, O., and Zimmermann, K.F. (2017). Macroeconomic conditions in home countries and the well-being of migrants. J. Hum. Resour. 52: 351–373, https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.2.0115-6900R1 . Search in Google Scholar

Aldashev, A., Gernandt, J., and Thomsen, S.L. (2012). The immigrant-native wage gap in Germany. Jahrb. Natl. Stat. 232: 490–517, https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2012-0502 . Search in Google Scholar

Basilio, L., Bauer, T.K., and Sinning, M. (2009). Analyzing the labor market activity of immigrant families in Germany. Lab. Econ. 16: 510–520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.03.002 . Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, T.K., Cobb-Clark, D.A., Hildebrand, V.A., and Sinning, M.G. (2011). A comparative analysis of the nativity wealth gap. Econ. Inq. 49: 989–1007, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00221.x . Search in Google Scholar

Bauer, T.K. and Sinning, M.G. (2011). The savings behavior of temporary and permanent migrants in Germany. J. Popul. Econ. 24: 421–449, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-010-0306-z . Search in Google Scholar

Brell, C., Dustmann, C., and Preston, I. (2020). The labor market integration of refugee migrants in high-income countries. J. Econ. Perspect. 34: 94–121, https://doi.org/10.1257/JEP.34.1.94 . Search in Google Scholar

Brücker, H., Kroh, M., Bartsch, S., Goebel, J., Kühne, S., Liebau, E., and Schupp, J. (2014), The new IAB-SOEP Migration Sample: an introduction into the methodology and the contents. SOEP Survey Papers 216: Series C. Search in Google Scholar

Constant, A.F. and Zimmermann, K.F. (2008). Measuring ethnic identity and its impact on economic behavior. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6: 424–433, https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.2-3.424 . Search in Google Scholar

Diehl, C. and Schnell, R. (2006). “Reactive ethnicity” or “assimilation”? Statements, arguments, and first empirical evidence for labor migrants in Germany. Int. Migrat. Rev. 40: 786–816, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00044.x . Search in Google Scholar

Dill, V., Jirjahn, U. and Tsertsvadze, G. (2015). Residential segregation and immigrants’ satisfaction with the neighborhood in Germany. Soc. Sci. Q. 96: 354–368, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12146 . Search in Google Scholar

Dustmann, C. (1994). Speaking fluency, writing fluency and earnings of immigrants. J. Popul. Econ. 7: 133–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173616 . Search in Google Scholar

Dustmann, C. and Van Soest, A. (2001). Language fluency and earnings: estimation with misclassified language indicators. Rev. Econ. Stat. 83: 663–674, https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237740 . Search in Google Scholar

Eisnecker, P.S. (2019). Non-migrants’ interethnic relationships with migrants: the role of the residential area, the workplace, and attitudes toward migrants from a longitudinal perspective. J. Ethnic Migrat. Stud. 45: 804–824, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1394180 . Search in Google Scholar

Eisnecker, P.S. and Kroh, M. (2017). The informed consent to record linkage in panel studies: optimal starting wave, consent refusals, and subsequent panel attrition. Publ. Opin. Q. 81: 131–143, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw052 . Search in Google Scholar

Esser, H. (1980). Aspekte der Wanderungssoziologie. Assimilation und Integration von Wanderern, ethnischen Gruppen und Minderheiten . Darmstadt: Luchterhand. Search in Google Scholar

Esser, H. (2001). Integration und ethnische Schichtung . Mannheim. Search in Google Scholar

Esser, H. (2006). Migration, Sprache und Integration . Berlin. Search in Google Scholar

Esser, H. (2008). Das SOEP und die Lindenstraße. Vierteljahrshefte Wirtschaftsforsch. 77: 181–186. 10.3790/vjh.77.3.181 Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, G. (1986). Migration and the political economy of the welfare state. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 485: 51–63. 10.5040/9780755619931.ch-001 Search in Google Scholar

Gathmann, C. and Keller, N. (2018). Access to citizenship and the economic assimilation of immigrants. Econ. J. 128: 3141–3181, https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12546 . Search in Google Scholar

Goebel, J. (2020). Verbindung von Surveydaten und Geodaten. Möglichkeiten, Mehrwert und Probleme am Beispiel des SOEP. In: Qualität bei zusammengeführten Daten . Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 107–122. 10.1007/978-3-658-31009-7_8 Search in Google Scholar

Goebel, J., Grabka, M.M., Liebig, S., Kroh, M., Richter, D., Schröder, C., and Schupp, J. (2019). The German socio-economic panel (SOEP). Jahrb. Natl. Stat. 239: 345–360, https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2018-0022 . Search in Google Scholar

Guichard, L. (2020). Self-selection of asylum seekers: evidence from Germany. Demography 57: 1089–1116, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00873-9 . Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, E., Richter, D., Schupp, J., and Back, M.D. (2019). Predictors of refugee adjustment: the importance of cognitive skills and personality. Psychology 5: 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.212 . Search in Google Scholar

Hanefeld, U. (1987). Das Sozioökonomische Panel. Grundlagen und Konzeption . Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. (2019). An investment in the future: institutional aspects of credential recognition of refugees in Germany. J. Refug. Stud. , https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fez094 . Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. and Fuchs, L.M. (2020). Can we compare conceptions of democracy in cross-linguistic and cross-national research? Evidence from a random sample of refugees in Germany. Soc. Indicat. Res. 151: 669–690, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02397-6 . Search in Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J., Kroh, M., Kühne, S., Scheible, J.A., Siegers, R., and Siegert, M. (2019), Supplementary of the IAB-BAMF-SOEP survey of refugees in Germany (M5). SOEP Survey Papers, 605. Search in Google Scholar

Jursch, B., Kroh, M., Krieger, M., Legewie, N., and Löbel, L.M. (2020). Patenschaften zwischen Geflüchteten und Einheimischen: determinanten von Zufriedenheit in der Tandembeziehung. In: Engagement für Integration und Teilhabe in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft . Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 307–326. 10.1007/978-3-658-31631-0_13 Search in Google Scholar

Keita, S. and Trübswetter, P. (2020). IAB-BAMF-SOEP Befragung von Geflüchteten verknüpft mit administrativen Daten des IAB. No. 202015_de . Institut für Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung (IAB), [Institute for Employment Research], Nürnberg, Germany. Search in Google Scholar

Kosyakova, Y. and Brücker, H. (2020). Seeking asylum in Germany: do human and social capital determine the outcome of asylum procedures? Eur. Socio Rev. 36: 663–683, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa013 . Search in Google Scholar

Krieger, M. (2020a). Agents of socialization and female migrants’ employment: the influence of mothers and the country context. Eur. Socio Rev. 36: 902–919, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa029 . Search in Google Scholar

Krieger, M. (2020b). Tied and troubled: revisiting tied migration and subsequent employment. J. Marriage Fam. 82: 934–952, https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12620 . Search in Google Scholar

Kroh, M., Kühne, S., Goebel, J., and Preu, F. (2015), The 2013 IAB-SOEP migration sample (M1): sampling design and weighting adjustment. SOEP Survey Papers Series C – Data Documentations 271. Search in Google Scholar

Kroh, M., Kühne, S., Jacobsen, J., Siegert, M., and Siegers, R. (2017), Sampling, nonresponse, and integrated weighting of the 2016 IAB-BAMF-SOEP survey of refugees (M3/M4) – revised. SOEP survey papers: series C - data documentation 477. Search in Google Scholar

Kroh, M., Siegers, R., and Kühne, S. (2014). Gewichtung und Integration von Auffrischungsstichproben am Beispiel des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP). In: Nonresponse bias . Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 10.1007/978-3-658-10459-7_13 Search in Google Scholar

Krupp, H.-J. (2008). Die Anfänge: Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des SOEP. Vierteljahrshefte Wirtschaftsforsch. 77: 15–26. 10.3790/vjh.77.3.15 Search in Google Scholar

Kühne, S. and Kroh, M. (2017). The 2015 IAB-SOEP migration study M2: sampling design, nonresponse, and weighting adjustment. SOEP Survey Papers Series C - Data Documentations 473. Search in Google Scholar

Legewie, N., Jaschke, P., Krieger, M., Kroh, M., Löbel, L.-M., and Schacht, D. (2019). Integrating randomized controlled field trials into (existing) panel surveys – the “mentoring of refugees” study. Briefs on Methodological, Ethical and Epistemological Issues 7: 1–8. Search in Google Scholar

Lersch, P.M. (2013). Place stratification or spatial assimilation? Neighbourhood quality changes after residential mobility for migrants in Germany. Urban Stud. 50: 1011–1029, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012464403 . Search in Google Scholar

Liebau, E., Humpert, A., and Schneiderheinze, K. (2018), Wie gut funktioniert das Onomastik- Verfahren? Ein Test am Beispiel des SOEP-Datensatzes. SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 976. Search in Google Scholar

Löbel, L.M. (2020). Family separation and refugee mental health – a network perspective. Soc. Network. 61: 20–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.08.004 . Search in Google Scholar

Olney, W.W. (2015). Remittances and the wage impact of immigration. J. Hum. Resour. 50: 694–727, https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.3.694 . Search in Google Scholar

Peters, H.E. (1988). Retrospective versus panel data in analyzing lifecycle events. J. Hum. Resour. 23: 488–513, https://doi.org/10.2307/145810 . Search in Google Scholar

Riphahn, R.T. and Saif, S. (2019). Naturalization and labor market performance of immigrants in Germany. Lab. Travail. 33: 48–76, https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12136 . Search in Google Scholar

Sager, L. (2012). Residential segregation and socioeconomic neighbourhood sorting: evidence at the micro-neighbourhood level for migrant groups in Germany. Urban Stud. 49: 2617–2632, https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011429487 . Search in Google Scholar

Schaffner, S. and Treude, B. (2018). The effect of ethnic clustering on migrant integration in Germany. Ruhr economic papers, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2579732 . Search in Google Scholar

Schupp, J. and Wagner, G.G. (1995). Die Zuwanderer-Stichprobe des Sozio-Ökonomischen Panels (SOEP). Vierteljahrshefte Wirtschaftsforsch. 64: 16–25. Search in Google Scholar

Walther, L., Fuchs, L.M., Schupp, J., and von Scheve, C. (2020). Living conditions and the mental health and well-being of refugees: evidence from a large-scale German survey. J. Immigr. Minority Health 22: 903–913, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-019-00968-5 . Search in Google Scholar

Weinhardt, M., Meyermann, A., Liebig, S., and Schupp, J. (2017). The linked employer-employee study of the socio-economic panel (SOEP-LEE): content, design and research potential. Jahrb. Natl. Stat. 237: 457–467, https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2015-1044 . Search in Google Scholar

© 2021 Jannes Jacobsen et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

• X / Twitter

Supplementary Materials

Please login or register with De Gruyter to order this product.

Journal and Issue

Articles in the same issue.

• main navigation
• content area

Service Navigation

• Bank sort codes search

Main navigation

Climate change poses huge challenges for the financial sector, too. The Bundesbank supports the transition to a low-carbon economy.

• back hide navigation
• Overview Bundesbank
• Overview Organisation
• Overview Executive Board
• Dr Joachim Nagel
• Burkhard Balz
• Dr Sabine Mauderer
• COO and Directorates
• Compliance and legal regulations
• GTC and legal basis
• Mission statement and Strategy
• The Bundesbank: key figures
• Overview Regional Offices and branches
• Overview Baden-Württemberg
• Overview Bavaria
• Overview Berlin and Brandenburg
• Overview Bremen, Lower Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt
• Overview Hamburg, Mecklenburg-West Pomerania and Schleswig-Holstein
• Overview Hesse
• Overview North Rhine-Westphalia
• Overview Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland
• Overview Saxony and Thuringia
• Overview Research and Research Data
• Overview Research Centre
• Research Professors, Research Council and Research Fellows
• Research Areas and Programme
• Research Brief
• Discussion Papers
• Refereed Publications
• Invited Speakers Series
• Overview Research Data and Service Centre
• Research Data
• Your research project at the RDSC
• About the RDSC
• Research Council

Publications

• Conferences
• Research Visit and Internship
• Overview Panel on Household Finances (PHF)
• About the PHF
• Methodology
• User-Documentation
• Data access and data protection
• Links and documents
• Survey on Consumer Expectations
• Survey on the expectations of firms
• Green Finance
• Overview Library and archives
• Historical archive
• Overview Art and Numismatics
• Overview Art Collection
• Paintings and works on paper
• Sculptures and installations
• Overview Exhibitions & viewing times
• Overview Coin and banknote collection
• Special pieces
• Pictures archive
• Recent acquisitions
• Numismatic library
• Overview Money Museum
• Visitor Information
• Offers for Groups
• Museum discovery tours
• Overview International Central Bank Dialogue
• Overview International Central Banking Courses
• Application procedure
• Past courses
• Bilateral cooperation
• EU-funded projects
• Frequently asked questions
• Representative network

A digital euro would be a digital form of central bank money, specifically the euro. It could be used by the general public in much the same way as cash, only in virtual form. Alongside cash, the Eurosystem would thus supply households with an additional form of central bank money that can be used quickly, easily and securely.

• Overview Tasks
• Overview Monetary policy
• Monetary policy decisions
• Economic analyses
• Monetary policy framework
• Overview Open market operations
• Outstanding open market operations
• Tender calendar and system
• Regular refinancing and fine-tuning operations
• Foreign currency transactions
• PSPP Auctions
• Overview Collateral
• Eligibility criteria
• Bundesbank's tasks
• Credit assessment
• Mobilisation of collateral
• Counterparty information
• Overview Outright transactions
• Asset purchase programme (APP)
• Pandemic emergency purchase programme (PEPP)
• Securities lending under the APP and PEPP
• Transmission Protection Instrument (TPI)
• Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT)
• Terminated programmes
• Overview Minimum reserves
• Legal basis
• Interest rates and reserve ratios
• Excess reserves
• Standing facilities
• Overview Financial and monetary system
• Overview Financial and monetary stability
• Role of the Bundesbank
• Terms and definitions
• Macroprudential surveillance (G-FSC)
• Residential Mortgages of private households
• Risks and stability analysis
• Macroprudential tools
• Financial Stability Forum
• Overview International cooperation
• ESRB and FSC
• EU committees
• Financial Stability Review
• Overview Banking supervision
• Overview Bundesbank's role
• Bundesbank and BaFin
• Single Supervisory Mechanism
• Overview Operational tasks
• Capital and liquidity adequacy
• On-site inspections
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
• Overview Legal basis
• EU legislation
• National legal basis
• Basel framework
• Overview Individual aspects
• Supervision priorities
• Authorisation procedure, Holder control, Governance
• Overview Own funds requirements
• Credit risk
• Operational risk
• Market risk positions
• Deposit protection
• Macroprudential measures
• MiCAR – Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation
• Overview Liquidity
• Supervisory reporting of institutions of the LCR
• Supervisory reporting of institutions with regard to the net stable funding ratio
• Additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting
• Treatment of central bank reserves in the LCR
• Regulation on the liquidity of institutions
• Leverage Ratio
• Lending business
• Overview Risk Management
• Prudential requirements for IT (BAIT)
• ICAAP / ILAAP
• Machine learning methods
• Remuneration
• Interest rate risk
• Financial services institutions
• Payment institutions and e-money institutions
• Recovery and resolution
• Sustainable Finance
• Expert panels
• Documentation
• Overview Cash management
• The Eurosystem cash strategy
• Overview Euro banknotes
• Research and Development
• Main features
• Overview Euro coins
• Regular coins
• €2 commemorative coins
• Collector coins
• Foreign exchange
• DEM banknotes and DEM coins
• Damaged money
• Overview Counterfeit money
• Counterfeit detection
• Overview Cash services
• Business clients
• Non-business clients
• Central banks
• Overview CashEDI
• Overview General Information
• Data exchange
• Scope of services WebEDI/Filetransfer
• Downloads and video tutorials
• Access to CashEDI
• Overview Cash recycling
• Legal framework
• Cash processing systems
• Environmental sustainability
• Reproduction regulations
• Overview Payment systems
• Digital euro
• Overview TARGET
• TARGET Services
• Common components of TARGET Services
• Committee work
• Restricted service area
• Overview T2
• TARGET balances
• T2 – for professional use
• TARGET2-Securities
• Overview TIPS
• Making a project reality
• Pan-European reachability
• Participants
• Overview Information for participants
• Terms and conditions
• Reference documents
• Customer tests / Releases
• Overview Eurosystem Collateral Management System
• Harmonisation initiatives
• Community Readiness Monitoring
• Participant information
• Test and Migration
• Documentation & FAQs
• Overview Collateral account
• Overview Information for new customers
• Collateral management system
• Overview RPS
• Overview SEPA-Clearer
• Participation
• Fees and operating hours
• SCL-Directory
• Overview National cheque processing
• Overview Customer access mechanism
• CAM-Individual
• CAM-Instant
• Operating hours and fees
• Communication
• Correspondent banking
• Overview Oversight
• Business Continuity
• Trigger Solution
• Overview Services
• Bank sort codes
• Check-digit calculation
• Customer Test Centre
• Overview Publications

The Bundesbank provides a new procedure for the automated download of statistical data sets. The web service offers an interface for programmatic access.

The Bundesbank’s up-to-date statistical data in the form of time series (also available to download as a CSV file or SDMX-ML file).

• Overview Statistics
• Overview Banks and other financial corporations
• Overview Banks
• Balance sheet items
• Banks' profit and loss accounts
• External position of banks (MFIs)
• Monetary aggregates
• OTC derivatives
• Triennial Central Bank Survey
• Investment companies
• Pension funds
• Financial vehicle corporations
• Insurance corporations
• Payments statistics
• Overview Economic activity and prices
• Orders received and stock of orders
• Employment and labour market
• Negotiated pay rates and labour costs
• Producer and consumer prices
• Foreign trade prices
• Property prices and prices for construction work
• Weekly activity index
• Enterprises and households
• Overview Exchange rates
• Exchange rates, euro foreign exchange reference rates, gold prices
• Effective exchange rates
• Overview External sector
• Balance of payments
• International investment position and external debt
• Direct investments
• Overview Macroeconomic accounting systems
• National accounts
• Financial accounts
• Balance sheets
• Overview Money and capital markets
• Euro money market
• Securities holdings
• Securities issues
• Overview Interest rates and yields
• Central bank interest rates
• Money market rates
• Yields on debt securities outstanding
• Prices and yields of listed Federal securities
• Term structure of interest rates
• Discount interest rates
• Interest rates on deposits and loans
• Real interest rates on households' deposits
• Expected real interest rates
• Overview Public finances
• Maastricht deficit and debt level
• Budgetary developments in Germany (national accounts)
• Budgetary developments in Germany (public finance statistics)
• Overview Sets of indicators
• System of indicators for the German residential property market
• System of indicators for the German commercial property market
• Financial Soundness Indicators
• Long time series
• Sustainability
• Time series databases

Here you will find information on the bank sort code file and on the bank sort code update service. You can also download the bank sort code files.

• Overview Service
• Banking services for central banks
• Overview Banks and companies
• Overview Bund Bidding System (BBS)
• Operating and support hours
• Overview Collateralmanagement Access Portal (CAP)
• Test environment
• CERT-Bundesbank
• Creditors meetings
• Overview ESM/EFSF Bidding System (EBS)
• Overview Mobilisation and Administration of Credit Claims (MACCs)
• Customer information
• Cross-border use of credit claims
• FAQs - Frequently asked questions
• Overview OpenMarket Tender Operation System (OMTOS)
• General information
• Information for new customers
• Overview PKI - Public Key Infrastructures
• Certificate Policies (CP) and Certification Practice Statements (CPS)
• Explanatory notes on e-mail security
• Overview ExtraNet
• New conception ExtraNet – NExt
• Overview Federal securities
• One-off issues
• Issue terms
• Issue calendar
• Auction procedure
• Prices and yields
• Financial sanctions
• Overview Media library
• Overview Reporting systems
• External auditing
• Overview Electronical submission
• General statistics reporting portal
• Filetransfer
• FAQ and notices
• Overview External sector forms centre
• Payment reports
• Stock reports on external claims and liabilities
• Stock reports on cross-border equity investments
• Overview Banking Supervision
• PRISMA: Refining and improving the supervisory reporting system
• Submission via ExtraNet
• Formats (XBRL and XML)
• Reports pursuant to SolvV and LiqV
• COREP/FINREP
• ECB financial information
• Guidelines on the counterparty breakdown
• Reports on remuneration
• Overview Banking Supervision form centre
• Overview Banking statistics
• Customer classification
• Revised ECB regulations
• Banking statistics form centre
• Overview Financial Stability
• Formats (XML)
• Other legal basis
• Overview School service
• Animation videos
• Money and monetary policy online
• Interactive features
• Overview Teaching materials
• Graphics for teaching

In the press area, you will find press releases, speeches, guest contributions and interviews with Bundesbank Executive Board members as well as further press materials.

• Overview Press
• Overview Press releases
• Federal securities
• Contributions
• Overview Press materials
• Video footage
• Press dates
• Press contact
• Calendar of the Executive Board

The Bundesbank published various studies and conference proceedings, resulting from the research activities of its employees and guest researchers.

• Reports and studies

With the dual bachelor's degree in applied computer science, we offer an attractive career in the world of information technology.

• Overview Career
• Overview Training programmes
• Office communication assistant (m/f)
• Training for the Bundesbank's Intermediate Service
• Overview Dual study programmes
• Bachelor of Science in Central Banking
• Bachelor of Science in Applied Computer Science
• Overview Entry options
• Fast-track trainee programme
• Direct entry
• Overview Work placements
• Work placements for secondary school students
• Work placements for university students
• Easy to read

The impact of EU immigration on labour market outcomes in Germany over the past decade

The impact of eu immigration on labour market outcomes in germany over the past decade research brief | 45th edition – march 2022.

In the mid-2010s, wages in Germany recorded comparatively weak growth while employment was surprisingly strong. A new study examines how immigration in the context of EU free movement of workers, in particular from the “new” Central and Eastern European Member States, contributed to these developments on the German labour market.

Starting in May 2011, Germany successively lifted the restrictions to free movement of workers for nationals of the 11 “new” Central and Eastern European (CEE) EU Member States. This elicited an immediate rise in CEE immigration rates to Germany. Between 2011 and 2017, around 3.9 million CEE nationals migrated to Germany (see Figure 1) whilst around 2.5 million CEE nationals emigrated from Germany. Net immigration – i.e., immigration minus emigration – thus amounted to around 1.4 million persons, thereby increasing the CEE share in the German labour force from 1.1% to 3.4% (BA Statistik, 2022a).

CEE immigration driven primarily by labour market-oriented motives

The employment rate among CEE nationals in Germany rose steeply between 2011 and 2017, from almost 36% to 55% (BA Statistik, 2022b). The sharp rise in the employment rate in the wake of increased immigration by CEE nationals following the extension of free movement of workers suggests that most CEE immigration over the past decade was labour market-oriented. In other words, immigration was motivated in particular by the objective of taking up employment in Germany. Over the same period, the unemployment rate among CEE nationals in Germany fell from 12.8% to 8.1%. This would suggest that CEE immigrants typically already had a job offer in Germany before making the move. This kind of positive selection implies that they brought along skill profiles wanted by domestic employers.

Importantly, it is those immigrants whose first years in the job market progress satisfactorily that tend to stay. From this, we may assume that the skills composition of “stayers” (previous “new arrivals” who have already been working in Germany for a few years and so have proved themselves in the German labour market) is even more closely geared to the needs of domestic employers than that of “new arrivals”.

Owing to the high incidence of temporary and/or return migration among CEE nationals (see Figure 2) – and in contrast to previous studies (e.g. Dustmann et al., 2013, Jaeger et al., 2018) – our empirical analysis of the labour market effects of immigration explicitly distinguishes between new arrivals and stayers (Hammer & Hertweck, 2022). This novel approach allows us to identify not only the short but also the medium-term effects of recent EU immigration on labour market outcomes. While new arrivals capture the short-term effects of the expansion in labour supply, stayers help to additionally isolate the indirect effects of immigration. Such indirect effects typically only show up with some time lag, for instance because of changes in labour supply or changes in investment decisions of domestic residents. Focusing exclusively on new arrivals would therefore fail to provide a complete picture.

Counterbalancing effects of new arrivals and stayers on wage growth

According to the results, the inflow of new arrivals from other EU Member States, in particular from the CEE accession countries, had a significant dampening effect on the growth rate of mean wages among German full-time employees, whereas the impact of stayers is significantly positive.

We thus conclude that stayers attenuate the dampening wage effect brought about by new arrivals (Jaeger et al., 2018). While the initial net effect on the wage level may be negative, around five years after an immigration influx the wage level returns to its original growth path (see Figure 3). The effects are relatively strong in the lower income groups in particular – i.e. where EU migrants are frequently positioned and where competition with the resident workforce is relatively strong.

EU immigration has a long-term positive effect on employment among German nationals

In addition to this, EU immigration exerted a long-term positive effect on the employment level of German nationals and of persons with a migration background settled in Germany. This empirical finding could be caused by a complementarity between the jobs held by resident workers and EU immigrants and the skill profiles most common among the latter group being relatively rare among the resident workforce (Chassambouli & Palivos, 2014). The study thus helps to reconcile why wages in Germany rose comparatively weakly whilst employment rose surprisingly strongly in the mid-2010s.

Compared to previous studies on immigration to Germany during the 1990s (for example, D’Amuri et al. 2010), the present study finds much more beneficial effects over the last decade, particularly with regards to employment growth. This finding is likely due to the interaction of two factors. First, the German labour market has become considerably more flexible over the past 20 years. Newly emerged sectors, such as subcontracted labour, pay low wages but may also offer immigrants opportunities to gather initial experience in the German job market. Second, the extension of the right to EU free movement to CEE nationals facilitated precisely that kind of labour market-oriented immigration that was closely geared towards the needs of domestic employers. In this way, CEE immigrants have effectively “filled the gaps” which could not be properly filled by the domestic workforce. As a result, crowding out effects on domestic workers did not occur. On the contrary, the influx of workers from the EU likely helped German nationals to find newly created jobs, complementary to those comparatively low-paid jobs found by recent EU immigrants.

This study uses the weakly anonymous Sample of Integrated Labour Market Biographies (Years 1975-2017). Data access was provided via on-site use at the Research Data Centre (FDZ) of the German Federal Employment Agency (BA) at the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) and subsequently remote data access: https://doi.org/10.5164/IAB.SIAB7517.de.en.v1. Data documentation: Antoni et al. (2019).

• Antoni, M., A. Schmucker, S. Seth & P. vom Berge (2019). Sample of Integrated Labour Market Biographies (SIAB) 1975-2017. FDZ data report, 02/2019 (en), Nuremberg.
• BA Statistik (2022a). Eingeschränkte Bezugsgröße nach ausgewählten Staatsangehörigkeiten, Deutschland. Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
• BA Statistik (2022b). Migrationsmonitor, Deutschland (Monatszahlen). Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit.
• Chassamboulli, A. & T. Palivos (2014). A search-equilibrium approach to the effects of immigration on labor market outcomes. International Economic Review 55, 111-129.
• D’Amuri, F., G. I. Ottaviano, & G. Peri (2010). The labor market impact of immigration in Western Germany in the 1990s. European Economic Review 54(4), 550-570.
• Destatis (2022). Wanderungen zwischen Deutschland und dem Ausland: Deutschland, Jahre, Staatsangehörigkeit, Table 12711-0007. Federal Statistical Office.
• Dustmann, C., T. Frattini, & I. P. Preston (2013). The effect of immigration along the distribution of wages. Review of Economic Studies 80(1), 145-173.
• Hammer, L. & M. S. Hertweck (2022). EU enlargement and (temporary) migration: Effects on labour market outcomes in Germany. Discussion Paper No 02/2022 (February), Deutsche Bundesbank.
• Jaeger, D. A., J. Ruist, & J. Stuhler (2018). Shift-share instruments and the impact of immigration. NBER Working Papers, No 24285, National Bureau of Economic Research.

News from the Research Centre

• “Direct, Spillover and Welfare Effects of Regional Firm Subsidies” by Nils Wehrhöfer (Deutsche Bundesbank), Sebastian Siegloch (University of Mannheim) and Tobias Etzel (Deutsche Bundesbank) will be published in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy.
• “Nowcasting GDP with a pool of factor models and a fast estimation algorithm” by Sercan Eraslan (Deutsche Bundesbank) and Maximilian Schröder (BI Norwegian Business School) will be published in the International Journal of Forecasting.
• 8th Annual Macroprudential Conference 26. – 27.06.2024 | jointly organized by De Nederlandsche Bank, Sveriges Riksbank and Deutsche Bundesbank
• International Conference on Payments and Securities Settlement 04. – 05.07.2024 | jointly organized by Bank of Canada and Deutsche Bundesbank

846 KB, PDF

Immigration Countries and Migration Research: The Case of Germany

Cite this chapter.

• Christoph M. Schmidt 3 , 4  

Part of the book series: Studies in Contemporary Economics ((CONTEMPORARY))

2 Citations

The Federal Republic of Germany does not belong to the set of “classical” immigration countries like Australia, Canada or the United States. Nevertheless, migration has become a topic of increased interest for the whole of western Europe and, in particular, for Germany. This interest has arisen from the expectation of massive migration flows in the near future: migrants from the new democracies in East Europe, migrants moving within the growing European Community from the south to the north, and migrants trying to escape war and starvation in many countries of the Third World. It is believed that these flows will particularly affect Germany because of its ties to East Europe and its relative affluence.

This paper is a revised version of “The Economic Consequences of International Migration: Status of International Research and Applications to the Federal Republic of Germany” that was written in February 1991 while the author was a graduate student at Princeton University. I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, and from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation through its Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship. The paper benefitted from discussions with David Card, Ani Dasgupta, Christian Dustmann, Anette Gehrig, Franque Grimard, Annamaria Lusardi, Rolf Tschernig, Rainer Winkelmann and Klaus F. Zimmermann.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Altonji, Joseph and Card, David (1990): The Effects of Immigration on the Labor Market Outcomes of Natives; in: Freeman, Richard B. and Abowd, John M. (eds.); Immigration. Trade, and the Labor Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Google Scholar  

Berry, R. Albert and Soligo, Ronald (1969): Some Welfare Aspects of International Migration; Journal of Political Economy , vol.77, pp.778–794

Article   Google Scholar  

Borjas, George J. (1987): Self-Selection and the Earnings of Immigrants; American Economic Review , vol.77, pp.521–553

Borjas, George J. (1990): Friends or Strangers: The Impact of Immigrants on the U.S. Economy . New York: Basic Books

Butcher, Kristin F. and Card, David (1991): Immigration and Wages: Evidence from the 1980’s; American Economic Review , vol.81, pp.292–296

Card, David (1990): The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market; Industrial and Labor Relations Review , vol.43, pp.245–257

Chiswick, Barry R. (1978): The Effects of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-Born Men; Journal of Political Economy , vol.86, pp.897–921

Dustmann, Christian (1993): Earnings Adjustments of Temporary Migrants; Journal of Population Economics , vol. 6, pp. 153–168

Franz, Wolfgang (1991): International Migratory Movements: The German Experience : University of Konstanz Disc. Paper Serie II No. 160

Harris, John R. and Todaro, Michael P. (1970): Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis; American Economic Review , vol.60, pp. 126–142

Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (1990): Zahlen zur wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland . Köln: Deutscher Instituts-Verlag

Licht, Georg and Steiner, Viktor (1993): Assimilation. Labour Market Experience. and Earnings Profiles of Temporary and Permanent Immigrant Workers in Germany : ZEW Discussion Paper No.93–06

McCall, Brian P. and McCall, John J. (1987): A Sequential Study of Migration and Job Search; Journal of Labor Economics , vol.5, pp.452–476

Pischke, Jörn-Steffen (1992): Assimilation and the Earnings of Guestworkers in Germany : ZEW Discussion Paper No.92–17

Roy, Andrew D. (1951): Some Thoughts on the Distribution of Earnings; Oxford Economic Papers , vol.3, pp.80–93

Schmidt, Christoph M. (1992a): Countrv-of-Origin Differences in the Earnings of German Immigrants : University of Munich Discussion Paper No. 92–29

Schmidt, Christoph M. (1992b): The Earnings Dynamics of Immigrant Labor : University of Munich Discussion Paper No.29–28

Schmidt, Christoph M. and Zimmermann, Klaus F. (1992): Migration Pressure in Germany: Past and Future; in: Zimmermann, Klaus F. (ed.): Migration and Economic Development . Berlin et al.: Springer, pp.201–230

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Statistisches Bundesamt (1970 – 1991): Statistische Jahrbücher für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistische Jahrbücher für das Ausland , Wiesbaden

Straubhaar, Thomas and Zimmermann, Klaus F. (1992): Towards a European Migration Policy : CEPR Discussion Paper No.641

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

SELAPO, University of Munich, Ludwigstrasse 28 RG, 80539, Munich, Germany

Christoph M. Schmidt

CEPR, London, UK

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Department of Economics, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Große Steinstr. 73, D-06108, Halle, Germany

Gunter Steinmann

Faculty of Social Sciences, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, D-10099, Berlin, Germany

Ralf E. Ulrich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Schmidt, C.M. (1994). Immigration Countries and Migration Research: The Case of Germany. In: Steinmann, G., Ulrich, R.E. (eds) The Economic Consequences of Immigration to Germany. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51177-6_1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51177-6_1

Publisher Name : Physica, Heidelberg

Print ISBN : 978-3-7908-0796-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-642-51177-6

eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

•  We're Hiring!
•  Help Center

German Immigration - US

• Most Cited Papers
• Most Downloaded Papers
• Newest Papers
• Save to Library
• Immigration and German Culture Follow Following
• Immigration History Follow Following
• U.S. Ethnic Studies Follow Following
• Irish Immigration Follow Following
• Immigration and Ethnicity Follow Following
• Immigration an Citzenship Follow Following
• Immigration Follow Following
• Texas History Follow Following
• Immigration Status & Nationality Follow Following
• Local Studies Follow Following

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• Academia.edu Publishing
•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Switch language:

Merck’s Life Science Advanced Research Centre, Darmstadt, Germany

Merck will build an advanced research centre for its Life Science business sector in Darmstadt, Germany, by early 2027.

Project Type

Research centre

Darmstadt, Germany

Estimated Investment

€300m ($321m)

Construction Started

Expected operations.

Merck KGaA (Merck), a pharmaceutical company based in Germany, will build a new state-of-the-art advanced research centre at its headquarters in Darmstadt, Germany.

The research centre named Life Science Advanced Research Center (LS ARC) will be utilised by Merck’s Life Sciences business sector to explore critical technologies for manufacturing antibodies, mRNA applications, essential products for biotechnological production and more.

Recommended White Papers

IoT Technologies for Pharmaceutical Packaging: Latest Developments and Perspective

Oral drug reconstitution making it simple and accurate through packaging innovation, recommended buyers guides.

Pharmaceutical clean room manufacturing, flooring and design 

Process automation and equipment.

Merck will invest more than €300m ($321m) in the project. The investment is part of a broader €1.5bn ($1.6bn) investment programme at the Darmstadt site by 2025.

The construction of the research centre officially began in April 2024, following the completion of the feasibility study in 2022. The facility is expected to begin operations in 2027 and can accommodate approximately 550 employees.

Location of Merck’s new research centre

The advanced research centre will be situated at the Merck Firmenzentrale on Frankfurter Street 250 in Darmstadt.

The new research building will be built facing the city centre within a central research and development (R&D) campus at Merck Group’s headquarters.

The campus is located along an area called the Innovation Mile, whose southern end is marked by Merck’s Innovation Center at Emanuel-Merck-Platz.

The Darmstadt site is among Merck’s most critical centres for life science R&D, with an estimated one-fifth of the life science business sector’s sales from new products forecasted to originate from this location over the next decade.

Merck Advanced Research Centre details

The new centre will have an area of 18,000m² (193,750ft²). It will encompass a gross floor area of 32,000m² (344,445ft²) with a total of six floors above ground and two subterranean levels.

It will include 7,500m² (80,729ft²) office and communication spaces, as well as 8,300m² (89,340ft²) laboratory space with modules of 650m² (6,996ft²) each, measuring 71m long, 68m wide and 28m high.

The Technikum, a demonstration lab on the ground floor, will be used to offer insights into the research work of the company. The technical centre at the basement will feature innovative automated logistics and storage technology such as a driverless transport system, vertical automated goods handling system to the laboratory, and fully automated storage systems (auto store and pallet warehouse).

The centre will focus on R&D in life science to strengthen innovation in downstream R&D, cell cultures, pharmaceutical processes, formulation and purification aids, analytical chemistry, and digital chemistry for researching and manufacturing antibodies, recombinant proteins and viral vectors. Research activities related to the mRNA value chain will also be based at the new centre.

Merck’s Advanced Research Centre design

The LS ARC will offer an open and contemporary working environment designed to foster cross-departmental collaboration. The building’s design will maximise work process synergies by linking spaces, allowing for flexible subdivision both horizontally and vertically.

The upper stories’ open-plan layout merges laboratories and offices into a unified workspace. Laboratory areas will be situated on two sides of the building, with the central world of knowledge space encompassing office areas and shared communication zones for employee interaction.

Two compact cube-structured atria will be built, one at the entrance lobby and another in the winter garden, opening towards the campus and the city. The atria will be enclosed by a staggered, cantilevered arrangement of the upper floors allowing daylight to permeate the building’s core through the glass ceilings. The incorporation of regional flora transforms the atria into serene recreational spaces.

Glazed walls will offer transparency within the building and across the campus, while the interior’s subtle colour palette will create a comfortable atmosphere. Laboratory areas will be emphasised with coloured glass walls. The louvre structure present in front of the glazed facade will be cut open to allow glimpses into the interiors.

Sustainable features of Merck’s Advanced Research Centre

The building will provide solar shading with projecting floor slabs on the southern side of the building and recessed terraces on the northern facade together with the external louvres made of bright perforated metal.

Rooftop photovoltaic installations will generate electricity for the facility. The building will also feature full-surface geothermal energy and air-source heat pumps.

The facades and green roofs with rainwater retention will contribute to energy conservation and microclimate enhancement. The green roofs will also play a role in converting carbon dioxide into oxygen and absorbing particulate matter from the ambient air.

The research centre is designed for gold certification from the German Sustainable Building Council (DGNB).

Contractors involved

HENN, an international architecture company, is responsible for the design of the new research centre and Drees & Sommer, a construction and real estate consulting company, for project controlling.

Aplantis, a landscape architecture company, serves as a consultant for outdoor facilities and indoor greening, and B+G Ingenieure Bollinger und Grohmann, an engineering company, for structural engineering, facade, building physics, and acoustics.

Winter Beratende Ingenieure fur Gebaudetechnik, an engineering consultancy company, provides building services while Tichelmann & Barillas Ingenieurgesellschaft, an engineering company, provides fire protection services.

Baudynamik Heiland & Mistler, an engineering consultant, collaborated on structural dynamics, Eurolabors, a company specialising in laboratory planning, architecture, and consulting, on laboratory planning, Scherr+Klimke, an architecture digitalisation and automation services provider, on logistics planning, Lumen3, a company specialising in lighting design and solutions, on light planning, and io-consultants, a consulting and planning company, on process planning for the project.

Related Projects

More Projects

South Korea’s MFDS approves Eisai-Biogen’s LEQEMBI for Alzheimer's

Asco 2024: medilink’s nsclc and breast cancer adc shows early safety success, asco 2024: msd’s adc shows efficacy in lung and breast tumours, asco 2024: merus touts positive phase ii data for head and neck cancer antibody, sign up for our daily news round-up.

Give your business an edge with our leading industry insights.

Sign up to the newsletter

Your corporate email address.

Pharmaceutical Technology In Brief

Pharma Technology Focus

Thematic Take

I consent to Verdict Media Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with Privacy Policy

Thank you for subscribing

View all newsletters from across the GlobalData Media network.